İmalat Sektörü Tedarik Zincirinde Karbon Emisyonları Azaltma Stratejileri: Literatür Taraması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 272 - 289, 31.12.2025

Ümmügülsüm Geyik , Yavuz Özdemir , Mustafa Yıldırım , Fatmanur Göçer

https://doi.org/10.46578/humder.1736553

Öz

Küreselleşme ve çevresel sorunlar, karbon emisyonlarının azaltılmasını her geçen gün daha önemli bir konu haline getirmiştir. Bu çalışma, imalat sektörü tedarik zincirlerinde karbon emisyonlarını azaltmaya yönelik yöntemleri incelemektedir. Literatür taraması kapsamında sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri tasarımı, karbon emisyonlarının ölçülmesi, etkin karbon yönetimi ve çevreye duyarlı tedarikçi seçimi gibi temel yaklaşımlar analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, en yaygın olarak kullanılan yöntemin oyun teorisi olduğunu; bunu sırasıyla matematiksel modelleme, karar verme ve sistematik analiz yöntemlerinin izlediğini göstermektedir. Bazı yöntemlerin ise daha sınırlı kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, çalışmaların yıllara göre artması, alanın akademik ve uygulama açısından önemini ortaya koymaktadır. İncelenen yayınlarda en çok vurgulanan konu karbon emisyon politikaları olurken, teknolojik gelişmeler ve dijital dönüşüm uygulamaları da bu süreci desteklemektedir. Bu çalışma, literatürdeki metodolojik eğilimleri ortaya koymakta ve karbon azaltım stratejileri ile teknolojik gelişmelerin etkileşimini göstermesi bakımından önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Karbon emisyonu , tedarik zinciri yönetimi , sürdürülebilirlik , karbon emisyon politikaları

Etik Beyan

Çalışmanın tüm süreçlerinin araştırma ve yayın etiğine uygun olduğunu, etik kurallara ve bilimsel atıf gösterme ilkelerine uyduğumu beyan ederim.

Carbon Emissions Reduction Strategies in Manufacturing Sector Supply Chain: A Literature Review

Öz

Globalization and escalating environmental challenges have made reducing carbon emissions a critical priority for manufacturing supply chains. This review synthesizes recent literature on strategies to mitigate carbon emissions in manufacturing-oriented supply chains, focusing on sustainable network design, carbon measurement and accounting, carbon management practices, and low-carbon supplier selection. Our analysis of the reviewed papers shows that game theory, mathematical modeling, and decision-making techniques are commonly used, whereas advanced statistical and Lagrangian approaches are less frequent. Over time, there has been a clear increase in publications and a growing influence of policy instruments (e.g., carbon pricing) and digital technologies on emission reduction strategies. By mapping methodological tendencies and revealing underexplored areas, this review identifies key research gaps and outlines directions for future studies that combine technological innovation with policy mechanisms in supply chain decarbonization.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carbon Emission , Supply Chain Management , Sustainability , Carbon Emission Policies

Etik Beyan

I declare that all processes of the study are in accordance with research and publication ethics, and that I comply with ethical rules and scientific citation principles.

Kaynakça

• Akben, İ. (2019). 21. yüzyıl iş ve ekonomi dünyasının değişen dinamikleri içinde çevresel bir problem olarak karbon ayak izi ve lojistik sektörü. Z. Köse & F. G. Bilginer (Ed.), Hiperlink Yayın Grubu.
• Günhar, E. E. & Gürsoy, İ. (2024). Lojistik ve taşımacılıkta karbon ayak izinin sosyal etkilerinin araştırılması. Uluslararası Dünya Bilim ve Araştırma Kongresi, İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Amiruddin, S. Z., Hishamuddin, H., Darom, N. A. & Naimin, H. H. (2021). A case study of carbon emissions from logistic activities during supply chain disruptions. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 33(2), 221-228.
• Şişman, B. (2015). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde karbon salınımının sosyal maliyetini dikkate alan bir model önerisi: Bir mermer işletmesi örneği. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(4), 177-193.
• Karaboğa, K. & Cici Karaboğa, E. N. (2019). Tedarik zinciri yönetiminde yeni bir maliyet unsuru: Karbon salınım hakkı maliyeti ve yeşil pazarlama ilişkisi. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(36), 2845-2854.
• Wilkerson, T. (2005). Can One Green Deliver Another? Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.
• Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
• Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M. (2009). Designing and evaluating sustainable supply chains: A carbon market oriented approach. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), 42(4 PART 1), 2029–2034.
• Elhedhli, S. & Merrick, R. (2012). Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(5), 370–379.
• Shaw, K., Irfan, M., Shankar, R. & Yadav, S. S. (2016). Low carbon chance constrained supply chain network design problem: a Benders decomposition based approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 98, 483–497.
• Maeno, K., Tokito, S. & Kagawa, S. (2022). CO2 mitigation through global supply chain restructuring. Energy Economics, 105, 105768.
• Vimal, K. E. K., Kumar, A., Sunil, S. M., Suresh, G., Sanjeev, N. & Kandasamy, J. (2022). Analysing the challenges in building resilient net zero carbon supply chains using Influential Network Relationship Mapping. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379, 134635.
• Sundarakani, B., De Souza, R., Goh, M., Wagner, S. M. & Manikandan, S. (2010). Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 43-50.
• Lee, K. H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: The case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1216–1223.
• Lee, K. H. (2012). Carbon accounting for supply chain management in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 83–93.
• Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H. & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.
• Martí, J. M. C., Tancrez, J. S. & Seifert, R. W. (2015). Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 129–142.
• Nouira, I., Hammami, R., Frein, Y. & Temponi, C. (2016). Design of forward supply chains: Impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 173, 80–98.
• Chen, J. X. & Chen, J. (2017). Supply chain carbon footprinting and responsibility allocation under emission regulations. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 255–267.
• Ji, J., Zhang, Z. & Yang, L. (2017). Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 852–867.
• Wong, E. Y. C., Tai, A. H. & Zhou, E. (2018). Optimising truckload operations in third-party logistics: A carbon footprint perspective in volatile supply chain. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 649–661.
• Nie, D., Li, H., Qu, T., Liu, Y. & Li, C. (2020). Optimizing supply chain configuration with low carbon emission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122539.
• Bodendorf, F., Dimitrov, G. & Franke, J. (2022). Analyzing and evaluating supplier carbon footprints in supply networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133601.
• Mezatio, E. P., Aghelinejad, M., Amodeo, L. & Ferreira, I. (2022). Design a sustainable supply chain for the textile and clothing industry with consideration of carbon emissions. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 1687–1692.
• Ebersold, F., Hechelmann, R. H., Holzapfel, P. & Meschede, H. (2023). Carbon insetting as a measure to raise supply chain energy efficiency potentials: Opportunities and challenges. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 20, 100504.
• Liew, M. & Cao, J. (2024). Green supply chain management for carbon accountability. Energy Economics, 138, 107840.
• Mohsin, A. K. M., Gerschberger, M., Plasch, M., Ahmed, S. F., Rahman, A. & Rashed, M. (2024). Examining the synergy of green supply chain practices, circular economy, and economic growth in mitigating carbon emissions: Evidence from EU countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 371, 123109.
• Jin, M., Granda-Marulanda, N. A. & Down, I. (2014). The impact of carbon policies on supply chain design and logistics of a major retailer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 453–461.
• Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Choudhary, A. & Eshragh, A. (2015). Tactical supply chain planning under a carbon tax policy scheme: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 206–215.
• Yang, L., Zhang, Q. & Ji, J. (2017). Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 286–297.
• Ji, J., Zhang, Z. & Yang, L. (2017). Comparisons of initial carbon allowance allocation rules in an O2O retail supply chain with the cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 68–84.
• Li, J., Su, Q. & Ma, L. (2017). Production and transportation outsourcing decisions in the supply chain under single and multiple carbon policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1109–1122.
• Qi, Q., Wang, J. & Bai, Q. (2017). Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 286–302.
• Kaur, H. & Singh, S. P. (2017). Modeling low carbon procurement and logistics in supply chain: A key towards sustainable production. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 11, 5–17.
• Peng, H., Pang, T. & Cong, J. (2018). Coordination contracts for a supply chain with yield uncertainty and low-carbon preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 291–302.
• Fang, Y., Yu, Y., Shi, Y. & Liu, J. (2020). The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 133, 101818.
• Jain, R., Mittal, M., Mangla, S. K. & Baraiya, R. (2023). Optimizing supply chain strategies for deteriorating items and imperfect manufacturing under carbon emission regulations. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 182, 109350.
• Wang, L. & Peng, K. (2023). Carbon reduction decision-making in supply chain under the pledge financing of carbon emission rights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139381.
• Zhou, H., Liu, M. & Tan, Y. (2023). Long-term emission reduction strategy in a three-echelon supply chain considering government intervention and Consumers’ low-carbon preferences. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 186, 109697.
• So, P. Y., Liu, J. M., Hung, C. J. & Kuo, H. C. (2024). Impact of carbon pricing on the integrated green supply chain of the semiconductor industry. Heliyon, 10(4), e25633.
• Jiang, K., Wang, D., Xu, L. & Wang, F. (2024). Assessing the impact of carbon quota allocation in enhancing supply chain members emission reduction and advertising efforts. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 95, 102033.
• Wu, W., Li, M., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Wang, L. & You, Y. (2024). Electric vehicle battery closed-loop supply chain pricing and carbon reduction decisions under the carbon cap-and-trade and reward-penalty policies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 192, 1467–1482.
• Hamidoğlu, A. & Weber, G. W. (2024). A novel Nash-based low-carbon implementation in agricultural supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 449, 141846.
• Zhao, R., Neighbour, G., Han, J., McGuire, M. & Deutz, P. (2012). Using game theory to describe strategy selection for environmental risk and carbon emissions reduction in the green supply chain. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(6), 927–936.
• Jabbour, C. J. C., Neto, A. S., Gobbo, J. A., Ribeiro, M. D. S. & De Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2015). Eco-innovations in more sustainable supply chains for a low-carbon economy: A multiple case study of human critical success factors in Brazilian leading companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 245–257.
• Wang, Q., Zhao, D. & He, L. (2016). Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 72–84.
• Hong, I. H., Su, J. C. P., Chu, C. H. & Yen, C. Y. (2018). Decentralized decision framework to coordinate product design and supply chain decisions: Evaluating tradeoffs between cost and carbon emission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 107–116.
• Zu, Y., Chen, L. & Fan, Y. (2018). Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 527–546.
• Jamali, M. B. & Rasti-Barzoki, M. (2019). A game theoretic approach to investigate the effects of third-party logistics in a sustainable supply chain by reducing delivery time and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 636–652.
• Ghosh, S. K., Seikh, M. R. & Chakrabortty, M. (2020). Analyzing a stochastic dual-channel supply chain under consumers’ low carbon preferences and cap-and-trade regulation. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 149, 106765.
• Liu, X., Du, W., Olasehinde, T. & Fan, Y. (2025). Balancing competition and sustainability: Strategic supply chain configurations in response to consumer low-carbon preferences. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100411.
• Shen, J., Zhang, Q. & Tian, S. (2025). Decarbonization pathways analysis and recommendations in the green steel supply chain of a typical steel end user-automotive industry. Applied Energy, 377, 124711.
• Singh, A., Kumari, S., Malekpoor, H. & Mishra, N. (2018). Big data cloud computing framework for low carbon supplier selection in the beef supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 139–149.
• Bai, Q., Xu, J. & Chauhan, S. S. (2020). Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 142, 106324.
• Leonzio, G. & Zondervan, E. (2020). Analysis and optimization of carbon supply chains integrated to a power to gas process in Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122172.
• Ouassou, E. H., Onyeaka, H., Tamasiga, P. & Bakwena, M. (2024). Carbon transparency in global supply chains: The mediating role of institutional and innovative capacity. Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101405.
• Geoffrion, A. M. (1972). Generalized Lagrangean relaxation for integer programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 10(4), 237–260.
• Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237, 82–117.
• Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8(4), 365–381.
• United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2015). Paris Agreement. United Nations.
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
• Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). (2017). Final report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
• European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. European Commission.