Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sosyal Düşüncede Kent Kimliği

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 20 - 47, 31.05.2010

Öz

İnsan bir yerde veya kentte, belirli bir mekân üstünde konmuş bir nesne
gibi bulunmaz; kentsel mekânları işaretler ve sahiplenir, yaşam alanına
anlamlar yükleyerek başka yerlerden ayırt eder ve bir kimlik verir; bu yere kök
salar ve bir kimlik yeri olarak inşa eder. Bu inşa sürecinin temel vasıtalarından
biri, günlük yaşamda üretilen ve paylaşılan sosyal temsillerdir. Kentler günlük
konuşmalarımızın vazgeçilmez bir malzemesidir ve bu bakımdan haklarında örtük
(implicit) teoriler ürettiğimiz en önemli sosyal temsil konularındandır. Bu
yazıda sosyal düşüncenin önemli bir platformu olan Ekşi Sözlük’te İzmir ve
İzmirli olmaya ilişkin girişlerde (entry), İzmir’e ilişkin sosyal temsiller ele
alınarak kent kimliğinin ve kimlik yeri olarak kentin nasıl kurgulandığı
incelenmektedir

Kaynakça

  • Barker, R G. (1968): Ecological Psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Pres.
  • Bilgin, N, (2009): Sosyal Değişme Sürecinde İnsan-Eşya İlişkileri, İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bilgin, N. (1979): Kendileme Kavramı ve Olgusu, Psikoloji Dergisi, no. 2 (5).
  • Bilgin, N. (2010): İzmir'in İnsanları ya da İnsanların İzmir'i, İzmirli Olmak, İzmir: APİKAM, s. 7-13.
  • Bilgin, N. (1991): Eşya ve İnsan, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Bilgin, N. ve Uğurlar, P. (2010): İzmir ve İzmirlilere ilişkin algı ve temsiller, İzmirli Olmak, İzmir: APİKAM, s. 165-179.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998): The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Cambridge: Polity Press, Frans. baskı: La Misère du Monde, Pocketbook edition, Paris, Seuil/Points.
  • Boyer, M.C. (1994): City of Collective Memory: its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • Caland, F. C. (2003): Zoopolis: Mythifications de l’identite urbaine, in Le Soi et l’Autre, (ed. Ouelle, P.), Presses de l’Universite de Laval, s. 95-110.
  • Castells, M. (2002): Urban sociology in Twenty-first Century, Susser, I. (ed), The Castells Reader on Cities and Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell
  • Felonneau, M.-L. (2002): Des stereotypes spatiaux aux Theories Implicites de la Ville, in Psychologie Sociale Appliquee Environnement, Sante, Qualite de Vie (ed. C. Bonardi, F. Girandola, N. Roussiau ve N. Soubiale), Paris: In Pres, s. 73-98.
  • Halbwachs, M. (1950): La Mémoire Collective, Paris: Albin Michel, yeni basım 1997.
  • Halbwacs, M. (1941): Topographie Legendaire des Evangiles en Terre Sainte : Etude de memoire collective, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Hartog, F. (2003): Regimes d’historicite. Presentisme et Experiences du Temps, Paris: Seuil
  • Letissier, F. (2008): Mobilite-alterite, un couple pour comprendre le identites urbaines, Colloque MSFS 2008, Mobilités, Identités, Altérités; dossier Adobe Reader, pdf. www.uhb.fr/sc_sociales/mrss/fcolloques/ID1_Letissier.pdf -.
  • Marie, M. (1982): Le territoire sans nom, pour une approche des societes locales, Paris: Libraries des Meridiens.
  • Mazzella, S. (1996): La villemémoire : quelques usages de La Mémoire collective de Maurice Halbwachs, Enquête : Anthropologie, Histoire, Sociologie, no. 4, s. 177-189.
  • Moles, A. A. (1976): Aspects Psychologiques de l’appropriation de l’espace, P. Korosec Serfaty (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Architectural Psychology Conference, Louis Pasteur University Strasbourg, s. 84-99.
  • Moles, A. A. (1972): La Psychologie de l’Espace, Paris: Seuil.
  • Moles, A., A. et Rohmer, E. (1978), La Psychologie de l’Espace, Paris:Casterman.
  • Moser, G. ve Weiss, K., (2003): Espaces de Vie, Aspects de la Relation Homme-Environnement, Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Noppen, L. ve Morisset, L. K. (2005): Ville et mort du patrimoine, In La Ville Autrement, (ed. Delorme, P.), Quebec: PUQ, s. 49-66.
  • Nora, P. (1986 -1992): Les Lieux de Memoire (tome 1. La Republique; t. 2. La Nation, t. 3-4, Les France), Paris: Editions Gallimard.
  • Ortar, N. (2003): Territoire d’origine et migration: la construction identitaire des residents secondaires en France et en Russie, in Identites, Poitiers: Universite de Poitiers / CNRS, s. 195-205.
  • Pennebaker,J. W. & Polakoff, R.(1990): The effects of the John F. Kennedy assassination on Dallas, Texas: Dallas Southern Methodist University.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1978): The city and self identity, in Environnement and Behaviour, 10 (2), s. 147-169.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1976): Appropriation et non-appropriation de l’espace, P. Korosec Serfaty (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Architectural Psychology Conference, Louis Pasteur University Strasbourg, s. 34-47.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian A. K. ve Kaminoff R. (1983): Place identity: Physical world socialisation of the self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, n. 3, s. 57-83.
  • Rivera, L. ve Rivera, I. (2003): Categorisation des zones urbaines et son incidence dans la formation de l’identite des classes sociales en Colombie, in Identites, Poitiers: Universite de Poitiers / CNRS, s. 483-493.
  • Serfaty-Garzon, P. (2003): Chez Soi, les Territoires de l’Intimite, Armand Collin, Paris Stock, M. (2006): Construire l’identite par la pratique des lieux, in Chez Nous (ed. De Biuaise, A. ve Rossi, C.), Paris: La Villette, s. 142-159.

City Identity in Social Thought

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 20 - 47, 31.05.2010

Öz

An individual is not like an object located on a
specific place in a city; s/he imprints and internalizes places in a city,
distinguishes these life spaces from the rest by giving meaning and identity to
them; builds strong bonds with these places and constructs place identities.
One of the essential means of this construction process is social
representations that are created, developed and shared within the everyday
life. Cities are integral parts of our daily conversations; therefore, they
form one of the most important issues in social representations on which we
produce implicit theories. This paper discusses how city identity and city as a
place of identity are constructed for the city of Izmir. In order to do so, social representations
regarding Izmir are examined within the entries
of Izmir and being Izmirian in Eksi Sozluk, which is an important
platform for social thought.

Kaynakça

  • Barker, R G. (1968): Ecological Psychology: concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Pres.
  • Bilgin, N, (2009): Sosyal Değişme Sürecinde İnsan-Eşya İlişkileri, İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Bilgin, N. (1979): Kendileme Kavramı ve Olgusu, Psikoloji Dergisi, no. 2 (5).
  • Bilgin, N. (2010): İzmir'in İnsanları ya da İnsanların İzmir'i, İzmirli Olmak, İzmir: APİKAM, s. 7-13.
  • Bilgin, N. (1991): Eşya ve İnsan, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları.
  • Bilgin, N. ve Uğurlar, P. (2010): İzmir ve İzmirlilere ilişkin algı ve temsiller, İzmirli Olmak, İzmir: APİKAM, s. 165-179.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1998): The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society, Cambridge: Polity Press, Frans. baskı: La Misère du Monde, Pocketbook edition, Paris, Seuil/Points.
  • Boyer, M.C. (1994): City of Collective Memory: its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
  • Caland, F. C. (2003): Zoopolis: Mythifications de l’identite urbaine, in Le Soi et l’Autre, (ed. Ouelle, P.), Presses de l’Universite de Laval, s. 95-110.
  • Castells, M. (2002): Urban sociology in Twenty-first Century, Susser, I. (ed), The Castells Reader on Cities and Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell
  • Felonneau, M.-L. (2002): Des stereotypes spatiaux aux Theories Implicites de la Ville, in Psychologie Sociale Appliquee Environnement, Sante, Qualite de Vie (ed. C. Bonardi, F. Girandola, N. Roussiau ve N. Soubiale), Paris: In Pres, s. 73-98.
  • Halbwachs, M. (1950): La Mémoire Collective, Paris: Albin Michel, yeni basım 1997.
  • Halbwacs, M. (1941): Topographie Legendaire des Evangiles en Terre Sainte : Etude de memoire collective, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Hartog, F. (2003): Regimes d’historicite. Presentisme et Experiences du Temps, Paris: Seuil
  • Letissier, F. (2008): Mobilite-alterite, un couple pour comprendre le identites urbaines, Colloque MSFS 2008, Mobilités, Identités, Altérités; dossier Adobe Reader, pdf. www.uhb.fr/sc_sociales/mrss/fcolloques/ID1_Letissier.pdf -.
  • Marie, M. (1982): Le territoire sans nom, pour une approche des societes locales, Paris: Libraries des Meridiens.
  • Mazzella, S. (1996): La villemémoire : quelques usages de La Mémoire collective de Maurice Halbwachs, Enquête : Anthropologie, Histoire, Sociologie, no. 4, s. 177-189.
  • Moles, A. A. (1976): Aspects Psychologiques de l’appropriation de l’espace, P. Korosec Serfaty (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Architectural Psychology Conference, Louis Pasteur University Strasbourg, s. 84-99.
  • Moles, A. A. (1972): La Psychologie de l’Espace, Paris: Seuil.
  • Moles, A., A. et Rohmer, E. (1978), La Psychologie de l’Espace, Paris:Casterman.
  • Moser, G. ve Weiss, K., (2003): Espaces de Vie, Aspects de la Relation Homme-Environnement, Paris: Armand Colin.
  • Noppen, L. ve Morisset, L. K. (2005): Ville et mort du patrimoine, In La Ville Autrement, (ed. Delorme, P.), Quebec: PUQ, s. 49-66.
  • Nora, P. (1986 -1992): Les Lieux de Memoire (tome 1. La Republique; t. 2. La Nation, t. 3-4, Les France), Paris: Editions Gallimard.
  • Ortar, N. (2003): Territoire d’origine et migration: la construction identitaire des residents secondaires en France et en Russie, in Identites, Poitiers: Universite de Poitiers / CNRS, s. 195-205.
  • Pennebaker,J. W. & Polakoff, R.(1990): The effects of the John F. Kennedy assassination on Dallas, Texas: Dallas Southern Methodist University.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1978): The city and self identity, in Environnement and Behaviour, 10 (2), s. 147-169.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1976): Appropriation et non-appropriation de l’espace, P. Korosec Serfaty (ed), Proceedings of the 3rd International Architectural Psychology Conference, Louis Pasteur University Strasbourg, s. 34-47.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian A. K. ve Kaminoff R. (1983): Place identity: Physical world socialisation of the self, Journal of Environmental Psychology, n. 3, s. 57-83.
  • Rivera, L. ve Rivera, I. (2003): Categorisation des zones urbaines et son incidence dans la formation de l’identite des classes sociales en Colombie, in Identites, Poitiers: Universite de Poitiers / CNRS, s. 483-493.
  • Serfaty-Garzon, P. (2003): Chez Soi, les Territoires de l’Intimite, Armand Collin, Paris Stock, M. (2006): Construire l’identite par la pratique des lieux, in Chez Nous (ed. De Biuaise, A. ve Rossi, C.), Paris: La Villette, s. 142-159.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nuri Bilgin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Mayıs 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA Bilgin, N. (2010). Sosyal Düşüncede Kent Kimliği. İDEALKENT, 2(3), 20-47.