An Exploration of Primary Stress in If-Conditionals in English Language Education Majors in Türkiye

Öz

It is well-established that suprasegmental pronunciation features are essential to effective communication. Given the assumed significance of primary stress as one suprasegmental aspect (Ghosh and Levis, 2021), the perceived difficulty of If-conditionals (Norris 2003), the professional requirement for language teachers to attain a good command of pronunciation (e.g., knowledge, skills, and competences) (Topal & Altay, 2022), and the causal connection between teacher cognition (e.g., knowledge), learning, and practice (Farrell and Tomenson-Filion, 2014), this study examined the perception and production levels of teacher trainees in relation to primary stress of If-conditionals. Employing a one-group pretest-posttest design (Cranmer, 2017), the study collected data from teacher trainees (n = 61) in a Turkish state-research university through tests of perception and production. Participants received suprasegmental pronunciation training between the pretest and posttest. Findings indicated moderate improvement in perceiving and producing the primary stress of If-conditionals. A linear relationship between the perceived difficulty of types of conditional sentences and degrees of improvement was also determined. The study is expected to contribute to our perceptions of language teacher cognition in language teacher education settings, notwithstanding the limitations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• suprasegmental pronunciation
• teacher cognition
• effective communication
• teacher education

Kaynakça

1. Aksakalli, C., & Yagiz, O. (2020). The pre-service EFL teachers' development of phonological processing and evaluation of their attitudes toward pronunciation. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 20, 7-31. doi: 10.26817/16925777.712.
2. Amory, M. D., & Johnson, K. E. (2023). Provoking novice teacher development: Cognition-and-emotion in learning-to-teach. System, 117, 103112. doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103112.
3. Arıkan, A., & Yılmaz, A. F. (2019). Pre-service English language teachers’ problematic sounds. International e-Journal of Educational Studies, 4(7), 1-26. doi: 10.31458/iejes.594715.
4. Arslan, R. Ş. (2013). Non-native pre-service English language teachers achieving intelligibility in English: Focus on lexical and sentential stress. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 370–374. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.074.
5. Ayaz, A. D., Ozkardas, S., and Ozturan, T. (2019). Challenges of English language teaching in high schools in Turkey and possible suggestions to overcome them. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 41-55. doi: 10.32601/ejal.543778
6. Azar, B. S., & Hagen, S. A. (2010). Understanding and using English grammar. New York: Pearson Longman.
7. Baills, F., Alazard-Guiu, C., & Prieto, P. (2022). Embodied prosodic training helps improve accentedness and suprasegmental Accuracy. Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 776–804. doi:10.1093/applin/amac010
8. Baker, A., & Murphy, J. (2011). Knowledge base of pronunciation teaching: Staking out the territory. TESL Canada Journal, 29-29. doi:10.18806/tesl.v28i2.1071

9. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. doi: 10.1017/S0261444803001903
10. Borg, S. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In P. Garrett and J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 75–91). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
11. Brdarević Č. A., Bećirović, S., & Bureković, M. (2018). The use of imaginative conditional clauses by Bosnian university-level English-majoring students. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education, 11(2), 25–40. doi:10.29302/jolie.2018.11.2.2.
12. Brown, G. (2017). Listening to spoken English. London: Routledge.
13. Brown, G., Currie, K., and Kenworthy, J. (2015). Questions of intonation. New York: Routledge.
14. Burri, M. (2015). Student teachers' cognition about L2 pronunciation instruction: A case study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(10), 66-87. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2015v40n10.5
15. Burri, M., Chen, H., & Baker, A. (2017). Joint development of teacher cognition and identity through learning to teach L2 pronunciation. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 128-142. doi:10.1111/modl.12388
16. Çam, E. (2024). EFL instructors’ knowledge, beliefs, and classroom practices regarding pronunciation in Türkiye. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 14(1), 368-384. doi: 10.24315/tred.1374129
17. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Carter, R. (2011). English grammar today with CD-ROM: An AZ of spoken and written grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Cauldwell, R., & Hewings, M. (1996). Intonation rules in ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 50(4), 327–334. doi:10.1093/elt/50.4.327.
20. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Clare, A., & Wilson, J. J. (2015a). Speakout: Intermediate Student's book. Harlow: Pearson Education.
22. Clare, A., & Wilson, J. J. (2015b.) Speakout: Upper-intermediate Student's book. Harlow: Pearson Education.
23. Clennell, C. (1997). Raising the pedagogic status of discourse intonation teaching. ELT Journal, 51(2), 117-125. doi: 10.1093/elt/51.2.117
24. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
25. Couper, G. (2017). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Teachers' concerns and issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820-843. doi:10.1002/tesq.354
26. Couper, G. (2019). Teachers’ cognitions of corrective feedback on pronunciation: Their beliefs, perceptions and practices. System, 84, 41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.04.003.
27. Covitt, R. I. (1976). Some problematic grammar areas for ESL teachers (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
28. Cranmer, G. (2017). One-group pretest–posttest design. In M. Allen (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1124–1126). London, UK: Sage.
29. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, UK: Sage.
30. Crystal, B., and Crystal, D. (2015). You say potato: A book about accents. London, UK: Pan Books.
31. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
32. Czap, L., & Pintér, J. M. (2015, May). Intensity feature for speech stress detection. In Proceedings of the 2015 16th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) (pp. 91-94). IEEE. doi:10.1109/carpathiancc.2015.7145052
33. Čeljo, A. B., Bećirović, S., & Bureković, M. (2018). The use of imaginative conditional clauses by Bosnian university-level English-majoring students. Journal of Linguistic Intercultural Education, 11(2), 7-22.
34. Demirezen, M. (2009). An analysis of the problem-causing elements of intonation for Turkish teachers of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2776-2781. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.492
35. Demirezen, M. (2010). The principles and applications of the audio-lingual pronunciation rehabilitation model in foreign language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 127–147.
36. Demirezen, M. (2016). Perception of nuclear stress in vocabulary items in teacher education in terms of shadow listening. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 537-546. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.074
37. Demirezen, M. (2022). How to teach the/ð/phoneme to Indonesian and Turkish English majors: First application. FIRE: Futuristic Implementations of Research in Education, 3(1), 2-16.
38. Derwing, T., Munro, M., & Wiebe, G. (1997). Pronunciation instruction for’ fossilized’ learners: Can it help?. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 217–35.
39. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale Development: Theory and applications. London, UK: Sage.
40. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Evis, D., & Kılıç, M. (2020). Türkçede bulunan Hint-Avrupa dil ailesine ait kelimelerin İngilizce konuşan Türkler tarafından İngilizce telaffuzunda sözcük vurgusu analizi. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 4739-4767. doi:10.26466/opus.682025.
42. Farrell, T., & Tomenson-Filion, B. (2014). Teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study of an ESL teacher in Canada. Essay. In S. Ben Said and L. J. Zhang (Eds.), Language teachers and teaching (pp. 201–216). New York: Routledge.
43. Ferguson, G. (2001). If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 61-82. doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(99)00027-7.
44. Gabrielatos, C. (2019). If-conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics, 47(4), 301-334. doi:10.1177/0075424219875994.
45. Gabrielatos, C. (2021). If-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency distribution. ICAME Journal, 45, 87-124. doi:10.2478/icame-2021-0003.
46. Gao, Y., Qin, L., & Gu, Q. (2022). Unpacking language teacher beliefs, agency, and resilience in the complex, unprecedented time: A mixed-method study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 958003. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.958003
47. Gao, Z., Lee, J. E., Pope, Z., & Zhang, D. (2016). Effect of active videogames on underserved children's classroom behaviors, effort, and fitness. Games for Health Journal, 5(5), 318-324. doi:10.1089/g4h.2016.0049.
48. Georgiou, G. P. (2019). EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 538-550. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2018.1539090
49. Ghosh, M., & Levis, J. M. (2021). Vowel quality and direction of stress shift in a predictive model explaining the varying impact of misplaced word stress: Evidence from English. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 628780. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.628780.
50. Gilbert, J. (2014). Intonation is hard to teach. In L. Grant (Ed.), Pronunciation myths: Applying Second language research to classroom teaching (pp. 107–37.) Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.
51. Gluhareva, D., & Prieto, P. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 609-631. doi:10.1177/1362168816651463.
52. Golombek, P., and Doran, M. (2014). Unifying cognition, emotion, and activity in language teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 102-111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.002
53. Goodman, K. (2014). Reading, writing, and written texts: A transactional socio-psycholinguistic view. In K. Goodman and Y. Goodman (Eds.), Making sense of learners making sense of written language: The selected works of Kenneth S. Goodman and Yetta M. Goodman (pp. 55–67). New York: Routledge.
54. Gordon, J., and Darcy, I. (2022). Teaching segmentals and suprasegmentals: Effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on comprehensibility, fluency, and accentedness. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 8(2), 168-195. doi:10.1075/jslp.21042.gor.
55. Gussenhoven, C., and Jacobs, H. (2017). Understanding phonology. New York: Routledge.
56. Hahn, L. D. (2004). Primary stress and intelligibility: Research to motivate the teaching of suprasegmentals. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 201-223. doi:10.2307/3588378.
57. Halliday, M. (1970). A course in spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Hişmanoğlu, M. (2012). Teaching word stress to Turkish EFL (English as a foreign language) learners through internet-based video lessons. US-China Education Review A1, 26–40.
59. Hismanoglu, M., & Hismanoglu, S. (2013). A qualitative report on the perceived awareness of pronunciation instruction: Increasing needs and expectations of prospective EFL teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 507-520. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0049-6
60. Hodgetts, J. (2020). Pronunciation instruction in English for academic purposes: An investigation of attitudes, beliefs and practices. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
61. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.doi: 10.1093/applin/23.1.83
63. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle. In R Quirk and H.G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press.
64. Karaazmak, F. (2015). Development of intonation patterns in time clauses among EFL prospective teachers: An experimental study (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Türkiye.
65. Karimi, M. N., & Asadnia, F. (2023). Variations in novice and experienced L2 teachers’ pedagogical cognitions and the associated antecedents in tertiary-level online instructional contexts. Language Awareness, 32(2), 235-254. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2022.2033251
66. Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC journal, 38(2), 216-228. doi: 10.1177/0033688207079696
67. Knapp, T. R. (2016). Why is the one-group pretest–posttest design still used?. Clinical Nursing Research, 25(5), 467-472. doi: 10.1177/1054773816666280
68. Ko, W. (2013). A Study on the acquisition of if-conditionals by Korean-and Spanish-speaking Learners of English. English Teaching, 68(1), 141–78. doi: 10.15858/engtea.68.1.201303.141
69. Koller, M., & Stuart, H. (2016). Reducing stigma in high school youth. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 134, 63-70. doi: 10.1111/acps.12613
70. Ladd, D. R. (2014). Simultaneous structure in phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Lee, G. G., Lee, H. Y., Song, J., Kim, B., Kang, S., Lee, J., & Hwang, H. (2017). Automatic sentence stress feedback for non-native English learners. Computer Speech and Language, 41, 29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.csl.2016.04.003
72. Lee, H.Y., & Song, J. (2019). Evaluating Korean learners’ English rhythm proficiency with measures of sentence stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1363–1376. doi: 10.1017/s0142716419000298
73. Levis, J. M. (2021). Conversations with experts – in conversation with John Levis, Editor of Journal of Second Language Pronunciation. RELC Journal, 52(1), 206–219. doi:10.1177/0033688220939221
74. Levis, J., & Wichmann, A. (2015)0. English intonation–form and meaning. In M. Reed and J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 139–155). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
75. Lewis, C., and Deterding, D. (2018). Word stress and pronunciation teaching in English as a lingua franca contexts. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 161–176.
76. Li, L. (2025). Language teacher cognition in EFL contexts: A systematic review. In Z. Tajeddin and T.S. Farrell (Eds.), Handbook of language teacher education: Critical review and research synthesis (pp. 53-96). Switzerland: Springer.
77. Liu, D. (2017). The acquisition of English word stress by Mandarin EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 10(12), 196-201. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n12p196.
78. Luchini, P. L., and Paz, C. D. (2022). Assessing L2 pronunciation using measurements of nuclear stress placement and comprehensibility. In V. Sardegna and E. Waniek-Klimczak (Eds.), Theoretical and practical developments in English speech assessment, research, and training: Studies in Honour of Ewa Waniek-Klimczak (pp. 45–66). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
79. Macalister, J. (2012). Pre-service teacher cognition and vocabulary teaching. RELC Journal, 43(1), 99-111. doi: 10.1177/0033688212439312
80. Martin, A. I. (2020). Pronunciation can be acquired outside the classroom: Design and assessment of homework‐based training. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 457–479. doi:10.1111/modl.12638.
81. Maule, D. (1988). 'Sorry, but if he comes, I go': Teaching conditionals. ELT Journal, 42(2), 117–123. doi:10.1093/elt/42.2.117
82. Mcalpine, J., & Myles, J. (2003). Capturing phraseology in an online dictionary for advanced users of English as a second language: A response to user needs. System, 31(1), 71–84. doi:10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00074-x
83. Mead, H., & Stevenson, J. (1996). The essentials of grammar. New York: Berkley Books.
84. Ministry of National Education (2018a). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [English language curriculum for primary and secondary education (grades 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8]. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=327
85. Ministry of National Education (2018b). İngilizce dersi öğretim programı (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) [English language curriculum (grades 9, 10, 11, and 12)]. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=342
86. Ministry of National Education. (2017). General competencies for teaching profession. Directorate General for Teacher Training and Development. Retrieved from https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_06/29111119_TeachersGeneralCompetencies.pdf
87. Mitrofanova, Y. (2012). Raising EFL students’ awareness of English intonation functioning. Language Awareness, 21(3), 279–291. doi:10.1080/09658416.2011.609621.
88. Nazari, M., Seyri, H., & Karimpour, S. (2023). Novice language teacher emotion labor and identity construction: A community of practice perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104110. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2023.104110.
89. Norris, R. W. (2003). How do we overcome the difficulties of teaching conditionals?. Bulletin of Fukuoka International University, 9, 39–50.
90. Pickering, L. (2018). Discourse intonation: A discourse-pragmatic approach to teaching the pronunciation of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
91. Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
92. Reed, M., & Michaud, C. (2015). Intonation in research and practice: The importance of metacognition. In M. Reed and J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (454–470). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
93. Reyes, A. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse and Society, 22(6), 781–807. doi:10.1177/0957926511419927.
94. Roach, P. (2012). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Römer, U. (2007). Learner Language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. In S. Volk-Birke and J. Lippert (Eds.), Proceedings: Anglistentag 2006 Halle. (pp. 355–363). Trier, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
96. Shadish, W. R., Phillips, G., & Clark, M. H. (2003). Content and context: The impact of Campbell and Stanley. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The anatomy of impact: What makes the great works of psychology great? (pp. 161–176). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
97. Shi, Y. (2021). The interactive effect of EFL teachers’ emotions and cognitions on their pedagogical practices. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 811721. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.811721
98. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
99. Shiu, W. H. C. (2024). Teacher learning in Hong Kong: primary English language teachers’ cognitions about online teaching to survive or thrive during COVID-19. Teachers and Teaching, 30(7-8), 1097-1125. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2024.2328017
100. Small, L. H. (2020). Fundamentals of phonetics: A practical guide for students. Hoboken: Pearson Education.
101. Smiljanic, R. (2021). Clear speech perception: Linguistic and cognitive benefits. In J. S. Pardo, L. C. Nygaard, R. E. Remez, and D. B. Pisoni (eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 177-205). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
102. Sonsaat-Hegelheimer, S., & Levis, J. (2025). Is intonation learnable in the classroom? Evidence from Turkish learners of English. Language Teaching Research, 13621688241312502. doi:10.1177/13621688241312502.
103. Sun, C., Wei, L., & Young, R. F. (2022). Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 382-410. doi: 10.1177/1362168820903010
104. Swan, M. (2002). Practical English usage: International student's edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
105. Swan, M., & Walter, C. (2011). Oxford English grammar course. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. Şahinkayasi, Y., & Büyükaşık, N. (2012). Using corpora in writing authentic English grammar textbooks: The case of Turkey. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(20), 549–66.
107. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–96. doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
108. Tan, Ş. (2009). Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 101–112. doi:10.15390/ES.2009.810
109. Taş, T., & Khan, Ö. (2022). An acoustic analysis of potentially problematic lexical stress patterns for Turkish EFL teachers. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 2(3), 263–78.
110. Tench, P. (2015). The intonation systems of English. London: Bloomsbury.
111. TESOL, International Association. (2019). Standards for initial TESOL pre-K-12 teacher preparation programs. Washington: TESOL.
112. Topal, İ. H., & Altay, İ. F. (2022). Revisiting the problematic English sounds for prospective Turkish EFL teachers. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(4), 1794–1816.
113. Topal, İ. H. (2017). An analysis of the intonation patterns of if-clauses in Turkish English majors (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Türkiye.
114. Topal, İ. H. (2018a). An investigation into the recognition and production of pitch patterns of if-clauses by Turkish pre-service teachers of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 285–300.
115. Topal, İ. H. (2018b). An evaluation of juncture phonemes of if-statements in prospective Turkish teachers of English. International Journal of Language Academy, 6(23), 467–485. doi: 10.18033/ijla.3936
116. Topal, İ. H. (2021). An investigation into pronunciation representation in an EFL textbook series utilized in a Turkish state university. Language Related Research, 12(5), 305-331.
117. Topal, İ. H. (2022). Pronunciation in EFL textbooks published by Turkish ministry of national education. MEXTESOL Journal, 46(2), 1-9. doi: 10.61871/mj.v46n2-17
118. Topal, İ. H. (2024). An inquiry into the perceptions of English language learning: Voices from the preparatory school students in Türkiye. International Journal of Language Academy, 12(50), 364-385. doi: 10.29228/ijla.75529
119. Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 553–584. doi:10.1017/s0142716408080247
120. Tuan, L. T. (2012). Learning English conditional structures. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2(1), 156–160. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.1.156-160.
121. Uzun, T. (2022). Preservice English teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about learning and teaching pronunciation. Dil Dergisi, 173(2), 22-42. doi: 10.33690/dilder.1040120
122. Wells, J. (2014). Sounds interesting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Winter, T., & Le Foll, E. (2022). Testing the pedagogical norm. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 8(1), 31–66. doi:10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win.
124. Wong, R. (1997). Pronunciation Myths and Facts. In T. Kral (Ed.), Teacher development: Making the right moves (pp. 115–119). Washington, D.C.: United States Information Agency.
125. Yagiz, O. (2018). EFL language teachers' cognitions and observed classroom practices about L2 pronunciation: The context of Turkey. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(2), 187-204.
126. Yazan, B. (2023). A conceptual framework to understand language teacher identities. Second Language Teacher Education, 1(2), 185-208. doi:10.1558/slte.24908
127. Zhang, L. J., & Sun, Q. (2022). Developing and validating the English teachers’ cognitions about grammar teaching questionnaire (TCAGTQ) to uncover teacher thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 880408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880408