TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR INNOVATION SCALE

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to carry out the Turkish adaptation of the Management Support for Innovation Scale developed by Vincent-Höper and Stein (2019) to measure management support for innovation. In the research design, descriptive, explanatory, and exploratory approaches were used together. The study sample consisted of 290 employees working in public healthcare institutions in İzmir. The findings of the confirmatory factor analysis conducted within this framework indicated that the theoretically proposed factor structure of the scale was consistent with the data. At the item level, factor loadings ranged from 0.87 to 0.98; these values suggest that the items strongly represent the relevant latent construct. The squared multiple correlations for the items were found to range between 0.50 and 0.89, showing that a substantial portion of each item’s variance was explained by the corresponding factor. The obtained index values generally fell within the acceptable to excellent fit range and supported that the measurement model operated consistently with the sample data. As evidence of reliability, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were found to be high. In conclusion, the analyses suggest that the three-factor structure of the scale was confirmed and that the Turkish form demonstrates adequate psychometric properties in terms of validity and reliability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Innovation
• Management Support
• Staff Development
• Innovative Leadership

İNOVASYON İÇİN YÖNETİM DESTEĞİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE UYARLAMASI

Öz

Bu çalışmada, inovasyon için yönetim desteğini ölçmeye yönelik olarak Vincent-Höper ve Stein (2019) tarafından geliştirilen İnovasyon İçin Yönetim Desteği Ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlamasını gerçekleştirmeyi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma tasarımında betimsel, açıklayıcı ve keşfedici desenler bir arada kullanılmıştır. Çalışma örneklemini, İzmir’de kamu sağlık kurumlarında görev yapan 290 çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede yürütülen doğrulayıcı faktör analizi bulguları, ölçeğin kuramsal olarak öngörülen faktör yapısının veriyle uyumlu olduğunu göstermiştir. İfade düzeyinde faktör yükleri 0,87–0,98 aralığında değişmekte; bu değerler, maddelerin ilgili örtük yapıyı güçlü biçimde temsil ettiğine işaret etmektedir. Maddelere ilişkin çoklu korelasyon kareleri ise 0,50–0,89 aralığında bulunmuş; her bir maddenin varyansının önemli bir bölümünün ilgili faktör tarafından açıklandığı görülmüştür. Elde edilen indeks değerleri, genel olarak kabul edilebilir ile mükemmel uyum aralığında yer almakta ve ölçüm modelinin örneklem verisiyle tutarlı biçimde çalıştığını desteklemektedir. Ölçeğin güvenirlik kanıtları kapsamında Cronbach alfa katsayılarının yüksek düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, analizler ölçeğin üç faktörlü yapısının doğrulandığına ve Türkçe formun geçerlik ile güvenirlik bakımından yeterli psikometrik özellikler sunduğuna işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yenilik
• Yönetim Desteği
• Personel Gelişimi
• Yenilikçi Liderlik

Kaynakça

1. Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M., & Haridy, S. (2021). The relationship between leadership styles and organizational innovation: A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 338-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339
2. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
3. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state‐of‐the‐science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.236
4. Basadur, M. (2004). Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.007
5. Basu, R., & Green, S. G. (1997). Leader‐member exchange and transformational leadership: An empirical examination of innovative behaviors in leader‐member dyads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(6), 477-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00643.x
6. Bell, H., Hagedorn, W. B., & Robinson, E. M. (2016). An exploration of supervisory and therapeutic relationships and client outcomes. Counselor Education and Supervision, 55(3), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12044
7. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2008). 3 Staffing twenty‐first‐century organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 133-165. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211461
8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

9. Deniz, Z. (2007). The adaptation of psychological scales. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000180
10. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
11. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
12. Eva, N., Meacham, H., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Tham, T. L. (2019). Is coworker feedback more important than supervisor feedback for increasing innovative behavior?. Human Resource Management, 58(4), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21960
13. Finch, J. F., & West, S. G. (1997). The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 439-485. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194
14. Fuad, D. R. S. M., Ming, G. K., Musa, K., Abdullah, A. R., Khalid, H., & Mudin, V. F. (2024). Mapping the terrain of innovation leadership studies: A bibliometric and content analysis exploration. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(11), 1408-1431. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i11/23291
15. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: a simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update. Allyn & Bacon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
16. Gümüşlüoğlu, L., & İlsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032
17. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Prentice Hall.
18. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637
19. Hashemian Moghadam, A., Nemati-Vakilabad, R., Imashi, R., Yaghoobi Saghezchi, R., Dolat Abadi, P., Jamshidinia, M., & Mirzaei, A. (2024). The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the innovation support inventory (ISI-12) in clinical nurses: A methodological cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 23(699). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02372-3
20. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
21. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
22. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications. Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., Eubanks, D. L., Bedell, K. E., & Murphy, S. T. (2007). Developing leaders for creative efforts: A domain-based approach to leadership development. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.002
23. Oke, A., Munshi, N., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics, 38(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.10.005
24. Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019). Diffusion of innovations. In D. W. Stacks, M. B. Salwen, & K. C. Eichhorn (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 415-434). Routledge.
25. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
26. Shin, S. J., Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2017). When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 68-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2111
27. Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: A clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
28. Tekin, H. (2010). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Yargı Yayınevi.
29. Vincent-Höper, S., & Stein, M. (2019). The leader support for innovation questionnaire (LSIQ) development and validation of a measure for assessing leader support for innovation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(8), 898-915. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2019-0137
30. Weintraub, P., & McKee, M. (2018). Leadership for innovation in healthcare: An exploration. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8(3), 138. 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.122
31. West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 309-333), John Wiley & Sons.
32. West, M. A. (2000). Creativity and innovation at work. In M. Vartiainen, F. Avallone, & N. Anderson (Eds.), Innovative theories, tools, and practices in work and organizational psychology (pp. 1–14). Huber Publishers. Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Pearson Education India.