The Mediation Role of Product and Process Innovation in the Effect of Agility on the Sustainability Permormance

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 4, 675 - 699, 24.12.2023

Mehmet Serhat Pancaroğlu , Selçuk Perçin

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1271273

Öz

Technological developments and increasing competition in recent years have affected customer preferences and expectations. Customers want more, faster and at less cost day by day. This situation manifests itself especially in sectors that produce fashion-based products such as garment industry. Product life cycles have shortened and demand has become unstable. As a result, delivering new products to customers faster by using new processes provide a competitive advantage. The aim of this study is to analyze the mediating effect of Product Innovation (PI) and Process Innovation (PRI) in the effect of Agile Manufacturing (AM) on the Sustainability Performance (SUP) in garment industry. On the other hand, the sub-purpose of the study is to reveal the importance of AM and innovation in ensuring sustainability. For this purpose, a questionnaire was created with the help of the literature. The created questionnaire was applied to 125 garment company managers operating in Turkey. The obtained data were analyzed with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM). It has been concluded that PI and PRI have mediator effects separately and together in the effect of AM on SUP. Thus, AM increases the SUP of companies, and this increase is more pronounced in companies with PI and PRI capabilities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Garment, Agile Manufacturing, Innovation, Sustainability

Çevik Üretimin Sürdürülebilirlik Performansına Etkisinde Ürün ve Süreç İnovasyonunun Aracı Rolü

Öz

Son yıllarda meydana gelen teknolojik gelişmeler ve artan rekabet müşteri tercih ve beklentilerini etkilemiştir. Müşteriler her geçen gün daha fazlasını daha hızlı ve daha az maliyetle istemektedir. Bu durum özellikle hazır giyim gibi moda ağırlıklı ürün üreten sektörlerde kendini göstermektedir. Ürünlerin yaşam süreleri kısalmış ve talep kararsızlaşmıştır. Bunun sonucu olarak yeni süreçler kullanarak yeni ürünlerini müşteriye daha hızlı teslim edebilen firmalar rekabet avantajı sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı hazır giyim sektöründe Çevik Üretimin (ÇÜ) Sürdürülebilirlik Performansına (SÜP) etkisinde Ürün İnovasyonu (Üİ) ve Süreç İnovasyonunun (Sİ) aracı etkisini analiz etmektir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmanın alt amacı sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanmasında ÇÜ ve inovasyonun önemini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla literatür yardımıyla bir anket oluşturulmuştur. Oluşturulan anket Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren 125 hazır giyim firma yöneticisine uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler Partial Least Squares Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (PLS-SEM) ile analiz edilmiştir. ÇÜ’nün SÜP’e etkisinde Üİ ve Sİ’nin ayrı ayrı ve bir arada aracı etkileri olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Buna göre ÇÜ hazır giyim firmalarının SÜP’lerini artırmakta Üİ ve Sİ yetenekleri olan firmalarda bu artış daha fazla gerçekleşmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hazır Giyim, Çevik Üretim, İnovasyon, Sürdürülebilirlik

Kaynakça

• Abbas, J., & Sağsan, M. (2019). Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024
• Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakundarini, N., Raja Ghazilla, R. A., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223
• Adeleye, E. O., & Yusuf, Y. Y. (2006). Towards agile manufacturing: Models of competition and performance outcomes. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, 1(1), 93-110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJASM.2006.008861
• Afum, E., Osei-Ahenkan, V. Y., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Amponsah Owusu, J., Kusi, L. Y., & Ankomah, J. (2020). Green manufacturing practices and sustainable performance among Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs: The explanatory link of green supply chain integration. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2020-0019
• Agrawal, S., & Singh, R. K. (2020). Outsourcing and reverse supply chain performance: A triple bottom line approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(4), 1146-1163. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2020-0498
• Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2009). Organizational emotional capability, product and process innovation, and firm performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26(3), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.06.008
• Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant validity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Composite Reliability (CR), and Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). In Spanish STATA meeting, 39, 1-39. 13.01.2022 tarihinde https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/50804454/convergent_validity_with_average_variance_extracted-with-cover-page- adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Alpert, F., Kamins, M., Sakano, T., Onzo, N., & Graham, J. (2001). Retail buyer beliefs, attitude and behavior toward pioneer and me‐too follower brands: A comparative study of Japan and the USA. International Marketing Review, 18(2), 160-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330110389990
• Anderson, M. A., Anderson, E., & Parker, G. (2021). Operations management for dummies. John Wiley and Sons.
• Arora, A., Arora, A. S., Sivakumar, K., & Burke, G. (2020). Strategic sustainable purchasing, environmental collaboration, and organizational sustainability performance: The moderating role of supply base size. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 25(6), 709-728. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-07-2019-0284
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competetive advantage. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 Bartezzaghi, E., Corso, M., & Verganti, R. (1997). Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1997.001704
• Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525-1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2967
• Boer, H., Caffyn, S., Corso, M., Coughlan, P., Gieskes, J., Magnusson, M., Pavesi, S., & Ronchi, S. (2001). Knowledge and continuous innovation: The CIMA methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 490-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110381390
• Booth, R. (1996). Agile manufacturing. Engineering Management Journal, 6(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1049/em:19960206
• Bruce, M., Daly, L., & Towers, N. (2004). Lean or agile: A solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(2), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410514867
• Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
• Caridi, M., Pero, M. & Sieanesi, A. (2012). Linking product modularity and innovativeness to supply chain management in the Italian furniture ındustry”. International Journal of Production Economics, 136(1), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.012
• Chin, T. A., Tat, H. H., & Sulaiman, Z. (2015). Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance. Procedia CIRP, 26, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035
• Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
• Coronado M, A. E., Sarhadi, M., & Millar, C. (2002). Defining a framework for information systems requirements for agile manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00181-5
• Correa, H. L. (2001). Agile Manufacturing as the 21st Century Strategy for Improving Manufacturing Competitiveness. Agile manufacturing: The 21st century competitive strategy, 3. Elsevier.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
• Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
• DeVor, R., Graves, R., & Mills, J. J. (1997). Agile manufacturing research: Accomplishments and opportunities. IIE Transactions, 29(10), 813-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179708966404
• Dey, P. K., Malesios, C., De, D., Chowdhury, S., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2020). The impact of lean management practices and sustainably-oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: Empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Management, 31(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12388
• Dowlatshahi, S., & Cao, Q. (2006). The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: An industry perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 835-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.074
• Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2015). Agile manufacturing: Framework and its empirical validation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(9-12), 2147-2157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6455-6
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Wamba, S. F., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020
• Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106
• Fadaki, M., Rahman, S., & Chan, C. (2019). Quantifying the degree of supply chain leagility and assessing its impact on firm performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2018-0099
• Foo, P.-Y., Lee, V.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Tan, G. W.-H., & Sohal, A. (2021). Unfolding the impact of leadership and management on sustainability performance: Green and lean practices and guanxi as the dual mediators. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4136-4153. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2861
• Foo, P.-Y., Lee, V.-H., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2018). A gateway to realising sustainability performance via green supply chain management practices: A PLS–ANN approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.013
• Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: Lisrel and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151718
• Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757-1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321993576
• Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
• Ghobakhloo, M., & Azar, A. (2018). Business excellence via advanced manufacturing technology and lean-agile manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2017-0049
• Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
• Goldman, S. L., & Nagel, R. N. (1993). Management, technology and agility: The emergence of a new era in manufacturing. International Journal of Technology Management, 8(1-2), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1993.025758
• Gunasekaran, A. (1998). Agile manufacturing: Enablers and an implementation framework. International Journal of Production Research, 36(5), 1223-1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075498193291
• Gunasekaran, A., McGaughey, R., & Wolstencroft, V. (2001). Agile Manufacturing: Concepts and Framework. Agile Manufacturing: The 21st Century Competitive Strategy, 3. Elsevier.
• Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Papadopoulos, T. (2017). Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 99, 14-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.008
• Gunasekaran, A., Yusuf, Y. Y., Adeleye, E. O., Papadopoulos, T., Kovvuri, D., & Geyi, D. G. (2019). Agile manufacturing: An evolutionary review of practices. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 5154-5174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530478
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Edition). Sage.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Hormozi, A. M. (2001). Agile manufacturing: The next logical step. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770110389843
• Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
• Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y.-H., Yang, B., Wu, C.-M., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2011). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.07.001
• Inman, R. A., Sale, R. S., Green, K. W., & Whitten, D. (2011). Agile manufacturing: Relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.001
• Iqbal, T., Huq, F., & Bhutta, M. K. S. (2018). Agile manufacturing relationship building with TQM, JIT, and firm performance: An exploratory study in apparel export industry of Pakistan. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.033
• Iqbal, T., Jajja, M. S. S., Bhutta, M. K., & Qureshi, S. N. (2020). Lean and agile manufacturing: Complementary or competing capabilities? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(4), 749-774. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0165
• Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Dhone, N. C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1319-1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772
• Kaymaz, S., & Özgüner, Z. (2021). Çevik üretim modelinin yeni ürün performansına etkisi: Gaziantep ilinde bir uygulama. Business Economics and Management Research Journal, 4(2), 47-56.
• Kidd, P. T. (1995). Agile manufacturing: A strategy for the 21st Century. IEE Colloquium on Agile Manufacturing, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:19951097
• Kim, D.-Y., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.003
• Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350775
• Krajewski, L. J., Ritzman, L. P., & Malhotra, M. K. (2013). Operations management processes and supply chains global edition (10 Edition). Pearson.
• Marzi, G., Dabić, M., Daim, T., & Garces, E. (2017). Product and process innovation in manufacturing firms: A 30-year bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 113(2), 673-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2500-1
• Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research, 38(17), 4061-4070. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540050204920
• Mittal, V. K., Sindhwani, R., Kalsariya, V., Salroo, F., Sangwan, K. S., & Singh, P. L. (2017). Adoption of integrated lean-green-agile strategies for modern manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP, 61, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.189
• Munasinghe, M. (1993). Environmental economics and sustainable development. World Bank Publications.
• Nabass, E. H., & Abdallah, A. B. (2019). Agile manufacturing and business performance: The indirect effects of operational performance dimensions. Business Process Management Journal, 25(4), 647-666. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-07-2017-0202
• Najafi-Tavani, S., Najafi-Tavani, Z., Naudé, P., Oghazi, P., & Zeynaloo, E. (2018). How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009
• Narkhede, B. E., Raut, R. D., Roy, M., Yadav, V. S., & Gardas, B. (2020). Implementation barriers to lean-agile manufacturing systems for original equipment manufacturers: An integrated decision-making approach. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 108, 3193-3206. 28.10.2020 tarihinde https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-020-05486-5 adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory—25 years ago and now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21.
• OECD (Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü) (2011). The OECD Sustainable Manufacturing Toolkit. 24.04.2022 tarihinde https://www.oecd.org/innovation/green/toolkit/48704993.pdf adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• OECD (Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü) & Eurostat. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. OECD. 06.11.2022 tarihinde https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264065581-en adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• OECD (Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü) & Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th Edition). OECD. 06.11.2022 tarihinde https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Perçin, S. (2022). Circular supplier selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24(4), 5551-5581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01671-y
• Perera, D., Wickramarachchi, R., Abeysekara, N., & Vidanagamachchi, K. (2020). Moving from lean to leagile: a framework to ımprove supply chain performance of fashion garment manufacturing. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, UAE, (10-12). 23.10.2022 tarihinde https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruwan-Wickramarachchi/publication/342053027_Moving_from_Lean_to_Leagile_A_Framework_to_Improve_Supply_Chain_Performance_of_Fashion_Garment_Manufacturing/links/604ab90c299bf1f5d840dd4d/Moving-from-Lean-to-Leagile-A-Framework-to-Improve-Supply-Chain-Performance-of-Fashion-Garment-Manufacturing.pdf adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Potdar, P. K., Routroy, S., & Behera, A. (2017). Agile manufacturing: A systematic review of literature and implications for future research. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(7), 2022-2048. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2016-0100
• Purvis, L., Naim, M., & Towill, D. (2013). Intermediation in agile global fashion supply chains. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 5(2), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v5i2.3S
• Quinn, R. D., Causey, G. C., Merat, F. L., Sargent, D. M., Barendt, N. A., Newman, Velasco Jr., V. B., Podgurski, A., JO, J. Y., Sterling, L. S. & Kim, Y. (1997). An agile manufacturing workcell design. IIE transactions, 29(10), 901-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179708966410
• Riis, J. O., & Johansen, J. (2001). A Strategic Approach to Develop Agile Manufacturing. Agile Manufacturing: The 21st Century Competitive Strategy. Elsevier. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S. and Becker, J.M. (2015) SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. http://www.smartpls.com
• Ruttan, V. W. (1959). Usher and Schumpeter on invention, innovation, and technological change. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73(4), 596-606. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884305
• Sarkis, J. (2001). Benchmarking for agility. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(2), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770110389816
• Schumpeter, J. (1939). A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. JA Schumpeter McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2079-2106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624
• Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile manufacturing in practice ‐ Application of a methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5-6), 772-794. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110390462
• Sharp, J. M., Irani, Z., & Desai, S. (1999). Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00228-X
• Shashi, Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Singh, R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.011
• Shi, L., Wang, X., Sun, H., & He, Z. (2018). The impact of technological innovation on product quality: The moderating role of firm size. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29(7-8), 746-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1233810
• Silva, G. M., Gomes, P. J., & Sarkis, J. (2019). The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 819-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2283
• Sönmez Çakır, F. (2020). Kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLS-SEM) smartpls uygulamaları (1. Baskı). Gazi Kitabevi. Steiber, A., & Alänge, S. (2013). A corporate system for continuous innovation: The case of Google Inc. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(2), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061311324566
• Stevenson, W. J. (2021). Operations management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2018). The impact of organization commitment to process and product innovation in improving operational performance. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(2), 335-346. 30.03.2022 tarihinde https://repository.petra.ac.id/id/eprint/18072 adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Valentinov, V. (2022). Stakeholder theory and the knowledge problem: A Hayekian perspective. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(2), 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12383
• Vazquez-Bustelo, D., Camarero, L. A., & Vázquez, E. F. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: Empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(12), 1303-1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710835633
• Virmani, N., Saha, R., & Sahai, R. (2018). Evaluating key performance indicators of leagile manufacturing using fuzzy TISM approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(2), 427-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0687-4
• Warhurst, A. (2002). Sustainability Indicators and Sustainability Performance Management. Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Devolopment [MMSD] project report, 43, 129. 27.03.2022 tarihinde https://www.iied.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/migrate/G01026.pdf adlı adresten alınmıştır.
• Wijethilake, C. (2017). Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 196, 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.057
• Yıldız, E. (2020). Smartpls ile yapısal eşitlik modllemesi (1. Baskı). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yildiz Çankaya, S., & Sezen, B. (2019). Effects of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 30(1), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0099
• Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4), 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570010314818
• Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257