A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS

Nurcan Demirtaş

A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS

Öz

This study provides a very general and limited overview of the understanding of judicial electronic documents in electronic judicial proceedings in general and the steps of electronicisation of the judiciary that are currently taking place from the perspective of traditional civil procedural law. How judicial electronic documents, electronic data, electronic media and electronic tools are constructed and what kind of position they can occupy in electronic judicial process is briefly scrutinised with a few examples. In this context, electronic substantive/formal judicial activities and electronic judicial systems where judicial electronic documents are created or stored are briefly mentioned through examples. Issues such as the use of artificial intelligence tools, electronic hearing and the principles of use of secure electronic signature are not directly included in the scope of this study, as they expand the scope of the subject matter excessively and are also debatable areas.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ashley, Kevin D.; Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Atalay, Oğuz; “Emare İspatı”, Manisa Barosu Dergisi, Y. 18, V. 70, 1999, p. 7-22.
Atalay, Oğuz; Pekcanıtez Usûl – Medenî Usûl Hukuku (3 Cilt), 15. E., İstanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2017.
Atalı, Murat/Ermenek, İbrahim/Erdoğan, Ersin; Medenî Usûl Hukuku, 5. E., Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2022.
Becker, Arnd; Elektronische Dokumente als Beweismittel im Zivilprozess, Peter Lang, 2004.
Bergman, Margarethe/ Streitz, Sirgfried; “Beweisführung durch EDVgestützte Dokumentation“, CR, 1994, p. 77-83.
Berkin, Necmettin; Medenî Usûl Hukuku Esasları, İstanbul, 1969.
Bizer, Johann/ Hammer, Volker; “Elektronisch signierte Dokumente als Beweismittel”, DuD, 11/1993, p. 619-625.

Bozkurt-Yüksel, Armağan; “Nesnelerin İnternetinin Hukuki Yönden İncelenmesi”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 17, V. 2 (Aralık 2015): p. 113-40.
Czeguhn, Ignacio; “Beweiswert und Beweiskraft digitaler Dokumente im Zivilprozess”, JuS, 2004, p. 124-126.
Erturgut, Mine; “Elektronik İmza Bakımından E-Belge ve E-İmza”, Bankacılar Dergisi, V. 48, 2004, p. 66-79.
Hähnchen, Susanne; “Elektronische Akten bei Gericht - Chancen und Hindernisse”, NJW, 2005, p. 2257-2259.
Hasenböhler, Franz; Das Beweisrecht der ZPO, Bd. 1 Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Mitwirkungspflichten und Verweigerungsrecht, Schultess Verlag, Zurich, 2015.
Huber, Michael; “Verfahren und Urteil erster Instanz nach dem Zivilprozessreformgesetz (ZPO-RG) - 2. Teil. Weitere besonders wichtige Änderungen im Verfahrensrecht erster Instanz”, JuS, 2002, p. 690-693.
Keser Berber, Leyla; İnternet Üzerinden Yapılan İşlemlerde Elektronik Para ve Dijital İmza, Ankara, 2002.
Koruyan, Kutan/ Bingöl, Fatma İtır; “Bulut Bilişim Hizmet Sağlayıcılarının Veriyi Koruyamamaları Durumuyla İlgili Türk, Avrupa Birliği ve Amerikan Hukukundaki Düzenlemeler”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2016, 17(3), p. 367-388, p. 370 etc.,available on https://Doi.Org/10.16953/Deusbed.67150, accessed 21.09.2022.
Kuru, Baki; Hukuk Muhakemeleri Usûlü, B. I-VI, İstanbul, Demir Demir Yayıncılık, 2001.
Kuru, Baki/Aydın, Burak; Medenî Usul Hukuku El Kitabı, 2. E., B. I-II, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara, 2021.
Leipold, Dieter; “Die gerichtliche Anordnung der Urkundenvorlage im reformierten deutschen Zivilprozess”, Festschrift für Walter Gerhardt, Köln, 2004, p. 563-585.
Malzer, Hans Michael; “Elektronische Beglaubigung und Medientransfer durch den Notar nach dem Justizkommunikationsgesetz”, DNotZ, 2006, p. 9-32.
Musielak, Hans-Joachim/Voit, Wolfgang; Zivilprozessordnung, 20. Auflage, 2023.
Müller, Henning; “eJustice – Die Justiz wird digital”, JuS, 2015, p. 609-613.
Müller, Heinrich Andreas; Schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung ZPO Kommentar, 2.A., Dike Verlag AG, 2016.
Nart, Serdar; “Alman ve Türk Hukukunda Senetle İspat”, DEÜHFD, B. 9, V. 1, 2007, p. 207-232.
Oğlakçıoğlu, Onur; “Medenî Usûl Hukuku Yönünden Elektronik Adli İletişim” Aydın, 2008, available on https://oglakcioglu.av.tr/ accessed 20.12.2021.
Oğurlu, Yücel; İdare Hukukunda E-Devlet Dönüşümü ve Dijitalleşen Kamu Hizmeti, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2010.
Özbek, Mustafa Serdar/ Yardım, Mehmet Ertan; ”Elektronik Noterlik İşlemleri“, Türkiye Noterler Birliği Hukuk Dergisi, B. 3, V. 1, Ocak 2016, p. 3-118.
Özbek, Mustafa Serdar; ”Elektronik Ortamda Düzenlenen Noter Senetleri“, Cevdet Yavuz’a Armağan, 2016, p. 2213-2282.
Pekcanıtez, Hakan/Atalay, Oğuz/Özekes, Muhammet; Medenî Usûl Hukuku Ders Kitabı, 11. E., On iki Levha Yayınları, İstanbul, 2023.
Postacıoğlu, İlhan; Medenî Usûl Hukuku Dersleri, 3. E., İstanbul, Sulhi Garan Matbaası Kollektif Şirketi, 1975.
Roßnagel, Alexander/ Fischer-Dieskau, Stefanie; “Elektronische Dokumente als Beweismittel - Neufassung der Beweisregelungen durch das Justizkommunikationsgesetz”, NJW 2006, p. 806-808.
Roßnagel, Alexander/Nebel, Maxi; “Beweisführung mittels ersetzend gescannter Dokumente”, NJW, 2014, p. 886-891.
Roßnagel, Alexander; “Neue Regeln für sichere elektronische Transaktionen – Die EU-Verordnung über elektronische Identifizierung und Vertrauensdienste”, NJF, 2014, p. 3686-3692.
Rühl, Giesela; “Preparing Germany for the 21st Century: The Reform of the Code of Civil Procedure” 6 German Law Journal, Vol. 06 No. 06, 2005, p. 910-942.
Rüssmann, Helmut; “Moderne Technologien im Zivilverfahren”, 53 Annales U. Sci. Budapestinensis Rolando Eotvos Nominatae, 2012, available on (HeinOnline) accessed 21.09.2022.
Schilken, Eberhard; “Gedanken zum Anwendungsbereich von Strengbeweis und Freibeweis im Zivilverfahrensrecht“, Recht und Risiko – Festschrift für Helmut Kollhosser zum 70. Geburtstag Band II Zivilrecht, Karlsruhe, 2004, p. 649-662.
Susskind, Richard; Online Courts and Future of Justice, Oxford University Press, 2019.
von Sponeck, Henning; “Beweiswert von Computerausdrucken”, CR, 1991, p. 269-273.
Yaltı, Billur; E-İmza ve E-Belge: Kağıtsız ve Mürekkepsiz Dünyada Hukuk-I, Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, Nisan 2001, V. 151, p. 127-135.
Zimmerman, Walter; Zivilprozessordnung, 10.A., Bonn, 2016.
Zöller, Richard; Zivilprozessordnung, 33. A., Otto Schmidt, 2020.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Bilişim ve Teknoloji Hukuku, Hukuk Reformu, Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Nurcan Demirtaş ^*
0000-0001-5215-6945
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

6 Ağustos 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ocak 2024

Kabul Tarihi

1 Şubat 2024

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Demirtaş, N. (2024). A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 1-21. https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB

AMA

1.Demirtaş N. A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS. HFD. 2024;9(1):1-21. https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB

Chicago

Demirtaş, Nurcan. 2024. “A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS”. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9 (1): 1-21. https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB.

EndNote

Demirtaş N (01 Ağustos 2024) A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9 1 1–21.

IEEE

[1]N. Demirtaş, “A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS”, HFD, c. 9, sy 1, ss. 1–21, Ağu. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB

ISNAD

Demirtaş, Nurcan. “A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS”. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 9/1 (01 Ağustos 2024): 1-21. https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB.

JAMA

1.Demirtaş N. A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS. HFD. 2024;9:1–21.

MLA

Demirtaş, Nurcan. “A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS”. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 9, sy 1, Ağustos 2024, ss. 1-21, https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB.

Vancouver

1.Nurcan Demirtaş. A GENERAL AND LIMITED OVERVIEW OF THE CONCEPT OF JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS AND THE USE OF ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTS IN ELECTRONIC JUDICIAL PROCESS. HFD [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2024;9(1):1-21. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA35NX49KB