GÜVENLİK-ÇEVRE İLİŞKİSİNE YENİDEN BAKIŞ VE TÜRKİYE İÇİN BEKLENTİLER

Öz

Çevresel bozulma 1970lerden bu yana uluslararası ilişkilerde hem akademik tartışmaların hem de dünyaya dair sosyo-politik kaygıların önemli konularından biri olmuştur. Ancak güvenlik çevre ilişkisi 1990’lara kadar akademik çevrelerin çok da ilgisini çekmemiştir. Soğuk Savaş dönemi boyunca kapsamlı ve tamamlayıcı bir güvenlik anlayışının kabulü için yapılan tüm çağrılar, sahada Süper Güçlerin çekişmesi, kuramsal alanda da realist/neo-realist hâkimiyetin gölgesinde kalmıştır. Ortodoks realist okulun tüm sert eleştirilerine rağmen, 1990’ların başında Sovyetler Birliği’nin çözülmesiyle birlikte güvenlik-çevre ilişkisi giderek daha önemli ve tartışılır bir hale gelmiştir. Çalışma günümüzde giderek önemi artan güvenlik-çevre bağlantısını güvenliğin referans nesneleri olan devlet ve birey açısından incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Devlet ve bireyi merkez alan kuramsal çerçevede, çevresel bozulmanın ulusal güvenlik ve insan güvenliği üzerindeki etkileri Türkiye’ye özel bir vurgu yaparak anlatılacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevresel Bozulma, Ulusal Güvenlik, İnsan Güvenliği, Devlet İçi Çatışma, Kaynak Savaşları

REVISITING THE ENVIRONMENT-SECURITY NEXUS AND PROSPECTS FOR TURKEY

Öz

Environmental degradation has been a significant matter of academic debate and sociopolitical concern in international relations since the 1970s. However the linkage between environmental degradation and security did not receive scholarly attention until 1990s. During the Cold War period, the call for a comprehensive and complementary security agenda encompassing non-military threats was overshadowed by Superpower rivalry as well as realist/neo-realist predominance. Despite heavy criticisms from the orthodox realist school of international relations, environment-security linkage became gradually significant after the disintegration of the Soviet Union by the beginning of the 1990s. This study aims to explore the links between environmental degradation and security by pointing out human beings and the states as the core referent objects of security. Within the framework of this theoretical background, the impacts of environmental degradation on state and human security in the post Cold War period will be evaluated with special reference to Turkey

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Environmental Degradation, National Security, Human Security, Intra-state Conflict, Resource Wars

Kaynakça

1. American Academy of Dermatology (2009). What is Skin Cancer. Retrieved October, 19, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.skincarephysicians.com/SkinCancerNet/whatis.html
2. Benjamin, P. (2000). Green Wars: Environmentalism as a National Security Issue. USA Today, November, 14-16.
3. Beckett, M. (2007). Lecture by the Foreign Secretary, Royal United Services Institute, 05.10.2007. Retrieved January 16, 2009, from the World Wide Web: ref:E464343E93D15A/info:public/infoID:E4643430E3E85A/
4. Bilgin, P. (2002). Beyond Statism in Security Studies? Human Agency and Security in the Middle East. The Review of International Affairs, 2(1), 100-118.
5. Booth, K. (1991). Security and Emancipation. Review of International Studies, 17(4), 313-326.
6. Brown, G. (2008). National Security Strategy Statement, 19 March 2008, House of Commons, Offical Site of the Prime Minister’s Office. Retrieved January 19, 2009 from the World Wide Web: http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page15102
7. Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post Cold War Era. Second Edition. New York: Harvester Wheatsteaf.
8. Dabelko, G.D. (2008). An Uncommon Peace: Environment, Development, and the Global Security Agenda. Environment, May-June 2008, 23- 29.

9. Deudney, D. (1990). The Case against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 19(3), 461-476.
10. Dimitrov, R.S. (2002). Water, Conflict and Security: A Conceptual Minefield. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 677-691.
11. Dixon, T.F.H. (1991). On the Threshold: Environmental Changes as the Causes of Acute Conflict. International Security, 16(2), 76-116.
12. Dixon, T.F.H. (1994). Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from Cases. International Security, 19(1) (Summer 1994), 5 - 40.
13. Environment and Security in an International Context (1999). Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society, K.M. Lietzmann and G.D. Vest (Eds.), Final Report, Executive Summary, No 232, Berlin, Germany.
14. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2008). Health Effects of Overexposure to the Sun; January 4, 2008. Retrieved August 08, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.epa.gov/ sunwise/uvandhealth.html
15. Eslen, N. (2009). Küresel Isınma Ciddi Bir Güvenlik Sorunudur. Radikal, August 25, 2009.
16. FAO (United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization) (2008). Indigenous Peoples Threatened by Climate Change; August 8, 2008. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from the World Wide Web:http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2008/1000906/index .html
17. Fırat, M. & Kürkçüoğlu, Ö. (2003). 1980–1990 Ortadoğu ile İlişkiler. In B. Oran (Ed.), Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, Cilt 2, 6. Baskı, (pp. 140-148). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
18. Falk, R. (1971). This Endangered Planet: Prospects and Proposals for Human Survival. New York: Random House.
19. Forster, J.A. (2007). A Matter of Security. New Statesman, 17, January 29, 2007. Retrieved September 14, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2007/01/ climate- change-mod-global
20. Foster, G.D. (2001). Environmental Security: The Search for Strategic Legitimacy. Armed Forces and Society, 27(3), 373-395.
21. Gleick, P.H. (1993). Water and Conflict: Fresh Water Resources and International Security. International Security, 18(1), 79-112.
22. Gleditsch, N.P. (1998). Armed Conflict and the Environment: A Critique of the Literature. Journal of Peace Research, 35(3), 381–400.
23. Greenfieldboyce, N. (2009). 634 Million People at Risk from Rising Seas. Retrieved August 14, 2009, from the World Wide Web:http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9162 438.
24. Howard, P.N. & Dixon, T.H. (1996). Project on Environment, Population and Security, Occasional Paper. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science and the University of Toronto.
25. Kadıoğlu, M. (2008). Küresel İklim Değişikliği ve Uyum Stratejiler. Kar Hidrolojisi Konferansı, 27-28 Mart, 2008 (pp. 69-94). DSİ VII. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Erzurum.
26. Karaca, M. & Nicholls, R.J. (2008). Potential Implications of Accelerated Sea-Level Rise for Turkey. Journal of Coastal Research, 24(2), 288- 298.
27. Kibaroğlu, A. (2007). Politics of Water Resources in the Jordan, Nile and Tigris-Euphrates: Three River Basins, Three Narratives. Perceptions, Spring 2007, 143-164.
28. Knudsen, O.F. (2001). Post Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization. Security Dialogue, 32(3), 355-368.
29. Lynn-Jones, S.M. (1991). International Security Studies after the Cold War: An Agenda for the Future. CSIA Discussion Paper 91-11, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
30. Mearsheimer, J.J. (1994). The False Promise of International Relations. International Security, 19(3), 5-49.
31. Maxwell, J.H. & Reuveny, R. (2000). Resource Scarcity and Conflict in Developing Countries. Journal of Peace Research, 37(3), 301-322.
32. Maybee, S.C. (2008). National Security and Global Climate Change. Joint Force Quarterly, 49(Second Quarter), 98-102.
33. Page, E. (2000). Theorizing the Link between Environmental Change and Security. Reciel, 9(1), 33-43.
34. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). United Nations General Assembly, 42. Session, Item 83(e) of the Provisional Agenda, Official Document No: A/42/427.
35. Reuchlin, P. (2007). Environmental Security: Ways Ahead for the OSCE. Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights, 1, 64–76.
36. Rourke, J.T. (2007). International Politics on the World Stage. New York: McGraw Hill.
37. Schefrann, J. (2008). Climate Change and Security. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64(2), 19-25.
38. Smith, P.J. (2007). Climate Change, Weak States and the ‘War on Terrorism’ in South and Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 29(2), 264-285.
39. Ullman, R. (1983). Redefining Security. International Security, 8(1), 129– 153.
40. UNEP (United Nations Environment Program) (2007). Environmental Degradation Triggering Tensions and Conflict in Sudan, Press Release, June 22, 2007. Retrieved August 7, 2008 from the World Wide Web: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default. asp?DocumentID=512&ArticleID=5621&l=en
41. United Nations Human Development Report (1994). New York: Oxford University Pres.
42. United Nations Human Development Report (2003). New York: Oxford University Pres.
43. Uzgel, İ. (1998). Türk Dış Politikasında ‘Sivilleşme’ ve Demokratikleşme Sorunları: Körfez Savaşı Örneği. SBF Dergisi, 53(1), 307-326.
44. Vidal, J. (2009). Global Warming Could Create 150 Million 'Climate Refugees' by 2050. Retrieved November 18, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov /03/global-warming-climate-refugees