Kolesistektomi Sonrası Histopatolojik İnceleme Gereklilik mi Yoksa Fazlalık mı?

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 635 - 640, 25.12.2025

Hüseyin Turap , Sabiha Nur Özmen , Bedri Burak Sucu , Fırat Canlıkarakaya

https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1733640

Öz

kesesi kanseri insidansı çok düşüktür. Bu çalışmanın amacı kolesistektomi sonrası çıkarılan tüm spesmenler yerine preoperatif ve peroperatif şüphe halinde seçici bir histopatolojik inceleme yapılıp yapılmayacağının sonucunu araştırmaktır.
Materyal ve metod: Bu çalışma, Amasya Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde 1 Ocak 2015-31 Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında kolesistektomi yapılan ve histopatolojik olarak incelenen 2.355 hasta ile retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirildi. Patoloji sonuçları benign, premalign ve malign olarak 3 grubaayrıldı.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 2.355 hastanın 569’u (%24,2) erkek, 1.786’sı (%75,8) kadındı. Yaş ortalaması 56,45 minimum: 18 maximum: 98 olarak bulundu. Patoloji incelemesinin %99,2 sinde benign lezyonlar tespit edildi. Geriye kalan patolojik spesmenlerin 6 tanesi (%0,3) low grade displazi, 7 tanesi (%0,3) biliyer intraepitelyal neoplazi (low grade) olmak üzere %0,6’sında premalign lezyonlar bulundu. Hastaların sadece 5 tanesinde (%0,2) sinde safra kesesi kanseri tespit edildi.
Sonuç: Bu çalışmaya dahil edilen 2.355 hastanın patolojisinde %0,6’sında premalign lezyonlar, %0,2’sinde malignite tespit edilmiştir. Malignite tespit edilen tüm spesimenlerde ya preoperatif görüntülemelerde ya da intraoperatif bulgularda maligniteyi öngörebilecek durumlar mevcuttu. Bu bağlamda preoperatif görüntülemelerde ve intraoperatif olarak şüpheli bir durum olmaması halinde ya da özellikli risk faktörü taşımayan gruplarda rutin histopatolojik inceleme gerekmeyebileceğini düşünmekteyiz. Bu durum çok sık gerçekleştirilen bir ameliyat olması sebebiyle iş gücü kaybının azalacağını ve maliyetlerin düşebileceğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Displazi , Histopatolojik inceleme , Kanser , Kolesistektomi , Safra kesesi

Is Histopathological Examination After Cholecystectomy Necessary or Redundant?

Öz

Background: Although cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in general surgical practice, the incidence of gallbladder cancer is very low. The aim of this study is to investigate whether selective histopathological examination, based on preoperative and perioperative suspicion, can replace routine examination of all specimens removed after cholecystectomy.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted retrospectively with 2,355 patients who underwent cholecystectomy and were examined histopathologically between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2024 at Amasya Sabuncuoğlu Şerefeddin Training and Research Hospital. Pathology results were divided into 3 groups as benign, premalignant and malignant.
Results: Of the 2,355 patients included in the study, 569 (24.2%) were male and 1,786 (75.8%) were female. The average age was found to be 56.45 (minimum: 18 maximum: 98). Benign lesions were detected in 99.2% of specimens. Premalignant lesions were found in 0.6% of the remaining specimens, including 6 (0.3%) cases of low-grade dysplasia and 7 (0.3%) cases of biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (low grade). Only five (0.2%) of the patients had gallbladder cancer.
Conclusions: In the pathology of 2,355 patients included in this study, premalignant lesions were detected in 0.6% and malignancy in 0.2%. In all specimens that were malignant, either preoperative imaging or operative findings predicted malignancy. In this context, we believe routine histopathological examination is unnecessary when preoperative and intraoperative imaging does not reveal any suspicious findings and when there are no special risk factors. This suggests that, as it is a common surgery, there will be a reduction in labor loss and a potential decrease in costs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cancer , Cholecystectomy , Dsplasia , Gallbladder , Histopathological examination

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Amasya University Non-Interventional Ethics Committee (approval no: 2025/49, date: April 10, 2025).

Kaynakça

• 1. Behari A, Kapoor VK. Does gallbladder divide India? Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29(1):3-7.
• 2. Lai C, Lau W. Gallbladder cancer a comprehensive review. Surgeon. 2008;6(2):101-110.
• 3. Lundgren L, Muszynska C, Ros A, Persson G, Gimm O, Valter L, et al. Are incidental gallbladder cancers missed with a selective approach of gallbladder histology at cholecystectomy? World J Surg. 2018;42(4):1092-1099.
• 4. Rathanaswamy S, Misra S, Kumar V, Chintamani, Pogal J, Agarwal A, et al. Incidentally detected gallbladder cancer - the controversies and algorithmic approach to management. Indian J Surg. 2012;74(3):248-254.
• 5. Okumura K, Gogna S, Gachabayov M, Felsenreich D, McGuirk M, Rojas A, et al. Gallbladder cancer: Historical treatment and new management options. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;13(9):1317-1335.
• 6. Deng Y, Xiong X, Zhou Y, Shrestha A, Li F, Cheng N. Selective histology of cholecystectomy specimens-is it justified? J Surg Res. 2015;193(1):196-201.
• 7. Liebmann R, Varma M. Best practice recommendations: Histopathology and cytopathology of limited or no clinical value. The Royal College of Pathologists; 2019. G177-3.
• 8. Khan S, Rashikh M, Rehman K, Berjis H. Selective or routine histology of cholecystectomy specimens for diagnosing incidental carcinoma of gallbladder and correlation with careful intraoperative macroscopic examination? A systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(3):651-659.
• 9. Jayasundara J, de Silva W. Histological assessment of cholecystectomy specimens performed for symptomatic cholelithiasis: routine or selective? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(5):317-322.
• 10. Benkhadoura M, Elshaikhy A, Eldruki S, Elfaedy O. Routine histopathological examination of gallbladder specimens after cholecystectomy: Is it time to change the current practice? Turk J Surg. 2019;35(2):86-90.
• 11. Özel H, Dinç T. Pathologic results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens with 8148 patients in a single center. Turk J Surg. 2025;41(1):42-46.
• 12. Olthof P, Metman M, De Krijger R, Scheepers J, Roos D, Dekker J. Routine Pathology and Postoperative Follow-Up are Not Cost-Effective in Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder Disease. World J Surg. 2018;42(10):3165-3170.
• 13. Van Vliet J, Van Gulik T, Verbeek P. Is it necessary to send gallbladder specimens for routine histopathological examination after cholecystectomy? The use of macroscopic examination. Dig Surg. 2014;30(4-6):472-475.
• 14. Mittal R, Jesudason M, Nayak S. Selective histopathology in cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2010;29(1):26-30.
• 15. Kalita D, Pant L, Singh S, Jain G, Kudesia M, Gupta K, et al. Impact of routine histopathological examination of gall bladder specimens on early detection of malignancy - a study of 4,115 cholecystectomy specimens. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(5):3315-3318.
• 16. Hamdani N, Qadri S, Aggarwalla R, Bhartia V, Chaudhuri S, Debakshi S, et al. Clinicopathological study of gall bladder carcinoma with special reference to gallstones: our 8-year experience from eastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(11):5613-5617.
• 17. Prasad N, Sen S. Gall bladder carcinoma: the facts and the mimics. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2021;52(1):1.
• 18. Terzioglu S, Kilic M, Sapmaz A, Karaca A. Predictive factors of neoplastic gallbladder polyps: Outcomes of 278 patients. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28(3):202-206.
• 19. Golse N, Lewin M, Rode A, Sebagh M, Mabrut J. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2017;154(5):345-353.
• 20. Sarici I, Duzgun O. Gallbladder polypoid lesions >15mm as indicators of T1b gallbladder cancer risk. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2017;18(3):156-158.
• 21. Wu T, Sun Z, Jiang Y, Yu J, Chang C, Dong X, et al. Strategy for discriminating cholesterol and premalignancy in polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(4):388-392.
• 22. Wennmacker S, van Dijk A, Raessens J, Luyer M, Nienhuijs S, de Reuver P, et al. Polyp size of 1cm is insufficient to discriminate neoplastic and non-neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1564-1571.
• 23. Alshahri T, Abounozha S. Best evidence topic: Does the presence of a large gallstone carry a higher risk of gallbladder cancer? Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;61:93-96.
• 24. Lowenfels A, Walker A, Althaus D, Zomzely-Neurath C, Winn-Deen R, Hsieh C. Gallstone growth, size, and risk of gallbladder cancer: an interracial study. Int J Epidemiol. 1989;18(1):50-54.
• 25. Emmett C, Barrett P, Gilliam A, Mitchell A. Routine versus selective histological examination after cholecystectomy to exclude incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97(7):526-529.
• 26. Elshaer M, Gravante G, Yang Y, Hudson S, Thomas K, Sorge R, et al. Routine versus selective histologic analysis of gallbladder specimens for the detection of incidental gallbladder cancers. A retrospective review over 9 years of activity with a special focus on patients’ age. Am J Surg. 2014;208(3):444-449.
• 27. Wrenn S, Callas P, Abu-Jaish W. Histopathological examination of specimen following cholecystectomy: are we accepting resect and discard? Surg Endosc. 2017;31(2):586-593.