ADALET DİVANI’NIN 2/15 SAYILI GÖRÜŞÜ’NÜN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN YENİ YATIRIM ANTLAŞMALARINI NASIL ŞEKİLLENDİRECEĞİNE İLİŞKİN BİR DEĞERLENDİRME
Öz
Gerek Lizbon Antlaşmasıyla Avrupa Birliği’nin münhasır yetkilerinin kapsamının genişlemesi, gerekse Dünya’da daha geniş kapsamlı Yeni Nesil Ticaret Antlaşmalarının görüşülmeye
başlaması Avrupa Birliği Hukuku kapsamında bu alandaki yetkilerin Avrupa Birliği’ne mi, üye ülkelere
mi, ya da iki grup arasında paylaşılan
yetkilere mi dahil olup olmadığı
konusu tartışmalı
hale gelmiştir. Çalışmada “Avrupa Birliği-Singapur arasındaki Serbest Ticaret Antlaşması” kapsamında bu konuda verilen Adalet Divanının 2/15
sayılı Görüşü
incelenecek, Avrupa Birliği
hukuku dinamikleri de dikkate alınarak önemli konulara dikkat çekilecektir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
2/15 Sayılı Görüş Avrupa Birliği Yatırım Hukuku Münhasır Yetki
Kaynakça
- 2/15 Sayılı Görüş, (OPINION 2/15 OF THE COURT), 16 Mayıs 2017: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d2dc30d63c5084083f7b49bd8e26e1cacbce1dfd.e34KaxiLc3qMb40Rch0SaxyLb3r0?text=&docid=190727&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=473213, (Görüş)
- Hukuk Sözcüsü’nün Görüşü (OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL) SHARPSTON 21 Aralık 2016, Opinion procedure 2/15: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=186494&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=125523, (Sharpston, 2017)
- Charlotin D. (2017), EU Court Determines That Some Key Aspects Of Singapore-EU FTA Investment Chapter, Including ISDS, Require That It Be Submitted For Ratification In All EU Member-States, May 16, 2017, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/a-mixed-outcome-for-the-european-commission-as-eu-court-determines-that-some-key-aspects-of-singapore-eu-fta-investment-chapter-including-isds-require-that-it-be-submitted-for-rat/
- Karacan, P. (2014), Lizbon Andlaşması Sonrası Avrupa Birliği Yatırım Anlaşmaları, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Rona Aybay’a Armağan-Özel Sayı, Aralık 2014, s. 1421-1456 (Karacan, 2014).
- Karacan, P. (2016), Yatırım Mahkemesi Sistemi: Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkimi Sona mı Eriyor?, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, s. 61-84, Temmuz 2016, (Karacan, 2016).
- Roberts A., (2017), A Turning of the Tide against ISDS?, May 19, 2017, http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2017/05/the-court-of-justice-for-the-european-union-fired-a-significant-shot-at-investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds-this-week-a.html
- Thomdon D. (2017a), ECJ Says Member States must sign off on ISDS, Investment Reporter, 16 May 2017, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1141765/ecj-says-member-states-must-sign-off-on-isds
- Thomson D, (2017b), GAR, EU says “ISDS is dead” ahead of Japan trade deal, 06 July 2017, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1144114/eu-says-“isds-is-dead”-ahead-of-japan-trade-deal
- Tietje, C. (2016), The Applicability of ECT in Intra-EU Disputes, Conference: ‘The EU and Investment Arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty, 11 & 12 February 2016, at Queen Mary University of London, (Tietje, 2016).
Öz
Competences in the
European Union law such as exclusive European Union competences, exclusive
member state competences or shared competences became a very disputed area
after the Lisbon Treaty increased the scope of the exclusive competences of the
European Union in addition to the wider scope New General Trade
Agreements. The paper aims to discuss
these issues and focus on important topics with reference to the Opinion 2/15
of the Court on the “European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement” with
special emphasis on European Union law features.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Opinion 2/15 European Union Investment Law Exclusive Competence
Kaynakça
- 2/15 Sayılı Görüş, (OPINION 2/15 OF THE COURT), 16 Mayıs 2017: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d2dc30d63c5084083f7b49bd8e26e1cacbce1dfd.e34KaxiLc3qMb40Rch0SaxyLb3r0?text=&docid=190727&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=473213, (Görüş)
- Hukuk Sözcüsü’nün Görüşü (OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL) SHARPSTON 21 Aralık 2016, Opinion procedure 2/15: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=186494&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=125523, (Sharpston, 2017)
- Charlotin D. (2017), EU Court Determines That Some Key Aspects Of Singapore-EU FTA Investment Chapter, Including ISDS, Require That It Be Submitted For Ratification In All EU Member-States, May 16, 2017, https://www.iareporter.com/articles/a-mixed-outcome-for-the-european-commission-as-eu-court-determines-that-some-key-aspects-of-singapore-eu-fta-investment-chapter-including-isds-require-that-it-be-submitted-for-rat/
- Karacan, P. (2014), Lizbon Andlaşması Sonrası Avrupa Birliği Yatırım Anlaşmaları, Legal Hukuk Dergisi, Rona Aybay’a Armağan-Özel Sayı, Aralık 2014, s. 1421-1456 (Karacan, 2014).
- Karacan, P. (2016), Yatırım Mahkemesi Sistemi: Uluslararası Yatırım Tahkimi Sona mı Eriyor?, İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 15, Sayı 2, s. 61-84, Temmuz 2016, (Karacan, 2016).
- Roberts A., (2017), A Turning of the Tide against ISDS?, May 19, 2017, http://worldtradelaw.typepad.com/ielpblog/2017/05/the-court-of-justice-for-the-european-union-fired-a-significant-shot-at-investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds-this-week-a.html
- Thomdon D. (2017a), ECJ Says Member States must sign off on ISDS, Investment Reporter, 16 May 2017, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1141765/ecj-says-member-states-must-sign-off-on-isds
- Thomson D, (2017b), GAR, EU says “ISDS is dead” ahead of Japan trade deal, 06 July 2017, http://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1144114/eu-says-“isds-is-dead”-ahead-of-japan-trade-deal
- Tietje, C. (2016), The Applicability of ECT in Intra-EU Disputes, Conference: ‘The EU and Investment Arbitration under the Energy Charter Treaty, 11 & 12 February 2016, at Queen Mary University of London, (Tietje, 2016).
Ayrıntılar
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 15 Aralık 2017 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2017 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 2 |