A Negative Sociology of the State: Thinking the State with Pierre Bourdieu

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 659 - 674, 30.11.2023

Gürhan Özpolat

https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1294753

Öz

This article explores Pierre Bourdieu’s theory on the state’s pivotal role in producing and perpetuating social order, symbolic power, and domination. Bourdieu challenges the traditional view of the state as a monolithic entity and emphasizes its function as a generator of symbolic capital. According to Bourdieu, the state is the central bank of symbolic capital, confers privileges and authorizations upon social actors, thereby cements its position as the monopoly of legitimate symbolic violence. He contends that the state operates within a universe of belief, much like a sorcerer, and its power lies in its capacity to make itself invisible while maintaining social order. By examining the state as a meta-field, Bourdieu challenges conventional state theories, uncovering the underlying power dynamics and interests within the bureaucratic sphere. In conclusion, Bourdieu’s multifaceted perspective on the state provides a robust framework for understanding the intricate interplay of symbolic power, domination, and social order. This article highlights the importance of critically analysing the state’s role in shaping collective beliefs and underscores the necessity of comprehensively understanding state power, encompassing both its symbolic and material dimensions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bureaucratic field, genetic sociology, negative sociology, symbolic capital, symbolic power

Bir Negatif Devlet Sosyolojisi: Pierre Bourdieu ile Devleti Düşünmek

Öz

Bu makale Pierre Bourdieu’nün devletin toplumsal düzen, simgesel iktidar ve tahakkümün üretilmesi ve sürdürülmesindeki önemli rolüne ilişkin teorisini incelemektedir. Bourdieu, devletin monolitik bir varlık olduğu yönündeki geleneksel görüşe karşı çıkmakta ve simgesel sermaye üreticisi olarak işlevini vurgulamaktadır. Bourdieu’ye göre devlet, simgesel sermayenin merkez bankasıdır, toplumsal aktörlere ayrıcalıklar ve yetkiler verir, böylece meşru simgesel şiddet tekeli olarak konumunu sağlamlaştırır. Devletin, tıpkı bir büyücü gibi, bir inanç evreni içinde faaliyet gösterdiğini ve gücünün, toplumsal düzeni sağlarken kendini görünmez kılma kapasitesinde yattığını iddia eder. Devleti bir meta alan olarak inceleyen Bourdieu, geleneksel devlet teorilerine meydan okuyarak bürokratik alanın altında yatan güç dinamiklerini ve çıkarları ortaya çıkarır. Sonuç olarak, Bourdieu’nün devlete ilişkin çok yönlü perspektifi, simgesel iktidar, tahakküm ve toplumsal düzenin karmaşık etkileşimini anlamak için sağlam bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu makale, devletin kolektif inançları şekillendirmedeki rolünü eleştirel bir şekilde analiz etmenin önemini vurgulamakta ve devlet iktidarını hem simgesel hem de maddi boyutlarını kapsayacak şekilde kapsamlı bir şekilde anlamanın gerekliliğinin altını çizmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bürokratik alan, genetik sosyoloji, negatif sosyoloji, simgesel sermaye, simgesel iktidar

Kaynakça

• Abrams, P. (1988). Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977). Journal of Historical Sociology, 1(1), 58–89.
• Addi, L. (2001). Violence symbolique et statut du politique chez Pierre Bourdieu. Revue Française de Science Politique, 6(51), 949–963.
• Althusser, L. (2005). For Marx (trans. B. Brewster). London and New York: Verso.
• Arnholtz, J., & Hammerslev, O. (2013). Transcended Power of the State: The Role of Actors in Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology of the State. Distinktion, 14(1), 42–64.
• Batou, J., & Keucheyan, R. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu et le marxisme de son temps: une rencontre manquée ? Swiss Political Science Review, 20(1), 19–24.
• Berkkurt, A. G. (2012). Sosyolojinin Kaçınılmaz Nesnesi Devlet Üzerine: Pierre Bourdieu’nün 1989-1992 Yılları Arasında Collège de France’da Verdiği Dersler. Sosyoloji Dergisi, 25(3), 31–56.
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Sur le pouvoir symbolique. Annales. Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations, 3(32), 405–411.
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field. Comparative Social Research, 13, 1–44.
• Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question (trans. R. Nice). London: SAGE Publications.
• Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1–18.
• Bourdieu, P. (1996). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power (trans. L. C. Clough). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1998a). Acts of resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market (trans. R. Nice). New York: The New Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1998b). Pratical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations (trans. R. Nice). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination (trans. R. Nice). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (2004). The Mystery of the Ministry: From Particular Wills to the General Will. Constellations, 11(1), 37–43.
• Bourdieu, P. (2013). Bilimin Toplumsal Kullanımları: Bilimsel Alanın Klinik Bir Sosyolojisi İçin (trans. L. Ünsaldı). Ankara: Heretik Yayıncılık.
• Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1989-1992 (trans. D. Fernbach). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P., Christin, O., & Will, P.-É. (2000). Sur la science de l’État. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 133(3), 3–11.
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1993). From Ruling Class to Field of Power: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu on La Noblesse d’État. Theory, Culture & Society, 10(3), 19–44.
• Gözaydın, İ. (2014). Bourdieu ve Din. Cogito, (76), 389–401.
• Lenoir, R. (2012). L’État selon Pierre Bourdieu. Societes Contemporaines, 87(3), 123–154.
• Loveman, M. (2005). The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1651–1683.
• Loyal, S. (2017). Bourdieu’s Theory of the State. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
• Pallotta, J. (2015). Bourdieu’s Engagement with Althusserian Marxism: The Question of the State. Actuel Marx, 58(2), 130–143.
• Sapiro, G. (2019). Rethinking the Concept of Autonomy for the Sociology of Symbolic Goods. Biens Symboliques: Revue de Sciences Sociales Sur Les Arts, La Culture et Les Idées, (4), 1–50.
• Shammas, V. L. (2019). The State as God: On Bourdieu’s Political Theology. Journal of Extreme Anthropology, 2(2), 61–77.
• Steinmetz, G. (2014a). État-mort, État-fort, État-empire. Actes de La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 201–202(1–2), 112. Steinmetz, G. (2014b). On Bourdieu, Sur l’État: Field Theory and the State, Colonies, and Empires. Sociologica, 8(3), 1–13.
• Swartz, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
• Weber, M. (1965). The Sociology of Religion (trans. E. Fischoff). London: Methuen & Co Ltd.
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.