Ağ Günlük Uygulamasının Yansıtıcı Düşünme Becerisi Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 40 , 93 - 104 , 01.06.2011

Fatma Bayrak , Yasemin Koçak Usluel

https://izlik.org/JA89UG56HT

Öz

Bu ararmada, a günlük uygulamasn ö rencilerin yans dü ünme becerilerinde bir farkl k yarat pyaratmadzamanda yansolmad olu turmaktad r. Aratoplama araçlar , “Problem Çözmeye Yönelik YansYakla mlar Envanteri” (Çolak ve Fer, 2007) ve ö rencilerin a günlü ü ile ilgili görü lerinin belirlenmesi amac ylahaz rlanm dört aç k uçlu sorudan olu maktad r. Verilerin analizinde, ili kili örneklemler için t testi, regresyon analizi veiçerik analizi kullan lmyaratmad

Anahtar Kelimeler

yans dü ünme , a günlü ü , ö renme yakla

Kaynakça

• Ak, . (2009). Ö renme yakla mlar na ili kin kavramsal bir inceleme. Kuram ve Uygulamada E itim Bilimleri, 8 (3), 693-720.
• Allen, R. M. & Casbergue, R. M. (1997). Evolution of novice through expert teachers' recall: Implications for Effective reflection on practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13 (7): 741-755.
• Andrusyszyn, M.A. & Davie, L. (1997). Facilitating reflection through interactive journals writing in an online graduate course: A qualitative study. Journal of Distance Education, XII(1/2), 103-126.
• Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environment. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,Issue 100 (57-68).
• Bain, J.D., Ballantyne R., Packer, J. & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements, Teachers and Teaching. 5 (1), 51–73.
• Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.) Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Birney, R., Barry, M. & OhÉigeartaigh, M. (2006) The use of weblogs as a tool to support collaborative learning and reflective practice in third-level institutions. In: E. Pearson and P. Bohman, Editors, Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, AACE, Chesapeake, VA (2006), s. 1047–1052.
• Boyd, E. M., Fales , A. W. (1983) Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, (2,) pp.99-117.
• Brockbank, A. & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education. 2nd edition. London: Open University Press.
• Büyüköztürk, . Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, .,Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Ara
• rma Yöntemleri. Pegem
• Akademi Yay nc k, Ankara
• Chen, N.S.; Wei, C.W.; Wu, K.T. & Uden, L. (2008). Effects on high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels. Computer & Education, 52 (2), p.283-291
• Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40 (1), 179-183.
• Çolak, E. ve Fer, S. (2007). Ö renme yakla mlar envanterinin dilsel e de erlik, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çal mas . Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (1), 197-212.
• Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. New York: Prometheus Books
• Dewey, J. (1996). Demokrasi ve e itimi. (çev. M. Salih Otaran) stanbul: Ba ar Yay.
• Epp, S. (2008). The value of reflective journaling in undergraduate nursing education: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1379-1388.
• Epstein, A. S. (2003). “How planning and reflection develop young children’s thinking skills.” RetrievedAugust 26, 2009 from http://www.journal.naeyc.org/btj/200309/Planning&Reflection.pdf
• Fraenkel, R.M. & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6. Edition). Newyork: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
• Gelter, H. (2003). Why is reflective thinking uncommon?. Reflective Practice, 4, 3.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Gleaves, A., Walker, C., & Grey, J. (2007). Using digital and paper diaries for learning and assessment purposes in higher education: A comparative study of feasibility and reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 631–643.
• Henderson, K., Napan K. & Monteiro, S. (2004). Encouraging reflective learning: An online challenge. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (s 357-364). Perth,December5-8. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/henderson.html
• Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. In L. M. English & M. A. Gillen (Eds.), New directions for adult and continuing education (No. 60). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. lkaya, G. Ve A kar, P. (2009). Problem çözmeye yönelik yans ve Bilim, 34 (154), 82-92.
• dü ünme becerisi ölçe inin geli tirilmesi. itim
• Kuit, J.A., Reay, G. & Freeman, R. (2001). Experinces of reflective teaching. Active Learning In Higher Education, 2, 1.
• Lai, T. & Land, S.M. (2009). Supporting reflection in online learning environments. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook (s 141-154). Springer US
• Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: learning about teaching learning through modelling. London: Falmer Press
• Lin, X. D., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62.
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Moon, J.( 2003) Learning Journals and Logs, Reflective Diaries, Centre for Teaching and Learning, University College Dublin. http://www.ucd.ie/teaching/printableDocs/Good%20Practices%20in%20T&L/learningJournals.pdf August 15 2009 from
• Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals. A handbook for reflective practice and Professional development. 2. nd. Edition London ve New York: Routledge
• Nückles, M. Schwonke, R.; Berthold, K. & Renkl, A. (2004). The use of public learning diaries in blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, Vol. 25, No.1
• Philip, R. & Nicholls, J. (2009). Group blogs: Documenting collaborative drama processes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 683-699. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/philip.html
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education, 2. nd. Edition. London ve New York: Rotledge Farmer
• Russell, S. (2009). Taking care of business: authentic use of web 2.0 schools. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook (s 199-209). Springer US,.
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Trigwell, K. (2006). An analysis Of The Relations Between Learning And Teaching Approaches. In Sutherland, P. Crowther, J. (Eds) Lifelong learning: concept and contexts (pp. 108-116). Oxford: Routledge
• Usluel, Y.K. ve Mazman, S.G. (2009). Adoption process of web 2.0 tools in distance education, (p. 818-823). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1).
• Ünver, G. (2003). Yans
• dü ünme. Ankara: Pegem A. Yay nc k
• Wilson, J. & Jan, L.W. (1993). Thinking for themselves developing strategies for reflective learning. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing,
• Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18-25.
• Yang, S.-H. (2009). Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (2), 11–21.
• Zeegers, P. (2001). Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 115-132.