Öz Belirleme Kuramının Psikolojik Danışma Sürecinde Kullanımı

Yıl 2024, , 201 - 212, 31.10.2024

Sezen Güleç

https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1541995

Öz

Self Determination Theory (SDT) is an important theoretical framework used in psychological counseling to increase intrinsic motivation, strengthen psychological well-being and support behavioural changes. This study examines the applications and effects of SDT in psychological counseling in detail. SDT focuses on the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness to increase the intrinsic motivation of individuals. Meeting these basic needs has positive effects on the psychological well-being of clients. SDT applications in psychological counseling stand out with their effectiveness in increasing client engagement and commitment to therapy. The autonomy-supportive approaches of SDT encourage clients to participate more actively in the therapy processes, which positively affects therapeutic outcomes. Research shows that SDT increases clients' intrinsic motivation and this motivation leads to high success rates in therapeutic processes. In the study, the application examples and case studies section shows how SDT is applied in various therapeutic contexts and what results it yields. The case studies illustrate how SDT supports clients' psychological well-being and is effective in behavioural change processes. Clinical research and meta-analyses provide important findings supporting effectiveness of SDT. In conclusion, SDT is an effective approach in psychological counseling to increase clients' intrinsic motivation, strengthen their psychological well-being and support long-term changes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öz Belirleme Kuramı, özerklik, yeterlik, ilişkili olma, psikolojik danışma, uygulama.

The Application of Self-Determination Theory in Psychological Counseling Process

Öz

Self Determination Theory (SDT) is an important theoretical framework used in psychological counseling to increase intrinsic motivation, strengthen psychological well-being and support behavioural changes. This study examines the applications and effects of SDT in psychological counseling in detail. SDT focuses on the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness to increase the intrinsic motivation of individuals. Meeting these basic needs has positive effects on the psychological well-being of clients. SDT applications in psychological counseling stand out with their effectiveness in increasing client engagement and commitment to therapy. The autonomy-supportive approaches of SDT encourage clients to participate more actively in the therapy processes, which positively affects therapeutic outcomes. Research shows that SDT increases clients' intrinsic motivation and this motivation leads to high success rates in therapeutic processes. In the study, the application examples and case studies section shows how SDT is applied in various therapeutic contexts and what results it yields. The case studies illustrate how SDT supports clients' psychological well-being and is effective in behavioural change processes. Clinical research and meta-analyses provide important findings supporting effectiveness of SDT. In conclusion, SDT is an effective approach in psychological counseling to increase clients' intrinsic motivation, strengthen their psychological well-being and support long-term changes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-Determination Theory, authonomy, competence, relatedness, counseling, application.

Kaynakça

• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
• Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(3), 151-170. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_03
• Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, Y. (2023). Cross-cultural differences in the autonomy-supportive behaviors of parents and teachers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(5), 648-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221105178
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). University of Nebraska Press.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M. H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2022). The role of self-determination theory in explaining individuals' responses to positive and negative feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000842
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Barkoukis, V., Wang, J. C. K., & Baranowski, T. (2005). Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: A cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.376
• Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Culverhouse, T. (2022). Self-determination theory and behavioral change: An overview of current research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(4), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221004023
• Kaye, K., Hughes, A. M., & Smith, R. (2024). Meta-analysis of self-determination theory in clinical settings: Effectiveness and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 77, 101908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.101908
• Kim, Y., Chirkov, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). The role of cultural values in the application of self-determination theory: Evidence from cross-cultural studies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(8), 767-786. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211003789
• Morin, A., Vansteenkiste, M., & Koestner, R. (2022). Exploring the impact of self-determination theory on individual differences in motivation and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 46(3), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09923-0
• Niemann, J., Kemper, J., & Shapiro, D. (2022). Long-term effects of self-determination theory interventions in clinical practice. Psychotherapy Research, 32(1), 120-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2021.2004856
• Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., & Deci, E. L. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612455226
• Ohtake, Y., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Applying the self-determination theory to Japanese special education contexts: A four-step model. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1(3–4), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2004.04033.x
• Reeve, J. (2016). Autonomy-supportive teaching: A review of the empirical literature and implications for practice. Educational Psychologist, 51(3), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1177974
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In Advances in motivation science. 6, 111-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012753
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). University of Rochester Press.
• Ryan, R. M., Lynch, J. H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). Motivation and autonomy in counseling and psychotherapy. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 277-293). Oxford University Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
• Sailer, M., Mullan, B., & Gidley, B. (2023). Methodological advancements in the study of self-determination theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, 103350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.103350
• Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable new happiness: Prospects, practices, and prescriptions. In R. J. Diener (Ed.), Happiness in the present (pp. 276-305). Academic Press.
• Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2021). The effects of self-determination theory on long-term well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(2), 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1743392
• Vansteenkiste, M., & Sheldon, K. M. (2006). There’s nothing more practical than a good theory: Integrating self-determination theory and goal-setting theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 435-450. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X53170
• Vansteenkiste, M., Mouratidis, A., & Nicaise, V. (2022). The role of self-determination theory in promoting behavior change and achievement. Motivation and Emotion, 46(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09921-2
• Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2004). How to become a persevering exerciser? Providing a clear, future intrinsic goal in an autonomy-supportive way. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26(2), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.232
• Walck, D. (2017). Understanding culturally diverse client motivation from a self-determination theory perspective using a critical race theory lens (Doctoral dissertation). University of Rochester http://hdl.handle.net/1802/33060
• Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115