Tedarikçi Geliştirme ve Verimlilik

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 26, 254 - 267, 30.04.2021

Mehmet Fatih Acar

Öz

Küreselleşme ile birlikte, şirketler için hem iç performansları hem de tedarikçilerini de kapsayan değer zincir performansı oldukça önem kazanmıştır. Firmaların; düzenli, verimli ve etkin çalışması, tedarikçileri ile olan uyumuna bağlıdır. Tedarikçileri ile koordine olamayan bir organizasyon, her ne kadar kurum içi performansı yüksek olsa bile, değişik operasyonel problemler yaşayabilir. Tedarikçi geliştirme kavramı, bu duruma dikkat çekerek, kurumların daha verimli çalışması adına tedarikçilere önem verilmesi gerektiğine işaret eder. Tedarikçi geliştirme, tedarikçilerin becerilerini geliştirmek için organizasyon ve tedarikçileri arasında uzun vadeli işbirliği çabasıdır. Tedarikçi geliştirme, hem reel sektörde hem de akademik literatürde gün geçtikçe tartışılan bir konudur. Tedarikçilerin öneminin artması sonucu, firmalar kendi performanslarının yanında, tedarikçilerinin performansını da göz önünde bulundurmaya başlamışlardır. Bu araştırmada, konu hakkında genel bir açıklama yapılmış ve literatür taraması ışığında tedarikçi geliştirmenin önemi tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Tedarikçi Geliştirme, Operasyon Yönetimi

Supplier Development and Productivity

Öz

With globalization, value chain performance, which includes both internal performances and suppliers, has gained importance for companies. The regular, efficient and effective operation of the companies depends on their compatibility with their suppliers. An organization that cannot coordinate with its suppliers may experience various problems, even though its internal performance is high. The concept of supplier development draws attention to this situation and indicates that organizations should give importance to their suppliers in order to work more efficiently. Supplier development is a long-term collaborative effort between the organization and its suppliers to improve the skills of suppliers. Supplier development is a topic that is being discussed day by day both in the real sector and in the academic literature. As a result of the increasing importance of suppliers, companies have started to consider the performance of their suppliers as well as their own performance. In this study, a general explanation about supplier development is given and the importance of this subject is highlighted by making a literature review.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Supply Chain Management, Supplier Development, Operations Management

Kaynakça

• Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. F., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872-1881.
• Ağan, Y., Acar, M. F., & Neureuther, B. (2018). The importance of supplier development for sustainability. In Sustainable freight transport (pp. 165- 178). Springer, Cham.
• Bai C. and Sarkis J. (2010), “Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory”, Journal of Cleaner Production ,Vol.18 pp. 1200– 1210.
• Boyd, D.E., Spekman, R.E., Kamauff, J.W., Werhane, P., 2007. Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: a procedural justice perspective. Long. Range Plan. 40 (3), 341e356.
• Busse, C., 2016. Doing well by doing Good? The self-interest of buying firms and sustainable supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 52 (2), 28e47.
• Carter, C. R., Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: a structural equation analysis. Journal of business Logistics, 25(1), 145-186.
• Child, J., Tsai, T. (2005). The Dynamic Between Firms’ Environmental Strategies and Institutional Constraints in Emerging Economies: Evidence from China and Taiwan. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 95-125.
• Christopher, M. (Ed.). (1992). Logistics: The strategic issues. Chapman & Hall.
• Dalvi, M. V., & Kant, R. (2015). Benefits, criteria and activities of supplier development: A categorical literature review. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(4), 653–675.
• Das, A., Narasimhan, R., and Talluri, S. (2006), “Supplier integration–finding an optimal configuration”. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24 No.5, pp. 563–582.
• Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., Carter, C. R. (2013). Environmental Development of Emerging Economy Suppliers: Antecedents and Outcomes.Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 131-147.
• Gimenez, C., Tachizawa, E. M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531-543.
• Glock, C. H., Grosse, E. H., & Ries, J. M. (2017). Reprint of decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 194(2017), 246– 260.
• Govindan, K., Kannan, D., & Haq, A. N. (2010). Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems,110(1), 43-62.
• Gualandris, J., Golini, R., Kalchschmidt, M., 2014. Do supply management and global sourcing matter for firm sustainability performance? Int. Study. Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 19 (3), 258e274.
• Hines, P. (1994). Creating world class suppliers: Unlocking mutual competitive advantage. Pitman Publishing.
• Hohmann, C (2014), hohmannchris.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/what-is-supplier- development/
• Humphreys, P., Cadden, T., Wen-Li, L., & McHugh, M. (2011). An investigation into supplier development activities and their influence on performance in the Chinese electronics industry. Production Planning and Control, 22(2), 137-156.
• Kannan, G., Kannan, D., Haq, A.N., 2010. Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 110 (1), 43e62.
• Klassen, R.D., Vereecke, A., 2012. Social issues in supply chains: capabilities link
• responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (1), 103- 115.
• Koplin, J., Seuring, S., Mesterharm, M. (2007). Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry–the case of the Volkswagen AG. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11), 1053-1062.
• Krause, D. R. (1997). Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(2), 12– 19.
• Krause, D.R., (1999), “The antecedents of buying firms’ efforts to improve suppliers”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol.17 No.2, pp. 205–224.
• Large, R.O., Thomsen, C.G., 2011. Drivers of Green supply management performance: evidence from Germany. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 17 (3), 176e184.
• Lee, S. Y., Klassen, R. D. (2008). Drivers and Enablers That Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Small‐and Medium‐Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains. Production and Operations Management, 17(6), 573-586.
• Li, W., Humphreys, P.K., Yeung, A.C.L., and Cheng, T.C.E., (2007), “The impact of specific supplier development efforts on buyer competitive advantage: an empirical model”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol.106, pp. 230–247.
• Lu, X.A.R., Lee, P.K.C., Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. Socially responsible supplier development: construct development and measurement validation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (1), 160-167.
• Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B., Dubey, R., 2016. Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: evidence from India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 111, 42-52.
• Maignan, I., Hillebrand, B., McAlister, D., 2002. Managing socially responsible buying: how to integrate non-economic criteria into the purchasing process. Eur. Manag. J. 20 (6), 641e648.
• Meixell, M.J., Luoma, P., 2015. Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain
• management: a systematic review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45 (1/2), 69
• Modi, S.B. and Mabert, V.A., (2007), “Supplier development: improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer”, Journal of Operations Management,Vol. 25 No.1, pp. 42–64.
• Mohanty, M. K., Gahan, P., & Choudhury, S. (2014). Why most of the supplier development programs fail in discrete manufacturing–findings from selected Indian discrete manufacturing industries. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, (ahead-of-print), 1-11.
• Narasimhan, R., Mahapatra, S., and Arlbjİrn, J., (2008), “Impact of relational norms, supplier development and trust on supplier performance”, Operations Management Research, Vol. 1 No.1, pp. 24–30.
• Noshad, K.,&Awasthi, A. (2018). Investigating critical criteria for supplier quality
• development. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2017.1387821.
• Parmigiani, A., R. B. Klassen, and M. V. Russo. 2011. “Efficiency Meets Accountability: Performance Implications of Supply Chain Configuration, Control, and Capabilities.” Journal of Operations Management 29 (3): 212– 223.
• Reuter, C., Foerstl, K. A. I., Hartmann, E. V. I., Blome, C. (2010). Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 45-63.
• Routroy, S., & Pradhan, S. K. (2013). Evaluating the critical success factors of supplier development: a case study. Benchmarking: An International Journal,20(3), 322-341.
• Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., Kazeminia, A., 2015a. Does implementing social supplier development practices pay off? Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 20 (4), 389-403.
• Sancha, C., Longoni, A., Gimenez, C., 2015b. Sustainable supplier development
• practices: drivers and enablers in a global context. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 21, 95
• Sancha, C., Giminez, C., Sierra, V., 2016. Achieving a socially responsible supply
• chain through assessment and collaboration. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 1934e1947.
• Seuring, D., M. Müller, (2008), From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 16, 1699-1710.
• Ustasüleyman, t. (2009). Tedarikçi geliştirmenin satın alma performansına etkisine yönelik yapısal model önerisi. İktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültesi dergisi, 11(1), 1-22.
• Wagner, S. M. (2010). Indirect and direct supplier development: performance implications of individual and combined effects. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 57(4), 536-546.
• Wagner S., (2011). Supplier development and the relationship life-cycle, Int. J. Production Economics, 129, 277–283
• Watts, C.A. and Hahn, C.K., (1993), “The supplier development program: an empirical analysis”, International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, Vol. 29 No.2, pp. 11–17. Webb, J. (2017), www.forbes.com/sites/jwebb/2017/04/27/what-is-supplier- development-three-levers-to-get-the-most-from-the-supply- base/?sh=47b6a91e1251
• Wuttke, D. A., Donohue, K.,&Siemsen, E. (2018). Initiating supplier new product development projects: A behavioral investigation. Production and Operations Management, 27(1), 80–99.
• Zimmer, K., Fr€ohling, M., Schultmann, F., 2016. Sustainable supplier management e a review of models of supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (5), 1412e1442.
• Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., Lai, K. H. (2011). Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 808-821.