Kenti Bourdieu’yle Düşünmek: İlişkisi, İlkeleri ve Uygulamaları

Öz

Bu makale, [International Journal of Urban and Regional Research’ün önümüzdeki iki sayısı boyunca] “Etkinlikler ve Tartışmalar” bölümünde yer verilecek olan “Bourdieu’yü Kente Getirmek” seminerinin ana hatlarını ele alıyor. Öncelikle, Bourdieu’nün Béarn ve Cezayir’de yürüttüğü, iktidar, mekan ve kentleşme temalı erken dönem çalışmalarını, Fransız metropolündeki toplumsal sefaleti incelediği geç dönem çalışmasıyla ilişkilendirerek Bourdieu sosyolojisinin kent çalışmaları için önemini ortaya koyuyorum. Ardından, Bourdieu’nün araştırma pratiğine hayat veren ve kent araştırmalarına verimli bir şekilde rehberlik edebilecek dört kesişen ilkeye ışık tutuyorum: Bachelardçı epistemolojik kopuş ve ihtiyat koşulu; faili (habitus), dünyayı (alana kaynaklık eden toplumsal uzam) ve araştırmacının kategorilerini (epistemik düşünümsellik) üçlü bir tarihselleştirmeye tabi tutmayı gerektiren Weberci buyruk; sembolik uzam, toplumsal uzam ve fiziksel uzam arasındaki karşılıklı mütekabiliyetin izini sürebilmek için topolojik akıl yürütme türüne başvurmaya çağıran Leibnizci-Durkheimcı davet; sembolik yapıların teşkil edici etkinliğinin farkında olmaya çağıran Cassirerci uğrak. Ayrıca, Bourdieucü kent araştırmacılarının kaçınmaları gereken üç tuzağa işaret ediyorum: Bunlardan ilki kavram fetişizmidir; ikincisi, Bourdieu’nün kavramlarının teşvik ettiği araştırma işlemlerinin uygulanamadığı hallerde bile “Bourdieucü konuşma” cazibesidir; üçüncüsü ise kavramları uyarlayarak kullanmanın daha üretken olduğu durumlarda bile Bourdieucü kuramsal çerçevenin bir blok olarak dayatılmasıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bourdieu
• kent
• uzam
• sosyal topoloji
• sembolik iktidar
• epistemolojik ihtiyat
• kamp
• kentleşme
• kent çalışmaları

Bourdieu Comes to Town: Pertinence, Principles, Applications

Öz

This article frames the themes of the two‐part Interventions section ‘Bourdieu Comes to Town’. I first establish the pertinence of Bourdieu's sociology for students of the city by revisiting his youthful work on power, space, and the diffusion of urban forms in provincial Béarn and colonial Algeria. In both cases, urbanization is the key vector of transformation, and the city, town, or camp the site anchoring the forces dissolving the social fabric of the French countryside and overturning French imperialism in North Africa. These early studies establish that all social and mental structures have spatial correlates and conditions of possibility; that social distance and power relations are both expressed in and reinforced by spatial distance; and that propinquity to the center of accumulation of capital (economic, military, or cultural) is a key determinant of the force and velocity of social change. Next, I discuss four principles that undergird Bourdieu's investigations and can profitably drive urban inquiry: the Bachelardian moment of epistemological rupture, the Weberian invitation to historicize the agent (habitus), the world (social space) and the categories of the analyst (epistemic reflexivity); the Leibnizian‐Durkheimian imperative to deploy the topological mode of reasoning; and Cassirer's command to heed the constitutive efficacy of symbolic structures. The plasticity and productivity of his concepts suggest that Bourdieu can not only energize urban inquiry but also merge it into a broader analytic of the trialectic of symbolic division, social space, and the built environment. This paves a pathway for reconceptualizing the urban as the domain of accumulation, differentiation and contestation of manifold forms of capital, which makes the city a central ground, product, and prize of historical struggles.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bourdieu
• city
• space
• social topography
• symbolic power
• epistemological vigilance
• camp
• urbanization
• urban studies

Kaynakça

1. Bachelard, G. (1938). La Formation de l’espirit scientifique: Contribution à psycha-nalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Vrin, 1999.
2. Barnes, K., Gordon, W., Nicholas, G., ve Chris G. (2006). Community and nos-talgia in urban revitalization: A critique of ‘urban village’ and ‘creative class’ strategies as remedies for social ‘problems’. Australian Geographer 37, no 3: 335-354.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1958). Sociologie de l’Algérie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (tadil edilmiş çev. The Algerians, Boston: Beacon Press, 1962).
4. Bourdieu, P. (1962). Célibat et condition paysanne. Études rurales 5-6 (April): 32-136. Kısaltılmış İngilizce çev.: The ball of bachelors: The crisis of the peasant society in Béarn (Cambridge: Polity Pressi [2002] 2008) ss. 7-130.
5. Bourdieu, P., Alain D., Jean-Pierre R. ve Claude S. (1963). Travail et traveilleur-sen Algérie. Paris and the Hauge: Mouton.
6. Bourdieu, P. ve Abdelmalek S. (1964). Le Déracinement: La crise de l’agriculture traditionelle en Algérie. Paris: Minuit.
7. Bourdieu, P., Jean-Claude, C. ve Jean-Claude, P. (1968). Le Métier de sociologue: Préalables épistémologiques. Paris and the Hauge: Mouton. (İngilizce çev.: The Craft of Sociology. New York: Walter De Gruyter, 1991).
8. Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédée de trois essais d’ethnologie kabyle. Geneva: Droz (tadil edilmiş çev. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, 1977).

9. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Algérie 60: Structures temporelles et structures sociales. Paris: Minuit (İngilizce çev.: Algeria 1960. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer-sity Press, 1979).
10. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit (İngilizce çev.: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1984) [Türkçe çev., Ayrım: Beğeni Yargısının Toplumsal Eleştirisi, Ankara: Heretik Yayınları, 2015].
11. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit. (İngilizce çev.: The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1990).
12. Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard (tadil edilmiş ve genişletilmiş İngilizce çev., Language and Symbolic Power, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).
13. Bourdieu, P. (1989). La noblesse d’État: Grandes écoles et espirit de corps. Paris: Minuit (İngilizce çev., The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996).
14. Bourdieu, P. (1991). First lecture. Social space and symbolic space: Introduc-tion to a japanese reading of ‘distinction’. Poetics Today12, no. 4: 627-638.
15. Bourdieu, P. ([1991] 2017). Social Space, Symbolic Space and Appropriated Physical Space. Paper Presented at the Russel Sage/MSH Conference on Pov-erty, Immigration and Urban Marginality in Advanced Societies. Paris, Mai-son des Science de l’Homme, 10-11 May. (İngilizce çev.: Social space and the genesis of appropriated physical space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, basım aşamasında).
16. Bourdieu, P., ve Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chica-go: The University of Chicago Press; Cambridge: Polity Press. [Türkçe çev. Düşünümsel bir antropoloji için cevaplar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2003].
17. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Effects de lieux. In Pierre Bourdieu vd., La Misère du monde. Paris: Seuil, ss. 123-129.
18. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1993). La misère du monde. Paris: Seuil. (İngilizce çev. The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999) [Türkçe çev., Dünyanın sefaleti. Ankara: Heretik Yayınları, 2015].
19. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascalliannes. Paris: Seuil. (İngilizce çev.: Pasca-lian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000) [Türkçe çev., Akademik aklın eleştirisi: Pascalca düşünme çabaları. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2016].
20. Bourdieu, P. ([2000] 2011). With Weber against Weber. The Legacy of Pierre Bourdieu: Critical Essays (içinde). Simon Susen ve Brian S. Turner (der.). ss. 111-124.London: Anthem Press.
21. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Science de la science et réflexivitié. Paris: Raisons d’agir Éditions. (İngilizce çev.: Science of Science and Reflexivity, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006).
22. Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002. Le Bal des célibataires: Crise de la société paysanne en Béarn. Paris: Seuil. (İngilizce çev. The Ball of Bachelors. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006) [Türkçe çev., Bekarlar Balosu, Ankara: DOST Kitabevi Yayınları, 2010].
23. Bourdieu, P. (2008). Esquisses algériennes. Paris: Seuil. (İngilizce çev. Algerian Sketches, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013).
24. Boyd, M. R. (2008). Jim crow nostalgia: Reconstructing race in Bronzeville. Minne-apolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Cassirer, E. (1902). Leibniz’ system in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. Mar-burg: Elwert.
26. Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Cresswell, T. (2002). Bourdieu’s geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20: 379-382.
28. Desmond, M. (2012). Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. American Journal of Sociology 118, no. 1 (May): 88-133.
29. Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. New York: Crown.
30. Desmond, M. (2017). Heavy is the house: Rent burden among the American urban poor. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. basım aşamasında.
31. De Risi, V. (2007). Geometry and monadology: Leibniz’s analysis situs and philoso-phy of space. Basel: Birkhäuser.
32. Duneier, M., Kasinitz, P., ve Murphy A. (2014). The urban ethnography reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Durkheim, E. ve Mauss M. (1901). De quelques formes primitives de classifica-tion: contribution à l’étude des représentations collectives.” L’Année so-ciologique 6: 1-72. (İngilizce çev.Primitive Classification. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press, 1963).
34. Fogle, N. (2011). The spatial logic of social struggle: A Bourdieuian topology. Lex-ington, MA: Lexington.
35. Gilbert, A. (2007). The return of the slum: Does language matter? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 31, no. 4: 697-713.
36. Hage, G. (1998). White nation: Fantasies of white supremacy in a multicultural socie-ty. Sydney: Pluto.
37. Harding, A. ve Blokland T. (2014). Urban theory: A critical introduction to power, cities and urbanism in the 21st century. London: Sage.
38. Jazouli, A. (1992). Les Années banlieues. Paris: Seuil.
39. Lebaron, F. ve LeRoux B. (Der.). (2015). La méthodologie de Pierre Bourdieu en action: Espace culturel, espace social et analyse des données. Paris: Dunod.
40. Lipunner, R. (2012). Pierre Bourdieu. In Eckard (der.), Handbuch stadtsoziologie. Berlin: VSA Verlag.
41. Marom, N. (2014). Relating a city’s history and geography with Bourdieu: One hundred years of spatial distinction in Tel Aviv. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, no. 4: 1344-1362.
42. Modan, G. G. (2007). Turf wars: Discourse, diversity and the politics of place. Mal-den, MA: Blackwell.
43. Neveu, E. (2013). Les sciences sociales doivent-elles accumuler les capitaux? Revue Française de Science Politique 63, no. 2: 337-358.
44. Painter, J. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu. In Mike Crang ve Nigel Thrift (der.) Thinking space. London: Routledge.
45. Pereira, V. B. (2005). Classes e culturas de classe das familias portuenses. Porto: Afrontamento.
46. Pereira, V. B. (Der.) (2017). Urban distinctions: Class, culture, and sociability in Porto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
47. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (1989). Dans les beaux quartiers. Paris: Seuil.
48. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (1992). Quartiers bourgeois, quartiers d’affaires. Paris: Payot.
49. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (1993). La Chasse à courre. Ses rites et ses enjeux. Paris: Payot.
50. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (1996). Grandes fortunes: Dynasties familiales et formes de richesse en France. Paris: Payot. (İngilizce çev. Grand Fortunes: Dynasties and Forms of Wealth in France, New York: Algora, 1998).
51. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (2005). Voyage en grande bourgeoisie: Journal d’enquête. Paris: PUF.
52. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (2010). Les ghettos du gotha (2. Baskı; ilk baskı 2007). Paris: Points/Seuil.
53. Pinçon, M., Pinçon-Charlot M. (2017). Class power and power over space: How the bourgeoisie reproduces itself in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, basım aşamasında.
54. Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29, no. 4: 740-770.
55. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2010). On historicizing epistemology: An essay. Stanford: Stan-ford University Press.
56. Ripoll, F. (2013). Quelle dimension spatiale des structures sociales chez Bour-dieu? Localisations résidentielles et jeux d’échelles dans La Distinction. ss. 365-377 Philip Coulangeon ve Julien Duval (der.) Trente ans après “La Distinction” de Pierre Bourdieu. Paris: La Découverte.
57. Rosenlund, L. (2009). Exploring the city with Bourdieu: Applying Pierre Bour-dieu’s theories and methods to study the community. Berlin: VDM Publish-ing.
58. Savage, M. (2011). The lost urban sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. ss. 511-520 The Blackwell companion to the city (içinde). Gary Bridge ve Sophie Watson (der.). Cambridge: Blackwell.
59. Savage, M., Hanquinet, L. (2017). Emerging cultural capital in the metropolis: Profiling London and Brussels. International Journal of Urban and Region-al Research, basım aşamasında.
60. Storper, M., Scott A. J. (2016). Current debates in theory: A critical assessment.” Urban Studies 53, no. 6: 1114-1136.
61. Tissot, S. (2007). L’État et les quartiers. Enquête sur une catégorie de l’action pu-blique. Paris: Seuil.
62. Tissot, S. (2011). De bons voisins: Enquête dans un quartier de la bourgeoisie pro-gressiste. Paris: Raisons d’agir éditions.
63. Tissot, S. (2017). Categorizing nighborhoods: The invention of ‘Sensitive areas’ in France and ‘Heritage districts’in the United States. International Jour-nal of Urban and Regional Research, basım aşamasında.
64. Wacquant, L. (2002). Scrutinizing the street: Poverty, morality, and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology 107-6 (May): 1468-1532.
65. Wacquant, L. (2004). Following Pierre Bourdieu into the field. Ethnography 5, no. 4 (December): 387-414.
66. Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban outcasts: A comparative sociology of advanced margin-ality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
67. Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic power and group-making: On Bourdieu’s re-framing of class. Journal of Classical Sociology 13, no. 2 (May): 274-291.
68. Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neoliberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic&Racial Studies 37, no. 10 (symposium with responses from Andy Clarno, Michael Dawson, Matt Desmond, Amy Lerman, Mara Loveman, Douglas Massey, Dorothy Roberts, Rob-ert Sampson, William Julius Wilson, Andreas Wimmer): 1687-1711.
69. Wacquant, L. (2015). Revisiting territories of relagation: Class, ethnicity and the state in the making of advanced marginality. Urban Studies Journal 53, no. 6 (symposium with responses by Nicole Marwell, Janos Ladanyi, Troels Schultz Larsen, Orlando Patterson, and Emma Shaw Crane): 1077-1088.
70. Wacquant, L. (2016). A conscise genaology and anatomy of habitus. The Socio-logical Review 64, no.1: 64-72.
71. Wacquant, L. (2017a). Practice and symbolic power in Bourdieu: The view from Berkeley. Journal of Classical Sociology 17, no. 1 (February): 55-69.
72. Wacquant, L. (2017b). The two faces of the ghetto. Cambridge: Polity Press.
73. Wacquant, L., Slater, T., ve Pereira, V. (2014). Territorial stigmatization in ac-tion. Special Issue of Environment & Planning A 46, no. 6 (June): 1270-1280.
74. Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. H. H. Gerth ve C. Wright Mills (der.). New York: Oxford University Press.
75. Webster, H. (2010). Bourdieu for architects. London: Routledge.
76. Weik, E. (2010). Research note: Bourdieu and Leibniz: Mediated dualisms. The Sociological Review 58, no. 3: 486-496.
77. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1 (July): 1-24.