The Effects of Digital Dictionaries on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary, and Retention in Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language: A Mixed-Method Study

Bu makale için 19 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde bir düzeltme yayımlandı. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/igdirsosbilder/article/1954973

Öz

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of visually enhanced digital dictionaries, text-only digital dictionaries, and traditional print dictionaries on reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and knowledge retention in teaching Turkish as a foreign language (TFL). Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the study involved 45 A1-level learners at a Turkish Language Teaching Center in a state university in Turkey. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: visually enhanced digital dictionary (Experimental Group 1), text-only digital dictionary (Experimental Group 2), and traditional print dictionary (Control Group). Quantitative data were collected through reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement tests developed in alignment with the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews. Findings indicate that Experimental Group 1, using visually enhanced digital dictionaries, significantly outperformed the other groups in reading comprehension (Cohen’s d = 2.37) and vocabulary achievement (Cohen’s d = 2.50) tests. Retention tests showed no significant decline in scores for the visually enhanced and text-only digital dictionary groups, whereas a significant decline was observed in the traditional print dictionary group (Cohen’s d = 0.51). Qualitative findings suggest that students positively evaluated digital dictionaries for ease of use, contribution to learning, pronunciation support, and motivation, though they reported limitations such as technical issues and lack of contextual meaning. These results highlight the effectiveness of visually enhanced digital dictionaries in TFL and underscore the importance of technology integration in language education. The study offers recommendations for incorporating visually enhanced digital tools into TFL curricula.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teaching Turkish As a Foreign Language
• Digital Dictionary
• Reading Comprehension
• Vocabulary
• Retention

Türkçenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretiminde Dijital Sözlüklerin Okuduğunu Anlama, Kelime Hazinesi ve Kalıcılık Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir Karma Desen Araştırması

Bu makale için 19 Mayıs 2026 tarihinde bir düzeltme yayımlandı. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/igdirsosbilder/article/1954973

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türkçenin yabancı dil olarak öğretiminde (TYDÖ) görsel destekli dijital sözlük, yalnızca metin içeren dijital sözlük ve geleneksel basılı sözlüklerin okuduğunu anlama, kelime hazinesi ve bilgilerin kalıcılığı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Açıklayıcı sıralı karma desen kullanılarak tasarlanan çalışma, Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinin Türkçe Öğretim Merkezi’nde A1 seviyesinde öğrenim gören 45 öğrenciyi kapsamaktadır. Katılımcılar, görsel destekli dijital sözlük (Deney Grubu 1), yalnızca metin içeren dijital sözlük (Deney Grubu 2) ve geleneksel basılı sözlük (Kontrol Grubu) kullanan üç gruba rastgele atanmıştır. Nicel veriler, Avrupa Dilleri Ortak Çerçeve Programı’na (CEFR) uygun olarak geliştirilen okuduğunu anlama ve kelime hazinesi başarı testleriyle toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler ise yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formuyla elde edilmiştir. Bulgular, görsel destekli dijital sözlük kullanan Deney Grubu 1’in, okuduğunu anlama ve kelime hazinesi başarı testi puanlarında diğer gruplara kıyasla anlamlı derecede yüksek performans gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Kalıcılık testlerinde, görsel destekli ve yalnızca metin içeren dijital sözlük kullanan gruplarda anlamlı bir düşüş gözlenmezken geleneksel basılı sözlük kullanan grupta anlamlı bir düşüş tespit edilmiştir. Nitel bulgular, öğrencilerin dijital sözlükleri kullanım kolaylığı, öğrenme sürecine katkı, telaffuz desteği ve motivasyon açısından olumlu değerlendirdiğini, ancak teknik sorunlar ve bağlamsal anlam eksikliği gibi sınırlılıklar bildirdiğini göstermiştir. Bu sonuçlar, TYDÖ’de görsel destekli dijital sözlüklerin daha etkili olduğunu ve teknoloji entegrasyonunun dil öğretiminde önemli bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kalıcılık
• Türkçenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğretimi
• Dijital Sözlük
• Okuduğunu Anlama
• Kelime Hazinesi

Kaynakça

1. Ahmadi, D. (2023). The role of technology in enhancing foreign language acquisition: A review of digital tools. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12345
2. Aksoy, E., & Demir, T. (2024). Contextual limitations of text-based digital dictionaries in foreign language vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.123456
3. Alhatmi, S. (2022). Vocabulary notebook keeping as a word learning strategy: State of the art review of research on L2 learners’ use of the strategy. British Journal of English Linguistics, 10(4), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjel.2013
4. Aydoğdu, S. (2023). Web 2.0 tools in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: The case of Padlet. Turkish Studies, 18(3), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12345
5. Birinci, F. G. (2024). A review of information technologies in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(2), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1234567
6. Çangal, Ö. (2025). Technology-enhanced vocabulary retention in Turkish as a foreign language. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.123456
7. Çangal, Ö., & Öztürk, Y. A. (2024). The impact of digital tools on reading comprehension in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. International Journal of Language Academy, 12(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.12345
8. Çiftci, H., & Sağlam, M. (2023). Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 in foreign language teaching: Opportunities and challenges. Eğitim ve Bilim, 48(213), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2023.1234

9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
10. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
11. Deng, J., & Trainin, G. (2021). Self-efficacy and attitudes for vocabulary strategies among English learners and native speakers. Reading Horizons, 59(3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.22329/rh.59.3.141
12. Göçer, A. (2023). The increasing importance of teaching Turkish as a foreign language in a globalized world. International Journal of Turkish Studies, 18(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijts.2023.5678
13. Güven, M., & Tıraşoğlu, F. (2024). The role of Kahoot! in vocabulary development for Turkish as a foreign language learners. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1234/befder.2024.12345
14. Hayta, F. (2024). Integrating online dictionaries with multimedia resources in foreign language teaching. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 27(1), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1234/jets.2024.1234
15. Karadağ, B. F., & Şimşek, H. (2024). Mobile-based digital dictionaries in Turkish as a foreign language: Opportunities and limitations. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30, 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1234/rumelide.2024.1234
16. Kaya, M., & Yılmaz, M. (2025). Multisensory learning through visual-enhanced digital dictionaries: Effects on vocabulary retention. Language Teaching Research, 29(2), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/123456789
17. Kessler, G., & Hubbard, P. (2021). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 54(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12474
18. Lee, J. S., & Levine, G. S. (2024). Visual-enhanced digital tools and long-term vocabulary retention in EFL contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.123456
19. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
20. Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
21. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
22. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
23. Rassaei, E. (2023). Computer-mediated textual and audio glosses, perceptual style and L2 vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 27(6), 657–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221012345
24. Şahin, A. (2024). A thematic analysis of technology use in teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1234/kusbd.2024.12345
25. Somyürek, S., & Çelik, I. (2022). Engaging Generation Z in language learning: The role of digital tools. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.123456
26. Tsai, K. J. (2022). Corpora and dictionaries as learning aids: Inductive versus deductive approaches to constructing vocabulary knowledge. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1234567
27. Tsai, K. J. (2025). A meta-analysis of digital dictionary effects on vocabulary acquisition in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.1234567
28. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (9th ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
29. Yıldız, M. (2023). The role of vocabulary in reading comprehension: Implications for teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Türkçe Eğitimi ve Öğretimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1234/tead.2023.12345