Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY

Yıl 2021, , 272 - 281, 23.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.855123

Öz

The aim of this study is to create a new definition of ‘rural area’ for the metropolitan city of Ankara in Turkey by developing a rural index. Two models are employed in the paper. One of them is a logit model which identifies the factors affecting population density, and the second one is principal component analysis. The variables used in this study are population density, the number of businesses, the number of summer cottages, the proportion of the population with university degrees, total asphalt roads, the distance to the nearest administrative centre, the number of agricultural holdings, total agricultural land and the number of points of interests (banks, pharmacies, schools, etc.) for each neighbourhood. According to the principal component analysis, classifications are made at three levels: urban quarter, intermediate quarter and rural quarter. This analysis is made on the basis of existing data at the level of the neighbourhood. There is an important drawback of this study: it does not include data regarding income levels of the people since there was no data at the neighbourhood level. But with 10 variables, this study is quite sufficient for defining the rural and urban Ankara, including socio-economic and spatial characters of neighbourhoods. 

Destekleyen Kurum

Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı

Kaynakça

  • Ankara Regional Plan (2014). Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı. Ankara, 38-43.
  • Basarsoft (2017). The POI data and the border of neighbours came from Basarsoft.
  • Bibby, P. & Shepherd, J. (2005). Developing a New Classification of Urban and Rural Areas for Policy Purposes-the Methodology, DEFRA London, UK.
  • Bucholtz, S. and Cromartie, J. (2008). Definin the “rural” in rural America. Amber Waves, Voluma:6, Issue:3.
  • Cloke, P. & Gareth, E. (1986). Rurality in England and Wales 1981. A replication of the 1971 index. Regional Studies, 20(4), 289-306.
  • Cloke, P.J. (1977). An Index of rurality for England and Wales. Regional Studies, 11, 31-46.
  • Coombes, M.G., Dixon, J.S., Goddard, J.B., Openshaw, S. & Taylor, P.J. (1982). Functional regions for the population census of the Great Britain. Geography and the Urban Environment, Progress in Research and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Vol 5, 63-112.
  • Dewey, R. (1960). The rural-urban continuum:Real but relatively important. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 60-66
  • EUROSTAT, (2020). Urban-rural typology. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:Urban- rural_typology#Definition_based_on_a_population_grid.
  • Fothergill, S., Gudgin, G K., M. & Monk, S. (1985). Rural industrialization: Trends and causes in the Industrialization of the countryside. In Healey, M. & Ilbery, B. (Eds.), Geo Books. Norwich, 147-159.
  • Gajic, A., Krunic, N. & Protic, B. (2018). Towards a new methodological framework for the delimitation of rural and urban areas: a case study of Serbia. Geografisk tidskrift / udgivet af Bestyrelsen for Det Kongelige danske geografiske selskab ,118(2), 1-13.
  • Gist, N.P. & Fava, S.F. (1966). Urban Society. Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
  • Halfacree, K.H. (1993). Locality and social representation: space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(1), 23-37.
  • Haynes, R.M. & Bentham, C.G. (1982). The effects of accessibility on general practitioner consultations, out- patient attendances and in-patient Admissions in Norfolk, England. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 561-9.
  • Hoggart, K. (1988). Not a definition of rural. The Royal Geographical Society, 20(1), 35-40.
  • Johnson, R.A. & Wichern, D.W. (1992). Applied Multivariate Analysis. New Jersey: Perarson Prentice-Hall.
  • Jones, L.W. (1955): The hinterland reconsidered. American Sociological Review, 20, 40-44. American Sociological Association.
  • Kolars, J.F. (1967). Types of Rural Development. Four Studies On the Ecocomic Development of Turkey. U.S.A.: Frank Cass and Company Limited.
  • Lassey, W.R. (1977). Planning in rural environments. Newyork, McGraw-Hill.
  • Lee, H. (1991). Definitions of rural: a review of the literature. In A. Bushy (Eds.), Rural nursing (pp 7-20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Muilu, T. & Rusanen, J. (2004). Rural definitions and short-term dynamics in rural areas of Finland in 1989- 97. Environment and Planning. 36, 1499-1516.
  • OECD, (2012). OECD Regional typology. Retrieved April 27, 2018, from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional- policy/OECD_regional_typology_Nov2012.pdf.
  • Official Gazzette, (1924). Village Law, Law number: 442, 1924. Accepted on 18.3.1924, January 17, 2020, retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.442.pdf.
  • Official Gazzette, (2012). Metropolitan Law number: 28489, Accepted on 12.11.2011, 6.12.2020 retrieved from http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6360.pdf.
  • Öğdül, H.G. (2010). Urban and rural definitions in regional context: a case study on Turkey. European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1519-1541. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2010.492589.
  • Paquetta, S. & Domon, G. (2003). Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 425-444.
  • Pateman, T. (2011). Rural and urban areas: comparing lives using rural/urban classification. Regional trends 43, 2011, Retrieved March 24, 2020, from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/rt.2011.2.pdf.
  • Pizzoli, E. & Gong, X. (2007). How to best classify rural and urban? Retrieved August 1, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228466634_How_to_Best_Classify_Rural_and_Urban.
  • Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry of Ankara (2017). The agricultural data used in the analysis taken from the provincial directorate with an official letter, 2017.
  • Redfield, R. (1947). The folk society. The American Journal of Sociology, 52 (January, 1947), 294.
  • Riola, R.O. & Carmen, N.C. (2005). Rurality index for small areas in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 73, 247-266. DOI 10.1007/s11205-004-0987-3.
  • Rousseau, N. (1995). What is rurality. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 1995 Sep; (71), 1–4.
  • SPO (1982). Hierarchy of Settlements in Turkey. State Planning Organisation, Ankara.
  • Stewart, C.T. (1958). The urban-rural dichotomy: Concepts and uses. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 152-158.
  • The Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (2015). National Rural Development Strategy 2014-2020, Turkey.
  • TURKSTAT (2017). Regional statistics. Retrieved March 20, 2017, from www.tuik.gov.tr.
  • Weiners, C. & Boik, R. J. (1995). MSU Rurality index: development and evaluation. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 453-46.
  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1-15.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2006). Introductory Econometrics, (Fourth Edition). South Western, 575-579.

A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY

Yıl 2021, , 272 - 281, 23.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.855123

Öz

The aim of this study is to create a new definition of ‘rural area’ for the metropolitan city of Ankara in Turkey by developing a rural index. Two models are employed in the paper. One of them is a logit model which identifies the factors affecting population density, and the second one is principal component analysis. The variables used in this study are population density, the number of businesses, the number of summer cottages, the proportion of the population with university degrees, total asphalt roads, the distance to the nearest administrative centre, the number of agricultural holdings, total agricultural land and the number of points of interests (banks, pharmacies, schools, etc.) for each neighbourhood. According to the principal component analysis, classifications are made at three levels: urban quarter, intermediate quarter and rural quarter. This analysis is made on the basis of existing data at the level of the neighbourhood. There is an important drawback of this study: it does not include data regarding income levels of the people since there was no data at the neighbourhood level. But with 10 variables, this study is quite sufficient for defining the rural and urban Ankara, including socio-economic and spatial characters of neighbourhoods. 

Kaynakça

  • Ankara Regional Plan (2014). Ankara Kalkınma Ajansı. Ankara, 38-43.
  • Basarsoft (2017). The POI data and the border of neighbours came from Basarsoft.
  • Bibby, P. & Shepherd, J. (2005). Developing a New Classification of Urban and Rural Areas for Policy Purposes-the Methodology, DEFRA London, UK.
  • Bucholtz, S. and Cromartie, J. (2008). Definin the “rural” in rural America. Amber Waves, Voluma:6, Issue:3.
  • Cloke, P. & Gareth, E. (1986). Rurality in England and Wales 1981. A replication of the 1971 index. Regional Studies, 20(4), 289-306.
  • Cloke, P.J. (1977). An Index of rurality for England and Wales. Regional Studies, 11, 31-46.
  • Coombes, M.G., Dixon, J.S., Goddard, J.B., Openshaw, S. & Taylor, P.J. (1982). Functional regions for the population census of the Great Britain. Geography and the Urban Environment, Progress in Research and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, Vol 5, 63-112.
  • Dewey, R. (1960). The rural-urban continuum:Real but relatively important. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 60-66
  • EUROSTAT, (2020). Urban-rural typology. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:Urban- rural_typology#Definition_based_on_a_population_grid.
  • Fothergill, S., Gudgin, G K., M. & Monk, S. (1985). Rural industrialization: Trends and causes in the Industrialization of the countryside. In Healey, M. & Ilbery, B. (Eds.), Geo Books. Norwich, 147-159.
  • Gajic, A., Krunic, N. & Protic, B. (2018). Towards a new methodological framework for the delimitation of rural and urban areas: a case study of Serbia. Geografisk tidskrift / udgivet af Bestyrelsen for Det Kongelige danske geografiske selskab ,118(2), 1-13.
  • Gist, N.P. & Fava, S.F. (1966). Urban Society. Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
  • Halfacree, K.H. (1993). Locality and social representation: space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9(1), 23-37.
  • Haynes, R.M. & Bentham, C.G. (1982). The effects of accessibility on general practitioner consultations, out- patient attendances and in-patient Admissions in Norfolk, England. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 561-9.
  • Hoggart, K. (1988). Not a definition of rural. The Royal Geographical Society, 20(1), 35-40.
  • Johnson, R.A. & Wichern, D.W. (1992). Applied Multivariate Analysis. New Jersey: Perarson Prentice-Hall.
  • Jones, L.W. (1955): The hinterland reconsidered. American Sociological Review, 20, 40-44. American Sociological Association.
  • Kolars, J.F. (1967). Types of Rural Development. Four Studies On the Ecocomic Development of Turkey. U.S.A.: Frank Cass and Company Limited.
  • Lassey, W.R. (1977). Planning in rural environments. Newyork, McGraw-Hill.
  • Lee, H. (1991). Definitions of rural: a review of the literature. In A. Bushy (Eds.), Rural nursing (pp 7-20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Muilu, T. & Rusanen, J. (2004). Rural definitions and short-term dynamics in rural areas of Finland in 1989- 97. Environment and Planning. 36, 1499-1516.
  • OECD, (2012). OECD Regional typology. Retrieved April 27, 2018, from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional- policy/OECD_regional_typology_Nov2012.pdf.
  • Official Gazzette, (1924). Village Law, Law number: 442, 1924. Accepted on 18.3.1924, January 17, 2020, retrieved from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.3.442.pdf.
  • Official Gazzette, (2012). Metropolitan Law number: 28489, Accepted on 12.11.2011, 6.12.2020 retrieved from http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.6360.pdf.
  • Öğdül, H.G. (2010). Urban and rural definitions in regional context: a case study on Turkey. European Planning Studies, 18(9), 1519-1541. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2010.492589.
  • Paquetta, S. & Domon, G. (2003). Changing ruralities, changing landscapes: exploring social recomposition using a multi-scale approach. Journal of Rural Studies, 19, 425-444.
  • Pateman, T. (2011). Rural and urban areas: comparing lives using rural/urban classification. Regional trends 43, 2011, Retrieved March 24, 2020, from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/rt.2011.2.pdf.
  • Pizzoli, E. & Gong, X. (2007). How to best classify rural and urban? Retrieved August 1, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228466634_How_to_Best_Classify_Rural_and_Urban.
  • Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry of Ankara (2017). The agricultural data used in the analysis taken from the provincial directorate with an official letter, 2017.
  • Redfield, R. (1947). The folk society. The American Journal of Sociology, 52 (January, 1947), 294.
  • Riola, R.O. & Carmen, N.C. (2005). Rurality index for small areas in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 73, 247-266. DOI 10.1007/s11205-004-0987-3.
  • Rousseau, N. (1995). What is rurality. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 1995 Sep; (71), 1–4.
  • SPO (1982). Hierarchy of Settlements in Turkey. State Planning Organisation, Ankara.
  • Stewart, C.T. (1958). The urban-rural dichotomy: Concepts and uses. American Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 152-158.
  • The Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock (2015). National Rural Development Strategy 2014-2020, Turkey.
  • TURKSTAT (2017). Regional statistics. Retrieved March 20, 2017, from www.tuik.gov.tr.
  • Weiners, C. & Boik, R. J. (1995). MSU Rurality index: development and evaluation. Research in Nursing & Health, 18, 453-46.
  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 44, 1-15.
  • Wooldridge, J.M. (2006). Introductory Econometrics, (Fourth Edition). South Western, 575-579.
Toplam 39 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Beşeri Coğrafya
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALESİ
Yazarlar

Coşkun Şerefoğlu 0000-0002-8260-7687

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Temmuz 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

APA Şerefoğlu, C. (2021). A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education(44), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.855123
AMA Şerefoğlu C. A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY. IGGE. Temmuz 2021;(44):272-281. doi:10.32003/igge.855123
Chicago Şerefoğlu, Coşkun. “A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY”. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, sy. 44 (Temmuz 2021): 272-81. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.855123.
EndNote Şerefoğlu C (01 Temmuz 2021) A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education 44 272–281.
IEEE C. Şerefoğlu, “A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY”, IGGE, sy. 44, ss. 272–281, Temmuz 2021, doi: 10.32003/igge.855123.
ISNAD Şerefoğlu, Coşkun. “A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY”. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education 44 (Temmuz 2021), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.855123.
JAMA Şerefoğlu C. A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY. IGGE. 2021;:272–281.
MLA Şerefoğlu, Coşkun. “A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY”. Lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, sy. 44, 2021, ss. 272-81, doi:10.32003/igge.855123.
Vancouver Şerefoğlu C. A NEW DEFINITION OF ‘RURAL AREAS’ FOR THE METROPOLITAN CITY OF ANKARA, TURKEY. IGGE. 2021(44):272-81.