DEVELOPMENT AS STRUCTURAL CHANGE: PATTERNS OF DEVELOPMENT APPROACH

Yıl 1996, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 107 - 119, 31.07.1996

Hakan Mıhçı

Öz

This paper
attempts to analyse some conceptual, methodological and statistical aspects of
Chenery-Syrquin's patterns of development approach. To investigate the
background of the approach* the works of Clark and Kuznets have been reviewed
in section two. and subsequently, the mam features of the patterns approach has
been examined In section four, some statistical problems related v,ith this
approach has been pointed out.

The paper
reaches the conclusion that the patterns approach developed by Chenery and
Syrquin should be considered in any studv dealing with the structural aspects
of the development process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Development, Structural Change, Paterns of Development

Kaynakça

• ADELMAN, land MORRIS, C.T. (1984); "Patterns ofEconomic Growth, 1850-1914, or Chenery-Syrquin in Historical Perspective" in M. SYRQUIN, L. TAYLOR and L.E. WESTPHAL (Eds.) Economic Structure and Performance: Essays in Honour of Hollis B. Chenery, New York:Academic Press.
• CELASUN, M. (1983); Sources ofIndustrial Growth and Structural Change: The Case of Turkey, World Bank Working Papers, No:614, Washington DC.
• CHENER H-B. (1988); "Typical Patterns of Transformation", in HB. CHENERY, S. ROBNSON and SYRQUIN (Eds.), and Washington DC: Oxford University Press.
• CHENERY, H B. and SYRQUIÑ, M. (1975); 1950-1970, London: Oxford University Press.
• CLARK C. G. (1940), The Conüions ofEconomic Progress, London: Macmillan.
• CRAFTS, N-F.R- (1984); "Patterns of Development in Nineteenth Century Europe", Oxford Economic Pqers, 36, 438458.
• CRAFTS, NE-R. (1991), British Economic Growth During The Industrial Revolution, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• FLOUD, R.C. and McCLOSKEY, DN. (1981); The Economic History ofBrüain Since 1700, Volume: I , Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
• HAITBOGLU, Z. (1978); AE Unconventional Analysis of Turkish Economy: An Essay on Economic Development, Istanbul: A.ktif Büro.
• HOBSBAWM, E.J. (1968); Industry And Empire, London: and Nicolson.
• NGHAM, B. (1995); Economics And Development, Cambridge: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
• KüThïETS, S.S. (1971); Economic Groffih of Nations: Total Output And Production Strgctzzre, Cambridge, Mass.: Belkamp. KUZNETS, S.S. (1973); 'Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections", American Economic Review, 63, 3, 247-258. O'BRIEN, PK. and KEYDER, c. (1978); Economic in Britain AndFrance1780 1914, London: George Allen and Unwin SMITH, M.A. (1992); Food And Hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa, University of Sussex, SOLOW, R.M. (1977); "Comment on Chenery" in B. P.O. HESSELBORN and P.M. WIJKMAN (Eds.), The International of Economic Activity, London: Macmillan.
• SYRQUIN, (1991); "Patterns of Structural Change": in H.B. CHENERY and TN.SRINIVASAN (Eds.) Handbook of Development Economics, Volume: Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
• TODARO. M.P. (1994), Economic Development, New York: Longman.
• TÜRKKAN E. (1981 "tktisadi Gelişme Teorisinde "Mukayeseli G-eçiì Ekonomisi" Yaklaşımı ve Türkive Örneği ( "The Comparative Transition Economy' Approach in The Theory of Economic Development And The Turkish Case), Hacettepe Universitesi Ìktisadi ye İdari Bilìmler Faküüesi Dergisi, 4, 1-16.
• WOOD, A. (1986); Growth and Structural Change in Large Countries, World Bank Staff Working Paper, No: 763, Washington DC.