Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 3, 555 - 570, 27.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1152152

Öz

Çalışmanın merkeziliği, hayatın diğer alanlarına göre işin daha önemli ve merkezi bir yere sahip olmasıdır. İşi hayatının merkezine konumlandıran insanlar için çalışmak, yaşam doyumunun önemli bir kaynağı olabilmektedir. Buradan hareketle bu araştırma, çalışmanın merkeziliğinin gönüllülerin yaşam doyumuna olan etkisini ortaya koymak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma için çeşitli STK’larda (Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları) gönüllü olan 397 kişiden anket tekniğiyle veri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiş ve önemli bulgulara ulaşılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda çalışmanın merkeziliğinin yaşam doyumuyla anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bunun yanında hipotezi test etmek üzere yapılan yol analizinde çalışmanın merkeziliğinin yaşam doyumunu pozitif şekilde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak bireylerin bir STK’da gönüllü olarak yaptıkları faaliyetleri hayatlarının merkezine taşımaları, onların yaşam doyumuna olumlu bir katkısının olduğu söylenebilir.

Kaynakça

  • Alfes, K., & Langner, N. (2017). Paradoxical leadership: Understanding and managing conflicting tensions to foster volunteer engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 96-103.
  • Amah, O. E. (2009). Job satisfaction and turnover intention relationship: the moderating effect of job role centrality and life satisfaction. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 17(1), 24-35.
  • Bal, P. M., & Kooij, D. (2011). The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 20(4), 497-523.
  • Chandna, V. (2021). The impact of work centrality and type of work on life satisfaction: An exploration of global respondents. Romanian Economic Journal, 24(81), 50-58.
  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1516.
  • Çevik, N. K., & Korkmaz, O. (2014). Türkiye’de yaşam doyumu ve iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin iki değişkenli sıralı probit model analizi. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 126-145.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59).
  • De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Why happy employees help: How meaningfulness, collectivism, and support transform job satisfaction into helping behaviours. Personnel Review, 48(4), 1001-1021.
  • Degli Antoni, G. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations to volunteer and social capital formation. Kyklos, 62(3), 359-370.
  • Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 93-108.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71-75.
  • Dikmen, A. A. (1995). İş doyumu ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 50(3). 115-140.
  • Frisch, M. B. (2000). Quality of life therapy: Applying a life satisfaction approach to positive psychology and cognitive therapy. Wiley.
  • Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108–1119.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel ilkeler ve uygulamalı analizler (IBM AMOS uygulamalı, örnek veri setleri). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hattrup, K., Ghorpade, J., & Lackritz, J. R. (2007). Work group collectivism and the centrality of work a multinational investigation. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(3), 236-260.
  • Hefferon, K., & Boniwell, I. (2011). Pozitif psikoloji: kuram, araştırma ve uygulamalar. Tayfun Doğan (Çev.). Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Hirschfeld, R. R., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
  • Jiang, L., & Johnson, M. J. (2018). Meaningful work and affective commitment: A moderated mediation model of positive work reflection and work centrality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(4), 545-558.
  • Jung, H. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2016). What does work meaning to hospitality employees? The effects of meaningful work on employees’ organizational commitment: The mediating role of job engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 59-68.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Work Alienation. Praeger
  • Keser, A. (2005). Çalışma yaşamı ile yaşam doyumu ilişkisine teorik bakış. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1), 897-913.
  • Kwok, Y. Y., Chui, W. H., & Wong, L. P. (2013). Need satisfaction mechanism linking volunteer motivation and life satisfaction: A mediation study of volunteers subjective well-being. Social indicators research, 114(3), 1315-1329.
  • Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself?. Economica, 75(297), 39-59.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Park, J., Yoon, S., Moon, S. S., Lee, K. H., & Park, J. (2017). The effects of occupational stress, work-centrality, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction on intent to quit among long-term care workers in Korea. Home health care services quarterly, 36(2), 96-111.
  • Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of applied psychology, 79(2), 224-228.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life. The journal of positive psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
  • Pollack, J. M., Ho, V. T., O'Boyle, E. H., & Kirkman, B. L. (2020). Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 311-331.
  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, (30), 91-127.
  • Sharabi, M., & Harpaz, I. (2010). Improving employees' work centrality improves organizational performance: work events and work centrality relationships. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 379-392.
  • Sherman, N. E., Michel, R., Rybak, C., Randall, G. K., & Davidson, J. (2011). Meaning in life and volunteerism in older adults. Adultspan Journal, 10(2), 78-90.
  • Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(1), 475–492.
  • Stukas, A., Snyder, M., & Clary, E. (2008). The social marketing of volunteerism: A functional approach. In C. Haugtvedt, P. Herr, & F. Kardes (ed.), Handbook of consumer psychology. Marketing and consumer psychology series (Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 959–979.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Revieıo of Psychology, 33(1),1-39.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social psychology quarterly, 54(2), 101-112.
  • Tziner, A., Ben-David, A., Oren, L., & Sharoni, G. (2014). Attachment to work, job satisfaction and work centrality. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(6), 555-565.
  • Uçanok, B. (2008). Çalışma değerleri, çalışmanın merkeziliği ve kişi-iş uyumunun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
  • Uçanok, B., & Karabatı, S. (2013). The effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 24(1), 89-129.
  • Ugwu, F. O., & Igbende, D. A. (2017). Going beyond borders: Work centrality, emotional intelligence and employee optimism as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1362805.
  • Veerasamy, C., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2013). Individual skills based volunteerism and life satisfaction among healthcare volunteers in Malaysia: role of employer encouragement, self-esteem and job performance, a cross-sectional study. PloS one, 8(10), 1-10.
  • Veerasamy, C., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2015). Life satisfaction among healthcare volunteers in Malaysia: Role of personality factors, volunteering motives, and spiritual capital. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 531-552.
  • Veltman, A. (2015). Is meaningful work available to all people?. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(7), 725-747.
  • Wei, Y., Donthu, N., & Bernhardt, K. L. (2012). Volunteerism of older adults in the United States. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 9(1), 1-18.
  • Wheeler, J. A., Gorey, K. M., & Greenblatt, B. (1998). The beneficial effects of volunteering for older volunteers and the people they serve: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(1), 69-79.
  • Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 41(2), 176-212.
  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1999). The effects of volunteering on the volunteer. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 141-168.
  • Ziegler, R., & Schlett, C. (2016). An attitude strength and self-perception framework regarding the bi-directional relationship of job satisfaction with extra-role and in-role behavior: The doubly moderating role of work centrality. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1-17.

A Study on the Relationship between Work Centrality and Life Satisfaction in Volunteers

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 3, 555 - 570, 27.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1152152

Öz

Work centrality is that work has a more important and central place than other areas of life. For people who place work at the center of their lives, working can become an important source of life satisfaction. From this point of view, this research was carried out to reveal the effect of the work centrality on the life satisfaction of volunteers. For the research, data were collected from 397 volunteers in various NPOs using the questionnaire technique. The obtained data were analyzed and important findings were determined. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the work centrality had a significant and positive relationship with life satisfaction. In addition, in the sem analysis conducted in line with the hypothesis, it was determined that the work centrality positively affected life satisfaction. As a result, it can be said that the fact that the volunteers carry their volunteer activities to the center of their lives has a positive contribution to their life satisfaction.

Kaynakça

  • Alfes, K., & Langner, N. (2017). Paradoxical leadership: Understanding and managing conflicting tensions to foster volunteer engagement. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 96-103.
  • Amah, O. E. (2009). Job satisfaction and turnover intention relationship: the moderating effect of job role centrality and life satisfaction. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 17(1), 24-35.
  • Bal, P. M., & Kooij, D. (2011). The relations between work centrality, psychological contracts, and job attitudes: The influence of age. European Journal of work and organizational psychology, 20(4), 497-523.
  • Chandna, V. (2021). The impact of work centrality and type of work on life satisfaction: An exploration of global respondents. Romanian Economic Journal, 24(81), 50-58.
  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1516.
  • Çevik, N. K., & Korkmaz, O. (2014). Türkiye’de yaşam doyumu ve iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin iki değişkenli sıralı probit model analizi. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 126-145.
  • Dağlı, A. & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59).
  • De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., & Azeem, M. U. (2019). Why happy employees help: How meaningfulness, collectivism, and support transform job satisfaction into helping behaviours. Personnel Review, 48(4), 1001-1021.
  • Degli Antoni, G. (2009). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivations to volunteer and social capital formation. Kyklos, 62(3), 359-370.
  • Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. Journal of organizational behavior, 23(1), 93-108.
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71-75.
  • Dikmen, A. A. (1995). İş doyumu ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 50(3). 115-140.
  • Frisch, M. B. (2000). Quality of life therapy: Applying a life satisfaction approach to positive psychology and cognitive therapy. Wiley.
  • Grube, J. A., & Piliavin, J. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(9), 1108–1119.
  • Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel ilkeler ve uygulamalı analizler (IBM AMOS uygulamalı, örnek veri setleri). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Hattrup, K., Ghorpade, J., & Lackritz, J. R. (2007). Work group collectivism and the centrality of work a multinational investigation. Cross-Cultural Research, 41(3), 236-260.
  • Hefferon, K., & Boniwell, I. (2011). Pozitif psikoloji: kuram, araştırma ve uygulamalar. Tayfun Doğan (Çev.). Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Hirschfeld, R. R., & Feild, H. S. (2000). Work centrality and work alienation: Distinct aspects of a general commitment to work. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 21(7), 789-800.
  • Jiang, L., & Johnson, M. J. (2018). Meaningful work and affective commitment: A moderated mediation model of positive work reflection and work centrality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(4), 545-558.
  • Jung, H. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2016). What does work meaning to hospitality employees? The effects of meaningful work on employees’ organizational commitment: The mediating role of job engagement. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 53, 59-68.
  • Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Work Alienation. Praeger
  • Keser, A. (2005). Çalışma yaşamı ile yaşam doyumu ilişkisine teorik bakış. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1), 897-913.
  • Kwok, Y. Y., Chui, W. H., & Wong, L. P. (2013). Need satisfaction mechanism linking volunteer motivation and life satisfaction: A mediation study of volunteers subjective well-being. Social indicators research, 114(3), 1315-1329.
  • Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2008). Is volunteering rewarding in itself?. Economica, 75(297), 39-59.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Park, J., Yoon, S., Moon, S. S., Lee, K. H., & Park, J. (2017). The effects of occupational stress, work-centrality, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction on intent to quit among long-term care workers in Korea. Home health care services quarterly, 36(2), 96-111.
  • Paullay, I. M., Alliger, G. M., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1994). Construct validation of two instruments designed to measure job involvement and work centrality. Journal of applied psychology, 79(2), 224-228.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life. The journal of positive psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
  • Pollack, J. M., Ho, V. T., O'Boyle, E. H., & Kirkman, B. L. (2020). Passion at work: A meta‐analysis of individual work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(4), 311-331.
  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, (30), 91-127.
  • Sharabi, M., & Harpaz, I. (2010). Improving employees' work centrality improves organizational performance: work events and work centrality relationships. Human Resource Development International, 13(4), 379-392.
  • Sherman, N. E., Michel, R., Rybak, C., Randall, G. K., & Davidson, J. (2011). Meaning in life and volunteerism in older adults. Adultspan Journal, 10(2), 78-90.
  • Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5(1), 475–492.
  • Stukas, A., Snyder, M., & Clary, E. (2008). The social marketing of volunteerism: A functional approach. In C. Haugtvedt, P. Herr, & F. Kardes (ed.), Handbook of consumer psychology. Marketing and consumer psychology series (Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 959–979.
  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Revieıo of Psychology, 33(1),1-39.
  • Thoits, P. A. (1991). On merging identity theory and stress research. Social psychology quarterly, 54(2), 101-112.
  • Tziner, A., Ben-David, A., Oren, L., & Sharoni, G. (2014). Attachment to work, job satisfaction and work centrality. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(6), 555-565.
  • Uçanok, B. (2008). Çalışma değerleri, çalışmanın merkeziliği ve kişi-iş uyumunun örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı üzerindeki etkisi (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi.
  • Uçanok, B., & Karabatı, S. (2013). The effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors: Evidence from Turkish SMEs. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 24(1), 89-129.
  • Ugwu, F. O., & Igbende, D. A. (2017). Going beyond borders: Work centrality, emotional intelligence and employee optimism as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Cogent Psychology, 4(1), 1362805.
  • Veerasamy, C., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2013). Individual skills based volunteerism and life satisfaction among healthcare volunteers in Malaysia: role of employer encouragement, self-esteem and job performance, a cross-sectional study. PloS one, 8(10), 1-10.
  • Veerasamy, C., Sambasivan, M., & Kumar, N. (2015). Life satisfaction among healthcare volunteers in Malaysia: Role of personality factors, volunteering motives, and spiritual capital. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 531-552.
  • Veltman, A. (2015). Is meaningful work available to all people?. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(7), 725-747.
  • Wei, Y., Donthu, N., & Bernhardt, K. L. (2012). Volunteerism of older adults in the United States. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 9(1), 1-18.
  • Wheeler, J. A., Gorey, K. M., & Greenblatt, B. (1998). The beneficial effects of volunteering for older volunteers and the people they serve: A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 47(1), 69-79.
  • Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 41(2), 176-212.
  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1999). The effects of volunteering on the volunteer. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 141-168.
  • Ziegler, R., & Schlett, C. (2016). An attitude strength and self-perception framework regarding the bi-directional relationship of job satisfaction with extra-role and in-role behavior: The doubly moderating role of work centrality. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1-17.
Toplam 49 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Sağlık Yönetimi
Bölüm Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazarlar

Mehmet Ali Taş 0000-0001-9714-7188

Yayımlanma Tarihi 27 Eylül 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 41 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Taş, M. A. (2023). SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 41(3), 555-570. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1152152
AMA Taş MA. SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Eylül 2023;41(3):555-570. doi:10.17065/huniibf.1152152
Chicago Taş, Mehmet Ali. “SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41, sy. 3 (Eylül 2023): 555-70. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1152152.
EndNote Taş MA (01 Eylül 2023) SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41 3 555–570.
IEEE M. A. Taş, “SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 41, sy. 3, ss. 555–570, 2023, doi: 10.17065/huniibf.1152152.
ISNAD Taş, Mehmet Ali. “SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 41/3 (Eylül 2023), 555-570. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1152152.
JAMA Taş MA. SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;41:555–570.
MLA Taş, Mehmet Ali. “SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ”. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 41, sy. 3, 2023, ss. 555-70, doi:10.17065/huniibf.1152152.
Vancouver Taş MA. SİVİL TOPLUM KURULUŞLARI GÖNÜLLÜLERİNDE ÇALIŞMANIN MERKEZİLİĞİ VE YAŞAM DOYUMU İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;41(3):555-70.

Dergiye yayımlanmak üzere gönderilecek yazılar Dergi'nin son sayfasında ve Dergi web sistesinde yer alan Yazar Rehberi'ndeki kurallara uygun olmalıdır.


Gizlilik Beyanı

Bu dergi sitesindeki isimler ve e-posta adresleri sadece bu derginin belirtilen amaçları doğrultusunda kullanılacaktır; farklı herhangi bir amaç için veya diğer kişilerin kullanımına açılmayacaktır.