DÜZELTME YÖNERGESİNİN TESTİN PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2006, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 30, 82 - 91, 01.06.2006

ÜMİT Çelen NÜKET DEMİRTAŞLI Çıkrıkçı Nükhet Çıkrıkçı Demirtaşlı

Anahtar Kelimeler

şans başarısı, tahmin, düzeltme formülü

Kaynakça

• Abu-Sayi, F. K.. Diamond J. .l . (1976). Effect of conŞdence level in multiple-choice test answers on reliability and validity of scores. Journal of Edu- cational Research, 7(2), 62-63.
• Angoff, W. H. (1989). Does guessing really help? Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(4), 323-336.
• Baykul, Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve psikolojide ölçme: Klasik test teorisi ve uygulaması, Ankara: ÖSYM Yayınlan.
• Budescu, D., Bar—Hillel, M. (1993). To guess or not to guess: a decision-theoretic view of formula scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(4) 277-291.
• Burton, R. F. (2001a). Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: Question selection and guessing of answers. Assess- ment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26 (1), 41-50.
• Burton, R. F. (2001b). Do item-discrimination indices really help us to improve our tests?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 213- 220.
• Burton, R. F., Miller, D. J. (1999). Statistical modelling of multiple-choice and true/false tests: ways of considering, and of reducing, the uncertainti- es attributable to guessing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24 (4), 399-411.
• Crocker, L., Algina, J. (1986). Introduction classical and modern test theory. USA: CBS College Publishing Company.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
• Ebe], R. L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc.
• Frary, R. B. (1989). The effect of inappropriate omissions on formula scores: a simulation study. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26 ( 1), 41—53.
• Gronlund, N. E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (Third edition). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
• Harris, D. K., Changas, P. S., Palmore, E. B. (1996). Palmore’s Şrst facts on aging quiz in a multiple-choice format. Educational Gerontology, 22(6), 575-589.
• Lord, F. M. (1963). Formula scoring and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 663-672.
• Lord, F. M. (1975). Formula scoring and number right scoring. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 7-11.
• Mattson, D. (1965). The effects of guessing on the standard error of measurement and reliability of test scores. Educational and Psychological Me- asurement, 25, 727-730.
• Mehrens, W. A., Lehmann, l. J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (Third edition). New York: CBS College Publis- hing.
• Muijtjens, A. M. M., Mameren, H., Hoogenboom, R. J. |., Evers, J. L. H., Vleuten, C. P. M. (1999). The effect of a ‘don’t know’ option on test sco- res: number—right and formula scoring compared. Medical Education, 33, 267-275.
• Remmers, H. H., Gage, N. L., Rummcl, J. F. (1965). A practical introduction to measurement and evaluation (Second edition). New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
• Şahhüseyinoğlu, D. (1998). Sayısal yetenek testlerinde seçenek sayısının test ve madde istatistikleri üzerindeki etkisinin şans başarısı ile birlikte in— celenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi.
• Telli, A. (1993). Şans başarısının madde türlerindeki madde ve test istatistikleri üzerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, An- kara, yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi.