WAYS TO EXPRESS THE AUTHOR'S MODALITY IN KAZAKH, KYRGYZ AND ENGLISH FICTION WORKS

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 97 - 117, 30.04.2021

Gulgul Iskakova Peter Kosta Shalabay Berdibay Shapauov Alibi Kabykenovich Kiyakova Raushan

https://doi.org/10.33390/homeros.4.2.05

Öz

The article widely describes the concept of author’s modality in the context of linguistic research and provides a brief history of the study of the category of modality in modern linguo-stylistics and text linguistics. Author’s modality is considered as a category that plays the role of compiler, organizer of the literary text. The author’s modality was also studied as a communicative-pragmatic and subjective assessment category. In such works as Kazakh writer A. Kekilbayev’s novel “Aṅızdıṅ aqırı” and Kyrgyz writer Sh. Aitmatov’s novel “Kıyamat”, famous American writers Theodore Dreiser’s novel “Jennie Gerhardt”, Oscar Wilde’s “The Picture of Dorian Gray” the different ways of expression the category of author’s modality were studied, and similarities and differences were identified

Anahtar Kelimeler

literary text, author’s modality, author’s assessment, author’s point of view, emotional-modal shades

Kaynakça

• LACOFF, G., 1976, Conversational Postulates // Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3 ‒ London.
• CELCE-MURCIA, M. and LARSEN-FREEMAN, D., 1999, The Grammar Book& An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (second edition). ‒ London: Heinle and Heinle. ‒ 854 p.
• YULE, G., 1998, Explaining English Grammar. – Hong-Kong& Oxford University University Press. ‒ 333 p.
• DAVYDENKO, L.G., 1984, The communicative modality of sentences with the verbs can / could, may, might in modern English ‒ Odessa: Compassb. ‒ 210 p.
• LYONS, J., 1978, Introduction to theoretical linguistics. ‒ M: Progress. ‒ 543 p.
• AGAEVA, F.A., 1990, Modality as a linguistic category. Dis. ... Doctor of Philology, Azerbaijan Pedagogical Institute of Russian Language and Literature named after M.F.Akhundova, Baku. ‒ 47 p.
• ILEBAEV, E.U., 1997, Comparative typological study of the category of modality and the means of its expression in English and in the Kyrgyz languages: abstract ... Candidate of Philology. Sciences, Kyrgyz State National University, Bishkek. ‒ 20 p.
• DUISENBEKOVA, L.S., 1993, Functional and semantic aspect of the category of the imperative mood in the Kazakh language: abstract of the candidate of philological sciences. ‒ Almaty. ‒ 21 p.
• MAMADILOV, K.A., 1996, Modal structures of verbs in the modern Kazakh language: phylol. science. abstract of the candidate of philological sciences: 10.02.02. ‒ Almaty. ‒ 21 p.
• ABDYGALIEVA, T., 1998, Semantics of negation and ways of its expression in the modern Kazakh language: abstract of the candidate of sciences: 10.02.02. ‒ Almaty. ‒ 28 p.
• ZHAKYPBEKOV, B.A., 2002, Imperative sentences and their application in fiction: abstract of the candidate of philological sciences: 10.02.02. – Astana. ‒ 28 p.
• KULMANOV, S.K., 2004, Functional-semantic field of modality of possibility in the Kazakh language: abstract of the candidate of philological sciences: 10.02.02. ‒ Almaty.‒ 34 p.
• SAPAROVA, D.V., 2005, Deontic modality and means of its expression in English and Russian (based on normative legal acts): abstract of the candidate of philological sciences: 10.02.20. ‒ Almaty. ‒ 32 p.
• AKHMEDZHANOVA, Z.K., 2005, Comparative linguistics: Kazakh and Russian languages. ‒ Almaty: alliance ‒2. ‒ 408 p.
• DALBERGENOVA, L.E., ZHARKYNBEKOVA Sh.K., 2020, Evidentiality as an argumentative function using the example of German, Russian and Kazakh; ZfSl; 65 (1): 134-144.
• KOSTA, Peter, 2011, Modalité Epistémique et Evidentialité et sa disposition à la base déictique, in: Claudia Schlaak / Lena Busse: Sprachkontakte, Sprachvariation und Sprachwandel. Festschrift für Thomas Stehl zum 60. Geburtstag, Narr: Tübingen, S. 257-283.
• KOSTA, Peter, 2013, How can I lie if I am telling the truth? The unbearable lightness of the being of strong and weak modals,modal adverbs and modal particles in discourse between epistemic modality and evidentiality, in: Approaches to Slavic Interaction. Edited by Nadine Thielemann and Peter Kosta. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, S. 167-184 (Dialogue Studies; Vol. 20).
• KOSTA, Peter, 2019, Kosta, P.: [Review]: Sarah E. Murray The Semantics of Evidentials. 2017. Oxford University Press Oxford (Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 9). ISBN 978-0-19-968157-0 (hbk.), 978-0-19-968158-7 (pbk.) 168 pp +Lists of tables, List of figures, List of abbreviations. In: Journal of Pragmatics 140, S. 156‒159 (Elsevier).
• KOSTA, Peter, 2021, On Typology of Epistemic Modality, Root Modals and Evidentiality. In: SLS-17 (2022): Hokkaido University (Sapporo, Japan).
• AIKHENVALD, Alexandra Y. , 2004, Evidentiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• FALLER, Martina, 2002, Semantics anf pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford dissertation.
• FALLER, Martina, 2003, Propositional- and illocutionary-level evidentiality in Cuzo Quechua. In Jan Anderssen, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Adam Werle (eds.). The Proceedings of SULA 2, 19-33. Amherst, MA:GLSA.
• FALLER, Martina, 2006, Evidentiality above and below speech acts. Ms. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/GZiZjBhO/ [ Date Accessed: 19 March 2021].
• FALLER, Martina, 2007, The Cuzco Quechua conjectural: An illocutionary analysis of an epistemic evidential In Amy Rose Deal (ed.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference on the Semantics of Underrepresented Languages in the Americas (SULA 4), 65-80. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
• von FINTEL, Kai, and Anthony GILLES, 2008, An opinionated guide to epistemic modality. In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.). Oxford studies in epistemology, vol. 2, 32-62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• HEIM, Irene & Angelika KRATZER,1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell
• MURRAY, Sarah E. 2017. The Semantics of Evidentials. Oxford University Press Oxford (Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 9). ISBN 978-0-19-968157-0 (hbk.), cf. review article by Kosta 2019 [18].
• WIEMER, Björn, 2018, Catching the Elusive. Lexical evidentiality markers in Slavic Languages (A questionnaire study and its background). Berlin etc: Peter Lang (Slavolinguistica 23).
• GALPERIN, I.R., 1981, Text as an object of linguistic research.‒ Moscow: Publishing house "Nauka". ‒ 138 p.
• BJNDARKO, A.V., 1984, Functional grammar. ‒ Leningrad: Nauka.‒ 136 p.
• SHVEDOVA, N.Yu., 1973, Paradigmatics of a simple sentence in modern Russian // Russian language. Grammar studies. ‒ Moscow: Nauka.‒ 286 p.
• KEKILBAYEV, A., 1999, Aṅızdıṅ aqırı. A collection of works in twelve volumes. ‒ Almaty: “Olke” Publishing House. ‒ Vol.3. ‒ 400 p.
• OSCAR WILDE, 2008, The Picture of Dorian Gray”. English fiction collection. Sib. Univ. Publishing house. ‒ 79 p.
• SERGALIEV, M., 2006, Basics of stylistics: Textbook. ‒ Astana: L.N.Gumilyov Eurasian National University. ‒ 273 p.
• AITMATOV, Sh., 2018, Kıyamat. An eight-volume collection of works. 3 vols. - Bishkek: "ULUU TOOLOR". ‒ 491 p.
• THEODORE, Driser, 1972, Jennie Gerhardt. ‒ Moscow: Progress Publishers.
• SHALABAY, B., 2016, Problems of Kazakh language education. ‒ Almaty: Arda. ‒ 488 p.