Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ACADEMIC TRENDS IN CONSUMER ETHICS: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 289 - 323, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1645657

Öz

This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the development and research trends in consumer ethics literature. Academic articles retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) database were analyzed to assess the distribution of publications over time, the most cited works, the most prolific authors, the most frequently used keywords, and academic collaborations in the field of consumer ethics. The findings indicate that academic interest in consumer ethics has increased over time, with particular emphasis on topics such as ethical consumption, sustainability, digital marketing ethics, and corporate social responsibility. Additionally, consumer ethics research is found to be interdisciplinary, exploring the relationship between ethical consumption, individual values, cultural factors, and business strategies. This study systematically identifies academic trends in consumer ethics and provides valuable insights for future research in this field.

Kaynakça

  • Araç, S. K. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlikte “Kadın” ın Rolü: Tüketim Odaklı Bir Yaklaşım. İçinde Women’s Studies in Social Sciences I, 117. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub146.c1199
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • Bharti, V. P., Gratz, E. T., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (2022). You can’t make me do it! A model of consumer compliance. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 56(1), 120-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12446
  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6
  • Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClair, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006025724126
  • Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95, 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039
  • Gentina, E., Rose, G. M., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Ethics during adolescence: A social networks perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2577-5
  • Hassan, S. M., Rahman, Z., & Paul, J. (2022). Consumer ethics: A review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21580
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014, May). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 216-225). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
  • Lu, L. C., Chang, H. H., & Chang, A. (2015). Consumer personality and green buying intention: The mediate role of consumer ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2024-4
  • Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005723832576
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. A. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00872270
  • Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.002
  • Ramos-Hidalgo, E., Diaz-Carrion, R., & Rodríguez-Rad, C. (2022). Does sustainable consumption make consumers happy? International Journal of Market Research, 64(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211030482
  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Öberseder, M. (2010). Half a century of marketing ethics: Shifting perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0182-1
  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022907014295
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. A. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7058-9
  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-4603-x
  • Zou, L. L. W. L., & Chan, R. Y. K. (2019). Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Research, 94, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.006

TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2, 289 - 323, 31.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1645657

Öz

Bu çalışma, tüketici etiği alanındaki akademik literatürün gelişimini ve araştırma eğilimlerini incelemek amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz yöntemini kullanmaktadır. Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanından elde edilen akademik makaleler analiz edilerek, tüketici etiği konusundaki yayınların yıllara göre dağılımı, en çok atıf alan çalışmalar, en fazla yayın yapan yazarlar, en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler ve akademik iş birlikleri detaylı bir şekilde değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, tüketici etiği alanındaki akademik ilginin zamanla arttığını, özellikle etik tüketim, sürdürülebilirlik, dijital pazarlama etiği ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk gibi konuların ön plana çıktığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, tüketici etiği literatürünün disiplinler arası bir yapıya sahip olduğu ve etik tüketim ile bireysel değerler, kültürel faktörler ve işletme stratejileri arasındaki ilişkinin giderek daha fazla araştırıldığı belirlenmiştir. Bu araştırma, tüketici etiği konusundaki akademik eğilimleri sistematik bir şekilde ortaya koyarak, gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalara yönelik önemli ipuçları sunmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Araç, S. K. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlikte “Kadın” ın Rolü: Tüketim Odaklı Bir Yaklaşım. İçinde Women’s Studies in Social Sciences I, 117. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub146.c1199
  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  • Bharti, V. P., Gratz, E. T., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (2022). You can’t make me do it! A model of consumer compliance. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 56(1), 120-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12446
  • Bray, J., Johns, N., & Kilburn, D. (2011). An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 597-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0640-9
  • Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6
  • Erffmeyer, R. C., Keillor, B. D., & LeClair, D. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006025724126
  • Ferrell, O. C., Harrison, D. E., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and brand attitudes: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research, 95, 491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039
  • Gentina, E., Rose, G. M., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Ethics during adolescence: A social networks perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2577-5
  • Hassan, S. M., Rahman, Z., & Paul, J. (2022). Consumer ethics: A review and research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21580
  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014, May). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media (Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 216-225). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
  • Lu, L. C., Chang, H. H., & Chang, A. (2015). Consumer personality and green buying intention: The mediate role of consumer ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2024-4
  • Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005723832576
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. A. (1992). Consumer ethics: An empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00872270
  • Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.002
  • Ramos-Hidalgo, E., Diaz-Carrion, R., & Rodríguez-Rad, C. (2022). Does sustainable consumption make consumers happy? International Journal of Market Research, 64(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211030482
  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Öberseder, M. (2010). Half a century of marketing ethics: Shifting perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0182-1
  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022907014295
  • Vitell, S. J., & Muncy, J. A. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7058-9
  • Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Singh, J. J. (2005). Religiosity and consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(2), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-4603-x
  • Zou, L. L. W. L., & Chan, R. Y. K. (2019). Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology. Journal of Business Research, 94, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.006
Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Tüketici Davranışı
Bölüm Derleme
Yazarlar

Sinem Sargın 0000-0002-7504-154X

Gönderilme Tarihi 23 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi 29 Haziran 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Sargın, S. (2025). TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2), 289-323. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1645657
AMA Sargın S. TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık 2025;26(2):289-323. doi:10.24889/ifede.1645657
Chicago Sargın, Sinem. “TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 26, sy. 2 (Aralık 2025): 289-323. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1645657.
EndNote Sargın S (01 Aralık 2025) TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 26 2 289–323.
IEEE S. Sargın, “TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 26, sy. 2, ss. 289–323, 2025, doi: 10.24889/ifede.1645657.
ISNAD Sargın, Sinem. “TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 26/2 (Aralık2025), 289-323. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.1645657.
JAMA Sargın S. TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;26:289–323.
MLA Sargın, Sinem. “TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 26, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 289-23, doi:10.24889/ifede.1645657.
Vancouver Sargın S. TÜKETİCİ ETİĞİ ALANINDAKİ AKADEMİK EĞİLİMLER: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2025;26(2):289-323.
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
TR-DİZİN, EBSCO ve SOBIAD tarafından taranmaktadır.

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınevi Web Sitesi

Dergi İletişim Bilgileri Sayfası