“Potansiyel bir haini besleme” anlatan deyimlerin dillerarası bilişsel analizi ve deyim öğretimine etkileri

Öz

Bu diller arası bilişsel çalışma, sekiz dilde (İngilizce, Vietnamca, Çince, Fransızca, İspanyolca, Arapça, Japonca ve Türkçe) “potansiyel bir haini besleme” temalı dokuz deyimi analiz etmekte ve dil öğrenimindeki pedagojik çıkarımlarını ele almaktadır. Ortak uyarıcı işlevlerine rağmen, İngilizce to feed a snake in one’s bosom (koynunda yılan beslemek) ve Vietnamca nuôi ong tay áo (“(elbise) kolunda arı beslemek”) gibi deyimler, özgün kavramsal metaforlar ve kültürel çerçeveler ortaya koymaktadır. YILAN, ARI, KARGA, KAPLAN ve KÖPEK gibi kaynak alanlarını ve hainin içinde beslendiği farklılaşan KAP imge şemasını kullanan bu deyimler, yakınımızdaki bir kişinin ihanetini; ihanet edenin içsel kötülüğü, karşılıklı bağlılık ilkesini ihlali veya haini besleyenin stratejik başarısızlığı olarak çerçevelemektedir. Bu durum, diller arası deyimsel eş anlamlılık nosyonunu sorgulamakta ve eş değerlilik temelli pedagojideki kavramsal ‘yalancı eş değerler’ riskini vurgulamaktadır. Bu sorunları ele almak amacıyla araştırmamız, metafor, imgelem ve kültürel bağlamsallaştırmayı öne çıkaran bilişsel-kültürel bir analiz yöntemini desteklemekte; anlama, akılda tutma ve edimsel yeterliliği geliştirmek için görselleştirme, senaryo temelli tartışmalar ve karşılaştırmalı eşleştirme gibi bir çok öğretim teknikleri önermektedir. Böylece deyim öğrenimi, her bir deyimin özgün mikro-modeline dayanan ve evrensel “Bir Haini Beslemenin Tehlikesi” makro-modeli içinde yer alan, ilgi çekici bir kültürler arası anlam keşfine dönüşmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• deyim pedagojisi
• bilişsel deyim analizi
• karşılaştırmalı deyim bilimi
• deyim eşdeğerliği
• ihanet deyimleri

Etik Beyan

Bu makale, insan katılımcıları veya hayvanları içeren herhangi bir ampirik veri hakkında bilgi vermemektedir. Bu nedenle, etik onay gerekli değildir.

A Cross-Linguistic Cognitive Analysis of ‘Nurturing a Potential Betrayer’ Idioms and Implications for Idiom Teaching

Öz

This cross-linguistic cognitive study analyses nine “nurturing a potential betrayer” idioms across eight languages—English, Vietnamese, Chinese, French, Spanish, Arabic, Japanese, and Turkish—while addressing their pedagogical implications for language teaching and learning. Despite their shared cautionary function, idioms such as English to feed a snake in one’s bosom and Vietnamese nuôi ong tay áo (“to raise bees in one’s sleeve”) reveal unique conceptual metaphors and cultural frames. Utilizing source domains like SNAKE, BEE, CROW, TIGER, and DOG and the CONTAINER image schema, the nine idioms frame a disappointing betrayal by an intimate as the betrayer’s inherent evil, a violation of reciprocity, or the nurturer’s strategic failure. This challenges the notion of cross-linguistic idiomatic synonymy and highlights the risks of conceptual “false equivalents” in equivalence-based pedagogy. To address these issues, our research supports a cognitive-cultural approach for idiom analysis that highlights metaphor, imagery, and cultural contextualization, and proposes various teaching techniques such as visualization, scenario-based discussions, and contrastive mapping to enhance comprehension, retention, and pragmatic competence. Thus, idiom learning becomes an engaging exploration of cross-cultural meaning, based on each idiom’s unique micro-model within the universal macro-model of The Danger of Nurturing a Betrayer.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• idiom pedagogy
• cognitive idiom analysis
• contrastive phraseology
• idiom equivalence
• betrayal idioms

Etik Beyan

This article does not report on any empirical data involving human participants or animals. Therefore, no ethical approval was necessary.

Kaynakça

1. Akbulut, F. D. (2023). Cross-cultural pragmatics and conceptual metaphor theory: The translation of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 19(1), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1184722
2. Andreou, G., & Galantomos, I. (2008). Teaching idioms in a foreign language context: Preliminary parameters for Modern Greek as L2. Metaphorik.de, 14, 7–26.
3. Ashkenazi, M. (2003). Handbook of Japanese mythology. ABC-CLIO.
4. Barcelona, A. (2000). Introduction: The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 1-28). Mouton de Gruyter.
5. Biedermann, H. (1994). Dictionary of symbolism: Cultural icons and the meanings behind them. Penguin.
6. Boers, F. (2000). Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553
7. Boers, F. (2001). Remembering figurative idioms by hypothesizing about their origin. Prospect, 16(3), 34-43.
8. Boers, F., & Demecheleer, M. (2001). Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners' comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT journal, 55(3), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.255

9. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2004a). Cross-cultural variation as a variable in comprehending and remembering figurative idioms. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277449
10. Boers, F., Demecheleer, M. & Eyckmans, J. (2004b). Etymological elaboration as a strategy for learning idioms. In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Ed.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 53-78). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.07boe
11. Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168806072460
12. Boers, F., Piquer Píriz, A. M., Stengers, H., & Eyckmans, J. (2009). Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms? Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809341505
13. Broz, V., & Glavan, M. (2011). Synonymy in idiomatic expressions. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za Hrvatski Jezik i Jezikoslovlje, 37(1), 45–70.
14. Cacciari, C., & Levorato, M. C. (1998). The effect of semantic analyzability in metalinguistic texts. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(3), 159-177.
15. Canta, A., & Husaj, L. (2024). A contrastive analysis of frequently used idioms in English and Albanian. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 12(2), 200-218. https://doi.org/10.46687/WEME3529
16. Chen, Y.-C., & Lai, H.-L. (2013). Teaching English idioms as metaphors through cognitive-oriented methods: A case in an EFL writing class. English Language Teaching, 6(6), 13–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n6p13
17. Chevalier, J., & Gheerbrant, A. (1996). A dictionary of symbols (2nd ed.). Penguin Books.
18. Chung, D.T.K. (2024). Challenges of translating idiomatic expressions: A cross-linguistic analysis at a university in Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(10), 7668–7678. https://doi.org/10.47191/IJSSHR/V7-I10-39
19. Council of Europe, Council for Cultural Co-operation, Education Committee, & Modern Languages Division. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
20. Croft, W. (2006). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 269–302). Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
22. Danesi, M. (1986). The role of metaphor in second language pedagogy. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 18(3), 1–10.
23. Danesi, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1992: Language, communication, and social meaning (pp. 489–500). Georgetown University Press.
24. Deignan, A., Gabryś, D., & Solska, A. (1997). Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. ELT Journal, 51(4), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.352
25. Dobrovol’skij, D. (2007). Idioms: On paradigmatic semantic relations. In K. Gerdes, T. Reuther, & L. Wanner (Eds.), Meaning - text theory 2007: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on meaning-text theory (pp. 139-148). Otto Sagner.
26. Dobrovol’skij, D. (1999). On the cross-linguistic equivalence of idioms In C. Beedham (Ed.), Langue and parole in synchronic and diachronic perspective (pp. 203–219). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043581-7/50067-0
27. Dobrovol’skij, D., & Piirainen, E. (2022). Motivation of conventional figurative units. In D. Dobrovol’skij & E. Piirainen (Eds.), Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives (pp.103-145). Elsevier.
28. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction (1st ed.). Routledge.
29. Fillmore, C. J. (2006). Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 373–400). Mouton de Gruyter.
30. Geeraerts, D. (Ed.). (2006). Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Mouton de Gruyter.
31. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press.
32. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Nayak, N. P. (1989). Psycholinguistic studies on the syntactic behavior of idioms. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 100–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90004-2
33. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90014-4
34. Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & O’Brien, J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning.Cognition, 36(1), 35-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M
35. Guo, Y. (2019). Teaching English idioms to Chinese EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic perspective. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p145
36. Guo, S. F. (2008). Differential effects of etymological elaboration and rote memorization on idiom acquisition in college EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal, 10 (3), 127-145.
37. Hung, B. P. (2019). A cognitive linguistic approach to teaching English idioms to EFL students: Experimental results. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(2), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2502-09
38. Ili, M. (2016). Strategies used in translation of English idioms into Turkish in John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men novel. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 54(1), 274–283.
39. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
40. Kovaliuk, Y. (2022). Idioms in cognitive linguistics: Is it all about conceptual metaphor theory?. BAS British and American Studies, 28, 287–298.
41. Kömür, Ş., & Çimen, Ş. S. (2009). Using conceptual metaphors in teaching idioms in a foreign language context. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (İLKE), 23, 205–222.
42. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
43. Kövecses, Z., & Szabó, P. (1996). Idioms: A view from cognitive semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.326
44. Lakoff, G. (2006). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 185–238). Mouton de Gruyter.
45. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
46. Langacker, R. W. (1987a). Nouns and verbs. Language, 63 (1), 53-94.
47. Langacker, R. W. (1987b). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
48. Langacker, R. W. (2006). Introduction to concept, image, and symbol. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp. 29–67). Mouton de Gruyter.
49. Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiomatic creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. John Benjamins.
50. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Language Teaching Publications
51. Li, T. F. (2012). The role of image-schemas and conceptual metaphors in learning idioms: An experimental study. International Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 3(1), 25–42.
52. Liontas, J. I. (2015). Developing idiomatic competence in the ESOL classroom: A pragmatic account. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 621–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.230
53. Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2021). Attributes and references to honey bees (Insecta; Hymenoptera; Apidae) and their products in some Asian and Australian societies’ folkloristic domains. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 45, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00213-x
54. Moeran, B. (1984). Individual, group and seishin: Japan’s internal cultural debate. Man, New Series, 19(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802280
55. Nippold, M. A., & Duthie, J. K. (2003). Mental imagery and idiom comprehension: A comparison of school-age children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/062)
56. Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/416483
57. Oakley, T. (2007). Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford University Press. https://doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195143782.013.0010
58. Özbaş, M. (2010). Kurtarıcı kargadan burnu pislikten çıkmayan kargaya: Türk halk anlatılarında karganın dönüşümü [From savior to dirt lover crow: Transformation of crow in Turkish folk narratives]. Millî Folklor, 11(88), 57-65. https://hdl.handle.net/11454/12596
59. Rasul, S. H. (2018). Translation of idioms across languages. Transletters: International Journal of Translation and Interpreting, 1, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.21071/tlijti.vi1.11036
60. Samani, E.R., & Hashemian, M. (2012). The effect of conceptual metaphors on learning idioms by L2 learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p249
61. Schafroth, E. (2020). Why equivalence of idioms in different languages is the exception: Arguments from a constructional perspective. In P. C. Ramusino & F. Mollica (Eds.), Contrastive phraseology: Languages and cultures in comparison (pp. 129–150). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
62. Schmidt, R. W. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476
63. Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(5), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
64. Vula, E., & Tyfekçi, N. (2024). Navigating non-literal language: The complexities of translating idioms across cultural boundaries. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(2), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0049
65. Williams, C. A. S. (2006). Chinese symbolism and art motifs: A comprehensive handbook on symbolism in Chinese art (4th rev. ed.). Tuttle Publishing.
66. Zhu, M. (2023). Metaphor in foreign language learning and teaching and its implications. English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 5(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.22158/eltls.v5n2p85