Participatory mapping to address the water crisis: socio-ecological resilience practices from the Philippines, Kenya and India

Öz

This study aims to assess the impact of participatory mapping on socio-ecological resilience strategies developed in response to water crises through three specific case studies in the Philippines, Kenya and India. In a context where water crises are shaped not only by physical scarcity, but also by historical inequalities, governance failures and inequities in access to information, participatory mapping stands out as a multi-faceted intervention tool. Based on a qualitative multiple case study design, this research uses secondary data sources to analyse the relationships between knowledge production processes, community-based forms of governance and demands for spatial justice through an interdisciplinary approach. The findings show that participatory mapping is not only a technical tool for spatial data production, but also a transformative method that enables the recognition of local knowledge systems, the inclusion of community actors in decision-making processes, and the politicisation of resilience mechanisms developed in response to environmental vulnerability. The study therefore demonstrates that participatory mapping provides a strong analytical and practical basis for building more equitable, inclusive and resilient water governance structures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Participatory Mapping
• Socio-Ecological Resilience
• Spatial Justice
• Water Governance
• Critical Geography

Su kriziyle mücadelede katılımcı haritalama: Filipinler, Kenya ve Hindistan'dan sosyo-ekolojik esneklik pratikleri

Öz

Bu çalışma, Filipinler, Kenya ve Hindistan’da yürütülen üç özgün örnek olay üzerinden, katılımcı haritalama yönteminin su krizlerine karşı geliştirilen sosyo-ekolojik esneklik stratejileri üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Su krizlerinin yalnızca fiziksel kıtlıkla değil; aynı zamanda tarihsel eşitsizlikler, yönetişim yetersizlikleri ve bilgiye erişim adaletsizlikleriyle şekillendiği bir bağlamda, katılımcı haritalama çok katmanlı bir müdahale aracı olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Nitel çoklu vaka çalışması tasarımına dayanan bu araştırma, ikincil veri kaynaklarına başvurarak bilgi üretimi süreçleri, topluluk temelli yönetişim biçimleri ve mekânsal adalet talepleri arasındaki ilişkileri disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımla analiz etmektedir. Bulgular, katılımcı haritalamanın yalnızca mekânsal veri üretimi sağlayan teknik bir araç değil; aynı zamanda yerel bilgi sistemlerinin tanınmasını, topluluk aktörlerinin karar alma süreçlerine dâhil edilmesini ve çevresel kırılganlıklara karşı geliştirilen dayanıklılık mekanizmalarının politikleştirilmesini mümkün kılan dönüştürücü bir yöntem olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma, bu nedenle katılımcı haritalamanın su yönetiminde daha adil, kapsayıcı ve esnek yapılar kurma yolunda güçlü bir analitik ve pratik zemin sunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Katılımcı Haritalama
• Sosyo-Ekolojik Esneklik
• Mekansal Adalet
• Su Yönetişimi
• Eleştirel Coğrafya

Kaynakça

1. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465
2. Arango-Quiroga, J., Kinol, A., & Kuhl, L. (2023). Examining knowledge and epistemic justice in the design of nature-based solutions for water management. PLOS Climate, 2(9), e0000194.
3. Asmolov, G. (2020). The failures of participatory mapping: A mediational perspective. İçinde Mapping crisis. Participation, datafication and humanitarianism in the age of digital mapping (ss. 39-65). University of London Press. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/135558607/failures_participatory_mapping.pdf
4. Asuero, M. P., Nelson, G. L. M., Espaldon, M. V. O., Acosta, L. A., Macandog, D. M., Lalican, N. M., Abucay, E. R., Malenab, M. C. T., & Talubo, J. P. P. (2012). Social characteristics and vulnerabilities of disaster-prone communities in Infanta, Quezon, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 15(2). https://www.academia.edu/download/78119989/Social_Characteristics_and_Vulnerabiliti20220105-20240- 1dawu9p.pdf
5. Ayson, D. (2018). Community mapping and data gathering for city planning in the Philippines. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818767338
6. Bakker, K. (2000). Privatizing water, producing scarcity: The Yorkshire drought of 1995. Economic Geography, 76(1), 4-27.
7. Bollettino, V., Alcayna, T., Dy, P., & Vinck, P. (2017). Introduction to socio-ecological resilience. İçinde Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science. https://oxfordre.com/naturalhazardscience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.001.0001/acrefore- 9780199389407-e-261
8. Braslow, J., & Cordingley, J. E. (2016). Participatory Mapping in the Upper Tana River Basin, Kenya. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstreams/51799520-f653-41c8-a273-aa7b54dba3db/download

9. Bryan, J. (2015). Participatory mapping. İçinde The Routledge handbook of political ecology (ss. 249-262). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download? identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315759289-24&type=chapterpdf
10. Cahill, C. (2007). The Personal is Political: Developing new subjectivities through participatory action research. Gender, Place & Culture, 14(3), 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690701324904
11. Campos, F. C., & Anderson, G. L. (2021). Paulo Freire’s influence on participatory action research. The SAGE handbook of participatory research and inquiry, 41-54.
12. Carvalho, A. (2017). Climate change and the socio-ecological crisis. İçinde The Routledge handbook of language and politics (ss. 487-499). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315183718-37/climate-change-socio-ecological- crisis-anabela-carvalho
13. Chambers, R. (2006). Participatory Mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose Map? Who is Empowered and Who Disempowered? Who Gains and Who Loses? THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 25(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00163.x
14. Cleaver, F., & Whaley, L. (2018). Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 23(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799116? casa_token=e_hnwt5iZUwAAAAA:r73xSybsHdFE8CR5VzRk02JFxBuOo- J7eirw0qj3SkB4efIM2xQTtWrW9eiEFd0dVeTwhQ2CXYNcrZlPtp0XjOr1YA_p-8rtBDhz4bZXROiaEVAHuw
15. Cochrane, L., & Corbett, J. (2020). Participatory Mapping. Içinde J. Servaes (Ed.), Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change (ss. 705-713). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15- 2014-3_6
16. Cole, M. J., Bailey, R. M., Cullis, J. D., & New, M. G. (2018). Spatial inequality in water access and water use in South Africa. Water Policy, 20(1), 37-52.
17. Colven, E. (2021). Water Justice: At the intersection of political geography and political ecology. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629820303413
18. Connelly, S., & Anderson, C. (2007). Studying water: Reflections on the problems and possibilities of interdisciplinary working. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(3), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801807X183669
19. Das, M., Das, A., Seikh, S., & Pandey, R. (2022). Nexus between indigenous ecological knowledge and ecosystem services: A socio-ecological analysis for sustainable ecosystem management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(41), 61561-61578.
20. De Moor, A. (2018). A community network ontology for participatory collaboration mapping: Towards collective impact. Information, 9(7), 151.
21. Emmel, N. (2008). Participatory Mapping: An innovative sociological method. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/540/
22. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 30(1), 441-473.
23. Franco, J., Mehta, L., & Veldwisch, G. J. (2013). The Global Politics of Water Grabbing. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1651-1675. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.843852
24. Gagnon, Y.-C. (2010). The case study as research method: A practical handbook. PUQ. https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=ouTW4b7WInUC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=case+study+research+method&ots=o0JIFcoXkG&sig= CHjWATjL3Je1IXxIpi45szkCW-g
25. Gallopin, G. C. (2012). The United Nations World Water Development Report: Global Water Futures 2050: Five
26. Stylized Scenarios. UNESCO Publishing. https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=5V43WagAEcMC&oi=fnd&pg=PA2&dq=un+2050+water+crisis&ots=nt2E- YQHVT&sig=EKFKWklhDxM_gE_kaWIdtgfQ4Y0
27. Geekiyanage, D., Fernando, T., & Keraminiyage, K. (2020). Assessing the state of the art in community engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban development. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 51, 101847.
28. Gerlach, J. (2015). Editing worlds: Participatory mapping and a minor geopolitics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12075
29. Gleick, P. H. (1993). Water in crisis (C. 82). New York: Oxford University Press. http://www.ibiologia.unam.mx/pdf/directorio/z/introduccion/world_watershed_re.pdf
30. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT press. https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=fmYjgiUMy7EC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=habermas+communicative+action&ots=- ddL58DcLm&sig=YouRJFpZKgSATq_Hp_86c47rvuk
31. Hacking, I. (2016). Memory sciences, memory politics. İçinde Tense Past (ss. 67-87). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download? identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315022222-6&type=chapterpdf
32. Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food policy, 35(5), 365-377.
33. Harley, J. B. (2008). Maps, knowledge, and power. İçinde Geographic Thought (ss. 129-148). Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download? identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203893074-13&type=chapterpdf
34. Hohenthal, J., Minoia, P., & Pellikka, P. (2017a). Mapping Meaning: Critical Cartographies for Participatory Water Management in Taita Hills, Kenya. The Professional Geographer, 69(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1237294
35. Hohenthal, J., Minoia, P., & Pellikka, P. (2017b). Mapping Meaning: Critical Cartographies for Participatory Water Management in Taita Hills, Kenya. The Professional Geographer, 69(3), 383-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1237294
36. Hossen, M. A. (2016). Participatory mapping for community empowerment. Asian Geographer, 33(2), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2016.1237370
37. Joy, K. J., Kulkarni, S., Roth, D., & Zwarteveen, M. (2014). Re-politicising water governance: Exploring water re- allocations in terms of justice. Local Environment, 19(9), 954-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.870542
38. Juarez, J. A., & Brown, K. D. (2008). Extracting or empowering?: A critique of participatory methods for marginalized populations. Landscape Journal, 27(2), 190-204.
39. Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 5- 19.
40. Kim, A. M. (2015). Critical cartography 2.0: From “participatory mapping” to authored visualizations of power
41. and people. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 215-225.
42. Klonner, C., Usón, T. J., Aeschbach, N., & Höfle, B. (2021). Participatory Mapping and Visualization of Local Knowledge: An Example from Eberbach, Germany. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 12(1), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00312-8
43. Laituri, M., Luizza, M. W., Hoover, J. D., & Allegretti, A. M. (2023). Questioning the practice of participation: Critical reflections on participatory mapping as a research tool. Applied Geography, 152, 102900.
44. Lall, U., Heikkila, T., Brown, C., & Siegfried, T. (2008). Water in the 21st century: Defining the elements of global crises and potential solutions. Journal of International Affairs, 1-17.
45. Lim, M. B. B., Lim, H. R., Piantanakulchai, M., & Uy, F. A. (2016). A household-level flood evacuation decision model in Quezon City, Philippines. Natural Hazards, 80, 1539-1561.
46. Linton, J. (2010). What is Water? : The History of a Modern Abstraction. UBC Press.
47. Maclean, K., Cuthill, M., & Ross, H. (2014). Six attributes of social resilience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(1), 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.763774
48. Mehta, L. (2000). Water for the twenty-first century: Challenges and misconceptions. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Water_for_the_Twenty- First_Century_Challenges_and_Misconceptions/26445280/1/files/48093733.pdf
49. Nayar, V. (2013). The Water Crisis—Rethinking Water Governance. Journal of Land and Rural Studies, 1(1), 75- 94. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321024913487271
50. Oki, T., & Quiocho, R. E. (2020). Economically challenged and water scarce: Identification of global populations most vulnerable to water crises. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 36(2-3), 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1698413
51. Okotto-Okotto, J., Yu, W., Kwoba, E., Thumbi, S. M., Okotto, L. G., Wanza, P., Trajano Gomes da Silva, D., & Wright, J. (2021). A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya. Plos one, 16(7), e0255286.
52. Perkins, C. (2017). Critical cartography. İçinde The Routledge handbook of mapping and cartography (ss. 80- 89). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315736822-8/critical-cartography- chris-perkins
53. Puri, S. K., & Sahay, S. (2003). Participation through communicative action: A case study of GIS for addressing land/water development in India. Information Technology for Development, 10(3), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.1590100305
54. Raza, T., Liwag, C. R., Andres, A. V. L., Castro, J. T., Cuña, A. C., Vinarao, V. G., Raza, T. K. S., Marasigan, K. M. E., Espinosa, R. I. M., & Rentoy, F. C. (2020). Extreme weather disasters challenges for sustainable development: Innovating a science and policy framework for disaster-resilient and sustainable Quezon City, Philippines. Progress in Disaster Science, 5, 100066.
55. Reichel, C., & Frömming, U. U. (2014). Participatory Mapping of Local Disaster Risk Reduction Knowledge: An Example from Switzerland. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 5(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-014-0013-6
56. Robbins, P. (2019). Political ecology: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books? hl=en&lr=&id=nOGvDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR6&dq=what+is+political+ecology&ots=xaHPoM6EXQ&sig=_3 9nBvj_xb0tkBCvg2rJSn7m93E
57. Rounsevell, M. D. A., Robinson, D. T., & Murray-Rust, D. (2012). From actors to agents in socio-ecological systems models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1586), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0187
58. Rubel, L., Lim, V., Hall-Wieckert, M., & Katz, S. (2016). Cash across the City: Participatory Mapping & Teaching for Spatial Justice. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 12, 4-14.
59. Rye, S. A., & Kurniawan, N. I. (2017). Claiming indigenous rights through participatory mapping and the making of citizenship. Political Geography, 61, 148-159.
60. Strang, V. (2020). The meaning of water. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003087090/meaning-water-veronica-strang
61. Truelove, Y. (2019). Rethinking water insecurity, inequality and infrastructure through an embodied urban political ecology. WIREs Water, 6(3), e1342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1342
62. Urbaniec, K., Mikulčić, H., Rosen, M. A., & Duić, N. (2017). A holistic approach to sustainable development of energy, water and environment systems. Journal of cleaner production, 155, 1-11.
63. Verovšek, P. J. (2016a). Collective memory, politics, and the influence of the past: The politics of memory as a research paradigm. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1167094
64. Verovšek, P. J. (2016b). Collective memory, politics, and the influence of the past: The politics of memory as a research paradigm. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 4(3), 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2016.1167094
65. Watts, M. (2017). Political Ecology. Içinde E. Sheppard & T. J. Barnes (Ed.), A Companion to Economic Geography (1. bs, ss. 257-274). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166430.ch16
66. Weyer, D., Bezerra, J. C., & De Vos, A. (2019). Participatory mapping in a developing country context: Lessons from South Africa. Land, 8(9), 134.
67. Wu, G., Feder, A., Cohen, H., Kim, J. J., Calderon, S., Charney, D. S., & Mathé, A. A. (2013). Understanding resilience. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 7, 10.
68. Wyatt, S., Bier, J., Harris, A., & Van Heur, B. (2013). Participatory Knowledge Production 2.0: Critical Views and Experiences. Information, Communication & Society, 16(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.746382
69. Young, O. R. (2012). Socio-ecological Systems. Global environmental commons: Analytical and political challenges in building governance mechanisms, 80.