Comparison of En-bloc Vs. Three-lobe Techniques of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HOLEP): A Single Center Experience

Öz

Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) surgery has played a significant role in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Since the definition of the classical three-lobe technique, many new techniques have been introduced. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the en bloc and three-lobe techniques used in this surgery. Material and Methods: Medical data of 80 patients who underwent HoLEP surgery at a tertiary center were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups (en-bloc: 40, three-lobe: 40). All patients were evaluated for age, preoperative PSA, prostate size, maximum flow rate (Qmax), enucleation time, morcellation time, enucleated tissue weight, enucleation time efficacy (enucleated weight/enucleation time), morcellation time efficacy (enucleated weight/morcellation time), perioperative and postoperative complications and incontinence status. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, PSA, and preoperative uroflowmetry results. 8 patients in the en-bloc group and 11 patients in the three-lobe group had a catheter preoperatively. Enucleation time was significantly shorter in the en-bloc group (p<0.001), while morcellation time was similar (p=0.706). Although the prostate volume was higher in the three-lobe group (p=0.013), no difference was observed in terms of enucleated tissue weight (p=0.261). Postoperative uroflowmetry results were similar in the two groups (p=0.628). Postoperative hematuria was observed in 2 patients in the en-bloc group and 4 patients in the three-lobe group. Prolonged incontinence developed in 6 patients in the en-bloc group and in 7 patients in the three-lobe group. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of complications. Conclusion: In reviewing the results of our study, we observed that both techniques yield comparably satisfactory outcomes and similar rates of late complications. However, the en-bloc technique demonstrates a significantly shorter enucleation time as well as a reduced overall operative duration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• En-bloc
• Three-lobe
• HOLEP
• Complication
• Benign prostate hyperplasia

Holmium Laser Prostat Enükleasyon (HOLEP) Cerrahisinde En-bloc ve Three-lobe Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması: Tek Merkez Sonuçlarımız

Öz

Amaç: Holmium lazer prostat enükleasyon (HOLEP) cerrahisi, benign prostat hiperplazisi tedavisinde önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Klasik three-lobe tekniğin tanımlanmasından sonra, çok sayıda yeni teknik literatüre sunulmuştur. Bu çalışmada, en-bloc teknik ile three-lobe tekniğin etkinlik ve güvenilirliğini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Materyal ve metod: 3. basamak bir merkezde, HoLEP cerrahisi uygulanan 80 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar 2 gruba ayrıldı (en-bloc:40, three-lobe:40). Tüm hastaların yaş, preoperatif PSA, prostat hacmi, maksimum akış hızı (Qmax), enükleasyon süresi, morselasyon süresi, enükleasyon etkinliği (çıkarılan doku/enükleasyon süresi), morselasyon etkinliği (çıkarılan doku/morselasyon süresi), peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonları kaydedildi. Bulgular: İki grup arasında yaş, PSA ve operasyon öncesi üroflowmetri sonuçları açısından farklılık saptanmadı. Operasyon öncesinde, en-bloc grubunda 8 ve three-lobe grubunda 11 hastada üretral kateter mevcuttu. Enükleasyon süresi en-bloc grubunda istatistiksel olarak daha kısa bulunurken (p<0,001), morselasyon süresi iki grupta da benzer bulundu (p=0,706). Preoperatif prostat hacmi three-lobe grubunda yüksek olmasına rağmen (p=0,013), iki grup arasında çıkartılan doku hacmi açısından anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı (p=0,261). Postoperatif üroflowmetri sonuçları açısından iki grup arasından farklılık saptanmadı (p=0,628). En-bloc grubunda 2, three-lobe grubunda 4 hastada postoperatif hematüri izlendi. En-bloc grubunda 6, three-lobe grubunda 7 hastada uzamış inkontinans tespit edildi. Total komplikasyon oranı açısından iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık saptanmadı. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarını incelediğimizde, her iki tekniğin de benzer şekilde tatmin edici sonuçlar ve benzer geç komplikasyon oranları sağladığını gözlemledik. Ancak en-bloc tekniği, anlamlı derecede daha kısa bir enükleasyon süresi ve daha kısa toplam ameliyat süresi göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• En-bloc
• Three-lobe
• HOLEP
• Komplikasyon
• Benign prostat hiperplazisi

Kaynakça

1. 1. Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, & de la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol 2004;46(5):547–54.
2. 2. Gilling PJ, Kennet K, Das AK, Thompson D, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. J Endourol 1998;12(5):457-9.
3. 3. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49(1):87-91.
4. 4. Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE. Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2010;183(3):1105-9.
5. 5. Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K, Fayad A. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 2004;172(3):1012-6.
6. 6. Bae J, Choo M, Park JH, Oh JK, Paick JS, Oh SJ. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Seoul National University hospital experience. Int Neurourol J 2011;15(1):29-34.
7. 7. Gilling PJ, Aho TF, Frampton CM, King CJ, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results at 6 years. Eur Urol 2008;53(4):744-9.
8. 8. Gury L, Mallet R, Robert G. Holmium laser en-bloc enucleation of the prostate: Bi-centric prospective evaluation of 109 consecutive cases. Prog Urol. 2022;32(2):121-9.

9. 9. Seung-June Oh, Current Surgical Techniques of enuclation in HoLEP. Investig Clin Urol 2019;60(5):333-42.
10. 10. Tan A, Liao C, Mo Z, Cao Y. Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction. Br J Surg 2007;94(10):1201 8.
11. 11. Yin L, Teng J, Huang CJ, Zhang X, Xu D. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013;27(5):604-11.
12. 12. Lourenco T, Pickard R, Vale L, Grant A, Fraser C, Maclennan G et al. Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2008;337(7660):a449.
13. 13. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde, S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1468-74.
14. 14. Chavali JSS, Rivera ME, Lingeman JE. HoLEP Learning Curve-Resident Perspective: Survey of Senior Residents from High-Volume Tertiary Center. J Endourol 2024;38(9):977-81.
15. 15. Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, Saussine C, Descazeaud A, Azzouzi A et al. Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 2016;117(3):495-9.
16. 16. Rücker F, Lehrich K, Böhme A, Zacharias M, Ahyai SA, & Hansen J. A call for HoLEP: en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe. World J Urol 2020;39(7):2337-45.
17. 17. Tamalunas A, Schott M, Keller P, Atzler M, Ebner B, Hennenberg M et al. Efficacy, efficiency, and safety of en-bloc vs three-lobe enucleation of the prostate: a propensity score-matched analysis. Urology 2023;175:48-55.
18. 18. Tokatli Z, Esen B, Yaman Ö, Saglam R. Comparison of 3 different enucleation techniques of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP). Urology J 2020;17(4):408-12.
19. 19. Ortner G, Pang KH, Yuan Y, Herrmann TRW, Biyani CS, Tokas T. Peri-and post-operative outcomes, complications, and functional results amongst different modifications of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP): a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 2023;41(4): 969-80.
20. 20. Ito TT, Keita T, Otsuka A, Shinbo H, Takada S, Kurita Y et al. Development of a complete en-bloc technique with direct bladder neck incision: a newly modified approach for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 2019;33(10):835–40.
21. 21. Nam JK, Kim HW, Lee DH, Han JY, Lee JZ, Park SW. Risk factors for transient urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. World J Mens Health 2015;33(2):88-94.
22. 22. Cho MC, Park JH, Jeong MS, Yi JS, Ku JH, Oh SJ et al. Predictor of de novo urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Neurourol Urodyn 2011;30(7):1343-9.
23. 23. Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;72(5):1926-9.
24. 24. Kobayashi S, Yano M, Nakayama T, Kitahara S. Predictive risk factors of postoperative urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate during the initial learning period. Int Braz J Urol 2016;42(4):740-6.
25. 25. Davydov DS, Tsarichenko DG, Bezrukov EA, Sukhanov RB, Vinarov AZ, Sorokin NI et al. Complications of the holmium laser enucleation of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urologiia, 2018;(1):42-7.
26. 26. Chen F, Chen Y, Zou Y, Wang Y, Wu X, Chen M. Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2023;51(8): 3000605231190763.