Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 41 Sayı: Tarım Özel Sayısı, 51 - 60, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1243771

Öz

For centuries, agriculture has been one of the vital sectors in economic development; its role in developing economies and rural development is still inevitable. Rising food and energy prices and the negative effects of climate change can be more problematic for middle-smallholder farmers or family enterprises and low-qualified farmworkers. To overcome them, unionization and cooperatives in agriculture may present a viable option. Unionization in agriculture can be a solution for vulnerable parts of agriculture, such as workers who are exploited by working cheap and long hours and small and family businesses in a market where cooperatives are disrupted. This study focuses on the impact of unionization in the agricultural market by exploring farmer behavior. World Values Survey Data (Wave 7) was applied to reveal the factors affecting farmers' perception of the economic and social factors from different countries by segmenting union members and non-members using binomial logistic regression models. The findings show that unionized farmers have different motivations than non-members. Income targeting policies are essential to support agri-business owners.

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Benjamin, D., Cooper, K., Heffetz, O., & Kimball, M. (2020). Self-reported well-being indicators are a valuable complement to traditional economic indicators but are not yet ready to compete with them. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), 198-209. doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.43
  • Cole, L. W., & Foster, S. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press.
  • Córdoba, D., Selfa, T., Abrams, J. B., & Sombra, D. (2018). Family farming, agribusiness and the state: Building consent around oil palm expansion in post-neoliberal Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.013
  • Czarzasty J. (2004). Trade unions in agriculture were examined. Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/it/publications/article/2004/trade-unions-in-agriculture-examined Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  • Fritz, M., & Berger, P. D. (2015). Improving the user experience through practical data analytics: Gain meaningful insight and increase your bottom line. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Gallin, D. (2001). Propositions on trade unions and informal employment in times of globalization. Antipode, 33(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00197
  • Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. http://doi.org/10.14281/18241.1 Retrieved 20 July 2022.
  • Holmes, S. (2013). Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States. University of California Press.
  • Hurd, R. W. (1973). Strategies for Union Growth In Food Manufacturing and Agriculture. ILR, 267-274. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1813/74907 22 May 2023
  • International Labour Office, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & International Union of Food and Allied Workers' Associations. (2007). Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development. ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@actrav/documents/publication/wcms_113732.pdf 7 October 2022
  • Jamieson, S. M. (1946). Labor unionism in American agriculture.
  • Khıtakhunov, A. (2020). Agriculture in the Eurasian economic union: Analysıs of trends and challenges. Eurasian research journal, 2(2), 37-53. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erj/issue/56110/768692 3 October 2022
  • Majka, L. C., & Majka, T. J. (1982). Farm workers, agribusiness, and the state. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Martin, P. L. (2015). Immigration and farm labor: Challenges and opportunities.
  • Martin, P. L. (2016). Migrant workers in commercial agriculture. International Labour Office, Sectoral Policies Department, Conditions of Work and Equality Department. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---migrant/documents/publication/wcms_538710.pdf 5 October 2022
  • Otieno, O. G., Wandeda, D. O., & Mwamadzingo, M. (2021). Trade union membership dynamics amidst COVID-19: Does social dialogue matter? International Journal of Labour Research, 10(1-2).
  • Schwartz, H. (1941). Organizational problems of agricultural labor unions. Journal of Farm Economics, 23(2), 456. https://doi.org/10.2307/1231643
  • Sims, S. (2021). American agriculture’s dependence on immigrant workers. Retrieved from https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2021/03/28/american-agricultures-dependence-on-immigrant-workers/, 15 May 2023.
  • Uppal, S. (2011). Unionization 2011 (75-001-X). Statistics Canada.
  • Wellman, D. (1997). The union makes us strong: Radical unionism on the San Francisco Waterfront. Cambridge University Press.

Tarım Sektöründe Sendikalaşmanın Etkisi: Çiftçi Algıları ve Davranışı

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 41 Sayı: Tarım Özel Sayısı, 51 - 60, 31.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1243771

Öz

For centuries, agriculture has been one of the vital sectors in economic development; its role in developing economies and rural development is still inevitable. Rising food and energy prices and the negative effects of climate change can be more problematic for middle-smallholder farmers or family enterprises and low-qualified farmworkers. To overcome them, unionization and cooperatives in agriculture may present a viable option. Unionization in agriculture can be a solution for vulnerable parts of agriculture, such as workers who are exploited by working cheap and long hours and small and family businesses in a market where cooperatives are disrupted. This study focuses on the impact of unionization in the agricultural market by exploring farmer behavior. World Values Survey Data (Wave 7) was applied to reveal the factors affecting farmers' perception of the economic and social factors from different countries by segmenting union members and non-members using binomial logistic regression models. The findings show that unionized farmers have different motivations than non-members. Income targeting policies are essential to support agri-business owners.

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Benjamin, D., Cooper, K., Heffetz, O., & Kimball, M. (2020). Self-reported well-being indicators are a valuable complement to traditional economic indicators but are not yet ready to compete with them. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), 198-209. doi:10.1017/bpp.2019.43
  • Cole, L. W., & Foster, S. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. NYU Press.
  • Córdoba, D., Selfa, T., Abrams, J. B., & Sombra, D. (2018). Family farming, agribusiness and the state: Building consent around oil palm expansion in post-neoliberal Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 57, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.013
  • Czarzasty J. (2004). Trade unions in agriculture were examined. Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/it/publications/article/2004/trade-unions-in-agriculture-examined Retrieved 2 October 2022.
  • Fritz, M., & Berger, P. D. (2015). Improving the user experience through practical data analytics: Gain meaningful insight and increase your bottom line. Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Gallin, D. (2001). Propositions on trade unions and informal employment in times of globalization. Antipode, 33(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00197
  • Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2020). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. http://doi.org/10.14281/18241.1 Retrieved 20 July 2022.
  • Holmes, S. (2013). Fresh fruit, broken bodies: Migrant farmworkers in the United States. University of California Press.
  • Hurd, R. W. (1973). Strategies for Union Growth In Food Manufacturing and Agriculture. ILR, 267-274. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1813/74907 22 May 2023
  • International Labour Office, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, & International Union of Food and Allied Workers' Associations. (2007). Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development. ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@actrav/documents/publication/wcms_113732.pdf 7 October 2022
  • Jamieson, S. M. (1946). Labor unionism in American agriculture.
  • Khıtakhunov, A. (2020). Agriculture in the Eurasian economic union: Analysıs of trends and challenges. Eurasian research journal, 2(2), 37-53. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erj/issue/56110/768692 3 October 2022
  • Majka, L. C., & Majka, T. J. (1982). Farm workers, agribusiness, and the state. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Martin, P. L. (2015). Immigration and farm labor: Challenges and opportunities.
  • Martin, P. L. (2016). Migrant workers in commercial agriculture. International Labour Office, Sectoral Policies Department, Conditions of Work and Equality Department. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---migrant/documents/publication/wcms_538710.pdf 5 October 2022
  • Otieno, O. G., Wandeda, D. O., & Mwamadzingo, M. (2021). Trade union membership dynamics amidst COVID-19: Does social dialogue matter? International Journal of Labour Research, 10(1-2).
  • Schwartz, H. (1941). Organizational problems of agricultural labor unions. Journal of Farm Economics, 23(2), 456. https://doi.org/10.2307/1231643
  • Sims, S. (2021). American agriculture’s dependence on immigrant workers. Retrieved from https://ualr.edu/socialchange/2021/03/28/american-agricultures-dependence-on-immigrant-workers/, 15 May 2023.
  • Uppal, S. (2011). Unionization 2011 (75-001-X). Statistics Canada.
  • Wellman, D. (1997). The union makes us strong: Radical unionism on the San Francisco Waterfront. Cambridge University Press.
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Tarım Ekonomisi
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Nazife Merve Hamzaoğlu 0000-0001-6240-7613

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Temmuz 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Ocak 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 41 Sayı: Tarım Özel Sayısı

Kaynak Göster

APA Hamzaoğlu, N. M. (2023). THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(Tarım Özel Sayısı), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1243771
AMA Hamzaoğlu NM. THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Temmuz 2023;41(Tarım Özel Sayısı):51-60. doi:10.17065/huniibf.1243771
Chicago Hamzaoğlu, Nazife Merve. “THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41, sy. Tarım Özel Sayısı (Temmuz 2023): 51-60. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1243771.
EndNote Hamzaoğlu NM (01 Temmuz 2023) THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41 Tarım Özel Sayısı 51–60.
IEEE N. M. Hamzaoğlu, “THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 41, sy. Tarım Özel Sayısı, ss. 51–60, 2023, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.1243771.
ISNAD Hamzaoğlu, Nazife Merve. “THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41/Tarım Özel Sayısı (Temmuz 2023), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1243771.
JAMA Hamzaoğlu NM. THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;41:51–60.
MLA Hamzaoğlu, Nazife Merve. “THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 41, sy. Tarım Özel Sayısı, 2023, ss. 51-60, doi:10.17065/huniibf.1243771.
Vancouver Hamzaoğlu NM. THE IMPACT OF UNIONIZATION IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR: FARMER PERCEPTIONS AND BEHAVIOR. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;41(Tarım Özel Sayısı):51-60.

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.