KAHRAMANMARAŞ DEPREMLERİ SONRASI YARDIM FAALİYETLERİNE GÖNÜLLÜ KATILAN PARAMEDİK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN DENEYİMLERİ: FENOMENOLOJİK YAKLAŞIM

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmayla İlk ve Acil Yardım Programı (paramedik) öğrencilerinin deprem yardımında gönüllü olma nedenleri ve deneyimleri incelenmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler:Nitel araştırma yöntemi desenlerinden biri olan fenomenolojik yaklaşımla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada 12 öğrenci ile yarı yapılandırılmış sorular ile derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Bulgular: MAXQDA22 programı ile veriler sıklık, benzerlik ve farklılık açısından tematik hale getirilerek alıntılar ile sunulmuştur. İlk ve Acil Yardım programı öğrencilerinin ifadelerinden yola çıkarak beş tema, 23 alt tema belirlenmiştir. 193 alıntı analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen ana temalar 1. Amaç, 2. Zorlaştırıcı Unsurlar, 3. Kolaylaştırıcı Unsurlar, 4. Hizmetler ve 5. Öneriler olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Elde edilen bulgulara göre afet müdahalesi sırasında karşılaşılan zorluklara rağmen, insanlara yardım etmenin ve topluma katkıda bulunmanın sağladığı tatmin duygusunun, öğrencilerin tekrar gönüllü olma isteğini olumlu yönde etkilediğini ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca öğrencilerin afet müdahalesi sürecinde yaşadıkları deneyimleri ve gönüllü olma nedenlerini analiz eden çalışmamız, gelecekteki hazırlık çalışmalarının stratejik olarak geliştirilmesine önemli katkılar sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Deprem
• Öğrenci
• Yardım
• Gönüllülük
• Deneyim

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK 2209-A

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma için Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Etik kurulundan (31.10.2023\ 19507) onay alınmıştır.

Experiences of Paramedic Students Voluntarily Participating in Aid Activities After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: Phenomenological Approach

Öz

Abstract Aim: In this study, the reasons and experiences of First and Emergency Aid Program (paramedic) students for volunteering in earthquake aid were examined. Materials and Methods: In this study, which was carried out with the phenomenological approach, one of the qualitative research method designs, in-depth interviews were conducted with 12 students with semi-structured questions. Results: With the MAXQDA22 program, the data was thematized in terms of frequency, similarity and difference and presented with quotations. Five themes and 23 sub-themes were determined based on the statements of the First and Emergency Aid program students. 193 quotes were analyzed. The main themes obtained were determined as 1. Purpose, 2. Difficult Elements, 3. Facilitating Elements, 4. Services and 5. Suggestions. Conclusion: The findings revealed that, despite the difficulties encountered during disaster response, the feeling of satisfaction provided by helping people and contributing to society positively affected students' desire to volunteer again. As a result, our study, which analyzes students' experiences during the disaster response process and their reasons for volunteering, will make significant contributions to the strategic development of future preparation studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Earthquake
• Student
• Aid
• Volunteering
• Experience

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, D., Prioleau, P., Taku, K., Naruse, Y., Sekine, H., Maeda, M., ... ve Yanagisawa, R. (2016). Post-traumatic stress and growth among medical student volunteers after the March 2011 disaster in Fukushima, Japan: implications for student involvement with future disasters. Psychiatric quarterly, 87(2), 241-251.
2. Balaban, A. Y., ve İnce, İ. Ç. (2015). Gençlerin sivil toplum kuruluşlarındaki gönüllülük faaliyetleri ve gönüllülük algısı: Türkiye Eğitim Gönüllüleri Vakfı (TEGV) Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 149-169.
3. Bunevicius, A., Katkute, A., ve Bunevicius, R. (2008). Symptoms of anxiety and depression in medical students and in humanities students: relationship with big-five personality dimensions and vulnerability to stress. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 54(6), 494-501.
4. Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2019). Psikolojide tematik analizin kullanımı. S. N. Şad, N. Özerve A. Atli (Çevirenler). Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi – Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 873-898. doi: 10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c.2s.17
5. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (3.Baskı). Mesut Bütün ve Selçuk Beşir (Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
6. Cusack, L., Arbon, P., ve Ranse, J. (2010) What is the role of nursing students and schools of nursing during disaster A discussion paper. Collegian 17: 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2010.09.006
7. Coles, E., ve Buckle, P. (2004). Developing community resilience as a foundation for effective disaster recovery. The Australian journal of emergency management, 19(4), 6-15.
8. Demirbilek, Ö., ve Öztürk, S. (2023). Understanding university students WHO do not want to volunteer in disasters: A qualitative study from Türkiye. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 96, 103994.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103994

9. Drexler, R., Hambrecht, J. M., ve Oldhafer, K. J. (2020). Involvement of medical students during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey study. Cureus, 12(8). DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10147
10. Dunlop, A. L., Logue, K. M., Vaidyanathan, L., ve Isakov, A. P.(2016). Facilitators and barriers for effective academic-community collaboration for disaster preparedness and response. Journal of public health management and practice, 22(3), E20-E28. DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182205087
11. Ekşi A.(2021). Hastane Öncesi Acil Sağlık Hizmetleri. Ema Tıp Kitapevi.Ankara. ISBN 9786257849432 Fernandez L., Barbera J., ve Van Dorp J. (2006) Strategies for managing volunteers during incident response: A systems approach. Homeland Security Affairs, 2(3), 1–15. https://hdl.handle.net/10945/25078
12. Fulmer, T., Portelli, I., Foltin, G. L., Zimmerman, R., Chachkes, E., ve Goldfrank, L. R. (2007). Organization-based incident management: developing a disaster volunteer role on a university campus. Disaster Management ve Response, 5(3), 74-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dmr.2007.06.001
13. Grant, A., Hart, M., ve Langer, E. R. (2019). Integrating volunteering cultures in New Zealand's multi-hazard environment. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, the, 34(3), 52-59.
14. Haven L. T., ve Van Grootel, D. L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in research, 26(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
15. Kahraman S. A. (2023) Comprehensive Health Economic Analysis of the 2023 Turkey Earthquake. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 17:e503. doi:10.1017/dmp.2023.160
16. Kaiser, H. E., Barnett, D. J., Hsu, E. B., Kirsch, T. D., James, J. J., ve Subbarao, I. (2009). Perspectives of future physicians on disaster medicine and public health preparedness: challenges of building a capable and sustainable auxiliary medical workforce. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness, 3(4), 210-216.
17. Katz, C. L., Gluck, N., Maurizio, A., ve DeLisi, L. E. (2002). The medical student experience with disasters and disaster response. CNS spectrums, 7(8), 604-610.
18. Kulik, L. (2022). A multi‐variable model for explaining long‐term commitment to volunteering among COVID‐19 volunteers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 22(3), 794-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12322
19. Kümbetoğlu, B. (2017). Sosyolojide ve Antropolojide Niteliksel Yöntem ve Araştırma, 5. Basım, Bağlam Yayıncılık İstanbul.
20. Lazarus, G., Findyartini, A., Putera, A. M., Gamalliel, N., Nugraha, D., Adli, I., ... ve Widyahening, I. S. (2021). Willingness to volunteer and readiness to practice of undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey in Indonesia. BMC Medical Education, 21, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02576-0
21. Livingood, W. C., Goldhagen, J., Little, W. L., Gornto, J., ve Hou, T. (2007). Assessing the status of partnerships between academic institutions and public health agencies. American Journal of Public Health, 97(4), 659-666.
22. Ma, Y., Zhu, W., Zhang, H., Zhao, P., Wang, Y., ve Zhang, Q. (2021). The factors affecting volunteers’ willingness to participate in disaster preparedness. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(8), 4141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084141
23. Mavrouli, M., Mavroulis, S., Lekkas, E., ve Tsakris, A. (2023). An emerging health crisis in Turkey and Syria after the earthquake disaster on 6 February 2023: risk factors, prevention and management of infectious diseases. In Healthcare (Vol. 11, No. 7, p. 1022). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11071022
24. Nelson, J. C., Rashid, H., Galvin, V. G., Essien, J. D., ve Levine, L. M. (1999). Public/private partners:: Key factors in creating a strategic alliance for community health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 16(3), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00148-2
25. Ertas, N. (2020). How public, nonprofit, and private-sector employees access volunteer roles. Journal of Nonprofit ve Public Sector Marketing, 32(2), 105-123. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/ 10495142. 2018.1526744
26. Nichol, B., Wilson, R., Rodrigues, A., ve Haighton, C. (2024). Exploring the effects of volunteering on the social, mental, and physical health and well-being of volunteers: an umbrella review. Voluntas: international journal of voluntary and nonprofit organizations, 35(1), 97-128.F
27. Umar, T. P., Samudra, M. G., Nashor, K. M. N., Agustini, D., ve Syakurah, R. A. (2022). Health professional student’s volunteering activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review. Frontiers in Medicine, 9, 797153. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.797153
28. Satoh, M., Iwamitsu, H., Yamada, E., Kuribayashi, Y., Yamagami-Matsuyama, T., ve Yamada, Y. (2018). Disaster nursing knowledge and competencies among nursing university students participated in relief activities following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes. SAGE Open Nursing, 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960818804918
29. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information,22(2),63-7. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
30. Yıldırım A, ve Şimşek H. (2005).Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri Güncelleştirilmiş Geliştirilmiş 5. Baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara. https://www.who.int/emergencies/grading, 03.03.2025.