ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET İLE SANAL KAYTARMA ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ANALİZİ: HASTANE ÇALIŞANLARI ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, dağıtım adaleti, işlemsel adalet ve etkileşim adaleti ile önemsiz ve ciddi sanal kaytarma faaliyetleri arasındaki ilişkilerin analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Konya ilinde faaliyet gösteren iki üniversite hastanesinde çalışanlardan oluşan örneklemden anket yöntemiyle veri toplanmış ve değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre; dağıtım adaleti, işlemsel adalet ve etkileşim adaleti ile önemsiz sanal kaytarma faaliyetleri arasında negatif yönlü ilişki olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Benzer şekilde dağıtım adaleti ile ciddi sanal kaytarma faaliyetleri arasında negatif yönlü ilişki olduğu da araştırma bulguları arasında yer almaktadır. Diğer yandan, işlemsel adalet ve etkileşim adaleti ile ciddi sanal kaytarma faaliyetleri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı ortaya konmuştur. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre; dağıtım adaletinin hem önemsiz, hem de ciddi sanal kaytarma faaliyetlerini negatif yönlü etkilediği saptanmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel Adalet, Sanal Kaytarma, Hastane Çalışanları

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND CYBERLOAFING: THE CASE OF HOSPITAL EMPLOYEES

Öz

The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice and serious and minor cyber-loafing. The sample consists of employees working in two university hospitals in Konya. The findings of the research indicated that there was a negative relationship between distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice and minor cyberloafing. Likewise, there was a negative relationship between distributive justice and serious cyber-loafing. On the other hand; no significant relationship was found out between procedural justice, interactional justice and serious cyberloafing. According to the results of the regression analysis, distributive justice had a negative effect on both serious and minor cyber-loafing

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational Justice, Cyber-loafing, Hospital Employees

Kaynakça

1. Ahmadi, H., Bagheri, F., Ebrahimi, S.A., Rokni, M.A.N. ve Kahrer, M.S. (2011). Deviant Work Behavior: Explaining Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Cyber-loafing as a Deviant Work Behavior. American Journal of Science Research, 24, 103-116.
2. Akman, G., Özkan, C. ve Eriş, H. (2008). Strateji Odaklılık ve Firma Stratejilerinin Firma Performansına Etkisinin Analizi. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(13), 93-115.
3. Aryee, S., Budhwari P.S. ve Chen, Z.X. (2002). Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
4. Balanchard, A.L. ve Henle, C.A. (2008). Correlates of Different Forms of Cyberloafing: The Role of Norms and External Locus of Control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1067-1084.
5. Behson, S.J. (2011). The Relative Importance of Organizational Justice Dimensions on Employee Outcomes: A Critical Reanalysis Using Relative Weights Analysis. Organization Management Journal, 8, 205-217.
6. Blau, G., Yang, Y. ve Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a Measure of Cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 35(1), 9-17.
7. Bozic, L. (2007). The Effects of Market Orientation on Product Innovation. Croatian Economic Survey, 9, 107-124.
8. Brown, G., Bemmels, B. ve Barclay, L.J. (2010). The Importance of Policy in Perceptions of Organizational Justice. Human Relations, 63(10), 1587-1609.

9. Chang, C.C. ve Dubinsky, A.J. (2005). Organizational Justice in the Sales Force: A Literature Revies with Propositions. Journal of Business- to-Business Marketing, 12(1), 35-71.
10. Çıngı, H. (1994). Örnekleme Kuramı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Yayınları Ders Kitapları Dizisi 20. Ankara: H.Ü. Fen Fakültesi Basımevi.
11. Di Fabio, A. ve Palazzeschi, L. (2012). Organizational Justice: Personality Traits or Emotional Intelligence? An Empirical Study in an Italian Hospital Context. Journal of Employment Counseling, 49, 31-42.
12. Eskew, D.E. (1993). The Role of Organizational justice in Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Right Journal, 6(3), 185-194.
13. Frenkel, S.J., Li, M. ve Restubog, S.L.D. (2012). Management, Organizational Justice and Emotional Exhaustion Among Chinese Migrant Workers: Evidence from two Manufacturing Firms. British Journal of Industrial Relatios, 50(1), 121-147.
14. Harris, K.J., Andwers, M.C. ve Kacmar, K.M. (2007). The Moderating Effects of Justice on the Relationship between Organizational Politics and Workplace Attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 135-144.
15. Heslin, P. A. ve VandeWalle, D. (2011). Performance Appraisal Procedural Justice: The Role of a Manager’s Implicit Person Theory. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1694-1718.
16. İçerli, L. (2010). Örgütsel Adalet: Kuramsal Bir Yaklaşım. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(1), 67-92.
17. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, 4. Baskı. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
18. Kılıçlar, A. (2011). Yöneticiye Duyulan Güven ile Örgütsel Adalet İlişkisinin Öğretmenler Açısından İncelenmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 23-36.
19. Liberman, B., Seidman, G., McKenna, K. ve Buffardi, L. (2011). Employee Job Attitudes and Organizational Characteristics as Predictors of Cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2192-2199.
20. Lim, V.K.G. (2002). The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 675-694.
21. Lim, V.K.G ve Teo, T.S.H. (2005). Prevalence, Perceived Seriousness, Justification and Regulation of Cyberloafing in Singapore. Information ve Management, 42, 1081-1093.
22. Mitchell, J.I., Gagne, M., Beaudry, A. ve Dyer, L. (2012). The Role of Perceived Organizational Support, Distributive Justice and Motivation in Reactions to New Information Technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 729-738.
23. Murtaza, G., Shahzad, K., Shah, M.K. ve Khan, N.A. (2011). Impact of Distributive and Procedural Justice on Employees’ Commitment: A Case of Public Sector Organization of Pakistan. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 29, 73-80.
24. Niehoff, B.P. ve Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556.
25. Özgener, Ş. ve Iraz, R. (2006). Customer Relationship Management in Small-Medium Enterprises: The Case of Turkish Tourism Industry. Tourism Management, 27, 1356-1363.
26. Özkalp, E., Aydın, U. ve Tekeli S. (2011). Sapkın Örgütsel Davranışlar ve Çalışma Yaşamında Yeni Bir Olgu: Sanal kaytarma (Cyberloafing) ve İş İlişkilerine Etkileri. 19. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Çanakkale (26-28 Mayıs), 465-470.
27. Robinson, S.L. ve Bennett, R.J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scalling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.
28. Schmiesing, R.J., Safrit, R.D. ve Gliem, J.A. (2003). Factors Affecting OSU Extension Agents’ Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Job Satisfaction. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 10(2), 25-33.
29. Seymour, L. ve Nadasen, K. (2007). Web Access for IT Staff: A Developing World Perspective on Web Abuse. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 543-557.
30. Tokgöz, N. (2011). Örgütsel Sinizm, Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Adalet İlişkisi: Elektrik Dağıtım İşletmesi Çalışanları Örneği. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(2), 363-387.
31. Zoghbi, P. (2007). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Cyberloafing in the Workplace: Has “Anomia” a Say in the Matter?. CyberPsychology ve Behavior, 10(3), 464-470.
32. Zoghbi, P. (2009). Inequity, Conflict, and Compliance Dilemma as Causes of Cyberloafing. International Journal of Conflict Management, 20(2), 188-201.
33. Zoghbi, P., Tacoronte, D.V. ve Ding, J.T. (2006). Do Current Anti- Cyberlaofing Disciplinary Practices have a Replica in Research Findings? A Study of the Effects of Coercive Strategies on Workplace Internet Misuse. Internet Research, 16(4), 450-46.