EFFICIENCYAND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT OF TURKISH UNIVERSITIES VIA DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS

Yıl 2020, , 115 - 138, 31.03.2020

Bushra Soummakie , İsilay Talay

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.524866

Cited By: 2

Öz

The
number of Turkish universities taking place in the global university rankings
has been increasing. Hence, it is necessary to develop a mechanism to measure
their efficiency. In this study, performance and efficiency measurement of
universities in Turkey was conducted via data envelopment analysis (DEA), and
the activities included in the performance definition were research indicators
and internet and website focused indicators. The analysis was performed for 50
universities in Turkey. It has been observed that some universities which are
successful in terms of research activities have not achieved similar success in
the interest and traffic to their websites. In the study, suggestions for
improvement in this and similar performance and efficiency metrics were
presented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

universities in Turkey, data envelopment analysis, research, website and internet-based communication, performance and efficiency

VERİ ZARFLAMA ANALİZİ ile TÜRKİYE ÜNİVERSİTELERİNİN VERİMLİLİĞİ ve PERFORMANSLARININ ÖLÇÜMÜ

Öz

Küresel
üniversiteler sıralamasında yer alan Türk üniversitelerinin sayısı artmaktadır.
Dolayısıyla, bu üniversitelerin etkinliklerini ölçmek için bir mekanizma
geliştirmek gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki üniversitelerin
performans ve verimlilik ölçümleri, veri zarflama analizi (DEA) ile
gerçekleştirilmiş ve performans tanımında yer alan faaliyetler, araştırma
çalışmaları ile internet ve web sitesi odaklı faaliyetler olarak ele
alınmıştır. Analiz, Türkiye'deki 50 üniversite için yapılmıştır. Araştırma
faaliyetleri açısından başarılı olan bazı üniversitelerin web sitelerine olan
ilgi ve trafikte benzer bir başarı elde edemediği görülmüştür. Çalışmada,
performans ve verimlilik ölçütlerinde iyileştirmeler için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Türk üniversiteleri, veri zarflama analizi, araştırma, web sitesi ve internet tabanlı iletişim, performans ve verimlilik

Kaynakça

• Abbott, M., C. Doucouliagos (2003), “The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis”, Economics of Education review, 22(1), 89-97.
• Ahn T., Arnold V., Charnes A., WW. Cooper (1989), “DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas”, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5(2), 165-185.
• Altınsoy S. (2011), “A review of university facilities in Turkey”, CELE Exchange, 2011(6), 1-5.
• Avkiran, N. K. (2001), “Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.
• Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., S. Zaim (2013), “Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(12), 1810-1830.
• Baysal, M. E., Alçılar, B., Çerçioğlu, H., B. Toklu (2005), “Türkiye'deki devlet üniversitelerinin 2004 yılı performanslarının, veri zarflama analizi yöntemiyle belirlenip buna göre 2005 yılı bütçe tahsislerinin yapılması”, Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 67-73.
• Botti, L., Briec, W., G. Cliquet (2009), “Plural forms versus franchise and company-owned systems: A DEA approach of hotel chain performance”, Omega, 37(3), 566-578.
• Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G., E. Thanassoulis (1991), “Applied data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 52(1), 1-15.
• Charnes,A., Cooper,W.W., E. Rhodes (1981), “Evaluating program and managerial efficiency:An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through”, Management Science, 27(6), 668–697.
• Cook, W. D., L. M. Seiford (2009), “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) - Thirty Years On”, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 1-17.
• Çınar, Y. (2016). Research and Teaching Efficiencies of Turkish Universities with Heterogeneity Considerations: Application of Multi-Activity DEA and DEA by Sequential Exclusion of Alternatives Methods. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1701/1701.07318.pdf (Access Date: 11.10.2018)
• Dikmen, F. C. (2007), “Veri zarflama analizi ile üniversitelerin etkinliğinin ölçülmesi”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 3-4(3-6), 1-22.
• Dollery, B., Murray, D., L. Crase (2006), “Knaves or knights, pawns or queens? An evaluation of Australian higher education reform policy”, Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 86-97.
• Erkoç, T. E. (2016). “Measuring efficiencies of Turkish public universities with non-parametric efficiency estimation method [Türkiye’de kamu üniversitelerinin etkinliğinin parametrik olmayan yöntem ile ölçülmesi]”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(3), 124-136.
• Fandel, G. (2007) “On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: government's redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures”, European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521-533.
• Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290.
• Girgin, M. C. (2006), “History of Higher Education Provision for the Deaf in Turkey and Current Applications at the Anadolu University”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 5(3), 6-11.
• Günay, A., Dulupçu, M. A., K. O. Oruç (2017), “Türkiye’de devlet üniversitelerinin etkinlik ve verimlilik analizi: veri zarflama analizi ve Malmquist toplam faktör verimlilik endeksi uygulamaları”, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(3), 85-113.
• İçöz., C., H. Sönmez (2015), “Türkiye’deki istatistik bölümlerinin göreli etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile ölçülmesi”, Alphanumeric Journal, 3(1), 41-50.
• http://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/ (Access Date: 15.10.2018)
• Johnes J, G. Johnes (1995), “Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: a frontier analysis”, European Economics Review,14(3), 301-314.
• Kağnıcıoğlu, C. H., Ö. İcan (2011), “Measuring relative efficiencies of Turkish universities in 2007: A DEA case study in R”, Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 13-26.
• Kong, W. H., T. T. Fu (2012), “Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indicators”, Omega, 40(5), 541-549.
• Köksal, G., B. Nalçaci (2006), “The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis”, Higher Education, 51(2), 173-189.
• Kuah, C. T., K. Y. Wong (2011), “Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis”, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
• Kuah, C. T., Wong, K. Y., & Behrouzi, F. (2010, May). A review on data envelopment analysis (DEA), In 2010 Fourth Asia International Conference On Mathematical/Analytical Modelling And Computer Simulation (pp. 168-173). IEEE.
• Munoz, D. A. (2016), “Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: A data envelopment analysis approach”, International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 809-825.
• Sarrico, C. S., Hogan, S. M., Dyson, R. G., A. D. Athanassopoulos (1997), “Data envelopment analysis and university selection”, Journal of the operational research society, 48(12), 1163-1177.
• Selim, S., S. A. Bursalioglu (2013), “Analysis of the determinants of universities efficiency in turkey: Application of the data envelopment analysis and panel Tobit model”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 895-900.
• Selim, S., S. A. Bursalıoğlu (2015), “Efficiency of higher education in Turkey: A bootstrapped two-stage DEA approach”, International Journal of Statistics and Applications, 5(2), 56-67.
• Tekneci, P. D. (2014). Evaluating Research Performance of Turkish Universities. PhD Dissertation, Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
• http://www.yok.gov.tr/ (Access Date: 14.10.2018)