Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ

Yıl 2020, , 561 - 584, 30.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.631885

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, liderin destekleyici sesi ve yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde uzmanlık ikliminin aracılık rolünü belirlemektir. Nicel olarak tasarlanan çalışmada, alan araştırması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın veri toplama tekniği ise yazılı soru sormadır. Çalışma, İzmir ilindeki özel sektörde çeşitli pozisyonlardan 154 çalışan ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan faktör, regresyon, korelasyon ve yapısal eşitlik modeli analizlerine göre liderin destekleyici sesi ile yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde uzmanlık ikliminin tam aracılık rolü tespit edilmiştir. Söz konusu değişkenler ile aracılık testi yapılması, yazındaki boşluğu doldurması açısından, çalışmanın özgünlüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular doğrultusunda, yöneticilerin astlarını teşvik etmeleri ve astlarının harekete geçebilmeleri için çaba göstermeleri gerektiği düşünülmektedir. Söz konusu tutumlar uzmanlık iklimi algısını geliştirerek, çalışanların yenilikçi davranışlar göstermelerini artıracaktır. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın sonuçlarının politika yapıcılara ve uygulamacılara fayda sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Aarons, G. A. ve Sommerfeld, D. H. (2012), “Leadership, Innovation Climate, and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice During A Statewide Implementation”, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 423-431.
  • Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C. ve Pensgaard, A. M. (2008), “Achievement Goals and Gender Effects on Multidimensional Anxiety in National Elite Sport”, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 449-464.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988), “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  • Amabile, T. ve Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987), “Creativity in the R&D Laboratory”, Center for Creative Leadership.
  • Ames, C. (1992), “Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
  • Ames, C. ve Ames, R. (1984), “Goal Structures and Motivation”, The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 39-52.
  • Ames, C. ve Archer, J. (1988). Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
  • Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. ve Nijstad, B. A. (2004), “The Routinization of Innovation Research: A Constructively Critical Review of the State-of-the-Science”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
  • Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P. ve McKinney, V. (2000), “Boundary Management Tactics and Logics of Action: The Case of Peer-Support Providers”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 704-736.
  • Baer, M. ve Frese, M. (2003), “Innovation is not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bekiari, A. (2016), “Insights into Instructors’ Verbal Aggressiveness and Students’ Machiavellianism Through Leadership Style and Motivational Climate”, European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(25), 90-110.
  • Bysted, R. ve Hansen, J. R. (2015), “Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the Role of Job and Organizational Characteristics, Job Types, and Subsectors”, Public Management Review, 17(5), 698-717.
  • Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A. ve Škerlavaj, M. (2017), “The Role of Multilevel Synergistic Interplay among Team Mastery Climate, Knowledge Hiding, and Job Characteristics in Stimulating Innovative Work Behavior”, Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281-299.
  • Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A. ve Škerlavaj, M. (2014), What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172-192.
  • Chen, A. S. Y. ve Hou, Y. H. (2016), The Effects of Ethical Leadership, Voice Behavior and Climates For Innovation on Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Examination”, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.
  • Cheung, H. K. (2014), “How Should We Speak: Comparing Effectiveness of Promotive and Prohibitive Voices”, Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 27(1). Erişim Adresi: https://journals.uncc.edu/ujop/article/view/274
  • De Jong, J. P. ve Den Hartog, D. N. (2007), “How Leaders Influence Employees' Innovative Behaviour”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
  • De Jong, J. ve Den Hartog, D. (2010), “Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • De Jong, J. ve Wennekers, S. (2008), “Conceptualizing Entrepreneurial Employee Behaviour”, EIM-SCALES (Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs)”, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.5106&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2019).
  • Dieterly, D. L. ve Schneider, B. (1974), The Effect of Organizational Environment on Perceived Power and Climate: A Laboratory Study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED069960.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 02.08.2019).
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D. (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  • Ekvall, G. (1996), “Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K. ve Puumalainen, K. (2008), “The Role of Trust in Organisational Innovativeness”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181.
  • Gisbert-López, M. C., Verdú-Jover, A. J. ve Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2014), “The Moderating Effect of Relationship Conflict on the Creative Climate–Innovation Association: The Case of Traditional Sectors in Spain”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(1), 47-67.
  • Hartmann, A. (2006), “The Role of Organizational Culture in Motivating Innovative Behaviour in Construction Firms”, Construction Innovation, 6(3), 159-172.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hughes, M. ve Morgan, R. E. (2007), “Deconstructing the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage of Firm Growth”, Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651-661..
  • İşçi S., Çakmak E. ve Karadağ E. (2015), The Effect of Leadership on Organizational Climate. In: Karadağ E. (Ed.) Leadership and Organizational Outcomes. Springer, Cham
  • Janssen, O. (2000), “Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort‐Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  • Janssen, O. (2005), “The Joint Impact of Perceived Influence and Supervisor Supportiveness on Employee Innovative Behaviour”, Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
  • Kanten, P. ve Ulker, F. E. (2012), “A Relational Approach among Perceived Organizational Support, Proactive Personality and Voice Behaviour”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1016-1022.
  • Khalili, A. (2016), ”Linking Transformational Leadership, Creativity, İnnovation, and Innovation-Supportive Climate”, Management Decision, 54(9), 2277-2293.
  • Knol, J. ve Van Linge, R. (2009), “Innovative Behaviour: The Effect of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Nurses”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359-370.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. ve Doherty, M. L. (1989), “Integration of Climate and Leadership: Examination of a Neglected Issue”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 546-553
  • Kuratko D. F. ve Hodgetts R. M. (1988), Entrepreneurship. Orlando: The Dreyden Pres.
  • Liang, J., Farh, C. I. ve Farh, J. L. (2012), “Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination”, Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
  • Maehr, M. L. ve Zusho, A. (2009), “Achievement Goal Theory”, Handbook of Motivation at School, 77-104.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2011), “Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research”, Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  • Mumford, M. D. (2000), “Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation”, Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313-351.
  • Nerstad, C.G.L., Roberts, G.C. ve Richardsen, A.M. ( 2013), “Achieving Success at Work: Development and Validation of The Motivational Climate at Work Questionnaire (MCWQ)”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43: 11, 2231– 2250.
  • Nicholls, J. (1984), “Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience. Task Choice, and Performance”, Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
  • Ntoumanis, N. ve Biddle, S. J. (1999), “A Review of Motivational Climate in Physical Activity”, Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(8), 643-665.
  • Parzefall, M. R., Seeck, H. ve Leppänen, A. (2008), “Employee Innovativeness in Organizations: A Review of the Antecedents”, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 2(08), 165-182.
  • Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L. ve Hirst, G. (2002), “How Leaders Influence the Impact of Affective Events on Team Climate and Performance in R&D Teams”, The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 561-581.
  • Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T. ve Sardessai, R. (2005), “Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.
  • Roberts, G. C. (2012), Motivation and Achievement Goals: After 25 Years, Where Are We, Where Are We Going? https://digitalis-dsp.uc.pt/jspui/bitstream/10316.2/32262/1/16%20sport%20and%20education%20tribute.pdf?ln=en (Erişim Tarihi:05.04.2019).
  • Sanders, K., Moorkamp, M., Torka, N., Groeneveld, S. ve Groeneveld, C. (2010), “How to Support Innovative Behaviour? The Role of LMX and Satisfaction with HR Practices”, Technology and Investment, 1(01), 59-68.
  • Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K. ve Santora, J. C. (2008), “Building a Climate for Innovation through Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145-158.
  • Sawang, S. (2010), “Moderation or Mediation? An Examination of the Role Perceived Managerial Support Has on Job Satisfaction and Psychological Strain”, Current Psychology, 29(3), 247-256.
  • Schein, E. H. (2004), "Organizational Culture and Leadership" (Third Edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schneider, B. (1981), "Work Climates. An Interactionist Perspective." https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a100414.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2019).
  • Schneider, B. (1982), "Interactional Psychology and Organizational Behavior." https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a113432.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2019).
  • Scott, S. G. ve Bruce, R. A. (1994), “Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Sezgin, O. B. (2015), “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek İle İçgirişimci Davranışı İlişkisinde Örgütsel Güvenin Rolü”, Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Si, S. ve Wei, F. (2012), “Transformational and Transactional Leaderships, Empowerment Climate, and Innovation Performance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Chinese Context”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 299-320.
  • Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., Nerstad, C. G. ve Su, C. (2017), “Riding Two Horses at Once: The Combined Roles of Mastery and Performance Climates in Implementing Creative Ideas”, European Management Review. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/emre.12151 (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2019).
  • Solmon, M. A. (1996), “Impact of Motivational Climate on Students' Behaviors and Perceptions in a Physical Education Setting”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 731-738.
  • Stull, M. (2005), “Intrapreneurship in Nonprofit Organizations Examining The Factors that Facilitate Entrepreneurial Behaviour among Employees”, Erişim Adresi https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike_Stull/publication/228383477_Intrapreneurship_in_nonprofit_organizations_Examining_the_factors_that_facilitate_entrepreneurial_behavior_among_employees/links/00b4952d465f9dc171000000.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2019).
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986), “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation”, Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
  • Van Dyne, L. V., Ang, S. ve Botero, I. C. (2003), “Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs”, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
  • Van Dyne, L.,ve LePine, J. A. (1998), “Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity”, Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  • Wimbush, J. C. ve Shepard, J. M. (1994), “Toward an Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisory Influence”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637-647.
  • Zhou, J. ve George, J. M. (2001), “When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.

THE MEDIATOR ROLE OF THE MASTERY CLIMATE IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROMOTIVE VOICE OF THE LEADER AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR

Yıl 2020, , 561 - 584, 30.09.2020
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.631885

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the mediating role of the mastery climate in the relationship between promotive voice of the leader and innovative work behavior. In the quantitatively designed study, field research was used as a research method. The data collection technique was questionnaire. The study was carried out by 154 employees from various positions in the private sector in İzmir. According to the analysis of the factor, regression, correlation and structural equation model, the full mediating role of the climate of expertise has been determined in the relationship between the supportive voice of the leader and innovative business behavior. Conducting mediation testing with the mentioned variables reveals the originality of the study in terms of filling the gap in the literature. According to findings, it is thought that managers should encourage their subordinates and make efforts to enable their subordinates to take action. These attitudes will increase the employees' innovative behaviors by improving the perception of mastery climate. In this context, the results of the study are expected to support policy makers and practitioners.

Kaynakça

  • Aarons, G. A. ve Sommerfeld, D. H. (2012), “Leadership, Innovation Climate, and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice During A Statewide Implementation”, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 423-431.
  • Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C. ve Pensgaard, A. M. (2008), “Achievement Goals and Gender Effects on Multidimensional Anxiety in National Elite Sport”, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 449-464.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988), “A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations”, Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  • Amabile, T. ve Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987), “Creativity in the R&D Laboratory”, Center for Creative Leadership.
  • Ames, C. (1992), “Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
  • Ames, C. ve Ames, R. (1984), “Goal Structures and Motivation”, The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 39-52.
  • Ames, C. ve Archer, J. (1988). Achievement Goals in the Classroom: Students' Learning Strategies and Motivation Processes”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
  • Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. ve Nijstad, B. A. (2004), “The Routinization of Innovation Research: A Constructively Critical Review of the State-of-the-Science”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173.
  • Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P. ve McKinney, V. (2000), “Boundary Management Tactics and Logics of Action: The Case of Peer-Support Providers”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 704-736.
  • Baer, M. ve Frese, M. (2003), “Innovation is not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  • Bekiari, A. (2016), “Insights into Instructors’ Verbal Aggressiveness and Students’ Machiavellianism Through Leadership Style and Motivational Climate”, European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(25), 90-110.
  • Bysted, R. ve Hansen, J. R. (2015), “Comparing Public and Private Sector Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: Understanding the Role of Job and Organizational Characteristics, Job Types, and Subsectors”, Public Management Review, 17(5), 698-717.
  • Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A. ve Škerlavaj, M. (2017), “The Role of Multilevel Synergistic Interplay among Team Mastery Climate, Knowledge Hiding, and Job Characteristics in Stimulating Innovative Work Behavior”, Human Resource Management Journal, 27(2), 281-299.
  • Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A. ve Škerlavaj, M. (2014), What Goes Around Comes Around: Knowledge Hiding, Perceived Motivational Climate, and Creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172-192.
  • Chen, A. S. Y. ve Hou, Y. H. (2016), The Effects of Ethical Leadership, Voice Behavior and Climates For Innovation on Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Examination”, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 1-13.
  • Cheung, H. K. (2014), “How Should We Speak: Comparing Effectiveness of Promotive and Prohibitive Voices”, Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 27(1). Erişim Adresi: https://journals.uncc.edu/ujop/article/view/274
  • De Jong, J. P. ve Den Hartog, D. N. (2007), “How Leaders Influence Employees' Innovative Behaviour”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
  • De Jong, J. ve Den Hartog, D. (2010), “Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
  • De Jong, J. ve Wennekers, S. (2008), “Conceptualizing Entrepreneurial Employee Behaviour”, EIM-SCALES (Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs)”, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.5106&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2019).
  • Dieterly, D. L. ve Schneider, B. (1974), The Effect of Organizational Environment on Perceived Power and Climate: A Laboratory Study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED069960.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 02.08.2019).
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D. (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
  • Ekvall, G. (1996), “Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105-123.
  • Ellonen, R., Blomqvist, K. ve Puumalainen, K. (2008), “The Role of Trust in Organisational Innovativeness”, European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 160-181.
  • Gisbert-López, M. C., Verdú-Jover, A. J. ve Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2014), “The Moderating Effect of Relationship Conflict on the Creative Climate–Innovation Association: The Case of Traditional Sectors in Spain”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(1), 47-67.
  • Hartmann, A. (2006), “The Role of Organizational Culture in Motivating Innovative Behaviour in Construction Firms”, Construction Innovation, 6(3), 159-172.
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hughes, M. ve Morgan, R. E. (2007), “Deconstructing the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance at the Embryonic Stage of Firm Growth”, Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 651-661..
  • İşçi S., Çakmak E. ve Karadağ E. (2015), The Effect of Leadership on Organizational Climate. In: Karadağ E. (Ed.) Leadership and Organizational Outcomes. Springer, Cham
  • Janssen, O. (2000), “Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort‐Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  • Janssen, O. (2005), “The Joint Impact of Perceived Influence and Supervisor Supportiveness on Employee Innovative Behaviour”, Journal Of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
  • Kanten, P. ve Ulker, F. E. (2012), “A Relational Approach among Perceived Organizational Support, Proactive Personality and Voice Behaviour”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1016-1022.
  • Khalili, A. (2016), ”Linking Transformational Leadership, Creativity, İnnovation, and Innovation-Supportive Climate”, Management Decision, 54(9), 2277-2293.
  • Knol, J. ve Van Linge, R. (2009), “Innovative Behaviour: The Effect of Structural and Psychological Empowerment on Nurses”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 359-370.
  • Kozlowski, S. W. ve Doherty, M. L. (1989), “Integration of Climate and Leadership: Examination of a Neglected Issue”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 546-553
  • Kuratko D. F. ve Hodgetts R. M. (1988), Entrepreneurship. Orlando: The Dreyden Pres.
  • Liang, J., Farh, C. I. ve Farh, J. L. (2012), “Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice: A Two-Wave Examination”, Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-92.
  • Maehr, M. L. ve Zusho, A. (2009), “Achievement Goal Theory”, Handbook of Motivation at School, 77-104.
  • Morrison, E. W. (2011), “Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research”, Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
  • Mumford, M. D. (2000), “Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation”, Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313-351.
  • Nerstad, C.G.L., Roberts, G.C. ve Richardsen, A.M. ( 2013), “Achieving Success at Work: Development and Validation of The Motivational Climate at Work Questionnaire (MCWQ)”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43: 11, 2231– 2250.
  • Nicholls, J. (1984), “Achievement Motivation: Conceptions of Ability, Subjective Experience. Task Choice, and Performance”, Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
  • Ntoumanis, N. ve Biddle, S. J. (1999), “A Review of Motivational Climate in Physical Activity”, Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(8), 643-665.
  • Parzefall, M. R., Seeck, H. ve Leppänen, A. (2008), “Employee Innovativeness in Organizations: A Review of the Antecedents”, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, 2(08), 165-182.
  • Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L. ve Hirst, G. (2002), “How Leaders Influence the Impact of Affective Events on Team Climate and Performance in R&D Teams”, The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 561-581.
  • Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T. ve Sardessai, R. (2005), “Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142-150.
  • Roberts, G. C. (2012), Motivation and Achievement Goals: After 25 Years, Where Are We, Where Are We Going? https://digitalis-dsp.uc.pt/jspui/bitstream/10316.2/32262/1/16%20sport%20and%20education%20tribute.pdf?ln=en (Erişim Tarihi:05.04.2019).
  • Sanders, K., Moorkamp, M., Torka, N., Groeneveld, S. ve Groeneveld, C. (2010), “How to Support Innovative Behaviour? The Role of LMX and Satisfaction with HR Practices”, Technology and Investment, 1(01), 59-68.
  • Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K. ve Santora, J. C. (2008), “Building a Climate for Innovation through Transformational Leadership and Organizational Culture”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145-158.
  • Sawang, S. (2010), “Moderation or Mediation? An Examination of the Role Perceived Managerial Support Has on Job Satisfaction and Psychological Strain”, Current Psychology, 29(3), 247-256.
  • Schein, E. H. (2004), "Organizational Culture and Leadership" (Third Edition). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schneider, B. (1981), "Work Climates. An Interactionist Perspective." https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a100414.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2019).
  • Schneider, B. (1982), "Interactional Psychology and Organizational Behavior." https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a113432.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 04.07.2019).
  • Scott, S. G. ve Bruce, R. A. (1994), “Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
  • Sezgin, O. B. (2015), “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek İle İçgirişimci Davranışı İlişkisinde Örgütsel Güvenin Rolü”, Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
  • Si, S. ve Wei, F. (2012), “Transformational and Transactional Leaderships, Empowerment Climate, and Innovation Performance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Chinese Context”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 299-320.
  • Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., Nerstad, C. G. ve Su, C. (2017), “Riding Two Horses at Once: The Combined Roles of Mastery and Performance Climates in Implementing Creative Ideas”, European Management Review. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/emre.12151 (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2019).
  • Solmon, M. A. (1996), “Impact of Motivational Climate on Students' Behaviors and Perceptions in a Physical Education Setting”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 731-738.
  • Stull, M. (2005), “Intrapreneurship in Nonprofit Organizations Examining The Factors that Facilitate Entrepreneurial Behaviour among Employees”, Erişim Adresi https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mike_Stull/publication/228383477_Intrapreneurship_in_nonprofit_organizations_Examining_the_factors_that_facilitate_entrepreneurial_behavior_among_employees/links/00b4952d465f9dc171000000.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2019).
  • Van de Ven, A. H. (1986), “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation”, Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
  • Van Dyne, L. V., Ang, S. ve Botero, I. C. (2003), “Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs”, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
  • Van Dyne, L.,ve LePine, J. A. (1998), “Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity”, Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
  • Wimbush, J. C. ve Shepard, J. M. (1994), “Toward an Understanding of Ethical Climate: Its Relationship to Ethical Behavior and Supervisory Influence”, Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637-647.
  • Zhou, J. ve George, J. M. (2001), “When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Toplam 64 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Oytun Sezgin 0000-0002-6671-8053

Sedef Aksu Bu kişi benim 0000-0001-6878-6108

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Eylül 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi 10 Ekim 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020

Kaynak Göster

APA Sezgin, O., & Aksu, S. (2020). LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(3), 561-584. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.631885
AMA Sezgin O, Aksu S. LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Eylül 2020;38(3):561-584. doi:10.17065/huniibf.631885
Chicago Sezgin, Oytun, ve Sedef Aksu. “LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38, sy. 3 (Eylül 2020): 561-84. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.631885.
EndNote Sezgin O, Aksu S (01 Eylül 2020) LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38 3 561–584.
IEEE O. Sezgin ve S. Aksu, “LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 3, ss. 561–584, 2020, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.631885.
ISNAD Sezgin, Oytun - Aksu, Sedef. “LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 38/3 (Eylül 2020), 561-584. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.631885.
JAMA Sezgin O, Aksu S. LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;38:561–584.
MLA Sezgin, Oytun ve Sedef Aksu. “LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 38, sy. 3, 2020, ss. 561-84, doi:10.17065/huniibf.631885.
Vancouver Sezgin O, Aksu S. LİDERİN DESTEKLEYİCİ SESİ İLE YENİLİKÇİ İŞ DAVRANIŞI İLİŞKİSİNDE UZMANLIK İKLİMİNİN ARACILIK ROLÜ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;38(3):561-84.

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.