"Þat Ʒet þe wynd & þe weder & þe worlde stynkes": The Sins of Richard II and the Corruption of the Crown

Yıl 2024, , 86 - 101, 31.10.2024

Shawn Mcavoy

https://doi.org/10.62352/ideas.1523537

Öz

Many writings from late-fourteenth century England reflect a popular conception that English society had deteriorated into serious dysfunction, which included the Hundred Years’ War, recurrent outbreaks of the Black Death, and ongoing tensions between the King and Parliament, among other matters. Three literati who discussed this problem were John Gower, William Langland, and the Gawain Poet. All three agreed that somehow King Richard II bore responsibility for the kingdom’s travails. He had engaged in a quest for a Crown which served the interests of one man, not of a society. Moreover, he had tried to create a Crown in which all law flowed from the king alone, and all ecclesiastical matters ultimately flowed from the king through the Crown. Richard’s Crown allowed for no debate, and no participation. Richard wanted the status regni and the status coronæ to merge; the king and the Crown would become one. This violated the symbol of the crown as it had already existed before Richard II’s kingship. The crown symbol he had inherited was corporate, with the king and the people together negotiating the meaning of royal power and duties. In addition, the English crown was a minor with the reigning king as the crown’s guardian. No king could unilaterally redefine the symbol of the crown, much less treat it as a personal possession. King Richard II’s treatment of the crown destabilized the kingdom, and it would cost him his crown. Gower, Langland, and the Gawain Poet disagreed vis-à-vis which exact failures of the king had destabilized English society thus abusing the crown, and all three wrote about the different issues they had with the king, but all concurred that whatever the exact failures, King Richard II had damaged the construct of the Crown of England, and thereby the realm.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Medieval literature, Ricardian poetry, Richard II, Crown of England, Images of kingship

Kaynakça

• Andrew, Malcolm, and Ronald Waldron, editors. The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript: Pearl, Cleanness, Patience, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Liverpool University Press, 2007.
• Barker, Juliet. 1381: The Year of the Peasants’ Revolt. Harvard University Press, 2014.
• Bennett, Michael J. “Richard II and the Wider Realm.” Richard II: The Art of Kingship, edited by Anthony Goodman and James L. Gillespie, Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 187–204.
• Benson, Larry D. “The Canon and Chronology of Chaucer’s Works.” The Riverside Chaucer, by Geoffrey Chaucer, edited by Benson, 3rd ed.,
• Bowers, John M. The Politics of Pearl. Cambridge University Press, 2001. Houghton Mifflin, 1987, pp. xxii–xxv.
• Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed., Houghton Mifflin, 1987.
• Coffman, George R. “John Gower, Mentor for Royalty: Richard II.” PMLA, vol. 69, no. 4, 1954, pp. 953–964. doi:10.2307/459942.
• Davies, Richard G. “Richard II and the Church.” Richard II: The Art of Kingship, edited by Anthony Goodman and James L. Gillespie, Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 83–106.
• Dunn, Alistair. The Politics of Magnate Power: England and Wales 1389–1413. Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Eberle, Patricia J. “Richard II and the Literary Arts.” Richard II: The Art of Kingship, edited by Anthony Goodman and James L. Gillespie, Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 231–253.
• Finch, Casey, translator. The Complete Works of the Pearl Poet. Edited by Malcolm Andrew, Ronald Waldron, and Clifford Peterson, University of California Press, 1996.
• Frantzen, Allen J. “The Disclosure of Sodomy in Cleanness.” PMLA, vol. 111, no. 3, 1996, pp. 451–464. doi:10.2307/463168.
• Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, 1973.
• Given-Wilson, Chris. “Richard II and the Higher Nobility.” Richard II: The Art of Kingship, edited by Anthony Goodman and James L. Gillespie, Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 107–128.
• Gower, John. Confessio Amantis. Edited by Russell A. Peck, vol. 3, University of Toronto Press, 1980.
• ---. “O Deus Immense.” John Gower: The Minor Latin Works with In Praise of Peace, edited and translated by R. F. Yeager, Medieval Institute Publications, 2005, pp. 34–38.
• Grady, Frank. “The Lancastrian Gower and the Limits of Exemplarity.” Speculum, vol. 70, no. 3, 1995, pp. 552–575. doi:10.2307/2865270.
• Hill, Ordelle G. and Gardiner Stillwell. “A Conduct Book for Richard II.” Philological Quarterly, vol. 73, no. 3, 1994, pp. 317–328.
• Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton University Press, 1957.
• Langland, William. Piers Plowman. Translated by Derek Pearsall, University of California Press, 1979.
• Rayner, Samantha J. Images of Kingship in Chaucer and His Ricardian Contemporaries. D. S. Brewer, 2006.
• Saul, Nigel. Richard II. Yale University Press, 1999.
• ---. “Richard II and the Vocabulary of Kingship.” The English Historical Review, vol. 110, no. 438, 1995, pp. 854–877.
• ---. “The Kingship of Richard II.” Richard II: The Art of Kingship, edited by Anthony Goodman and James L. Gillespie, Clarendon Press, 1999, pp. 37–58.
• Staley, Lynn. “Gower, Richard II, Henry of Derby, and the Business of Making Culture.” Speculum, vol. 75, no. 1, 2000, pp. 68–96. doi:10.2307/2887425.
• Thomas, Keith. Religion and the Decline of Magic. Penguin, 1978.
• Tumarkin, Nina. Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia. Enlarged ed., Harvard University Press, 1997.