GÖÇ KURAMLARI BAĞLAMINDA GÖÇ ETMEZLİĞİN ANATOMİSİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, son yıllarda dünyadaki en büyük kitlesel sorunlardan birine dönüşen göç hareketlerinin yanında göç etmeyenlerin durumu nicel ve nitel olarak ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca göç etmeyenlerin psikolojilerinden ve toplumsal durumlarından yola çıkılarak göç sorununun çözümü için pratik yollar önerilmiştir. Çalışma hem nitel hem nicel bağlamda yürütülmüş, göç kuramlarından hareketle, göç etmezliğin de kuramsal temeli ortaya konmaya çalışılmış, göç hareketinin yanı sıra göç etmezlik de ekonomik, siyasal, kültürel etkenlerle açıklanmıştır. Çalışmada nicel veri için yakınları göç ettiği halde kendileri göç etmeyen kişiler arasından rastsal olarak seçilen 100 kişiyle görüşülmüş sorulara verilen yanıtlar kategorize edilerek değerlendirilmiş ve raporlanmıştır. Görüşmeler, Van, Diyarbakır, Batman, Bitlis, Artvin, Rize, Giresun, Balıkesir, Adana, Hatay’da yaşayan yetişkin bireylerle yapılmıştır. Bazı cevaplar tek bir kategoriye ait gibi görünse de arkasında büyük bir arka planın da olduğu fark edilmiş, derinlemesine görüşme yapılarak göç etmeme kararının arkasında yatan bazı kritik sebepler akademik görüşlerle açıklanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda göç eyleminin hem artı hem eksi yönlü bir hareket olduğu keşfedilmiştir. Buna göre göç kavramı hem bulunulan coğrafyada kalmayı, hem de bulunulan coğrafyadan gitmeyi kapsamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• göç etmezlik
• göç teorileri
• göç araştırmaları

THE ANATOMY OF NON-MIGRATION IN THE CONTEXT OF MIGRATION THEORIES

Öz

In this study, the situation of the non-immigrants, as well as the migration movements, which have turned into one of the biggest mass problems in the world in recent years, are discussed quantitatively and qualitatively. In addition, practical ways to solve the immigration problem are proposed based on the psychology and social status of non-immigrants. The study was carried out in both qualitative and quantitative contexts, starting from the theories of migration, the theoretical basis of non-immigrant was tried to be revealed, as well as the migration movement, non-immigrant was explained with economic, political and cultural factors. For quantitative data in the study, 100 randomly selected people were interviewed among those whose relatives migrated but did not migrate, and the answers to the questions were categorized, evaluated and reported. Interviews were conducted with adult individuals living in Van, Diyarbakır, Batman, Bitlis, Artvin, Rize, Giresun, Balıkesir, Adana, Hatay. Although some of the answers seem to belong to a single category, it was noticed that there was a large background behind it, and some critical reasons behind the decision not to migrate were explained with academic views through in-depth interviews. As a result of the research, it has been discovered that migration is both a positive and negative movement. Accordingly, the concept of migration includes both staying in the origin geography and leaving the origin geography.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• non-migration
• migration theories
• migration researches

Kaynakça

1. Adıgüzel, Y. (2020). Göç Sosyolojisi. Nobel Yayıncılık. 4. Baskı.
2. Adorno, T.W. (1944). Kültür Endüstrisi – Kültür Yönetimi. Çeviren: Ülner, N. Tüzel, M. Gen, E. İletişim Yayınları 2014. 9. Baskı.
3. Bischoff-Moos, C. (2021). Über den Zusammenhang von Globalisierung, Migration und Flucht. Munich: GRIN Verlag.
4. Bösche, M. (2006). Trapped inside the European fortress? Germany and European Union asylum and refugee policy. In Germany’s EU Policy on Asylum and Defence (pp. 29-90). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
5. Burda, M. C. (1995). Migration and the option value of waiting. IIES.
6. Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2008). Göçler çağı: modern dünyada uluslararası göç hareketleri [The age of migration: international population movements in the modern world]. Çev. BU Bal & İ. Akbulut). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
7. Cereci, S. (2020). Migration Communication Adaptation. İstanbul: Hiperyayın.
8. Çağlayan, S. (2006). Göç kuramlari, göç ve göçmen ilişkisi. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (17), 67-91.

9. Dauvergne, C. (2008). Making people illegal: What globalization means for migration and law. Cambridge University Press.
10. Delanty, G., Wodak, R., & Jones, P. (Eds.). (2008). Introduction 1-20. Identity, belonging and migration. Oxford University Press.
11. Faist, T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and racial studies, 23(2), 189-222.
12. Foucault, M. (1994). Özne ve İktidar. Çeviren: Ergüden, I ve Akınbay, O. Ayrıntı Yayınları 2016. 5. Baskı.
13. Giordano, C. ve Boscoboinik, A. (2018). Society: A Key Concept in Anthropology. Ethnology, Ethnography and Cultural Anthropology, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Ed. Paolo Barbaro, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E: UNESCO, Eolss Publishers, s. 2-13.
14. Gurieva, L. K., & Dzhioev, A. V. (2015). Economic theories of labor migration. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6 S7), 101.
15. Hanson, B. T. (1998). What happened to fortress Europe?: External trade policy liberalization in the European Union. International Organization, 52(1), 55-85.
16. Henning, K. (2001). Max Webers Klassenmodell im Vergleich zu Karl Marx. Munich: GRIN Verlag.
17. Hill, A. (2018). Migrastion: How Many People are on the Move around the World. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/sep/10/migration-how-many-people-are-on-the-move-around-the-world, erişim tarihi: 07.10.2021.
18. https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/ (2021). How Many Refugees are There in the World? https://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/how-many-refugees/, erişim tarihi: 07.10.2021.
19. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/ erişim tarihi: 13.10.2021.
20. IOM International Organization for Migration (2019). World Migration Report 2020. Gerneva: International Organization for Migration.
21. Jolly, S. (2005). Gender and Migration Overview Report. Sussex: Institute of Development Studies.
22. Kantorowicz, H. (2014). The definition of law. Cambridge University Press.
23. Karabey, T. (2006). Ahmed-i Hânî (1651-1707) Hayâtı, Eserleri ve Mem O Zîn Mesnevisi. A.Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30: 57-65.
24. Kühne, O. (2020). Landscape Conflicts—A Theoretical Approach Based on the Three Worlds Theory of Karl Popper and the Conflict Theory of Ralf Dahrendorf, Illustrated by the Example of the Energy System Transformation in Germany. Sustainability, 12: 2-20.
25. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47-57.
26. Lu, M. (1999). Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior. Population and environment, 20(5), 467-488.
27. Lutz, H. (1997). The limits of European-ness: Immigrant women in fortress Europe. Feminist review, 57(1), 93-111.
28. Messing, V. ve Ságvári, B. (2020). Von der Landung bis zur Ankunft. Die subtile Integration der Einwanderer innerhalb Westeuropas. Frankfurt: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
29. O’Byrne, D. J. ve Hensby, A. (2011). Globalization: The Global Village. Theorizing Global Studies New York: Palgrave McMillan, s. 10-32.
30. Raumser, K. (2011). Bildungserfolge von Migrantenkindern Der Einfluss der Herkunftsfamilie. München: Deutsches Jugendinstitut e.V.
31. Schimany, P. ve Rühl, S. ve Kohls, M. (2012). Ältere Migrantinnen und Migranten Entwicklungen, Lebenslagen, Perspektiven. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.
32. Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. The american Economic review, 75(2), 173-178.
33. Tassinopoulos, A., & Werner, H. (1999). To move or not to move: migration of labour in the European Union (Vol. 35). Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.
34. Treibel, A. (2015). Integriert Euch!: Plädoyer für ein selbstbewusstes Einwanderungsland. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
35. Treichler, A. (2012). Die Wahrnehmung, Interpretation und Bearbeitung sozialer Ungleichheit in und durch die Global City Frankfurt am Main. Soziale Ungleichheit in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft Kategorien, Konzepte, Einfl ussfaktoren, Bonn: Abteilung Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
36. Wagner, N. (2003). Die Kultivierungshypothese von George Gerbner et al. Munich: Grin Verlag.
37. Weiß, M. (2021). Vom Existentialismus zum Nationalsozialismus? Martin Heideggers Denken nach den Schwarzen Heften. Geschichte und Gegenwart der Existenzphilosophie, Ed. Sölch, Dennis, Victor, Oliver, Basel: Schwabe Verlag, Schwabe Verlagsgruppe AG.
38. Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2012). Migration, risk, and uncertainty: Theoretical perspectives. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 167-180.
39. Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. In Papers of the Regional Science Association (Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 159-169). Springer-Verlag.