DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Halil Yurdugül

DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

güvenirlik, içtutarlılık, güvenirlik katsayısı, alfa katsayısı

Kaynakça

Armor, D. J. (1974). Theta reliability and factor scaling. In Costner, H. L. (ed.), Sociological Methodology. Jossey—Bass, San Francisco. 17—50.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefŞcient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98—104.
Crano, W D., & Brewer, M. B. (1973). Principles of research in social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cronbach, L.]. (1951). CoefŞcient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
Cronbach, L. J. & Shavelson R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefŞcient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 391-418.
Cronbach, L. J., Schonemann, P., & McKie, D. (1965). Alpha coefŞcients for stratiŞed-parallel tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25,29 1-3 12.
Feldt, L. S. & Qualls, A. L. (1996). Bias in coefŞcient alpha arising from heterogeneity of test content. Applied Measurement in Education. 9(3), 277-286.

Gorusch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Mulaik, S. (1977). Limitations of coefŞcient alpha as an index of text unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827—839.
Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255-282.
Iacobucci, D., & Duhachek, A. (2003). Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with conŞdence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 478-487.
Jackson, P. H., & Agunwamba, C. C. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of total scores on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: I. Algebraic lower bounds. Psychometrika, 42, 567-578.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
Komaroff, E. (1997). Effect of simultaneous violations of essential tau-equivalence and uncorrelated error on coefŞcient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 337-348.
Liu, Y., & Zumbo, B. D. (2007). The Impact of Outliers on Cronbach’s CoefŞcient Alpha Estimate of Reliability: Visual Analogue Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 620-634.
Lucke, J. F. (2005). The (x and a) of congeneric test theory: An extension of reliability and internal consistency to heterogeneous tests. Applied Psychological Measurements. 29(1), 65-81.
McDonald, R. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Miller, M. B. (1995). CoefŞcient alpha: A basic introduction from the perspectives of classical test theory and structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 255-273.
Osburn, H. G. (2000). CoefŞcient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5, 343-355.
Poon, W Y, Leung, K, and Lee, S. Y. (2002). The comparison of single item constructs by relative mean and relative variance. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 275-298.
Rae. G. (2006). Correcting CoefŞcient Alpha for Correlated Errors: Is uK a Lower Bound to Reliability? Applied Psychological Measuremet, 30(1), 56-59.
Raykov, T. (1997). Scale reliability, Cronbach's coefŞcient alpha, and violations of essential tauequivalence with Şxed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 329-353.
Raykov, T. (1998). CoefŞcient alpha and composite reliability with interrelated nonhomogeneous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22, 375-385.
Raykov, T. (2001). Bias of coefŞcient a. for Şxed congeneric measures with correlated errors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25, 69-76.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefŞcient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350—353.
Scholz, U., Gutiérrez Doza , B., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efŞcacy a universal construct? Psychometric Şndings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 242-251.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-EfŞcacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37).Windsor, UK: NFER- Nelson.
Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72a101.
Traub, E. R. (1994). Reliability for the social sciences: Theory and Applications. Measurement methods for the social sciences. Sage Publications, 1994.
van Zyl, J. M., Neudecker, H., & Nel, D. G. (2000). On the distribution of the maximum likelilıood estimator of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 65, 271-280.
Yuan, K., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). On robustness of the normal-theory cased asymptotic distributions of three reliability coefŞcient estimates. Psychometrika, 67, 251—259.
Yurdugül, H. (2005). Konjenerik test kuranu ve konjenerik madde analizi: Tek boyutlu çoktan seçmeli testler üzerine bir uygulama. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2), 21-47
Yurdugül, H. (2006). Paralel, eşdeğer ve konjenerik ölçmelerde güvenirlik katsayılanmn karşılaştırılması. A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 15-37.
Yurdugul, H. (2009). SIMREL: A Software for the coefŞcient alpha and its conŞdence intervals with Monte Carlo studies, Applied Psychological Measurement, 33 (4), 325-328.
Zimmerman, D. W., Zumbo, B.D. & Lalonde, C. (1993). CoefŞcient Alpha as an estimate of test reliability under violation of two assumptions. Etucational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (1), 33-49.
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s oc, Revelle’s, B and McDonalds 0): their relations With each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 1-11.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Halil Yurdugül Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Haziran 2009

Gönderilme Tarihi

23 Temmuz 2014

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2009 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 36

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Yurdugül, H. (2009). DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(36), 327-339. https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ

AMA

1.Yurdugül H. DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;36(36):327-339. https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ

Chicago

Yurdugül, Halil. 2009. “DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 36 (36): 327-39. https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ.

EndNote

Yurdugül H (01 Haziran 2009) DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 36 36 327–339.

IEEE

[1]H. Yurdugül, “DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 36, sy 36, ss. 327–339, Haz. 2009, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ

ISNAD

Yurdugül, Halil. “DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 36/36 (01 Haziran 2009): 327-339. https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ.

JAMA

1.Yurdugül H. DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;36:327–339.

MLA

Yurdugül, Halil. “DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 36, sy 36, Haziran 2009, ss. 327-39, https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ.

Vancouver

1.Halil Yurdugül. DÖRT FARKLI ALFA KATSAYISININ PSİKOMETRİK AÇIDAN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2009;36(36):327-39. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA98EK64ZJ