COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 1 Mart 2007
  • Gül Bayraktaroğlu
  • Bilge Aykol
PDF İndir
EN TR

COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Öz

Portals allowing consumers to share experiences on the Internet which are called blogs have become an information source that customers use more and more. This study aims to compare the effect of advertisements-an impersonal communication tool- with blogs- a personal communication tool- using an experimental design. The effect of blogs and advertisements on purchasing intentions of university students for mobile phones was investigated through experimental design which was conducted on four groups of university students, all of which included about 20 individuals. Findings indicate that exposure to different information sources like blogs and ads created a significant difference on intentions. The change caused by the exposure was greater for blogs than for ads. Unfavorable blogs created the largest change on intentions. These findings may warn marketers to consider online communication more and take precautions against negative online word-of-mouth communication.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Beales, H., Jagis, M.B., Salop, C. and Staelin, R. (1981). Consumer Search and Public Policy. Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (June), 11-22.
  2. Bickart, B. and Schindler, R.M. (2001). Internet Forums as Influential Sources of Consumer Information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31-40.
  3. Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. and Engel, James F. (2001). Consumer Behavior. Ohio: South-Western.
  4. Bloch, P.H., Sherrell, D.L. and Ridgway, N.M. (1986). Consumer Search: An Extended Framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 119-126.
  5. Blythe, J. (2003) Essentials of Marketing Communications. Malaysia Pearson: Education.
  6. Coakes, S.J. and Steed, L.G. (2001). SPSS Analysis without Anguish, Singapore: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  7. Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the Value of Electronic Word of Mouth and its Impact in Consumer Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63-79.
  8. Fill, C. (2002). Marketing Communications: Contexts, Strategies and Applications. Spain: Pearson Education.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Gül Bayraktaroğlu Bu kişi benim

Bilge Aykol Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Mart 2007

Gönderilme Tarihi

14 Haziran 2014

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2007 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Bayraktaroğlu, G., & Aykol, B. (2007). COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 69-86. https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE
AMA
1.Bayraktaroğlu G, Aykol B. COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;8(1):69-86. https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE
Chicago
Bayraktaroğlu, Gül, ve Bilge Aykol. 2007. “COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 8 (1): 69-86. https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE.
EndNote
Bayraktaroğlu G, Aykol B (01 Mart 2007) COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 8 1 69–86.
IEEE
[1]G. Bayraktaroğlu ve B. Aykol, “COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 69–86, Mar. 2007, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE
ISNAD
Bayraktaroğlu, Gül - Aykol, Bilge. “COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 8/1 (01 Mart 2007): 69-86. https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE.
JAMA
1.Bayraktaroğlu G, Aykol B. COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi. 2007;8:69–86.
MLA
Bayraktaroğlu, Gül, ve Bilge Aykol. “COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 8, sy 1, Mart 2007, ss. 69-86, https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE.
Vancouver
1.Gül Bayraktaroğlu, Bilge Aykol. COMPARING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION VERSUS PRINT ADVERTISEMENTS ON INTENTIONS USING EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 01 Mart 2007;8(1):69-86. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA42YE97CE
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi
TR-DİZİN, EBSCO ve SOBIAD tarafından taranmaktadır.

Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınevi Web Sitesi

Dergi İletişim Bilgileri Sayfası