Adolescents' Parental Rejection Perceptions and The Attachment Styles as a Parameter of Tendency to Violence

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 143 - 158, 17.06.2020

Fatih Karaboğa Engin Eker

Öz

The aim of the study is to gain an understanding of the quality of parent-child attachment relationship on the tendency to violence on high school adolescents with disciplinary penalties due to violence in Turkey. The sample group was composed of 145 volunteer adolescents aged 14-18 years from 8 different high schools in Istanbul. There are 43 adolescents who receive disciplinary penalties by the disciplinary boards of their schools for physical and verbal violence and 102 adolescents who not receive disciplinary penalties at all. Parental Acceptance /Rejection Scale, Violence Tendency Scale, Inventory of Experiences in Close Relationships and Personal Information Form were used to the collect the data. Results indicated that the perception of neglect/ indifference which adolescents with disciplinary penalties receive from, only, their mothers has been found higher. There is a negative correlation between the avoidant attachment and the feeling of harming others in relation to adolescents' patterns of violence and attachment patterns. In addition, adolescents' feelings of warmth/ affection perceived from their mothers and fathers reduce anxious attachment while feelings of indifference/ neglect of adolescents increase the anxious attachment. The results emphasized the importance of perceived parental rejection and attachment style established in childhood on the tendency to violence in adolescence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adolescence, parental rejection, tendency to violence, attachment, disciplinary penalty

Teşekkür

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank all of our family members and all of our friends who have always felt their spiritual support in the most difficult moments during the studies. We would like to thank our esteemed colleague, psychological counselor Nesrin Konakçi who has always felt his criticisms, help and patience in every step of this study. We would like to thank all parents and students who have volunteered to study for their help during the data collection process.

Ergenlerin Şiddet Eğilimi Parametresi Olarak Ebeveyn Reddi Algıları ve Bağlanma Stilleri

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’de şiddet nedeniyle disiplin cezası alan ergenlerin, şiddete eğiliminde ebeveyn-çocuk bağlanma ilişkisinin niteliğini incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklem grubu, İstanbul'daki 8 farklı liseden 14-18 yaş arası 145 gönüllü ergenden oluşmaktadır. Fiziksel ve sözlü şiddet nedeniyle okullarının disiplin kurulları tarafından disiplin cezası alan 43 ergen ve hiç disiplin cezası almayan 102 ergen bulunmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında Ebeveyn Kabul/Red Ölçeği, Şiddet Eğilimi Ölçeği, Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar disiplin cezası alan ergenlerin, yalnız annelerinden aldıkları ihmal/kayıtsızlık algısının daha yüksek olduğunu göstermiştir. Ergenlerin şiddet ve bağlanma paternleriyle ilgili olarak, kaçıngan bağlanma ve başkalarına zarar verme düşüncesi arasında negatif bir korelasyon bulunmuştur. Ayrıca ergenlerin, annelerinden ve babalarından algıladıkları sıcaklık/şefkat hisleri kaygılı bağlanmayı azaltırken, ergenlerin kayıtsızlık/ihmal hisleri ise kaygılı bağlanmayı artırmaktadır. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, çocuklukta algılanan ebeveyn reddinin ve ebeveynle kurulan bağlanma stilinin, ergenlik dönemindeki şiddet eğilimine olan önemini vurgulamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ergenlik, ebeveyn reddi, şiddet eğilimi, bağlanma, disiplin cezası

Kaynakça

• 1. Ali, S., Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R.P. (2015). Pancultural gender differences in the relation between perceived parental acceptance and psychological adjustment of children and adult offspring: A meta-analytic review of world-wide research. J Cross Cult Psychol, 46, 1059-1080.
• 2. Allen, J.P., Borman-Spurrell, E., & Hauser, S.T. (1996). Attachment theory as a framework for understanding sequelae of severe adolescent psychopathology: an 11-year follow-up study. Consult. Clin. Psychol, 64, 254– 263.
• 3. Allen, J.P., Marsh, P., & McFarland, C. (2002). Attachment and autonomy as predictors of the development of social skills and delinquency during midadolescence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol,(70)1, 56–66.
• 4. Altun, S.A., Güneri, O.Y., & Baker, Ö.E. (2005). Basındaki Yansımaları ile Okulda Şiddet [School Violence: Reflections from the Printed Media]. J Educ Res, 24, 12-21.
• 5. Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2005). The role of parenting styles in children’s problem behavior. Journal of Child Development, 76 (6), 1144-1159.
• 6. Bowlby, J.(1969). Attachment and loss: Vol I, Attachment. London, UK: Hogarth Press.
• 7. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol II, Separation, anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• 8. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. Routledge, Londra: Psychology Press.
• 9. Brennan, K.A., Clark, C.L., & Shaver, P.R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: an integrative overview. In: J.A., Simpson, W. S., Rholes (Ed), Attachment Theory and close relationships (ss. 46-76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• 10. Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of Attachment Theory: Bowlby J, Mary Ainsworth. J Developmental Psychology, 28(5), 759-775. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.759 11. Coşkun, S., & Bebiş, H. (2014). Şiddetin okul sağlığına etkisi ve hemşirelik [Effect of Violence on school health and nursing]. Cumhuriyet Hemşirelik Dergisi, 3(1): 15-23.
• 12. Değirmencioğlu, S.M. (2006). Toplumsal, Kültürel ve İnanca Dayalı Kökenler Işığında Okulda Şiddet [Violence as a Social Problem]. Ankara, Turkey: Eğitim-Sen Yayınları.
• 13. Dodge, K.A., & Newman, J.P. (1981). Biased decision-making processes in aggressive boy. J Abnorm Psychology, 90(4), 375-379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.90.4.375 14. Ebrahimi, M., Kharbou, A., Ahadi, H., & Hatami, H. (2015). The comparison of emotional self-regulation of students in different paretning styles. Indian J. Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 5 (2): 1146-1152.
• 15. Eken, A. (2010). Ergenlerin anne-babaya bağlanma biçimleri ile öznel iyi oluş durumların sosyal yetkinlik beklentileriyle ilişkileri [The relationships between adolescents’ types of attachment to parents, and their subjective well-being and expectations for social self-efficacy] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Karadeniz Teknik University, Trabzon, Turkey.
• 16. Fearon, R. P., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., IJzendoorn, M. H., Lapsley, A.M., & Roisman, G. I. (2010). The significance of insecure attachment and disorganization in the development of children’s externalizing behavior: a meta-analytic study. Child Development, 81(2), 435–456.
• 17. Garber, J,, Robinson, N.S., & Valentiner, D. (1997). The relation between parenting and adolescent depression: self-worth as a mediator. J Adolesc Re, (12)1, 12– 33.
• 18. Güngör, D. (2000). Bağlanma stillerinin ve zihinsel modellerin kuşaklara aktarımında ana babalık stillerinin rolü [The role of parenting styles in the ıntergenerational transmission of attachment styles and mental models] (Doctoral dissertation). Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
• 19. Haskan, Ö. (2009). Ergenlerde şiddet eğilimi, yalnızlık ve sosyal destek [The violence tendency, loneliness and social support among adolescents] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
• 20. Haskan, Ö., & Yıldırım, İ. (2012). Şiddet Eğilimi Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi [Development of violence tendency scale]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(163), 165-177.
• 21. Hoeve, M., Stams, G. J. J., Van der Put, C. E., Dubas, J. S., Van der Laan, P. H., & Gerris, J. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 40(5), 771-785.
• 22. Kayahan, A. (2002). Annelerin bağlanma stilleri ve çocukların algıladıkları kabul ve reddin çocuk ruh sağlığı ile ilişkileri [The relationships between mothers attachment styles children's perceptions of acceptance and rejection and children's mental health] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
• 23. Kenny, M.E., Lomax, R., Brabeck, M., & Fife, J. (1998). Longitudinal pathways linking adolescent reports of maternal and paternal attachments to psychological well-being. J. Early Adolesc, 18: 221–243.
• 24. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Dev. Psychol, (36)3,: 366–380.
• 25. Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R.P.(2002). Perceived parental acceptance/rejection and psychological adjustment: a meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. J Marriage and Fam, 64(1): 54-64.
• 26. Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (October 3, 2012). World report on violence and health. Retrieved from Word Health Organization: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/world_report/en/.
• 27. Kulaksızoğlu, A. (2011). Ergenlik psikolojisi [The psychology of adolescence]. Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Kitabevi.
• 28. Kuyumcu, B., Rohner, R.P. (2018). The relation between remembered parental acceptance in childhood and self-acceptance among young Turkish Adults. Int. J. Psychol, 53(2), 126-132.
• 29. La Guardia, R.R., Couchman, C., & Deci, E. (2000). Within-person variation a security of attachment: a self–determination theory perspective on attachment, need fullfilment and well–being. J Pers Soc Psychol, 79(3): 367-384.
• 30. Lopez, E.E., Olaizola, J.H., Ferrer, B.M., & Ochoa, G.M. (2006). Agressive and nonaggressive rejected students: An analysis of their differences. J Psychol Sch, 43(3), 387-400.
• 31. Lyons-Ruth, K., Alpern, L., & Repacholi, B. (1993). Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosocial problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Dev, (64) 2, 572–585.
• 32. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1996). Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems: the role of disorganized early attachment patterns. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol, (64)1, 64–73.
• 33. Lyons-Ruth, K., Easterbrooks, M.A., & Cibelli, C.D. (1997). Infant attachment strategies, ınfant mental lag, and maternal depressive symptoms: predictors of ınternalizing and externalizing problems at age seven. Dev. Psychol, 33, 681–692.
• 34. Marsh, I. (2000). Sociology-making sense of society. London: Pearson Education.
• 35. Murdock, T.B., & Love, K.M. (2004). Attachment to parents and psychological well-being: an examination of young adult college students in intact families and stepfamilies. J Fam Psychol, 18(4), 8-600.
• 36. Muris, P., Meesters, C., Morren, M., & Moorman, L. (2004). Anger and hostility in adolescents: Relationships with self-reported attachment style and perceived parental rearing styles. J. Psychom Res, 57, 257-264.
• 37. Pettit, G.S., Laird, R.D., Dodge, K.A., Bates, J.E., & Criss, M.M. (2001). Antecedents and behavior-problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence. Child Dev, (72)2, 583–598.
• 38. Rice, K.G., Cunningham, T.J., & Young, M.B. (1997). Attachment to parents, social competence, and emotional well-being: A comparison of black and white late adolescents. J Couns Psychol, 44(1), 89-101.
• 39. Rohner, R.P. (1986). The warmth dimension: Foundations of Parental Acceptance Rejection Theory. England: Sage Publications.
• 40. Rohner, R.P., Khaleque, A., & Cournoyer, D.E. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection theory, methods, and implications. In: R. P., Rohner, A., Khaleque (Ed), Handbook for the study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection (ss. 1-35). Mansfield, USA: Rohner Research Publications.
• 41. Rubin, K.H., & Burgess, K.B. (2002). Parents of aggressive and withdrawn children. In M.H., Bornstein (Ed), Handbook of Parenting: Children and Parenting (383-418). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• 42. Saleem, S., Asghar, A., Subhan, S., & Mahmood, Z. (2019). Parental rejection and mental health problems in college students: Mediating role of interpersonal difficulties. Pak. J. Psychol. Res, 34, 639-653.
• 43. Shetgiri, R., Lin, H., Avila, R.M., & Flores, G. (2012). Parental characteristics associated with bullying perpetration in US children aged10 to17 years. J. Res. Prac,(102) 12, 2280–2286.
• 44. Simons, K., Paternite, C.E., & Shore, C. (2001). Quality of parent–adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. J. Early Adolesc, 21, 182–203.
• 45. Soysal, A., Bodur, Ş., İşeri, E. & Şenol, S. (2005). Bebeklik dönemindeki bağlanma sürecine genel bir bakış [Attachment process in infancy: A review]. Klinik Psikiyatri, 8(2), 88-99.
• 46. Spender, Q., & Scott, S. (1996). Conduct disorder. Curr. Opin. Psychiatr, (9)4, 273–277.
• 47. Steinberg, L., Mounts, N.S., Lamborn, S.D., & Dornbusch, S.M. (1991). Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across varied ecological niches. J Res Adolesc,1, 19–36.
• 48. Üstün, A,, Yılmaz, M. & Kırbaş, Ş. (2007). Gençleri şiddete yönelten nedenler, okullarda şiddet ve okul suçluluğu. Ankara: Hegem Yayınları.
• 49. Wolchik, S.A., Wilcox, K.L., Tein, J.Y., &Sandler, I.N. (2000). Maternal acceptance and consistency of discipline as buffers of divorce on children’s psychological adjustment problems. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 28(1), 87-102.
• 50. Yalçın, İ. (2004). Ailelerinden algıladıkları destek düzeyleri farklı lise öğrencilerinin saldırganlık düzeyleri [The Aggression levels of high school students whose perceived support levels from their families are different] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
• 51. Young, J.E. (1999). Cognitive Therapy for personality disorders: A schema focused approach. Sarasota, US: Professional Resource Press.
• 52. Zimmermann, P. (2004). Attachment representations and characteristics of friendship relations during adolescence. J Exp Child Psychol, 88(1), 83-101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016 / j.jecp.2004.02.002