İÇSEL PARA TEORİSİ’NE GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 51 - 79, 31.12.2008

Gökçer Özgür

Öz

Bu çalışmanın ana amacı içsel para teorisinin
kökenlerini incelemek ve bu konudaki güncel tartışmalara ışık tutmaktır. İçsel
para yaklaşımı temel bir önermeye dayanmaktadır: Reel ekonomide faaliyet
gösteren işletmelerin kredi talebi, bankalar tarafından karşılandıkça
bankacılık sektöründe yeni mevduatlar oluşur. Bu yeni mevduatlar için gerekli
rezervlerin bulunması ile de para arzı genişlemeye başlar. Merkez bankası bu
sürece müdahale edebilse de tamamen kontrol edemez.

 

İçsel para yaratım süreci konusunda da tam bir fikir
birliği yoktur ve bu teorinin savunucuları arasında canlı bir tartışma devam
etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı söz konusu tartışmaların miadını doldurduğunu
ve değişen finansal yapı içinde geçerliliğini kaybettiğini ortaya koymaya
çalışmaktır. Bu tartışmalar, teorinin evrilip gelişmesine yol açmış olsa da son
yıllarda finansal alanda yer alan yenilikleri gözden kaçırmıştır. Bu nedenle
söz konusu teorinin bir kez daha gözden geçirilerek günün şartlarına uyumlu
hale getirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada öncelikle içsel para teorisinin
gelişimi incelenecek ve ardından teorinin günümüzde eksik kalan yönlerine
değinilecektir.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

İçsel para, para arzı, faiz oranları, kredi

A General Outlook to the Endogenous Money Theory

Öz

The purpose of this study is to shed light on the
origins of the endogenous money theory and analyze the current
debates on this topic. Endogenous money approach depends on a fundamental postulate: As banks meet the credit needs of
non-financial businesses, new deposits emerge in the banking sector. Similarly,
as the necessary reserves found for these new deposits the broad money expands
as well. Even though the central bank can intervene into this process it cannot
fully control it.

 

There is not a
clear-cut consensus on the endogenous money creation process and a lively
debate among the proponents of the theory still continues. The purpose of this
study is to reveal that such debates have outlived their shelf time, and lost
their validity in the changing financial structure. Even though these debates enabled the theory to evolve
and develop, they have disregarded the recent developments in financial
markets. The theory needs to be brought up to date by incorporating the
important transformations that have been taking place in the financial markets.

  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Endogenous money, money supply, interest rates, credit

Kaynakça

• Ateşoğlu, S. (2003-4) “Monetary Transmission - Federal Funds Rate and Prime Rate”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 26(2), 357-62.
• Barber, R.; and T. Ghilarducci (1993) “Pension Funds, Capital Markets, and the Economic Future”, in G. A. Dimsky, G. A.; G. Epstein and R. Pollin (eds.), Transforming the U.S. Financial System, Economic Policy Institute Series, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 287-319.
• Bennett, P., and S. Peristani (2002) “Are U.S. Reserve Requirements Still Binding?” FRBNY Economic Policy Review, (May), 1-16.
• Bernanke, B. S., and M. Gertler (1995) “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27-48.
• Bibow, J. (2000) “On Exogenous Money and Bank Behaviour: The Pandora’s Box Kept Shut in Keynes’ Theory of Liquidity Preference”, European Journal of History of Economic Thought, 7(4), 532-568.
• Bradley, C. M., and L. Shibut (2006) “The Liability Structure of FDIC-Insured Institutions: Changes and Implications”, FDIC Banking Review, 18(2), 1-37.
• Cuthbertson, K. (1985) “Sterling Bank Lending to UK Industrial and Commercial Companies”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 47(2), 91-118.
• D’Arista, J. (2002) “Rebuilding the Transmission System for Monetary Policy”, Financial Markets and Society, (November), 1-28.
• Dow, S. C. (2006) “Endogenous Money: Structuralist”, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds.), A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 35-51.
• Dow, A. C., and S. C. Dow (1989) “Endogenous Money Creation and Idle Balances”, in J. Pheby (ed.), New Directions in Post-Keynsean Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 147-64.
• Ertürk, K. (1998) “From the Treatise to the General Theory: The Transformation of Keynes’ Theory of Investment in Working Capital”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22(2): 173-85.
• Fontana, G. (2003) “Post Keynesian Approaches to Endogenous Money: A Time Framework Explanation”, Review of Political Economy, 15(3), 291-314.
• Friedman, B. (1999) “The Future of Monetary Policy: The Central Bank as An Army with only a Signal Corps?”, International Finance, 2(3), 321-38.
• Friedman, B. (2000) “Decoupling at the Margin: The Threat to Monetary Policy from the Electronic Revolution in Banking”, International Finance, 3(2), 261-72.
• Friedman, M. and A. Schwarz (1963) A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Fullwiler, S. T. (2006) “Setting Interest Rates in the Modern Money Era”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28(3), 495-525.
• Gertler, M., and S. Gilschirt (1994) “Monetary Policy, Business Cycles, and the Behavior of Small Manufacturing Firms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 309-40.
• Gootzeit, M. J. (1997) “Hoarding in Banks and Keynes’ Short Run Theory of Interest”, Economic Notes, 26(3), 515-530.
• Howells, P. (2006) “The Endogeneity of Money: Empirical Evidence”, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds.), A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 52-68.
• Howells, P. ve K. A. Hussein (1999) “The Demand for Bank Loans and the ‘State of Trade’”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 21(3), 441-54.
• Kaldor, N. (1980) Origins of New Monetarism, Cardiff: University College Cardiff Press.
• Kaldor, N. (1982) The Scourge of Monetarism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Keynes, J. M. (1971 [1930]) “A Treatise on Money,” in D. Moggridge (ed.), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Cilt V, Londra: MacMillan.
• Keynes, J. M. (1997 [1936]) The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Amherst: Prometheus Books.
• Lavoie, M. (1992) Foundations of Post Keynesian Economic Analysis, Hants: Edward Elgar.
• Lavoie, M. (1996) “Horizontalism, Structuralism, Liquidity Preference and the Principle of Increasing Risk”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 43(3), 275-300.
• Lavoie, M. (2006) “Endogenous Money: Accommodationist”, in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer (eds.) içinde, A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 17-34.
• Lowenstein, R. (2004) Origins of the Crash, New York: The Penguin Press.
• Minsky, H. (1957) “Central Banking and Money Market Changes”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(2), 171-187.
• Moore, B.J. (1979) “The Endogenous Money Stock”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2(1), 49-70.
• Moore, B.J. (1983) “Unpacking the Post Keynesian Black Box: Bank Lending and the Money Supply”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(4), 537-56.
• Moore, B. J. (1985) “Wages, Bank Lending, and the Endogeneity of Money”, in M. Jarsulic (ed.), Money and Macro Policy, Hingham: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1-28.
• Moore, B.J. (1989) “The Endogeneity of Credit Money”, Review of Political Economy, 1(1), 65-93.
• Moore, B.J. (1991) “Money Supply Endogeneity: ‘Reserve Price Setting’ or ‘Reserve Quantity Setting’?”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(3), 404-13.
• Moore, B. J. (2001) “Some Reflections on Endogenous Money”, in L. P. Rochon and M. Vernengo (eds.), Credit Interest Rates and the Open Economy: Essays on Horizantalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 11-30.
• Moore, B.J., and A.R. Threadgold (1985) “Corporate Bank Borrowing in the UK, 1965-1981”, Economica, 52(February), 65-78.
• Mott, T. (1985/86) “Towards a Post-Keynesian Formulation of Liquidity Preference”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 8(2), 222-32.
• Özgür, G. and K. Ertürk (2008) “Endogenous Money in the Age of Financial Liberalization”, University of Utah Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No: 2008-06.
• Palley, T. (1991) “The Endeogenous Money Supply: Consensus and Disagreement”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(3), 397-403.
• Palley, T. (1995) “The Demand for Money and Non-GDP Transactions”, Economics Letters, 48(2), 145-54.
• Pollin, R. (1991) “Two Theories of Money Supply Endogeneity”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 13(3), 366-96.
• Pollin, R. (1996) “Money Supply Endogeneity: What are the Questions and Why do They Matter”, in G. Deleplace, and E. J. Nell (eds.), Money in Motion: The Post Keynesian and circulation Approaches, New York: St. Martin's Press, 490-515.
• Rochon, L. P. (1999) Credit, Money and Production: An Alternative Post Keynesian Approach, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Rochon, L. P. (2001a) “Horizantalism and New Keynesian Economics: The Role of Scarcity, Savings and Sticky Wages”, in L. P. Rochon and M. Vernengo (eds.), Credit Interest Rates and the Open Economy: Essays on Horizantalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 120-139.
• Rochon, L. P. (2001b) “Horizantalism: Setting the Record Straight”, in L. P. Rochon and M. Vernengo (eds.), Credit Interest Rates and the Open Economy: Essays on Horizantalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 31-68.
• Rochon, L. P. (2001c) “Cambridge’s Contribution to the Endogenous Money: Robinson and Kahn on Credit and Money”, Review of Political Economy, 13(3), 287-307.
• Rousseas, S. (1986) Post Keynesian Monetary Theory, New York: M. E. Sharp.
• Sardoni, C. (2007) “Why Central Banks (and Money) ‘Rule the Roost”, The Levy Economic Institute of Bard College, Working Paper, No. 457.
• Teles, P. and R. Zhou (2005) “A Stable Money Demand: Looking for the Right Monetary Aggregate”, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives, (Quarter 1), 50-63.
• Vicarelli, F. (1984) The Instability of Capitalism, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Wray, L. R. (1990) Money and Credit in Capitalist Economies, Hants: Edward Elgar.
• Wray, L. R. (2004) “When are Interest Rates Exogenous”, Center for Full Employment and Price Stability, University of Missouri- Kansas City, Working Paper, No. 30.
• Wray, L. R. (2007) “Lessons from the Subprime Meltdown”, The Levy Economic Institute of Bard College, Working Paper, No. 522.