Analysis of Short Films of Prospective Teachers on Environmental Awareness

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 136 - 146, 28.05.2020

Zeynep Ünlü

Öz

This study aimed to evaluate short films on environment awareness prepared by prospective classroom teachers in terms of filming location, characters, topics, skills involved, messages conveyed and goals targeted for the audience. In this qualitative research, the participant students prepared nine short films in groups and completed written forms to explain the content of their films. The results showed that the prospective teachers mostly focused on the dispersal of waste materials into the environment and importance of keeping the environment clean. Based on the results, it is suggested that technological pedagogical content knowledge of prospective teachers on environmental education should be developed through future implementations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

environmental education, environmental awareness, short film, prospective teachers

Kaynakça

• Abono, C. (2016). 5 Major Differences Between Shooting Feature and Short Films. https://blog.lookat.io/2016/01/20/5-major-differences-between-shooting-a-feature-film compared-to-a-short-film.
• Ahi, B., Balci, S., & Alisinanoğlu, F. (2017). Exploring Turkish preservice teachers' mental models of the environment: are they related to gender and academic level? The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(3), 182-195.
• Alyaz, Isigicok and Gursoy (2017). The impact of the environmental documentary movies on pre-service German teachers’ environmental attitudes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(1), 159-170.
• Backenroth, O., & Sinclair, A. (2015). Lights, cameras, action research!-moviemaking as a pedagogy for constructivist Israel education. Journal of Jewish Education, 81(1), 64-84.
• Bulunuz, N. (2014). Noise pollution in Turkish elementary schools: evaluation of noise pollution awareness and sensitivity training. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 215-234.
• Culloty, E., & Brereton, P. (2017). Eco-film and the audience: making ecological sense of national cultural narratives, Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 16(3), 139-148,
• Contel, T. M., Ferrandis, I. G., & Ferrandis, X. G. (2016). Light pollution in natural science textbooks in Spanish secondary education. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 129‐139.
• Çakırlar Altuntaş, E., & Turan, S. L. (2018). Awareness of secondary school students about renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 116, 741-748.
• Demir, P., & Avgın, S. S. (2016). Global warming and measures to be taken: pre-service science teachers’ views. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 128-135.
• Genc, M., & Akilli, M. (2016). Modeling the relationships between subdimensions of environmental literacy. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(1), 58-74.
• Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
• Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
• Iliopoulou, I. (2018). Can young students think systemically about the environment? The case of pollution. Education 3-13, 46(3), 362-377.
• Janpol, H. L., & Dilts, R. (2016). Does viewing documentary films affect environmental perceptions and behaviors?, Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 15(1), 90-98.
• Keinonen, T., Palmberg, I., Kukkonen, J., Yli-Panula, E., Persson, C., & Vilkonis, R. (2016). Higher education students’ perceptions of environmental issues and media coverage. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(1), 5-22.
• Koklukaya, A. N., Guven Yildirim, E. & Selvi, M. (2017). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ awareness levels of electromagnetic pollution and other environmental problems. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 67, 17-35.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• MoNE-TEB. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (ilkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve8. sınıflar) [Science curriculum (primary and secondary schools 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 classes)]. Ankara.
• Morrone, M., Mancl, K., & Carr, K. (2001). Development of a metric to test group differences in ecological knowledge as one component of environmental literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 33-42.
• Önen Öztürk, F. (2017). Fen-toplum temelli eğitsel kısa filmler üzerine bir çalışma: fen bilgisi öğretmenliği örneği [A study on science-society based educational short films: example of science education]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 633-649.
• Pe'er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45-59.
• Peyton, R. B., & Miller, B. A. (1980). Developing an internal locus of control as a prerequisite to environmental action taking. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
• Robelia, B., & Murphy, T. (2012). What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research, 18(3), 299-321.
• Roth, C.E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
• Saribas, D., Doganca Kucuk, Z., & Ertepinar, H. (2017). Implementation of an environmental education course to improve pre-service elementary teachers’ environmental literacy and self-efficacy beliefs. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 311-326.
• Seçkin Kapucu, M., Çakmakçı, G., & Aydoğdu, C. (2015). The influence of documentary films on 8th grade students’ views about nature of science. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(3), 797-808.
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
• Özsoy, S., & Ahi, B. (2014). Elementary school students’ perceptions of the future environment through artwork. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(4), 1570-1582.
• Valenti, A. M. (2018) Attention to science documentaries fosters hope and solutions from new generations, Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17(2), 94-95.
• Veisi, H., Lacy, M., Mafakheri, S., & Razaghi, F. (2018): Assessing environmental literacy of university students: a case study of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, DOI: 10.1080/1533015X.2018.1431163
• Warner, L. A., Lamm, A. J., & Rumble, J. N. (2018) Can videos play a role in promoting good landscape management behaviors?, Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17(3), 187-197.
• Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2014). How do preservice teachers perceive ‘environment’ and its relevance to their area of teaching? Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 354-371.
• Yiğit, N., Alev, N., Yurt, Ö., & Mazlum, E. (2017). Kısa film tasarımlarında teknolojik ve pedagojik özelliklerin incelenmesi. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 8(1), 122-140.