Bölgesel Kalkınmada Kurumsal Sermaye

Yıl 2015, Sayı: 7, 47 - 69, 01.04.2015

Sertaç Hopoğlu Erol Çakmak

Öz

Küreselleşme ile birlikte yerel kalkınmaya olan yaklaşımlarda değişiklik yaşanmıştır. Gelişmiş ülkelerde bile bölgeler arası dengesizliklerin sürmesi, yerel kalkınmada etkili olabilen yerele özgü içsel faktörlere odaklanılmasına neden olmuştur. Yerel kurumsal altyapı bu faktörlerden biridir. Son yıllarda bazı araştırmacılar, kurumsal altyapının oluşturduğu yönetişim sinerjisini tanımlamak için, temelleri Yeni Kurumsal Ekonomi okuluna ve Marshall’ın “endüstriyel atmosfer” tezine dayanan “kurumsal sermaye” kavramını kullanmaya başlamışlardır. Kurumsal sermaye, kurumsal aktörler olan kamu kurumları ve sivil toplum kuruluşlarının kendi içlerindeki ve birbirleriyle olan ilişkilerinde ve etkileşimlerinde yatan bir kaynak olarak tanımlanabilir. Kurumsal sermaye tek başına kalkınmayı sağlayan bir süper formül değildir. Bununla birlikte, kurumsal sermayenin işlem maliyetlerini düşürerek, bölgesel kalkınmayı kolaylaştırıcı etkileri olabilmektedir. Arz yönlü bir kavram olan kurumsal sermaye, diğer bölgesel kaynakların etkinliğini artıran etkili bir politika aracı olarak kullanılabilir. Kurumsal sermayenin düzeyinin belirlenmesi, nitel belirleyicileri olmasından dolayı zor olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kurumlar, Kurumsal Sermaye, Sosyal Sermaye, Bölgesel Kalkınma

Institutional Capital in Regional Development

Öz

Globalization has changed the approaches to local development. Continuing imbalances even between the regions of developed countries have shifted focus on region-specific endogenous factors, which may impact local development. Institutional infrastructure is one of these factors. In recent years, some researchers began to use “institutional capital”, a concept based on New Institutional Economics and on Marshall‟s “industrial atmosphere” thesis, to explain the synergy of governance established by institutional infrastructure. Institutional capital may be defined as a resource which lies within the relations and interaction of actors from both the public and civil society. Institutional capital is not a super formula for regional development per se. However, it may facilitate regional development through lowering transaction costs. As a supplysided concept, institutional capital may be used as an efficient policy tool that amplifies the effectiveness of other resources. Determining the level of institutional capital may be difficult due to its qualitative indicators.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Institutions, Institutional Capital, Social Capital, Regional Development

Kaynakça

• Amin, Ash & Thrift, Nigel, “Living in the Global”, Globalization, Instituti- ons and Regional Development in Europe, ed. Ash Amin ve Nigel Thrift, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, 1-22.
• Boisier, Sergio, “Territorial Development and the Construction of Syner- getic Capital: A Contribution to the Discussion on the Intangibility of Development”, New Regional Development Paradigms, ed. Asfaw Kumssa & Terry McGee, London: Greenwood Press, 2001, 17-32.
• Brunell, Laura, Institutional Capital: Building Post-Communist Government Performance, New York: University Press of America, 2005.
• Boschma, Ron A., “Social Capital and Regional Development: An Empiri- cal Analysis of the Third Italy”, Learning from Clusters A Critical As- sessment from an Economic-Geographical Perspective, ed. Ron A. Boschma & Robert C. Kloosterman”, Dordrecht: Springer, 2005, 139-168.
• Busse, Matthias, “Competition Intensity, Potential Competition And Transaction Cost Economics”, HWWA Discussion Paper, 183, Ham- burg: Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA), 2002.
• Coase, Ronald H., “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Eco- nomics, 3, 1960, 1-44.
• Çakmak, Erol, Yerel Ekonomi ve Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları, Ankara: İmaj Yayınevi, 2006.
• Egidi, Massimo, “The „Creative Destruction‟ in Economic and Political Institutions”, CEEL Working Paper, 5-95, Trento: University of Tren- to, 1995.
• Kitson, Michael & Martin, Ronald & Tyler, Peter, “Regional Competiti- veness: An Elusive yet Key Concept?”, Regional Studies, 38 (9), 2004, 991-999.
• Kolodko, Grzegorz W., “Institutions, Policies and Economic Develop- ment”, UNU-WIDER Research Paper, 2006/21, Helsinki: United Na- tions University World Institute for Development Economics Re- search (UNU-WIDER), 2006.
• Krishna, Anirudh, “Creating and Harnessing Social Capital”, Social Capital A Multifaceted Perspective, ed. Partha Dasgupta & Ismail Serageldin”, Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999, 45-55.
• Marshall, Alfred, Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan, 1920, http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/marshall/Industry %26Trade.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 28 Haziran 2011.
• Martin, Ron, Thinking About Regional Competitiveness: Critical Issues. Backg- round ‘Think-Piece’ Paper Commissioned by the East Midlands Development Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, http://www.emda.org.uk/research/documents/research- studies/projects/RonMartinpaper1.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11 Ocak 2012.
• North, Douglass C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Perfor- mance, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• Plaatje, Joost, “„Institutional Capital‟ as a Factor of Sustainable Develop- ment: The Importance of an Institutional Equilibrium”, Baltic Jour- nal on Sustainable Development, 14 (2), 2008, 144-150.
• Putnam, Robert D. & Leonardi, Robert & Nonetti, Raffaela Y., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, New Jersey: Prince- ton University Press, 1993.
• Rabellotti, Roberta, External Economies and Cooperation in Industrial Districts A Comparison of Italy and Mexico, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1997.
• Storper, Michael, “Institutions of the Learning Economy”, Employment and Growth in the Knowledge-Based Economy, ed. Bengt-Ake Lundvall & Dominique Foray, Paris: OECD, 1996, 255-286.
• Williamson, Oliver E., “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3), 1981, 548-577.