The Short Term Effectiveness of an Outdoor Environmental Education on Environmental Awareness and Sensitivity of In-service Teachers

Abstract

Abstract Outdoor education is mostly mentioned in terms of environmental education. The aim of this research is to determine the short term effectiveness of an outdoor environmental education program on biodiversity awareness, environmental awareness and sensitivity to natural environment. The data is collected from an outdoor environmental education project which is financed by TUBITAK and its name is ‘Nature-based Outdoor Environmental Education in Canakkale and Suburbs, 2008.' There are 27 in-service teachers in the project and the project is only for 10 days. An environmental awareness and sensitivity scale is developed for the study. The research design is pre-posttest design. The data is analysed by Wilcoxon signed rank test because of the data is non-parametric. It is found that the nature-based outdoor education program is effective to improve environmental awareness and sensitivity to natural environment; on the other hand it is not successful to improve biodiversity awareness.

Key words:  Outdoor education, environmental education, in-service teachers, TUBITAK, Turkey

Keywords

• Outdoor education, environmental education, in-service teachers, TUBITAK, Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Aktepe, S. & Girgin, S. (2009). İlköğretimde eko-okullar ve klasik okulların çevre eğitimi açısından karşılaştırılması.İlköğretim Online Dergisi,8(2)9, 401-414. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol8say2/v8s2m11.pdf, 28.10.2011.
2. Alp, E., Ertepınar, H., Tekkaya, C.,& Yılmaz, A. (2006). A statistical analysis of children’s environmental knowledge and attitudes in Turkey. Geographical and Environmental Education, http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=84c70 620-c860-42cd-81a0-8e4781eb5d33%40sessionmgr114&vid=2&hid=105
3. Bas, T. & Akturan, U. (2008).Qualitative research methods. Ankara: Seckin Publication.
4. Ballantyne, R., Fien, J., & Packer, J. (2001). Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: lessons from the field.The Journal of http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/4097/15179_1.pdf?sequen ce=1 (4), 8-15.
5. Barr, S., & Gilg, A. W. (2007). A conceptual framework for understanding and analyzing attitudes towards environmental behaviour.Swedish Society for Anthropology and Geography, 89(4): 361-379. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00266.x
6. Bell, A. C., Russell, C. L., & Plotkin, R. (1998). Environmental learning and the study of extinction.The Journal of Environmental Education,29(2), 4-10. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/pqdlink?vinst=PROD&fmt=6&startpage= -1&ver=1&vname=PQD&RQT=309&did=26865983&exp=10-23- 2016&scaling=FULL&vtype=PQD&rqt=309&TS=1319592319&clientId=8119
7. Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective.Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17- 29. http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=2&hid=103&sid=a47fe87f-5d74-45ba-948b- Retrieved 03fe44572fc%40sessionmgr111&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=ei h&AN=782053 from
8. Bolstad, R. & Baker, R. (2004). Environmental education in New Zealand schools: Research ınto current practice and future possibilities, Volume 2: A Review Of National And International Research Literature On Environmental Education Practices”, Research Report, http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/7469/enviro-edu-vol- 2.pdf Retrieved from,

9. Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). The Practice of field ecology: Insights for science education.Research of Science Education, 37(2), 171- 187. doi: 10.1007/s11165-006- 9021-x.
10. Bozdogan, A. E. (2007).The importance and place of science and technology museums in science education (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Gazi University Educational Science Institution, Ankara, Turkey.
11. Bozkurt, O. & Kaya, O. N. (2008). Teaching about ozone layer depletion in Turkey: Pedagogical content knowledge of science teachers.Public Understending of Science,17, 261- 276.
12. http://pus.sagepub.com/content/17/2/261
13. Breidler, I. (1999). Two primary schools on the way towards ecologisation.Cambridge Journal (3), of Education, 29 367-377. Retrieved
14. Brookes, A. (2004). Astride a long-dead horse: Mainstream outdoor education theory and central curriculum problem.Australian Journal of Outdoor Education,8(2), 22-33. Retrieved http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/pqdweb?index=0&did=1058624701&Sr chMode=1&sid=4&Fmt=6&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS= 1317861588&clientId=8119 from
15. Brymer, E. & Davids, K. (2012). Ecological dynamics as a theoretical framework for development of sustainable behaviours towards the environment.Environmental Education http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.677416 19 (1), 45- 63. Retrieved from
16. Bunderson, E. D. & Cooper, J. G. (1997). An environmental education partnership for Utah secondary schools: A plant species inventory for the box death hollow wilderness area. The http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/stable/pdfplus/4450324.pdf?acceptTC=true Teacher, 59 (6), 332-336. Retrieved from
17. Bursa Science Museum (2013). Retrieved fromhttp://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/haber/tubitaktan- bursa-bilim-merkezine-40-milyon-tl
18. Buyukozturk, S. (2007).Data anlaysis handbook for social science. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem A Publication,
19. Carrier, A. M. (2004).The emergence of democratic educational and experiential educational philosophies in the practice of outdoor education.(Unpublished master of art thesis) Department of Theory and Policy Studies Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada.
20. Chen, P. J. (1997). Environmental educators, it is time to design a whole curriculum now. Environmental http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1350462970030210 Research, 3 (2), 233-237.
21. Chenoweth, J., Wehrmeyer, W., Lipchin, C., Smith, J., & Gazit, T. (2007). A comparison of environmental visions of university students in Israel and Paletsine.Futures, 39(6), 685- 703. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.11.003
22. Connolly, P. (2007).Quantitative data analysis in education: A critical introduction using SPSS. New York: Routledge.
23. Canterbury Polythechnic Institute of Technology (CPIT) (2013).Department of sustainability and outdoor education. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cpit.ac.nz/study-options/our-study- interest-areas/sustainability-and-outdoor-education
24. Çakır, M., İrez, S., &Doğan, Ö. K. (2010). Understandings of current environmental issues: Turkish case study in six teacher education colleges.Environmental Studies,36(1), 21– 33. http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=2260b Retrieved 201-fef8-4200-9df9-48d04b3291a1%40sessionmgr111&vid=2&hid=105 from
25. Daniel, M. (2011).Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
26. Disinger, J. F. (1997). Environmental education research news.The Environmentalist, 17(3), 153- 156.
27. Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study.Journal of Research in Science Education, 36(4), 411- 430.
28. Dreyfus, A., Wals, A. E. J., & Weelie, D. (1999). Biodiversity as a postmodern theme for environmental education.Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4(Summer): 155- http://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/viewFile/326/270 174. Retrieved
29. Eder, E. (1999). From scepticism to the urge to take action, or from daily frustration to a solo ınitiative. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0305764990290306 29
30. (3), 355-365. Retrieved from
31. Elliott, J. (1999). Sustainable society and environmental education: future perspectives and demands for the educational system.Cambridge Journal of Education,29(3), 325-340.
32. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0305764990290303
33. Emmons, K. M. (1997). Perceptions of the environment while exploring the outdoors: A case study in Belize.Environmental Education Research,3(3), 327-344. Retrieved from
34. Environmental Education&Training Partnership- EETAP (2002).Wildlife- based environmental education in a natural setting.EETAP Resource Library, December, Number 114, 1-3. Retrieved fromhttp://eelink.net/eetap/info114.pdf
35. Erdoğan, M., Marcinkowski, T., & Ok, A. (2009). Content analysis of selected features of K-8 environmental education research studies in Turkey, 1997–2007. Education 15 http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=c015d (5), 7f0-91e8-430e-8869-b5034059bcc3%40sessionmgr113&vid=2&hid=105 Environmental Research, 525–548. Retrieved from
36. Erdoğan, M. & Ok, A. (2011). An assessment of Turkish young pupils’ environmental literacy: A nationwide survey.International Journal of Science Education,33(17), , 2375-2406. Retrieved fromhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09500693.2010.550653
37. Erentay, N., & Erdogan, M. (2009).Nature education at 22 steps. Ankara: METU Publication.
38. Erten, S. (2005). Okul öncesi ögretmen adaylarında çevre dostu davranısların araştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/200528SİNAN%20ERTEN.pdf
39. 28, 91- 100. Retrieved from
40. Eryaman, M. Y., Yalcin-Ozdilek, S., Okur, E., Cetinkaya, Z., & Uygun, S. (2010.) A participatory action research study of nature education in nature: Towards community-based eco- pedagogy.International Journal of Progressive Education, 6(3), 26-38. Retrieved from http://inased.org/v6n3/ijpev6n3.pdf
41. Fadigan, K. A., & Hammrich, P. L. (2004). A longitudinal study of the educational and career trajectories of female participants of an urban informal science education program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 https://www.d.umn.edu/~bmunson/Courses/Educ5560/readings/fadigan04-fem.pdf
42. Fien, J. & Tilbury, D. (1996).Learning for a sustainable environment: an agenda for teacher education in Asia And The Pacific, Printed by UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia Bangkok, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0010/001056/105607e.pdf Pacific, and the Thailand. Retrieved
43. Ford, P. (1986).Outdoor education: Definition and philosophy.ERIC Publications; ERIC Digests in Full http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED267941.pdf ERIC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from
44. Gayford, C. (2000). Biodiversity education: A teacher’s perspective.Environmental Education Research, 6(4), 347- 361. doi: 10.1080/713664696
45. Gökçe, N., Kaya, E., Atay, S.,& Özden, M. (2007). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik tutumları.İlköğretim Online Dergisi,6(3), 452-468. Retrieved fromhttp://ilkogretim- online.org.tr/vol6say3/v6s3m35.pdf, 28.08.2011.
46. Gökdere, M. (2005). A study on environmental knowledge level of primary students in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, http://www.ied.edu.hk.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/apfslt/v6_issue2/gokdere/index.htm
47. Guler, T. (2009). The effects of an ecology based environmental education on teachers‘ opinions about environmental education.Education and Science,34(151), 30-42. Retrieved fromhttp://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/606/85
48. Hadlock, T. D., & Beckwith, J. A. (2002). Providing incentives for endangered species recovery. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 7(3), 197- 213. doi: 0.1080/10871200260293351
49. Halligan, M. W. (2006).Outdoor education for middle school youth: A grant proposal project. (Unpublished master thesis) Department of Social Work California State University, Master of Social Work Thesis, USA
50. Harrison, S. (2010). 'Why we are here?' Taking place into account in UK outdoor environmental education.Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning,10(1), 3-18. Retrieved http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/doi/pdf/10.1080/1472967100366932 1
51. Hart, P.& Nolan, K. (1999). A critical analysis of research in environmental education.Studies in Science http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/doi/pdf/10.1080/0305726990856014 8 34 (1), 1-69. Retrieved from
52. Irwin, D. (2010).Weaving the threads of education for sustainability and outdoor education. Published PhD Thesis, 2010, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved http://www.signsofchange.org.nz/abode/685/documents/14_David_Irwin_Outdoor%20E ducation%20CPIT.pdf
53. Kahyaoğlu, M., Daban, Ş. & Yangın, S. (2008). İlköğretim öğretmen adaylarının çevreye yönelik tutumları.Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,11, 42- 52. Retrieved from http://www.dicle.edu.tr/suryayin/zgegitimder/tam_metinler/11pdf/11_04_Kahyaoglu- Daban-Yangin.pdf
54. Karasar, N.(2003). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Nobel Publication.
55. Kassas, M. (2002). Environmental education: Biodiversity.The Environmentlist, 22, 345- 351. doi: 10.1023/A:1020766914456
56. Keles, O., Uzun, N., Varnaci- Uzun, F. (2010). The change of teacher candidates‘ environmental consciousness, attitude, thought and behaviors with nature training project and the assessment of its permanence.Electronic Journal of Social Sciences,9 (32), 384-401. Retrieved fromhttp://www.naimuzun.com/yayinlar/kelesuzunuzun.pdf
57. Lugg, A. & Slattery, D. (2003). Use of national park for outdoor environmental education: An Australian case study.Journal of Adventure Education& Outdoor Learning,3(1), 77-92. Retrieved from
58. http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/doi/pdf/10.1080/1472967038520026
59. Mansaray, A.; Ajiboye, J. O., & Audu U. F. (1998). Environmental knowledge and attitudes of some Nigerian secondary school teachers.Environmental Education Research,4(3), 329-339. Retrieved from
60. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1350462980040307
61. Mitchell, W. (2008). The changing climate of outdoor educatıon in the Quebec Cegep System. (Unpublished master thesis) Faculty Of Education Lakehead Unıversity, Ontario, Canada.
62. Morais, D. B.& Ogden, A. C. (2011). Initial development and validation of the global citizenship scale.Journal of Studies in International Education,15(5), 445- 466. Retrieved from http://jsi.sagepub.com/content/15/5/445
63. OECD/CERI (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/ Centre for Educational Research and Innovation). (2008). Learning in the 21st Century: Research, innovation and policy, assessment for learning formative assessment organisation. Institutional Report, Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/31/40600533.pdf
64. Okur, E., Yalcin-Ozdilek, S. (2013). Efficient use of energy and technological pollution awareness scale.Journal of Kastamonu Education Faculty,21(1), 271-286. Retrieved fromhttp://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/21_1/21_1_18.pdf
65. Okur-Berberoglu, E. & Uygun, S. (2012). Checking over relationship between environmental awareness and environmental attitudes by structural equation modelling.Educational Journal of http://home.uludag.edu.tr/users/ucmaz/PDF/egitim/htmpdf/2012-25%282%29/M8.pdf 25 Uludag University, (2), 459- 473. Retrieved from
66. Okur, E., Yalcin-Ozdilek, S. (2012). Environmental attitude scale developed by structural equation modeling.Elementary Education Online, 11(1), 85-94. Retrieved from http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol11say1/v11s1m6.pdf
67. Okur, E., Yalcin- Ozdilek, S., & Sahin, C. (2011). The common methods used in biodiversity education by primary school teachers (Canakkale, Turkey).Journal of Theory and Practice http://eku.comu.edu.tr/eku/index.php/eku/article/view/33/pdf_48 Education, 7 (1),142-159. Retrieved from
68. Özbay, Ş. (2010).Fen ve teknoloji programi içinde kompost hakkında verilen etkinliklerin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına ve çevre tutumlarına etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2010, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çanakkale.
69. Özden, M. (2008). Environmental awareness and attitudes of student teachers: An empirical research.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,17(1), 40-55.
70. Öztaş, F. & Kalıpçı, E. (2009). Teacher candidates’ perception level of environmental pollutant and their risk factors.International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(2), 185-195.
71. Palmberg, I. E., & Kuru, J. (2000). Outdoor activities as a basis for environmental responsibility. The 10.1080/00958960009598649 Environmental Education, 31 (4), 32-36. doi:
72. Pavlov, D. S., & Shishkin, V. S. (2003). Significance of biological stations for progress of science 10.1023/A:1024882411294 Biology Bulletin, 30 (4,) 422- 424. doi:
73. Pfaffenwimmer, G. F. (1998). The ecologisation of schools in Austria.The Journal of The OECD Programme http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/18/12/1821451.pdf Educational Building, 34, 12-15. Retrieved from Piller, N. (2002).
74. Outdoor education: A dialogue between theory and practice, and
75. implementation suggestions for the Discovery 10 Program at St. George’s School.
76. (Published master of arts thesis) The University of British Columbia, The Faculty of
77. Education Department of Curriculum Studies, Canada. Retrieved from
78. https://dspace.library.ubc.ca/bitstream/handle/2429/13379/ubc_20020534.pdf?sequenc e=1
79. Posch, P. (1999). The ecologisation of schools and ıts ımplications for educational policy. Cambridge http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0305764990290304 29, (3), 341-348. Retrieved fom
80. Powers, D. L. (2004).The effects of an outdoor education program on life effectiveness skills of participants.(Unpublished master of science thesis) California State University, California, USA.
81. Preston, L. (2004). Making connection with nature: bridging the theory- practice gap in outdoor and environmental education.Australian Journal of Outdoor Education,8(1), 12-19. Retrieved http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/pqdlink?vinst=PROD&fmt=6&startpage= -1&ver=1&vname=PQD&RQT=309&did=1060181621&exp=09-24- 2016&scaling=FULL&vtype=PQD&rqt=309&TS=1317074552&clientId=8119,
82. Preston, L. & Griffiths, A. (2004). Pedagogy of connections: findings of a collaborative action research project in outdoor and environmental education.Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, http://search.informit.com.au.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/fullText;dn=139846;res=AEIPT (2), 36-45. Retrieved from
83. Rauch, F. (2002). The potential of education for sustainable development for reform ın schools. Environmental http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13504620120109646 Research, 8 (1), 43-51. Retrieved from
84. Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. http://www.cemus.uu.se/dokument/asc2010/Mark%20Rickinson.pdf
85. Robottom, I., & Sauvé, L. (2003). Reflecting on participatory research in environmental education: some issues for methodology. Education,
86. Canadian Journal of Environmental
87. library.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/viewFile/241/101 111- 8, 128. Retrieved from http://new
88. Sencan, H. (2005).Reliability and validity in social and behavioral measures. Ankara: Seckin Publication.
89. Shanely, S. D. (2006).Towards an understanding of an outdoor education program: listening to participants’ stories. (Unpublished PhD thesis) University of Florida, Florida, USA.
90. Siegel, H. R. A. (2007).People on the move: An examination of significant life experiences of outdoor education instructors.(Unpublished master of science thesis) Department of Recreation Leisure Studies California State University, California, USA.
91. Stevenson, R. B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: contradictions in purpose and practice. 10.1080/13504620701295726 Education Research,13 (2), 139- 153. doi:
92. Storksdieck, M., Ellenbogen, K., & Heimlich, J. E. (2005). Changing minds? Reassessing outcomes in free-choice environmental education.Environmental Education Research, 11(3), 353, 369. doi: 10.1080/13504620500081228
93. Tallories Declaration (2012). Retrieved from
94. http://www.ulsf.org/programs_talloires_signatories.html, 16.05.2013
95. Tallories Declaration Action Plan (2012). Retrieved from
96. http://www.ulsf.org/pdf/TD.pdf, 16.05.2013
97. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998).
98. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and
99. quantitative approaches.Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
100. The University of Otago (2013). Retrieved fromhttp://www.csafe.org.nz/, 16.05.2013.
101. Tracy, S. (2013).Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact.Chichester, U.K. : Wiley-Blackwell.
102. Tuncer, G. (2008). University students' perception on sustainable development: A case study from Turkey.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,17 (3), http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/doi/pdf/10.1080/1038204080216829 7 212-226. Retrieved from
103. Tuncer, G., Ertepınar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2005). Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: Effects of school type and gender.Environmental Education Research,11(2), 215-233.
104. Vester, F. (1997).Mean of ecology.Istanbul, Turkey: Arıtan Publication,
105. Yalcin S. & Dogan S. (2007).The Effect of Science and Technology Lesson on Pupils Environmental Attitudes. VI. Symposium of National Grade Teachers- USOS (Anadolu University) Conference Book, 703- 705. Ankara, Tukey: Nobel Publication,
106. Yalcin- Ozdilek, S., Kaska, Y., Olgun, O. S., & Sonmez B. (2006).Monitoring of Samandağ Sea Turtles(Chelonia mydas ve Carette caretta).TUBITAK Project No: YDABAG- 104Y055, 64 p.
107. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2006).Qualitative research methods in social science. Ankara: Seckin Publication.
108. Young, J. (2001). Linking EfS and biodiversity? A UK- wide survey of the status of education within local biodiversity action plans.Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 439- 449. doi: 10.1080/13504620120081304