Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Etkisinin Keşfi: Türk Üniversitelerinde Girişimcilik Niyetleri Üzerine bir Araştırma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, girişimcilik eğitimi ile girişimcilik niyetlerinin arasındaki ilişkiyi Türk üniversiteleri bağlamında öğretim elemanlarının, ders içeriğinin ve üniversite politikalarının farklı ancak birbiriyle ilişkili işlevlerini incelemeyi hedeflemektedir. Tasarım/Yöntem: Kaynak Tabanlı Teori kapsamında, bu çalışma nitel bir yaklaşım benimsemektedir. Türkiye'nin çeşitli üniversitelerine devam eden öğrencilerden oluşan bir örneklemden çevrimiçi anket aracılığıyla veri toplanmıştır. Öğrencilerin girişimcilik niyetlerini üzerinde öğretim elemanlarının, ders içeriğinin ve üniversite politikalarının bireysel rollerini ortaya çıkarmak için hiyerarşik regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar: Ampirik kanıtlar, girişimcilik eğitmenlerinin, ders içeriğinin ve üniversite politikalarının girişimcilik niyetlerinin üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu faktörler arasında üniversite politikalarının etkisi, girişimcilik niyetlerinin ardındaki en büyük itici güç olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Uygulama Çıkarımları: Kurumlar, girişimcilik eğitiminin, özellikle öğretim elemanları, içerik ve politikalarla ilgili olarak girişimci niyetleri nasıl etkilediğini anlayarak öğrencileri girişimci faaliyetlere yönlendirecek bir atmosfer oluşturmaya yönelik stratejiler oluşturabilir, müfredatlarını ve destek sistemlerini girişimciliği teşvik edecek şekilde düzenleyebilirler. Özgün Değer: Öğretim elemanlarının rollerini, ders içeriğini ve üniversite politikalarını araştıran bu araştırma, girişimcilik eğitiminin girişimci niyetleri şekillendirdiği karmaşık mekanizmaları incelemekte ve nispeten az araştırılmış bir alan olan öğrencilerin bakış açılarını analiz ederek ilgili yazına katkıda bulunmaktadır. Türk üniversitelerindeki politikaların etkisine ilişkin önceki araştırmaların sınırlı kapsamı göz önüne alındığında, bu çalışma ilgili yazını genişletmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• girişimcilik niyeti
• girişimcilik eğitimi
• öğretim elemanı rolü
• ders içeriği
• politikalar

Exploring The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Study on Entrepreneurial Intentions in Turkish Universities

Öz

Objectives: Entrepreneurship education serves as a key driver within the entrepreneurial ecosystem, equipping individuals with the essential knowledge, skills, and resources to fuel job creation and economic expansion. Recognizing this vital role, this study aims to delve into the intricate relationship between entrepreneurship education and the cultivation of entrepreneurial intentions within the context of Turkish universities. Specifically, it focuses on the distinct yet interrelated functions of lecturers, course content, and university policies in shaping students' aspirations for entrepreneurship. Design/methodology/approach: The foundation of this study is rooted in Resource-Based Theory, which emphasizes the pivotal significance of resources, skills, and capabilities in fostering competitive advantage. Building upon this theoretical framework, this study takes on human capital as a resource and adopts a quantitative approach to unravel the multifaceted dynamics between entrepreneurship education and students' entrepreneurial intentions. An extensive online survey is conducted among a diverse group of students from various Turkish universities. Hierarchical regression analysis is employed to unveil the individual roles of lecturers, course content, and university policies in nurturing students' entrepreneurial intentions. Results: Empirical evidence highlights the substantial influence of entrepreneurship education on students' entrepreneurial intentions. The outcomes indicate the significance of entrepreneurship lecturers, course content, and university policies as influential determinants of entrepreneurial intentions. Notably, among these factors, the influence of university policies emerges as the utmost driving force behind entrepreneurial intentions. This finding underscores the pivotal role of well-designed institutional policies in fostering an environment conducive to effective entrepreneurship education and subsequently nurturing and cultivating entrepreneurial intentions. Practical implications: This study provides practical insights for institutions and policymakers, urging institutions to craft strategies to foster an atmosphere that drives students toward entrepreneurial activities. By understanding how entrepreneurship education, particularly concerning lecturers, content, and policies, influences entrepreneurial intentions, institutions can tailor their curricula and support systems to not only promote entrepreneurship but also foster a culture of entrepreneurial intent. Originality/value: This study pushes the boundaries of existing knowledge by illuminating the relatively unexplored yet crucially important crossroads of entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions with respect to Turkish universities. Moreover, the study adds an important perspective by focusing on analyzing the viewpoint of students, an area that has been relatively under-researched. This endeavor recognizes students as the primary beneficiaries of entrepreneurial education and consequently, a deeper exploration of their experiences and perceptions holds immense promise for enriching our understanding of the educational process's impact. By investigating the roles of lecturers, course content, and university policies, this research unravels the intricate mechanisms through which entrepreneurship education molds entrepreneurial intentions. Notably, given the limited scope of prior research on the influence of policies in Turkish universities, the distinct emphasis placed on policy impact in this study stands out as a noteworthy contribution.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• entrepreneurial intentions
• entrepreneurship education
• lecturer role
• course content
• policies

Kaynakça

1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
3. Akın, H. B., & Demirel, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship Education and Perception Change: The Preliminary Outcomes of Compulsory Entrepreneurship Course Experience in Turkey. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (34), 15-26.
4. Alberti, F., Sciascia, S., & Poli, A. (2004, July). Entrepreneurship education: notes on an ongoing debate. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual IntEnt Conference, University of Napoli Federico II, Italy (Vol. 4, No. 7).
5. Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of management, 27(6), 755-775.
6. Arpat, B., Yeşi̇l, Y., & Kocaalan, M. L. (2019). A Longitudinal Study on The Effect of Entrepreneurship Courses Taught at the Vocational Colleges in Turkey on Students’ Entrepreneurial Tendency. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 10(2), 127-161.
7. Askun, B., & Yıldırım, N. (2011). Insights on Entrepreneurship Education in Public Universities in Turkey: Creating Entrepreneurs or Not?, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 663-676.
8. Badwan, A. (2018). The adoption of mentorship and its influence on students’ cognitive psychology: A case of entrepreneurship education (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton, USA).

9. Bailetti, T. (2011). Fostering student entrepreneurship and university spinoff companies. Technology innovation management review, 1(1), 7-12.
10. Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European research on management and business economics, 24(1), 53-61.
11. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
12. Bechard, J. P., & Toulouse, J. M. (1998). Validation of a didactic model for the analysis of training objectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 13(4), 317-332.
13. Bello, B., Mattana, V., & Loi, M. (2018). The power of peers: A new look at the impact of creativity, social context and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions. International journal of entrepreneurial behavior & research, 24(1), 214-233.
14. Bergmann, H., Geissler, M., Hundt, C., & Grave, B. (2018). The climate for entrepreneurship at higher education institutions. Research policy, 47(4), 700-716.
15. Berk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic medicine, 80(1), 66-71.
16. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research policy, 36(5), 694-707.
17. Cho, Y. H., & Lee, J. H. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education and performance. Asia pacific journal of innovation and entrepreneurship, 12(2), 124-134.
18. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, USA.
19. Demirdag, İ., & Eraydin, A. (2021). Explaining regional differences in firm formation rates: how far are government policies important for entrepreneurship?. Journal of entrepreneurship in emerging economies, 13(2), 254-281.
20. Demirhan, D., Temel, S., & Durst, S. (2019). The role of public entrepreneurship programs in fostering technology-based entrepreneurship: a Turkish case study. In Societal Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness (pp. 5-28). Emerald Publishing Limited.
21. Doğan, E. (2015). The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Intentions of University Students In Turkey. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, (23), 79-93.
22. Douglas, L. M. (2014). Entrepreneurship education on women entrepreneurs at pre-primary and primary level in Kenya. Research on humanities and social sciences, 4(22), 77-83.
23. Ebewo, P. E., Rugimbana, R., & Shambare, R. (2017). Effects of entrepreneurship education on students’ entrepreneurial intentions: A case of Botswana. Management, 5(4), 278-289.
24. Edokpolor, J. E., & Somorin, K. (2017). Entrepreneurship education programme and its influence in developing entrepreneurship key competencies among undergraduate students. Problems of education in the 21st century, 75(2), 144.
25. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European industrial training, 32(7), 569-593.
26. Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of small business management, 53(1), 75-93.
27. Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas‐Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European industrial training, 30(9), 701-720.
28. Fulgence, K. (2015). Assessing the status of entrepreneurship education courses in higher learning institutions: The case of Tanzania education schools. Education + training, 57(2), 239-258.
29. Genç, S. Y., Sesen, H., Castanho, R. A., Kirikkaleli, D., & Soran, S. (2020). Transforming Turkish universities to entrepreneurial universities for sustainability: From strategy to practice. Sustainability, 12(4), 1496.
30. Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of a new ‘enterprise’and ‘entrepreneurship’ paradigm for learning: creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International journal of management reviews, 4(3), 233-269.
31. Gürol, Y., & Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education+ training, 48(1), 25-38.
32. Gürol, Y., Ülgen, A. & Atsan, N. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in Turkish universities, Journal of Asia entrepreneurship and sustainability, 4(4), 134-145.
33. Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education+ training, 47(2), 98-111.
34. Iacobucci, D., & Micozzi, A. (2012). Entrepreneurship education in Italian universities: trend, situation and opportunities. Education+ training, 54(8/9), 673-696.
35. Jones, B., & Iredale, N. (2010). Enterprise education as pedagogy. Education+ training, 52(1), 7-19.
36. Jones, C. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: revisiting our role and its purpose. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 17(4), 500-513.
37. Kalyoncuoğlu, S., Aydıntan, B., & Göksel, A. (2017). The effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: An experimental study on undergraduate business students. Journal of management research, 9(3), 72-91.
38. Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J., Lans, T., Chizari, M., & Mulder, M. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education: A study of Iranian students' entrepreneurial intentions and opportunity identification. Journal of small business management, 54(1), 187-209.
39. Kassean, H., Vanevenhoven, J., Liguori, E., & Winkel, D. E. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: a need for reflection, real-world experience and action. International journal of Entrepreneurial behavior & research, 21(5), 690-708.
40. Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. Journal of business venturing, 18(2), 283-300.
41. Kellermanns, F., Walter, J., Crook, T. R., Kemmerer, B., & Narayanan, V. (2016). The resource‐based view in entrepreneurship: A content‐analytical comparison of researchers' and entrepreneurs' views. Journal of small business management, 54(1), 26-48.
42. Kirkwood, J., Dwyer, K., & Gray, B. (2014). Students' reflections on the value of an entrepreneurship education. The international journal of management education, 12(3), 307-316.
43. Kjellman, A., & Ehrsten, M. (2005). A theory of homo entreprenaurus. In The emergence of entrepreneurial economics (Vol. 9, pp. 211-232). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
44. Klapper, R. G., & Neergaard, H. (2017). Teaching entrepreneurship as lived experience through ‘wonderment exercises’. In Entrepreneurship education: New perspectives on entrepreneurship education (pp. 145-170). Emerald Publishing Limited.
45. Klapper, R., & Tegtmeier, S. (2010). Innovating entrepreneurial pedagogy: examples from France and Germany. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 17(4), 552-568.
46. Kobia, M., & Sikalieh, D. (2010). Towards a search for the meaning of entrepreneurship. Journal of European industrial training, 34(2), 110-127.
47. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
48. Li, G., Long, Z., Jiang, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, P., & Huang, Z. (2023). Entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurship policy and entrepreneurial competence: Mediating effect of entrepreneurship competition in China. Education+ training, 65(4), 607-629.
49. Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross–cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 33(3), 593-617.
50. Liñán, F., Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C., & Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. International entrepreneurship and management journal, 7, 195-218.
51. Liu, X., Liu, Y & Zhuxin, W. A. N. (2015). Difficulties of college students’ business startups under economic new normal and their countermeasures. Cross-cultural communication, 11(11), 107-112.
52. Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of business venturing, 28(2), 211-224.
53. Matlay, H. (2019). Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy–2018. Education+ training, 61(7/8), 1040-1042.
54. Mawonedzo, A., Tanga, M., Luggya, S., & Nsubuga, Y. (2020). Implementing strategies of entrepreneurship education in Zimbabwe. Education+ training, 63(1), 85-100.
55. McNally, J. J., Piperopoulos, P., Welsh, D. H., Mengel, T., Tantawy, M., & Papageorgiadis, N. (2020). From pedagogy to andragogy: Assessing the impact of social entrepreneurship course syllabi on the Millennial learner. Journal of small business management, 58(5), 871-892.
56. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 1(1), 61-89.
57. Mohamed, N. A., & Sheikh Ali, A. Y. (2021). Entrepreneurship education: systematic literature review and future research directions. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and sustainable development, 17(4), 644-661.
58. Molaei, R., Zali, M. R., Mobaraki, M. H., & Farsi, J. Y. (2014). The impact of entrepreneurial ideas and cognitive style on students entrepreneurial intention. Journal of entrepreneurship in emerging economies, 6(2), 140-162.
59. Mueller, S. (2011). Increasing entrepreneurial intention: Effective entrepreneurship course characteristics. International journal of entrepreneurship and small business, 13(1), 55-74.
60. Muofhe, N. J., & Du Toit, W. F. (2011). Entrepreneurial education's and entrepreneurial role models' influence on career choice. SA journal of human resource management, 9(1), 1-15.
61. Otache, I. (2019). Enhancing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education: the role of entrepreneurial lecturers. Education+ training, 61(7/8), 918-939.
62. Othman, N. H., & Othman, N. (2019). A systematic review on entrepreneurship education in higher learning institutions in Southeast Asia. Universal journal of educational research, 7(11), 2406-2416.
63. Rae, D., & Carswell, M. (2001). Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 8(2), 150-158.
64. Rengiah, P. (2013). Effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in developing entrepreneurial intentions among Malaysian university students (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Cross University).
65. Reynolds, P., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional studies, 28(4), 443-456.
66. Schindehutte, M., Morris, M., & Allen, J. (2006). Beyond achievement: Entrepreneurship as extreme experience. Small business economics, 27, 349-368.
67. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
68. Sirelkhatim, F., & Gangi, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent business & management, 2(1), 1052034.
69. Smallbone, D. (2016). Entrepreneurship policy: Issues and challenges, Small enterprise research, 23(3), 201–218.
70. Solesvik, M. Z., Westhead, P., Kolvereid, L., & Matlay, H. (2012). Student intentions to become self‐employed: the Ukrainian context. Journal of small business and enterprise development, 19(3), 441-460.
71. Solomon, G. T., Weaver, K. M., & Fernald Jr, L. W. (1994). A historical examination of small business management and entrepreneurship pedagogy. Simulation & gaming, 25(3), 338-352.
72. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small business economics, 33, 77-89.
73. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305.
74. Toding, M., & Venesaar, U. (2018). Discovering and developing conceptual understanding of teaching and learning in entrepreneurship lecturers. Education+ training, 60(7/8), 696-718.
75. TÜBİTAK. (2021). 2022 Yılı Girişimci ve Yenilikçi Üniversite Endeksi Sonuçları, https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/sites/default/files/gostergebazliveri_tablo.pdf (08.08.2022)
76. Turker, D., & Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?. Journal of European industrial training, 33(2), 142-159.
77. Turkish Grand National Assembly. (2006). Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013), https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2006/07/20060701M1-2.pdf (10.10.2022)
78. Von Graevenitz, G., Harhoff, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 76(1), 90-112.
79. Walshok, M. L., & Shapiro, J. D. (2014). Beyond tech transfer: a more comprehensive approach to measuring the entrepreneurial university. In Academic Entrepreneurship: creating an entrepreneurial ecosystem (Vol. 16, pp. 1-36). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
80. Walter, S. G., & Block, J. H. (2016). Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: An institutional perspective. Journal of business venturing, 31(2), 216-233.
81. Westhead, P., & Solesvik, M. Z. (2016). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: Do female students benefit?. International small business journal, 34(8), 979-1003.
82. Wilson, K. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in Europe. Entrepreneurship and higher education, Chapter 5, OECD.
83. Yarkin, D., & Yeşil, Y. (2016). The Role of Entrepreneurship Education on Internationalization Intention. A Case Study from Izmir-TURKEY. European journal of social science education and research, 3(1), 128-134.
84. Yıldırım, N., & Aşkun, O. B. (2012). Entrepreneurship intentions of public universities in Turkey: going beyond education and research?. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 58, 953-963.
85. Yurtkoru, E. S., Kuşcu, Z. K., & Doğanay, A. (2014). Exploring the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention on Turkish university students. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 150, 841-850.
86. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., Gutierrez, I., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). Introduction to Special Topic Forum Privatization and Entrepreneurial Transformation: Emerging Issues and a Future Research Agenda. Academy of management review, 25(3), 509-524.
87. Zamberi Ahmad, S. (2013). The need for inclusion of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia lower and higher learning institutions. Education+ training, 55(2), 191-203.
88. Zeng, Z. E., & Honig, B. (2016). How should entrepreneurship be taught to students with diverse experience? A set of conceptual models of entrepreneurship education. In Models of start-up thinking and action: Theoretical, empirical and pedagogical approaches (Vol. 18, pp. 237-282). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.