Schmitt, the Constructivist? Possible Contributions to IR Theory

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 312 - 322, 31.05.2023

Abdullah Enes Tüzgen

https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1144578

Öz

This paper proposes re-reading famous German philosopher Carl Schmitt as a possible contributor to constructivist IR theory. It first examines Schmitt’s theories to determine if his writings enable such a reading. The paper argues that Schmitt, in fact, fulfills four criteria to be considered in the constructivist camp. The paper then turns to Wendt’s attempt to construct a systemic constructivist theory of IR. It contends that Wendt’s endeavor has certain shortcomings; and that these can be solved by Schmitt’s contribution. The distinction between “public and private enemy”; and the concept of Grossraum in Schmitt’s writings can be utilized as useful tools to solve certain theoretical problems regarding “self vs. other” distinction. In other words, Grossraum can act as a conceptual category to solve the tension between particularism of group self, and hypothetical universal state Wendt foresees. Practically that means the possibility of transcending nation-state identities without a necessity to accept that logical conclusion of such a reasoning is a universal world state.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carl Schmitt, Carl Schmitt, Carl Schmitt, constructivism, IR Theory, Alexander Wendt, Alexander Wendt, Alexander Wendt, Alexander Wendt, self-other distinction, self-other distinction, self-other distinction

Sosyal İnşacı Schmitt? Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorisine Muhtemel Katkılar

Öz

Bu makale meşhur Alman filozof Carl Schmitt’in uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerine katkı sunabilecek muhtemel bir isim olarak yeni bir okumasını önermektedir. Öncelikle Schmitt’in eserlerinde böyle bir okumanın mümkün olup olmadığı irdelenmektedir. Bu çalışma Schmitt’in sosyal inşacı uluslararası ilişkiler teorisi dahilinde telakki edilebilmesini mümkün kılan dört kriteri sağladığını savunmaktadır. Makale daha sonra Alexader Wendt’in sistemik uluslararası ilişkiler teorisi inşası çabalarını mercek altına almakta ve Wendt’in teklifinin bazı açmazları olduğunu; dahası bu açmazların Schmitt’in katkıları ile çözülebileceğini savunmaktadır. Schmitt’in kuramsallaştırdığı “kamusal ve özel düşman” ayrımı; ve yine onun Grossraum kavramsallaştırması, “ben ve öteki” ayrımına dair bazı teorik problemlere katkı sunmaktadır. Başka bir deyişle, grup kimliklerinin partikülarizmi ile Wendt’in öngördüğü farazi küresel dünya devleti arasındaki gerilimde Grossraum anahtar bir kavramsal kategori olarak işleyebilir. Daha pratik olarak bu, ulus-devlet üstü kimlikleri mümkün görmenin ille de küresel bir dünya devleti sonucunu mantıksal olarak zorunlu kılmayacağı manasına gelmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carl Schmitt, sosyal inşacılık, Alexander Wendt, uluslararası ilişkiler teorisi, ben ve öteki ayrımı

Kaynakça

• Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitanism Europe’s Way Out of Crisis. European Journal of Social Theory, 10(1), 67–85.
• Checkel, J. T. (1997). International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the Rationalist—Constructivist Divide. European Journal of International Relations, 3(4), 473–495.
• Dean, M. (2006) “A Political Mythology of World Order Carl Schmitt’s Nomos” Theory, Culture & Society 2006, Vol. 23(5): 1–22
• Gelderen, M. v. (2011) “‘Iustitiam non includo’: Carl Schmitt, Hugo Grotius and the Ius Publicum Europaeum” History of European Ideas 37 (2011) 154–159
• Habermas, J. (2006). The Divided West. Polity.
• Lebow, R. (2008) “Identity and International Relations“ International Relations 2008 22: 473
• McCormick, J. (2007) “Irrational Choice and Mortal Combat as Political Destiny: The Essential Carl Schmitt” Annual Review of Political Science. 2007. 10:315–39
• McCormick, J. (1998) “Political Theory and Political Theology: The Second Wave of Carl Schmitt in English” Political Theory, Vol. 26, No. 6 (Dec., 1998), pp. 830- 854
• Meier, H. (1995) Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue, trans. Harvey Lomax. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Mouffe, C. (1999). The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. Verso.
• Schmitt, C. (2002) Ex Captivate Salus: Erfahrungen der Zeit 1945/47, 2nd ed.
• Schmitt, C. (2006). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Telos Press Publishing.
• Schmitt, C. (2007). The Concept of the Political. University of Chicago Press
• Slomp, G. (2007) “Carl Schmitt on Friendship: Polemics and Diagnostics” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy Vol. 10, No. 2, 199–213
• Teschke, B. (2011) “Decision and Indecision: Political and Intellectual Receptions of Carl Schmitt” New Left Review Vol. 67 Jan-Feb 2011
• Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill
• Weldes, J. (1999). Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. University of Minnesota Press.
• Wendt, A. (1992). “Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics” International Organization, 46 , pp 391-425
• Wendt, A. (1994) “Collective Identity Formation and the International State” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 2 (Jun., 1994), pp. 384-396
• Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p.231
• Wendt, A. (2003) “Why a World State is Inevitable” European Journal of International Relations Vol. 9(4): 491–542
• Zarmanian, T. (2006) “Carl Schmitt and the Problem of Legal Order: From Domestic to International” Leiden Journal of International Law, 19 (2006), pp. 41–67