The Effect of Ecopedagogy-Based Environmental Education on Environmental Attitude of In-service Teachers

Öz

Abstract Environmental attitude covers a person’s behavioural aims, impacts, and believings which is acquired from environmental subjects or activites. It is also mentioned that environmental attitude can be used in order to predict environmental behaviour. The aim of this study is to analyse the efficiency of an ecopedagogy-based TUBITAK environmental education project, which comprised of community of practice and was titled ‘Ecology in Canakkale and Around, 2010’, on environmental attitude of in-service teachers and to determine whether there is any difference between genders in terms of environmental attitude. The methodology of the study was mixed methodology within a case study. The qualitative and the quantitative data were collected simultaneously and evaluated together. An environmental attitude scale was used in order to collect the quantitative data. The participants’ diaries, semi-structured interview and non-participant observation notes were used in order to collect the qualitative data. It was found that the ecopedagogy-based environmental eduction caused to change environmental attitude of in-service teachers favourably and this change was observed mostly on male in-service teachers.

Key words:Eco-pedagogy, community of practice, in-service teachers, environmental attitude, TUBITAK.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eco-pedagogy, community of practice, in-service teachers, environmental attitude, Key words:Eco-pedagogy, community of practice, in-service teachers, environmental attitude, Key words:Eco-pedagogy, community of practice, in-service teachers, environmenta

Kaynakça

1. References References References
2. Akşit, S., Akşit, F. & Kayacılar, C. (2012). Geography teaching: Without Walls. Procedia, Social and Behavioural Science, 46 (2012), 4487- 4492. Retrieved October 2014, http://ac.els- cdn.com/S1877042812020186/1-s2.0-S1877042812020186-main.pdf?_tid=82155d82- 5633-11e4-aafa- 00000aacb360&acdnat=1413574175_88313e740642dc33944280348bd6f0bd
3. Antunes, A. & Gadotti, M. (2009). Eco-pedagogy as the appropriate pedagogy to the earth charter process. The Earth Charter in Action, Part IV: Democracy, Nonviolence and Peace. http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/invent/images/uploads/ENG-Antunes.pdf Retrieved February
4. Aracıoğlu, B., & Talıdil, R. (2009). Tüketicilerin satın alma davranışında çevre bilincinin etkileri. Ege http://eab.ege.edu.tr/pdf/9_2/C9-S2-M5.pdf 9 (2), 435- 461, Retrieved December
5. Barr, S. & Gilg, A. W. (2007). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour. Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography, 89 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x/pdf 361-379. Retrieved March 2011,
6. Baran, B. (2006). Knowledge management and online communities of practice in teacher education . The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5 (3), 1303-6521. Retrieved February 2011, http://www.tojet.net/articles/533.pdf
7. Barker, M.& Rogers, L. (2004). In, about, for: Exploring the foundations of environmental education. Set, 2, 15- 18. ISSN 0110-6376.
8. Baş, T., & Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

9. Bogner, F. X. & Wiseman, M. (2006). Adolescent’ attitudes towards nature and environment: quantifying the 2-MEV model. The Environmentalist, 26, 247-254. Retrieved March 2011, http://www.springerlink.com/content/09n6k758wv264111/fulltext.pdf
10. Bowen, G. M. & Roth, W. M. (2007). The practice of field ecology: ınsights for science education. Res Sci Educ (2007) 37, 171–187.
11. Brymer, E. & Davids, K. (2012). Ecological dynamics as a theoretical framework for development of sustainable behaviours towards the environment. Environmental Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.677416 45- Research, 19 (1), 63. Retrieved October 2012,
12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık. Convention (CBD) of Biological http://www.cbd.int/2010/about/ Diversity (2010a). Retrieved November 2010,
13. Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) (2010b). Press release. Retrieved October 2010, http://www.cbd.int/doc/press/2010/pr-2010-10-29-cop-10-en.pdf
14. Csobod, E. (2002). Hungary an education ınitiative for a sustainable future. In Daniella Tilbury, Robert B. Stevenson, John Fien, Danie Schreuder (Ed.), Education and sustainability responding to the global challenge (p. 99-106). Retrieved October 2013, http://www.ibcperu.org/doc/isis/13028.pdf
15. Çepel, N. (2008). Ekolojik sorunlar ve çözümleri (3. Baskı). Ankara: TÜBİTAK Popüler Bilim Kitapları.
16. Çınar, D., Doğu, S., & Meydan, A. (2008). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının çevreye karşı tutumları. VII. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu (2-4 Mayıs), Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
17. Davis, R. (2013). A place for ecopedagogy in community literacy. Community Literacy Journal, 7(2), 77-91.de Wet, B. (2007). Influence of wilderness experince on the adoption of environmentally responsible behaviour. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Stellenbosch University, 2007. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/3018/DeWet,%20B.pdf?sequence= 1 Retrieved December 2010,
18. Demirel, Ö. (2005). Eğitimde program geliştirme. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
19. Dori, Y. J., & Tall, R. T. (2000). Formal and ınformal collaborative projects: engaging in ındustry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84 (1), 95- 113. Retrieved December 237X(200001)84:1%3C95::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-W/pdf
20. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098
21. Erentay, N. & Erdoğan, M. (2009). 22 adımda doğa eğitimi. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık.
22. Eryaman, M. Y., Yalçın- Özdilek, Ş., Okur, E., Çetinkaya, Z., & Uygun, S. (2010). A participatory action research study of nature education in nature: Towards community-based eco- pedagogy. International Journal of Progressive Education, 6 (3), 26-37.
23. Euractive (2010). İtalya'daki plastik poşet yasağına farklı tepkiler var. Retrieved February 2011, http://www.euractiv.com.tr/cevre/article/italyadaki-plastik-poet-yasana-farkl-tepkiler-var- 014572
24. Fernandez Lo Faso R. P., Gemio R. V., Garcia J. C. E., Ceballas- Zuniga E. G., Bueno C. and Gallardo J. M. (2006). Tench, Tinca tinca (L.), fish farms as a tool for enviromental education. Aquaculture International, 14, 209- 218.
25. Fien, J. & Mclean, R. (2000). Teacher education for sustainability. II. two teacher education projects from asia and the pasific. Journal of Science and Technology Education, 9 (1), 37-48. http://www.springerlink.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/content/k1rj633085208l50/fulltext.pd f Retrieved February
26. Gadotti, M. (2008). Education for sustainability: a critical contribution to the decade of education for sustainable development. Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4 (1), 15-64. doi: 10.3903/gtp.2008.1.3
27. Goleman, D. (2010). Ekolojik zeka. (Çev: Seda Toksoy). İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.
28. Gökçe, N., Erdoğan, K., Aktay, S., & Özden M. (2007). Elementary students’ attitudes towards environ- ment. Elementary Education Online, 6 (3), 452- 468.
29. Güler, T. (2009). Ekoloji temelli bir çevre eğitiminin öğretmenlerin çevre eğitimine karşı görüşlerine etkileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34 (151), 30-43. Retrieved December 2010, http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/issue/view/31/showToc
30. Hadlock, T. D. & Beckwith, J. A. (2002). Recommendations to improve recovery of endangered species in the United States. Human Dimension of Wildlife, 7(1), 37- 53.
31. Huck, S. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research (4. Edition). USA: Publisher, Allyn&Bacon Inc.
32. Hung, R. (2014). In search of ecopedagogy: Emplacing nature in the light of proust and thoreau, Educational Philosophy and Theory: Incorporating ACCESS, 46 (13), 1387-1401, DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2014.914874
33. İstanbullu, R. A. (2008). Investigation of environmentally literacy of sixth grades at a private school. Matser of Science Thesis, METU. YÖK Thesis Research.
34. Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet (2001) and http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6W4X-44BMD1R-4 1&_cdi=6554&_user=867440&_pii=S1096751601000471&_origin=search&_coverDate =01%2F01%2F2001&_sk=999959998&view=c&wchp=dGLzVzzzSkzS&md5=1c2a8d1f 3a5f73d63810aa94922b8177&ie=/sdarticle.pdf Retrieved February 2011,
35. Kahn, R. (2008). Introduction and genral principles of ecopedagogy. Green Theory and Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4 (1), i-v. http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/11/Vol-4-Issue-1-2008.pdf, 15/01/2015
36. Kahn, R., (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, & planetary crisis. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
37. Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S.& Fujrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology,19, 1-19.
38. Kıncal, Y. R. (2006). Eğitim bilimine giriş. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
39. Keleş, Ö., Uzun, N., & Varnacı-Uzun, F. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının çevre bilinci, çevresel tutum, düşünce ve davranışlarının doğa eğitimi projesine bağlı değişimi ve kalıcılığının değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9 (32),384-401. Retrieved December 2010, http://www.naimuzun.com/yayinlar/kelesuzunuzun.pdf
40. Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S. & Vedlitz, A. (2008) Personal efficacy, the ınformation environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the united states. Risk Analysis, 28 (1), 113-126.
41. Lucksinger, A. (2014). Ecopedagogy, cultivating environmental consciousness through sense of place http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/journals/pedagogy/v014/14.2.lucksinger.pdf Pedagogy, 14 (2), 355-369.
42. Lummis, G. (2002). Globalisation : building a partnership ethic for an ecopedagogy in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27 (1), 9-18; May 2002. http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/fullText;dn=125199;res=AEIPT> ISSN: 0313-5373.
43. McCallum, I. (2008). Ecological intelligence. Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.
44. McNaughton, M. J. (2010). Educational drama in education for sustainable development: ecopedagogy doi:10.1080/14681366.2010.505460 Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 18(3), 289-308.
45. McNeil, J. D. (1996). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction (5. Edition). New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
46. Miller, T. J. (2008). The Alaska factor: Outdoor education program design in Alaska. Master Thesis, University of Alaska Anchorage, 2008) (UMI No. 1462934).
47. Misiaszek, G. W. (2011). Ecopedagogy in the age of globalization: Educators' perspectives of environmental education programs in the americas which incorporate social justice models (Order No. 3483199). Available from ProQuest Central. (900574926). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/900574926? accountid=17287
48. Mitchell, W. (2008). The changing climate of outdoor education in the Quebec Cegep System. Master of Education Thesis, Lakehead University, Ontario, Canada.
49. Morgan, C. T. (1989). Psikolojiye giriş (7. Baskı). Ankara: METEKSAN Yayıncılık.
50. Morgan, S. P., Hamilton, S. P., Bentley, M. L., Myrie, S. (2009) Environmental education in botanic gardens: exploring Brooklyn botanic garden’s project green reach. of http://web.utk.edu/~mbentle1/Prj%20GreenReach%20JEE%20Summ09.pdf 40 Environmnetal Education, (4), 35- 52. Retrieved April 2013,
51. Mostafa, M. M. (2007) Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ gren purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 220-229.
52. Okur, E., & Yalçın- Özdilek, Ş. (2008). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi öğrenci- lerinin çevrelerine karşı tutumları, Çanakkale Kenti Çevre Sorunları Sempozyumu.
53. Okur, E., & Yalçın- Özdilek, Ş. (2012). Yapısal eşitlik modeli ile geliştirilmiş çevresel tutum ölçeği. İlköğretim Online, 11(1), 85-94. Retrieved October 2012, http://ilkogretim- online.org.tr/vol11say1/v11s1m6.pdf
54. Okur, E., Yalçın- Özdilek, Ş. & Sezer B. (2013). Çoklu zeka alanlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 2 (2), 737- 758. Retrieved October 2014, file:///C:/Users/bilber/Downloads/EXAMINING%20OF%20MULTIPLE%20INTELLIGEN CE%20DUE%20TO%20SOME%20VARIABLES.pdf
55. Okur-Berberoğlu, E. & Uygun, S. (2013a). TÜBİTAK 4004 projelerinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma için çevre eğitimi kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (2), 107- 133.
56. Okur-Berberoğlu, E. & Uygun, E. (2013b). The effect of outdoor education on environmental knowledge, awareness, and attitude: case study within ın-service teachers. Turkish Journal of Teacher Education, 2 (2), 65-81.
57. Ozaner, S. (2004). Türkiye’de okul dışı çevre eğitimi ne durumda? Neler yapılmalı? V.Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi (5-8 Ekim 2004), Bildiri Kitabı (Doğa ve Çevre), 67–98. Bolu: Abant http://74.125.155.132/scholar?q=cache:d- JIyoycousJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=tr&as_sdt=2000
58. Özgüven, İ. E. (1994). Psikolojik testler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
59. Öztunalı- Kayır, G. (2003). Doğaya dönüş, topluma ekolojik bakış. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
60. Peers, I. S. (1996). Statistical analysis for education &psychology researchers. Great Britain: Falmer Press.
61. Postel, S. (1999). Son vaha, su sıkıntısıyla karşı karşıya. Ankara: TÜBİTAK-TEMA Vakfı Yayınları.
62. Raykov, T.& Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in Structural Equation Modeling (Second Edition). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates, Publishers. Zirvesi Rio http://web.ogm.gov.tr/diger/SOYKriterleri/Dokumanlar/R%C4%B0O%20Zirvesi.pdf bildirgesi, (1992). Zirve Retrieved November 2010,
63. Robinson, G. H. (2008). The fragments of frustration in building academic literacy for college- bound African-American Students: Implications for the use of outdoor education. PhD Thesis, George Mason University, USA.
64. Schmitt, T. R. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of value and effects of outdoor education during an age of accountability. PhD Thesis, Loyola University, Chicago, USA.
65. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of http://www.stanford.edu/~kcarmel/CC_BehavChange_Course/readings/Additional%20 Resources/J%20Soc%20Issues%202000/stern_2000_4_metareview_a.pdf 2010,
66. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
67. Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks Eğitim ve Danışmanlık Hizmetleri, Siyasal Basın ve Dağıtım.
68. Tikka, P. M. , Kuitunen, M. T., & Tynys, S. M. (2000). Effect of educational background on students' attitude, activity levels and knowledge concerning environment. of Environmental Education, 31 (3), 12-19.
69. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (1972). Declaration of the United Nations Conference http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=150 3 Human Environment, Retrieved December 2010,
70. Ünder, H. (1996). Çevre felsefesi. İstanbul: Doruk Kitapçılık.
71. Vester, F. (1997). Ekolojinin anlamı. İstanbul: Arıtan Yayınevi.
72. Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal, January-February 2004. Retrieved http://www.itu.dk/people/petero/speciale/Wenger%20knowledge%20management.pdf February
73. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating community in practice. Boston: Harvard http://hbr.org/products/3308/3308p4.pdf Scholl Press. Retrieved February
74. Yalçın- Özdilek Ş., Kaska, Y., Olgun, O. S., Sönmez B. (2006). Observing the Samandağ Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas ve Carette caretta). TUBITAK Project No: YDABAG- 104Y055, 64 s.
75. Yalçın, S. & Okur, E. (2014). Ekopedagojik yaklaşım ile uygulanmış elektromanyetik alan (EMA) eğitiminin EMA farkındalığı üzerine etkisi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35 (Ocak 2014/1), 143- 156.
76. Yardımcı, E. (2009). Yaz bilim kampında yapılan etkinlik temelli doğa eğitiminin ilköğretim 4 ve 5. sınıftaki çocukların doğa algılarına etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi. YÖK Tez Tarama.
77. Yıldırım, A.&Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
78. Zanovello, I. (1999). Outdoor and environmental education centres: a case study of Starthcona Park Lodge and Outdoor Education Centre, British Columbia, Canada. A Master Degree Thesis, Faculty of Envirnmental Design, The University of Calgary, Alberta.