Global Brain Drain And Labor Market Dynamics: An Exploratory Study On The Mobility, Impacts And Return Potential Of Skilled Human Capital

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 13, 78 - 92, 23.12.2025

Sergen Gürsoy

https://doi.org/10.58618/igdiriibf.1823099

https://izlik.org/JA42ZA49EX

Öz

In today's rapidly accelerating globalization environment, the labor market is a primary factor impacting the economy. With the emergence of labor market distortions, academic focus is constantly increasing. This study aims to draw exploratory conclusions on the impact of brain drain on the socioeconomic structure and the potential for return by considering the mobility in labor markets where qualified human capital resides. It covers the push and pull factors for brain drain, working conditions, selection criteria, and human capital externalities. The aim is to explore the circulation of brain drain and brain gain by clarifying conceptual distinctions. Accordingly, a systematic synthesis is created based on the research findings and policy implications are presented. The research method utilizes document analysis, a qualitative research technique, and exploratory analysis is conducted on studies frequently cited within the scope of the topic. The findings suggest that brain drain in Turkey can be transformed into circulation rather than loss under proper governance. Institutionalizing sustainable economic and socio-cultural bridges, building an autonomous and merit-based career-governance infrastructure that will make the savings of returnees visible, and strengthening local-sectoral capacity in areas such as information technologies, health, and engineering to ensure skill compatibility appear critical.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Brain Drain , Reverse Brain Drain , Brain Circulation , Human Capital

Küresel Beyin Göçü ve İşgücü Piyasası Dinamikleri: Nitelikli İnsan Sermayesinin Hareketliliği, Etkileri Ve Geri Dönüş Potansiyeli Üzerine Keşifsel Çalışma

https://izlik.org/JA42ZA49EX

Öz

Günümüzün hızla küreselleşen ortamında, işgücü piyasası ekonomiyi etkileyen başlıca faktörlerden biridir. İşgücü piyasasında ortaya çıkan çarpıklıklar, akademik ilgiyi sürekli olarak artırmaktadır. Bu çalışma, nitelikli insan sermayesinin bulunduğu işgücü piyasalarındaki hareketliliği dikkate alarak, beyin göçünün sosyoekonomik yapıya etkisi ve geri dönüş potansiyeli hakkında keşifsel sonuçlar çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, beyin göçünün itici ve çekici faktörlerini, çalışma koşullarını, seçim kriterlerini ve insan sermayesinin dışsallıklarını kapsamaktadır. Amaç, kavramsal ayrımları netleştirerek beyin göçü ve beyin kazanımının dolaşımını araştırmaktır. Buna göre, araştırma bulgularına dayalı sistematik bir sentez oluşturulmakta ve politika çıkarımları sunulmaktadır. Araştırma yöntemi, nitel bir araştırma tekniği olan belge analizini kullanmakta ve konu kapsamında sıkça atıfta bulunulan çalışmalarda keşifsel analiz yapılmaktadır. Bulgular, Türkiye'de beyin göçünün uygun yönetişim altında kayıp yerine dolaşıma dönüştürülebileceğini göstermektedir. Sürdürülebilir ekonomik ve sosyo-kültürel köprülerin kurumsallaştırılması, geri dönenlerin tasarruflarını görünür kılacak özerk ve liyakate dayalı bir kariyer yönetişim altyapısının oluşturulması ve bilgi teknolojileri, sağlık ve mühendislik gibi alanlarda beceri uyumluluğunu sağlamak için yerel-sektörel kapasitenin güçlendirilmesi kritik öneme sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beyin Göçü , Ters Beyin Göçü , Beyin Dolaşımı , Beşeri Sermaye

Kaynakça

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Currency.
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty: Winners of the 2024 Nobel Prize in economics. Penguin UK.
• Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica.
• Agunias, D. R., & Newland, K. (2007). Circular migration and development: Trends, policy routes, and ways forward. MPI.
• Akyıldız, İ. E. (2025). Beyin Göçü Politikaları: Dünya'dan ve Türkiye'den Örnekler. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 326-361.
• Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Beine, M., Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2001). Brain drain and economic growth: theory and evidence. Journal of development economics, 64(1), 275-289.
• Bhargava, A., & Docquier, F. (2008). HIV pandemic, medical brain drain, and economic development in Sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(2), 345-366.
• Borjas, G. J. (1989). Economic theory and international migration. International migration review, 23(3), 457-485.
• Borjas, G. J., & Katz, L. F. (2007). The evolution of the Mexican-born workforce in the United States. In Mexican immigration to the United States (pp. 13-56). University of Chicago Press.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
• Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. Univ of California Press.
• Cassarino, J. P. (2013). Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. REMHU: Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 21, 21-54.
• Clemens, M. A. (2007). Do visas kill? Health effects of African health professional emigration. Center for Global Development Working Paper, (114).
• Clemens, M. A. (2011). Economics and emigration: Trillion-dollar bills on the sidewalk?. Journal of Economic perspectives, 25(3), 83-106.
• Clemens, M. A. (2014). Does development reduce migration? (pp. 152-185). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Czaika, M., & Parsons, C. R. (2017). The gravity of high-skilled migration policies. Demography, 54(2), 603-630.
• Desai, M. A., Kapur, D., McHale, J., & Rogers, K. (2009). The fiscal impact of high-skilled emigration: Flows of Indians to the US. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 32-44.
• Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2007). Skilled migration: the perspective of developing countries. (Discussion Paper Series 10/07). Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration: London, UK.
• Docquier, F., & Rapoport, H. (2012). Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of economic literature, 50(3), 681-730.
• Dustmann, C., & Glitz, A. (2011). Migration and education. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 327-439). Elsevier.
• Dustmann, C., & Weiss, Y. (2007). Return migration: theory and empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2), 236-256.
• Dustmann, C., Frattini, T., & Halls, C. (2010). Assessing the Fiscal Costs and Benefits of A8 Migration to the UK. Fiscal Studies, 31(1), 1-41.
• Faist, T. (2008). Migrants as transnational development agents: an inquiry into the newest round of the migration–development nexus. Population, space and place, 14(1), 21-42.
• Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2012). Foreign-born scientists: mobility patterns for 16 countries. Nature biotechnology, 30(12), 1250-1253.
• Güngör, N. D., & Tansel, A. (2014). Brain drain from Turkey: Return intentions of skilled migrants. International Migration, 52(5), 208-226.
• Hunt, J., & Gauthier-Loiselle, M. (2010). How much does immigration boost innovation?. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 31-56.
• Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2011). High-skilled immigration policy in Europe. BR Chiswick, High-Skilled Immigration in a Globalized Labor Market, American Enterprise Institute, Washington DC, 264-314.
• Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2005). The global migration of talent: What does it mean for developing countries. CGD Brief (Washington: Center for Global Development).
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978.
• Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. F. (2015). Skilled immigration and the employment structures of US firms. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(S1), S147-S186.
• Kerr, S. P., Kerr, W., Özden, Ç., & Parsons, C. (2016). Global talent flows. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 83-106.
• Kerr, W. R. (2013). US high-skilled immigration, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Empirical approaches and evidence (No. w19377). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science, 5(1), 69.
• Mihi-Ramírez, A., García-Rodríguez, Y., & Cuenca-García, E. (2016). Innovation and international high skilled migration. Engineering economics, 27(4), 452-461.
• Nathan, M. (2014). The wider economic impacts of high-skilled migrants: a survey of the literature for receiving countries. IZA Journal of Migration, 3, 1-20.
• OECD (2019). International Migration Outlook 2019. OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2022), International Migration Outlook 2022, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/30fe16d2-en.
• Özden, Ç., & Schiff, M. (Ed.). (2005). International migration, remittances, and the brain drain. World Bank Publications.
• Peri, G. (2012). The effect of immigration on productivity: Evidence from US states. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 348-358.
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98, 71-102.
• Rønning, H., Thomas, P., Tomaselli, K. G., & Teer-Tomaselli, R. (2006). Intellectual property rights and the political economy of culture. Critical Arts, 20(1), 1-19.
• Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in comparative international development, 40, 35-61.
• Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press.
• Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American economic review, 51(1), 1-17.
• Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 80–93.
• Stark, O., Helmenstein, C., & Prskawetz, A. (1997). A brain gain with a brain drain. Economics letters, 55(2), 227-234.
• Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. The American economic review, 59(1), 138-148.
• TÜİK. (2024).Higher Education Brain Drain Statistics, 2021-2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Higher-Education-Brain-Drain-Statistics-2021-2023-53839&dil=2
• Tung, R. L. (2008). Brain circulation, diaspora, and international competitiveness. European Management Journal, 26(5), 298-304.
• Wadhwa, V., Saxenian, A., Freeman, R. B., & Gereffi, G. (2009). America's loss is the world's gain: America's new immigrant entrepreneurs, Part 4.
• WHO. (2010). Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. Geneva: World Health Organization.
• World Population Review. (2025). Brain Drain Countries 2025. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/brain-drain-countries