Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk: Tanımları, Tarihi, Teorileri, Boyutları ve Avantajları Üzerine Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve

Öz

Günümüzde bireysel işletmeler geleneksel kâr etme hedeflerinin ötesine bakmakta, toplum ve çevre üzerindeki etkilerini yeniden düşünmekte ve paydaşlarla olumlu ve sürdürülebilir ilişkiler geliştirmenin yollarını aramaktadır. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, işletmelerin sosyal ve çevresel kaygılarını ticari faaliyetlerine ve paydaşlarıyla etkileşimlerine gönüllü olarak entegre ettikleri bir kavramdır ve esas olarak, işletmelerin daha iyi bir topluma ve daha temiz bir çevreye gönüllü olarak katkıda bulunmasını içerir. İş dünyasının topluma duyduğu endişenin kanıtlarını yüzyıllar boyunca izlemek mümkündür. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun geçmişi 1800’lü yıllara kadar uzanabilse de, ilk resmi katkılar 1950’lerden itibaren yapılmaya başlanmıştır. Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, işletmelerin olumlu etkilerini en üst düzeye çıkarırken, faaliyetlerinin toplum üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini en aza indirmesini sağlayan bir dizi yönetim uygulaması olarak tanımlanabilir. Her ne kadar kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk kavramı teori ve pratikte geniş olarak tartışılsa da evrensel olarak kabul edilen tek bir tanımı bulunmamaktadır. Bu makale, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, tanımları, tarihi, teorileri, boyutları ve avantajlarıyla ilgili geniş bir teorik çerçeve oluşturmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun tarihi
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk teorileri
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun boyutları
• kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun avantajları

Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theoretical Framework on Its Definitions, History, Theories, Dimensions and Advantages

Öz

Today, individual businesses look beyond their traditional profit making goals, rethink their impact on society and the environment, and seek ways to develop positive and sustainable relationships with stakeholders. Corporate social responsibility is a concept where businesses voluntarily integrate their social and environmental concerns into their business activities and interactions with their stakeholders, and it mainly involves voluntary contribution of businesses to a better society and a cleaner environment. It is possible to monitor the evidence of the business community’s concerns about society for centuries. Although the history of corporate social responsibility can go back to the 1800s, the first official contributions started to be made in the 1950s. Corporate social responsibility can be defined as a series of management practices that enable businesses to minimize the negative impact of their operations on society while maximizing their positive impact. Although the concept of corporate social responsibility is widely discussed in theory and practice, it does not have a universally accepted definition. This article aims to create a broad theoretical framework on corporate social responsibility, its definitions, history, theories, dimensions, and advantages.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Corporate Social Responsibility
• Social Responsibility
• Corporate Social Responsibility Theories

Kaynakça

1. Abe, M. ve Ruanglikhitkul, W. (2013). Developments in the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Studies Report, 1-18.
2. Agudelo, M., Johannsdottir, L. ve Davídsdottir, B. (2019). A Literature Review of The History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4:1, 1-23.
3. Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. ve Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The Relationships Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Supplier Development, and Firm Performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872-1881.
4. Alrubaiee, L., Aladwan, S., Joma, M., Idris, W. ve Khater, S. (2017). Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Performance: The Mediating Effect of Customer Value and Corporate Image. International Business Research, Vol:10 (2) .
5. Ashraf, M., Magnan, G., Adams, M. ve Walker, T. (2020). Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability, Sustainability ,12, 760, 1-17.
6. Ayalew , B. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility Practices, Determinants and Challenges; Theoretical and Empirical Lesson for Effective and Successful Engagement, Journal of Investment and Management, 7(6), 157-165.
7. Carroll, A. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
8. Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct, Business Society, 38, 268-295.

9. Castelo, B. (2013). Shareholder Theory, (Eds) Idowu S.O., Capaldi N., Zu L., Gupta A.D., Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_31
10. Cayiragasi, F., Guven, G. ve Ozpolat, A. (2016). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility On Firm Profitability: A Perspective Of Economics, Business and Law. 18th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, Building Resilient Society – Zagreb, Croatia
11. Chakraborty, U. (2015). Developments in the Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), The Researchers, International Research Journal, 1(1), 23-45.
12. Chen, S. (2013). On The Development and Implementation of A Sustainable CSR Strategy: A Literature Survey. California State University, Sacramento, Master Thesis.
13. Chen, X. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Price Crash Risk —Moderating Effect Analysis of Social Capital, American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, Vol:10(3)
14. Clarkson, M. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, Vol:20 (1), 92-117.
15. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.
16. Essays, UK. (2013). History Of Corporate Social Responsibility Business Essay, https://www.uniassignment.com/essay-samples/business/history-of-corporate-social-responsibility-business-essay.php , Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
17. Farcane, N. ve Bureana, E. (2015). History Of Corporate Social Responsibility Consept, Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 17(2), 31-48.
18. Faucher, R. (2015). Stakeholder Theory & Corporate Social Responsibility In Spain. Honors College at the College of Charleston.
19. Garriga, E. ve Mele D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.
20. Hamidu, A., Haron, H. ve Amran, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on Definitions, Core Characteristics and Theoretical Perspectives, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol: 6 (4), 83-95.
21. Hategan, C.-D., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R.-I. ve Hategan, V.-P. (2018). Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies, Sustainability,10, 1041,1-23.
22. Herrera, J. ve Heras-Rosas, C. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Resource Management: Towards Sustainable Business Organizations. Sustainability, 12, 841, 1-24.
23. https://asq.org/quality-resources/social-responsibility (2020). What Is Social Responsibility?, American Society for Quality, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
24. https://www.accprof.org/ACCP/ACCP/About_the_Field/Blogs/Blog_Pages/Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Brief-History.aspx (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Brief History, Association Of Corporate Citizenship Professionals, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
25. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1064104/willing-purchase-products-csr-france/ (2020b). Are You More Willing to Purchase A Product Offered By A Company With A Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Policy?, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020.
26. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1052498/japan-major-csr-tasks-company-operated/ (2019). Main Problems of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Which Companies Focused on Solving in Japan as of December 2018, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
27. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1131718/food-companies-corporate-responsibility-improvements-france/ (2020a). Main Areas to Focus on to Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility for Food Companies According to Consumers in France in 2019, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
28. https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/history-of-corporate-social-responsibility/#:~:text=Although%20responsible%20companies%20had%20already,as%20the%20father%20of%20CSR (2019). A Brief History of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
29. https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr (2020). What is CSR?, Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
30. Jamali, D. Ve Mirshak, R. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context, Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243-262.
31. Jermsittiparsert, K., Siam, M., Issa, M., Ahmed, U. ve Pahi, M. (2019). Do Consumers Expect Companies to be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior, Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7, 741–752.
32. Jhawar, N. ve Gupta, S. (2017). Understanding CSR- Its History and the Recent Developments, IOSR Journal of Business and Management, Vol:19(5), 105-109.
33. Kabir, R. ve Thai, H. (2017). Does Corporate Governance Shape The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance?, Pacific Accounting Review, Vol:29(2), 227-258.
34. Kim, H., Rhou, Y., Uysal, M. ve Kwon, N. (2017). An Examination of The Links Between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Its Internal Consequences, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol:61, 26-34.
35. Lanphear, K. (2019). Three Reasons Why CSR is Important for Your Business. https://www.uschamberfoundation.org/blog/post/three-reasons-why-csr-important-your-business , Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
36. Latif, K., Sajjad , A., Bashir , R., Shaukat , M., Khan, M. ve Sahibzada, U. (2020). Revisiting The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Team Outcomes. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1630-1641.
37. Madueno, J., Jorge, M., Conesa, I. ve Martinez-Martinez, D. (2016). Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical Evidence From A Stakeholders Perspective, Business Research Quarterly, 19(1), 55-72.
38. Majumdar, M., Alam, Q., Coghill , K. ve Samaratunge , R. (2008). Challenges of the Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in Developing Countries, Proceedings of the 22nd Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Managing in the Pacific Century. Australia, (Ed.) M. Wilson,1-23.
39. Martinez, J., Fernandez, M. ve Fernandez, P. (2016). Corporate Social responsibility: Evolution Through Institutional and Stakeholder Perspectives, European Journal of Managementand Business Economics, 25, 8-14.
40. Mele, D. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 47-82.
41. Mohammed, A. ve Rashid, B. (2018). A Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions, Brand Image, and Customer Satisfaction in Malaysian Hotel Industry. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, Vol: 39 (2), 358-364.
42. Mosca, F. ve Civera, C. (2017). The Evolution of CSR: An Integrated Approach, Symphonya, Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 16-35.
43. Moura‐Leite, R. ve Padgett, R. (2011). Historical Background of Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol:7 (4), 528-539.
44. Naseem, T., Shahzad, F., Asim, G., Rehman , I. ve Nawaz, F. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement and Firm Performance in Asia Pacific: The Role of Enterprise Risk Management, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 501-513.
45. Nguyen, T., Pham, T., Le, Q., Pham, T., Bui, T. ve Nguyen, T. (2020). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment Through Organizational Trust and Organizational Identification, Management Science Letters, 10 , 3453–3462.
46. Olatunle, M., Gumus, A. ve Wanjuu, L. (2020). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Youths Empowerment in Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 39-48 .
47. Orazalin, N. ve Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance: The Moderating Role of Board Gender Diversity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664-1676.
48. Ortas, E. ve Gallego-Alvarez, I. (2020). Bridging The Gap Between Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Tax Aggressiveness: The Moderating Role of National Culture, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol:33 (4) , 825-855.
49. Park, H.‐J. ve Ha, M.‐H. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Transparency: Evidence from Korea, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(3).
50. Popa , M. ve Salanța , I. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Corporate Social Iresponsibility, Management & Marketing, Challenges for the Knowledge Society, Vol: 9(2), 135‐144.
51. Rahman, J. ve Yu, F. (2019). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in China, Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions.
52. Rahman, S. (2011). Evaluation of Definitions: Ten Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility, World Review of Business Research, Vol:1(1), 166 - 176.
53. Rana, I. ve Asad , F. (2018). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance Evidence from Pharmaceutical Sector Listed Companies of Pakistan, European Business & Management, 4(1), 1-8.
54. Saeidi, S., Sofian, S., Saeidi , P., Saeidi, S. ve Saaeidi , S. (2015). How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Contribute to Firm Financial Performance? The Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage, Reputation, and Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68, 341–350.
55. Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, Managerial and Relational Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 347-373.
56. Singh, P., Sethuraman, K. ve Lam, J. (2007). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions on Firm Value: Some Evidence from Hong Kong and China, Sustainability, 9, 1532, 1-24.
57. Song, W., Ren, S. ve Yu, J. (2019). Bridging The Gap Between Corporate Social Responsibility and New Green Product Success: The Role of Green Organizational Identity, Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 88-97.
58. Sprinkle, G. ve Maines, L. (2010). The Benefits and Costs of Corporate Social Responsibility, Business Horizons, 53(5), , 445-453.
59. Suarez, R. (2020). Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No: 99164, 1-4.
60. Suganthi, L. (2020). Investigating The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Market, Cost and Environmental Performance for Sustainable Business, South African Journal of Business Management, 51(1), a1630, 1-13.
61. Sun, S., Li, T., Ma, H., Li, R., Gouliamos, K., Zheng, J., Han Y., Manta O., Comite U., Barros T., Duarte N. ve Yue, X.-G. (2020). Does Employee Quality Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China, Sustainability, 12, 2692, 1-19
62. Tran, K. ve Nguyen, P. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility: Findings from the Vietnamese Paint Industry, Sustainability, 12, 1044.
63. Wang , L. (2011). Factors Affecting Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation: An Emphasis on Values, University of Helsinki, Dissertationes Forestales 130 .
64. Wang, Y., Kaewkerd, T., Kotrakul, N., Suoptrakul, N., Varotha, V., Kanwiwat, S. ve Zhang, C. (2020). Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Corporate Financial Performance-- Listed Companies in China's Power Industry . The Journal of Pacific Institute of Management Science (Humanities and Social Science), 6(2), 11-26.
65. Wayne State University. (2020). What is Corporate Citizenship?, http://www.clas.wayne.edu/Citizenship/Definition-of-Corporate-Citizenship , Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020
66. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches, Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93-114.
67. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense, http://www.ceads.org.ar/downloads/Making%20good%20business%20sense.pdf , Erişim Tarihi: 27.07.2020