The Role of Nature Observations in the Discovery-Based Learning of Biology Concepts: The Case of Forest

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine how secondary school students develop knowledge of the concept of “forest” through guided discovery-based nature observation activities, and to evaluate the applicability of this method in teaching. Participants were 25 tenth-grade students who defined the forest one week before the nature observation (T1) and then engaged in two four-hour observation sessions (T2 and T3) in the forest of Hacettepe University’s Beytepe Campus. No prior information about forests was provided; instead, students were asked to record observations in nature that could inform their definitions. Data were analyzed through content analysis with MAXQDA, and codes were compared across the three stages. According to results, the number of codes, words, and characters in T3 increased significantly compared to T1 and T2 (p < 0.01). The findings revealed a clear development in perceptions of the forest from T1 to T3. Students’ statements mainly reflected general natural elements (tree, conservation) and emotional - perceptual expressions (quiet, dark) at T1. After the second stage (T2), attention shifted to direct observations, including concrete components (trunk, branch, root, leaf, mushroom, ant) and detailed descriptions. These observations were integrated with system-level ecological terms such as “ecosystem,” “biodiversity,” “water cycle,” “carbon,” and “environmental balance” at T3. Moreover, expressions related to human impact and environmental ethics - such as “human impact,” “logging,” “fire,” and “economic importance”- became prominent at T3. This developmental trajectory demonstrates that nature observation supported with guided discovery learning initially activates emotional and perceptual awareness, strengthens observational skills during the process, and ultimately contributes to the internalization of abstract forest and related concepts. Importantly, the study also highlights the potential applicability of this approach in formal school settings, particularly within biology curricula, to foster both conceptual understanding and environmental awareness.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Conceptual development
• biodiversity
• outdoor activities
• environmental education
• environmental sustainability

Etik Beyan

The study was conducted with ethical approval obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Educational Sciences at Hacettepe University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participation in the study was entirely voluntary. Participants were fully informed about the procedures of participation, the purpose of the research, and how their responses would be used and stored. They were also informed that they could withdraw from the study at any time. Throughout the study, all participant data and information were anonymized.

Kaynakça

1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
2. Allen, J. C., & Barnes, D. F. (1985). The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 75(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1985.tb00079.x
3. Arıkan, K. (2023). Ortaöğretim biyoloji öğretim programında orman kavramı. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 19(1), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.58816/duzceod.1244721
4. Arora, N. K., & Fatima, T. (2024). Environmental sustainability and biotechnology: Opportunities and challenges. Environmental Sustainability, 7(2), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-024-00317-9
5. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2009). Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience‐based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research, 15(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802711282
6. Baranzini, A., Faust, A. K., & Huberman, D. (2010). Tropical forest conservation: Attitudes and preferences. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(5), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.008
7. Beery, T., & Wolf-Watz, D. (2014). Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.006
8. Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2014.213a

9. Black, P. N. (2020). A revolution in biochemistry and molecular biology education informed by basic research to meet the demands of 21st century career paths. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 295(31), 10653–10661. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.aw120.011104
10. Börner, J., Schulz, D., Wunder, S., & Pfaff, A. (2020). The effectiveness of forest conservation policies and programs. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12(1), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-025703
11. Bouwman, A. F., & Leemans, R. (1995). The role of forest soils in the global carbon cycle. In Carbon forms and functions in forest soils (pp. 503–525). https://doi.org/10.2136/1995.carbonforms.c23
12. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
13. Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402
14. Committee on a New Biology for the 21st Century (CNB). (2009). A new biology for the 21st century: Ensuring the United States leads the coming biology revolution. National Research Council. https://doi.org/10.17226/12764
15. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
16. Cumming, F., & Nash, M. (2015). An Australian perspective of a forest school: Shaping a sense of place to support learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(4), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2015.1010071
17. Das, S., Ray, M. K., Panday, D., & Mishra, P. K. (2023). Role of biotechnology in creating sustainable agriculture. PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000069
18. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
19. Fahey, T. J., Woodbury, P. B., Battles, J. J., Goodale, C. L., Hamburg, S. P., Ollinger, S. V., & Woodall, C. W. (2010). Forest carbon storage: Ecology, management, and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(5), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1890/080169
20. Harwood, D., Huang, M., & Somma, M. (2022). “We’re trying to find cool things in the forest” – Exploring children’s curiosity and creativity in the outdoors. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 15(1), 33–42.
21. Honomichl, R. D., & Chen, Z. (2012). The role of guidance in children's discovery learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(6), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1199
22. Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
23. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056
24. Karan, E. (2023). Discovery-based approach combined with active learning to improve student learning experiences for STEM students. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 3(4), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.58557/(ijeh).v3i4.163
25. Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
26. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
27. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage.
28. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
29. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
30. Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology: The science of the living world. Universities Press.
31. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
32. McAteer, L., Roche, J., & Kelly, Á. M. (2023). Renewing an undergraduate science curriculum for the 21st century. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1270941. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1270941
33. Miller, K. M., & Yoon, S. A. (2023). Teaching complexity in biology through agent-based simulations: The relationship between students’ knowledge of complex systems and metamodeling knowledge. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1198307. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1198307
34. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2018). Biyoloji dersi öğretim programı (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
35. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2024). Türkiye yüzyılı Maarif modeli; Biyoloji dersi öğretim programı (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar). Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
36. Myers, N. (2023). Tropical deforestation: Rates and patterns. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003428190-3
37. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
38. Noviyanti, E., Rusdi, R., & Ristanto, R. H. (2019). Guided discovery learning based on internet and self concept: Enhancing students’ critical thinking in biology. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 2(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijobe.v2i1.1196
39. Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598649
40. Raab, K., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Learning about forest ecosystems: Comparing indoor and outdoor instruction. Forests, 11(9), 91265. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091265
41. Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
42. Rodríguez-Muñoz, C., & Huincahue, J. (2024). Interdisciplinary practices for teaching biology: A systematic review. Journal of Biological Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2024.2399516
43. Schilhab, T. (2021). Nature experiences in science education in school: Review featuring learning gains, investments, and costs in view of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Education, 6, 739408. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.739408
44. Schneiderhan-Opel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2021). Cannot see the forest for the trees? Comparing learning outcomes of a field trip vs. a classroom approach. Forests, 12(9), 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091265
45. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
46. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage.
47. Teker, S., Kurt, M., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2017). “Işığın ve sesin yayılması” ünitesini buluş yoluyla öğrenmenin öğrenci başarısı ve tutumuna etkisi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (27), 835–863. http://dx.doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.294931
48. Ünal, G., & Ergin, Ö. (2006). Buluş yoluyla fen öğretiminin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına, öğrenme yaklaşımlarına ve tutumlarına etkisi. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 36–52.
49. Wilke, R. R., & Straits, W. J. (2001). The effects of discovery learning in a lower-division biology course. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2001.25.2.62
50. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage.