Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Güneydoğu Anadolu Popülasyonunda Aksesuar Mental Foramen Prevalansının Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2021, , 480 - 484, 29.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.986197

Öz


Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı aksesuar mental foramenin Güneydoğu Anadolu popülasyonundaki prevalansının ve lokalizasyonunun Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile retrospektif olarak değer-lendirilmesidir.
Materyal ve Metod: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, 2015-2020 yılları arasında Dicle Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı’na çeşitli nedenlerle başvuran 629 hastaya ait konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi ve 61 aksesuar mental foramen tespit edilen vaka; yaş, cinsiyet ve lokalizasyon açısından değerlendirildi. Mental foramen ve aksesuar mental foramen arasındaki ortalama mesafesi de hesaplandı ve tüm ölçümler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi.
Bulgular: Yapılan analizler sonucunda 629 hasta değerlendirildi. Bunlardan 61 tanesinde aksesuar mental foramen tespit edildi. Bunlardan 28 tanesi erkek hasta iken 33 tanesi kadın hastada belirlendi. 56 hastada unilateral aksesuar mental foramen tespit edilirken 5 hastada bilateral olarak tespit edildi. Cinsiyete göre yapılan karşılaştırma sonrasında erkeklerde ortalama değer 1,931 elde edilirken kadınlarda 1,91 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Yapılan istatistiksel analizler sonucunda aralarında anlamlı bir fark elde edilememiştir.
Sonuç: Yapılan değerlendirmeler sonucunda, cinsiyetin ve yaşın mental foramen ile aksesuar mental foramen arasında bulunan mesafeye etkisinin olmadığını düşünmekteyiz. Daha kesin sonuçlar için daha fazla örneklem ile daha geniş çalışmalar yapılması gerekmektedir.

Kaynakça

  • Sawyer DR, Kiely ML, Pyle MA. The frequency of accessory mental foramina in four ethnic groups. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43: 417-20.
  • Vayvada H, Demirdover C, Yilmaz M, Barutcu A. An anatomic variation of the mental nerve and foramina: a case report. Clin Anat 2006; 19: 700-1.
  • Neves FS, Oliveira LS, Torres MG, Crusoé-Souza M, Oliveira C, Campos PS, et al. Accessory mental foramen: case report. RPG Rev Pós-Grad 2010; 17: 173-6.
  • Neves FS, Torres MG, Oliveira C, Campos PS, Crusoé-Rebe- llo I. Lingual accessory mental foramen: a report of an extremely rare anatomical variation. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 501 3.
  • Imada TS, Fernandes LM, Centurion BS, de Oliveira-Santos C, Honório HM, Rubira-Bullen IR. Accessory mental foramina: prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: e94-9.
  • Pancer B, Garaicoa-Pazmiño C, Bashutski JD. Accessory man- dibular foramen during dental implant placement: case report and review of literature. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 116-24.
  • da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM, Capelozza AL, Rubira-Bullen IR. Absence and hypoplasia of the mental foramen detected in CBCT images: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 731-4.
  • Matsumoto K, Araki M, Honda K. Bilateral absence of the mental foramen detected by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2013; 29: 198-201.
  • Balcioglu HA, Kocaelli H. Accessory mental foramen. N Am J Med Sci 2009; 1: 314-5.
  • Iwanaga J, Saga T, Tabira Y, Nakamura M, Kitashima S, Watanabe K, Kusukawa J, Yamaki K. The clinical anatomy of accessory mental nerves and foramina. Clin Anat. 2015 Oct;28(7):848-56.
  • Freitas GB, Silva AF, Morais LA, Silva MBF, Manhães LRC. Classification and prevalence of changes mandibular canal through examination of cone-beam computed tomography. BJOMS 2016; 16: 6–12.
  • Andrade YDN, Araujo EBJ, Souza LMA, Groppo FC. Análise das variações anatômicas do canal da mandíbula encon- tradas em radiografias panorâmicas. Rev Odontol UNESP 2015; 44:31–36.
  • Fu E, Peng M, Chiang CY, Tu HP, Lin YS, Shen EC. Bifid mandibular canals and the factors associated with their presence: a medical computed tomography evaluation in a Taiwanese population. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e64-7.
  • Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):289-94.
  • Al-Khateeb T, Al-HadiHamasha A, Ababneh KT. Position of the mental foramen in a northern regional Jordanian population. Surg Rad Anat. 2007;29:231-7.
  • Toh H, Kodama J, Yanagisako M, Ohmori T. Anatomical study of the accessory mental foramen and the distribution of its nerve. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1992;69:85-8.
  • Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Characteristics of accessory mental foramina observed on limited cone-beam computed tomography images. J Endod. 2008;34:1441-5.
  • Udhaya K, Saraladevi KV, Sridhar J. The morphometric analy- sis of the mental foramen in adult dry human mandibles: a study on the South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1547-51.
  • Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(2):20150310.
  • Mirbeigi S, Kazemipoor M, Khojastepour L. Evaluation of the Course of the Inferior Alveolar Canal: The First CBCT Study in an Iranian Population. Pol J Radiol. 2016 Jul 19;81:338-41
  • Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Dec;44(4):273-8.
  • Almeida KCM, Raveli TB, Vieira CIV, Santos-Pinto AD, Raveli DB. Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep-Oct;22(5):56-66.
  • Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jul;2(3):200-6.
  • Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Sep;23(9):1022-30.
  • Vieira CL, Veloso SDAR, Lopes FF. Location of the course of the mandibular canal, anterior loop and accessory mental foramen through cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Dec;40(12):1411-1417.
  • do Nascimento EH, Dos Anjos Pontual ML, Dos Anjos Pontual A, da Cruz Perez DE, Figueiroa JN, Frazão MA, Ramos-Perez FM. Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal: A study using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2016 Jun;46(2):69-75.
  • Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):731-4.
  • Torres MG, Valverde Lde F, Vidal MT, Crusoé-Rebello IM. Accessory mental foramen: A rare anatomical variation detected by cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Mar;45(1):61-5.

Retrospective Evaluation of The Prevalence of Accessory Mental Foramen in Southeastern Anatolian Population By Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Yıl 2021, , 480 - 484, 29.12.2021
https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.986197

Öz

Background: The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the prevalence and localization of the accessory mental foramen in the Southeastern Anatolian population using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, cone beam computed tomography images of 629 patients who applied to Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between 2015 and 2020 for various reasons were retrospectively evaluated and 61 accessory mental foramen fixations were made. the reported case; Age, gender and localization were evaluated. The mean distance between the mental foramen and the accessory mental foramen was also calculated, and all measurements were then statistically analyzed.
Results: As a result of the analysis, 629 patients were evaluated. AMF was detected in 61 of them. While 28 of them were male patients, 33 of them were determined in female patients. While unilateral accessory mental foramen was detected in 56 patients, it was detected bilaterally in 5 patients. After the comparison made by gender, the mean value was found to be 1.931 for men, while this value was found to be 1.91 for women. As a result of the statistical analysis, no significant difference was found between them.
Conclusions: As a result of the evaluations, we think that gender and age have no effect on the distance between the mental foramen and the accessory mental foramen. Larger studies with larger samples are required for more precise results.

Kaynakça

  • Sawyer DR, Kiely ML, Pyle MA. The frequency of accessory mental foramina in four ethnic groups. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43: 417-20.
  • Vayvada H, Demirdover C, Yilmaz M, Barutcu A. An anatomic variation of the mental nerve and foramina: a case report. Clin Anat 2006; 19: 700-1.
  • Neves FS, Oliveira LS, Torres MG, Crusoé-Souza M, Oliveira C, Campos PS, et al. Accessory mental foramen: case report. RPG Rev Pós-Grad 2010; 17: 173-6.
  • Neves FS, Torres MG, Oliveira C, Campos PS, Crusoé-Rebe- llo I. Lingual accessory mental foramen: a report of an extremely rare anatomical variation. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 501 3.
  • Imada TS, Fernandes LM, Centurion BS, de Oliveira-Santos C, Honório HM, Rubira-Bullen IR. Accessory mental foramina: prevalence, position and diameter assessed by cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiographs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: e94-9.
  • Pancer B, Garaicoa-Pazmiño C, Bashutski JD. Accessory man- dibular foramen during dental implant placement: case report and review of literature. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 116-24.
  • da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM, Capelozza AL, Rubira-Bullen IR. Absence and hypoplasia of the mental foramen detected in CBCT images: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 731-4.
  • Matsumoto K, Araki M, Honda K. Bilateral absence of the mental foramen detected by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2013; 29: 198-201.
  • Balcioglu HA, Kocaelli H. Accessory mental foramen. N Am J Med Sci 2009; 1: 314-5.
  • Iwanaga J, Saga T, Tabira Y, Nakamura M, Kitashima S, Watanabe K, Kusukawa J, Yamaki K. The clinical anatomy of accessory mental nerves and foramina. Clin Anat. 2015 Oct;28(7):848-56.
  • Freitas GB, Silva AF, Morais LA, Silva MBF, Manhães LRC. Classification and prevalence of changes mandibular canal through examination of cone-beam computed tomography. BJOMS 2016; 16: 6–12.
  • Andrade YDN, Araujo EBJ, Souza LMA, Groppo FC. Análise das variações anatômicas do canal da mandíbula encon- tradas em radiografias panorâmicas. Rev Odontol UNESP 2015; 44:31–36.
  • Fu E, Peng M, Chiang CY, Tu HP, Lin YS, Shen EC. Bifid mandibular canals and the factors associated with their presence: a medical computed tomography evaluation in a Taiwanese population. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e64-7.
  • Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):289-94.
  • Al-Khateeb T, Al-HadiHamasha A, Ababneh KT. Position of the mental foramen in a northern regional Jordanian population. Surg Rad Anat. 2007;29:231-7.
  • Toh H, Kodama J, Yanagisako M, Ohmori T. Anatomical study of the accessory mental foramen and the distribution of its nerve. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1992;69:85-8.
  • Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Characteristics of accessory mental foramina observed on limited cone-beam computed tomography images. J Endod. 2008;34:1441-5.
  • Udhaya K, Saraladevi KV, Sridhar J. The morphometric analy- sis of the mental foramen in adult dry human mandibles: a study on the South Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1547-51.
  • Haas LF, Dutra K, Porporatti AL, Mezzomo LA, De Luca Canto G, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(2):20150310.
  • Mirbeigi S, Kazemipoor M, Khojastepour L. Evaluation of the Course of the Inferior Alveolar Canal: The First CBCT Study in an Iranian Population. Pol J Radiol. 2016 Jul 19;81:338-41
  • Jung YH, Cho BH. Radiographic evaluation of the course and visibility of the mandibular canal. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014 Dec;44(4):273-8.
  • Almeida KCM, Raveli TB, Vieira CIV, Santos-Pinto AD, Raveli DB. Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017 Sep-Oct;22(5):56-66.
  • Mangla R, Singh N, Dua V, Padmanabhan P, Khanna M. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011 Jul;2(3):200-6.
  • Apostolakis D, Brown JE. The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve: prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Sep;23(9):1022-30.
  • Vieira CL, Veloso SDAR, Lopes FF. Location of the course of the mandibular canal, anterior loop and accessory mental foramen through cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Dec;40(12):1411-1417.
  • do Nascimento EH, Dos Anjos Pontual ML, Dos Anjos Pontual A, da Cruz Perez DE, Figueiroa JN, Frazão MA, Ramos-Perez FM. Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal: A study using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2016 Jun;46(2):69-75.
  • Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):731-4.
  • Torres MG, Valverde Lde F, Vidal MT, Crusoé-Rebello IM. Accessory mental foramen: A rare anatomical variation detected by cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Mar;45(1):61-5.
Toplam 28 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Nedim Güneş 0000-0001-7160-1899

Mehmet Gül 0000-0002-5721-8778

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Ağustos 2021
Kabul Tarihi 26 Ekim 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Güneş N, Gül M. Güneydoğu Anadolu Popülasyonunda Aksesuar Mental Foramen Prevalansının Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi İle Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;18(3):480-4.

Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi  / Journal of Harran University Medical Faculty