THE CREATIVITY FUNCTION OF PROVINCES: AN ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROVINCES OF TURKEY

Öz

Creative provinces are largely composed of people who are able to make free decisions, have a high level of education, and are engaged in solving quite complex problems. In this study, Florida et al. (2008) using the "Global Creativity Index" developed by him, the creativity level of the provinces of Turkey was calculated and the results were evaluated with a spatial focus. According to the creativity index, the most creative province of Turkey is Kocaeli. Kocaeli is followed by Ankara and Isparta. The provinces with the lowest Creativity value are Hakkâri, Şırnak and Mardin. It is seen that the nearby provinces of Ankara, Kocaeli and Istanbul, which have high creativity index values, also have high values. Although it is observed that important steps have been taken in the field of creative provinces in Turkey, it is thought that a much faster path can be taken in the coordination of a more organized superstructure.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban Geography
• Creativity
• Creativity Function of Provinces
• Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Acs, Z., & Megyesi, M. (2009). Creativity and industrial cities: A case study of Baltimore. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1(4), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903020086. (2021 Mayıs 16)
2. AKA, (2020). Ankara il yatırım destek ve tanıtım stratejisi 2017-2023, https://www.ankaraka.org.tr adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Mart 18)
3. Akman, A. Z., & Arıcıoğlu, M. A. (2019). Şehirlerin rekabetinde sosyal sermayenin önemi üzerine bir araştırma. KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 21(36), 19-33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kmusekad/issue/46428/544719
4. Aliağaoğlu, A., & Uğur, A. (2012). Şehir coğrafyası (2.Baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim Danışmanlık. Ankara.
5. Andersson, A. E., & Andersson, D. E. (2015). Creative cities and the new global hierarchy. Apply Spatial Analysis, 8(3), 181-198.
6. Andersson, A. E. (1985). Creativity and regional development. Papers in Regional Science Science, 56(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01887900.(2021 Nisan 28)
7. BEBKA, (2021). Eskişehir ili yatırım destek ve tanıtım stratejisi (2018- 2023), https://www.bebka.org.tr/admin/datas/yayins/184/bebka- esyatirimdestek_1527055116.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Şubat 25)
8. Berry, C. R., & Glaeser, E. L. (2005). The divergence of human capital levels across cities, NBER Working Paper No. 11617.(2021Mart 1)

9. Black, D., & Henderson, J. V. (1997). Urban Growth. Working Paper No: 97-1. Providence, R.I.: Brown Univ. 1997, Working Paper No: 6008, Cambridge Mass.: NBER April 1997.
10. Bookchin, M. (1992). Urbanization without cities: The rise and decline and citizenship. Black Rose. New York.
11. Bowen, H. P., Moesen, W., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2006). A Composite Index Of The Creative Economy With Application To Regional Best Practices. Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series.
12. Bowman, M. J., & Myers, R. G. (1967). Schooling, experience, and gains and losses in human capital through migration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(319), 875-898.
13. CCI, (2005). Silicon Valley, 2002 and 2005. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NADAC/studies/35580 adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Haziran 9)
14. Cherry, M. N. (2015). Creative cities. In Davies, W.K.D. (Ed.), Theme cities: solutions for Urban Problems. (pp. 359-379). Springer: London.
15. Correia, C. M., & Costa, J. S. (2014). Measuring creativity in the EU member states. Investigaciones Regionales, 30. 7-26.
16. Çetindamar, D., & Günsel, A. (2012). Measuring the creativity of a city: A proposal and an application. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1301- 1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.680583
17. DCMS, (2020). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for- digital-culture-media-sport adresinden edilmiştir. (2021 Nisan 30)
18. Demir, E. (2014). Yaratıcı endüstriler. Ankara Üniversitesi İlef Dergisi, 1(2), 87-107. https://doi.org/ 10.24955/ilef.106593.
19. Doğanay, H. (1986). Erzurum şehir planlarının eleştirisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Araştırma Dergisi, 14, 177-198.
20. Doğrul, H. G., & Çelikkol, M. M. (2017). Türkiye’de yaratıcı sınıfın coğrafi durumunu etkileyen faktörler üzerine bir inceleme. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 54(623), 35-50.
21. Doğrul, H. G., Çelikkol, M. M., & Murat, M. (2016). İllerin ekonomik gelişmişliği üzerinde yaratıcı sınıfın etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(4), 79-95. https://doi.org/ 10.20409/berj.2016422340
22. Esen, Ü. B., & Atay, Ö. (2020). Türkiye’nin yaratıcı şehirleri. Bilig-Türk Dünyası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 92, 29-54. https://doi.org/ 10.12995/bilig.9202
23. Esen, Ü. B., & Yıldırım, Ş. S. (2018). Yaratıcılık endekslerinin kıyaslanması ve değerlendirilmesi. Finans-Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 643, 109-124.
24. EU, (2021). The impact of culture on creativity KEA Affairs, http://www.keanet.eu/docs/impactculturecreativityfull.pdf, adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Şubat 13)
25. FBC, (2021). Comparison of cities creative city index, http://www.internationalregions.org/docs/InnovativeRegion_Nagase.p df, adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Mart 14)
26. Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2001), Technology and tolerance: the importance of diversity on high technology growth. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
27. Florida, R. (2002b). The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 743-755. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-8306.00314
28. Florida, R. (2002c). Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(1), 55-71. https://doi.org 10.1093/jeg/2.1.55
29. Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City & Community, 2(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1540-6040.00034
30. Florida, R. (2005a). The Flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. Harper Business, New York.
31. Florida, R. (2006). Where the brains are America’s educated elite is clustering in a few cities and leaving the rest of the country behind. Atlantic Monthly, 298(3), 34-36.
32. Florida, R. (2002a). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books. New York
33. Florida, R. (2005b). Cities and the creative class, New York: Routledge.
34. Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class (Revised Paperback Edition), New York: Basic Books.
35. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 615-649. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jeg/lbn023
36. Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2011). Creativity and prosperity: The global creativity index. Martin Prosperity Institute.
37. Glaeser, E. L. (2000). The new economics of urban and regional growth. In G. Clark, M. Gertler, & M. Feldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic geography (pp. 83-98). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Göney, S. (1995). Şehir coğrafyası I. İstanbul Ünv. Fen-Edb. Fak. Yayınları. İstanbul
39. Güneş, S., & Akın, T. (2019). Yüksek teknolojili ürün ihracatı: Lider ülkeler ve Türkiye analizi. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 11-29. https://doi.org/ 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.
40. Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050003946
41. HKCI (2021). https://www.hab.gov.hk/file_manager/en/documents/policy_respons ibilities/arts_culture_recreation_and_sport/HKCI-InteriReport- printed.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Haziran 21)
42. Hocaoğlu, D. (2015). Yaratıcı endüstrilerin yerel ekonomilerdeki önemi ve tasarımın bu endüstrilere katkısı. Planlama, 25(3), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.5505/planlama.2016.55265
43. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
45. Kaymas, S. (2020). Yaratıcı endüstriler, kültür temelli girişimcilik ve eleştirel ekonomi politik: Kör noktayı yeniden düşünmek. İnsan ve İnsan, 7(26), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.782478
46. Keleş, R. (2010). Kentleşme politikası. İmge Kitabevi. Ankara
47. Keyman, F., & Lorasdağlı, B. K. (2010). Kentler. Anadolu’nun dönüşümü, Türkiye’nin geleceği. Doğan Kitap. İstanbul.
48. Kloudova, J., & Stehlikova, B. (2010). Creativity index for the Czech Republic in terms of regional similarities and geographic location. Economics and Management, 13(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.21163/GT_2018.131.04
49. Kumral, N. (2010). Yaratıcılık ve İzmir Üzerine, Ege University Working Papers in Economics http://www.iibf.ege.edu.tr/economics/tartisma. (2021 Haziran 3 )
50. Landry, C. (2000). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. Earthscan. London.
51. Landry, C. (2012). The origins & futures of the creative city. Comedia. London.
52. Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Seçilmiş, İ. E. (2014). Türkiye’de yaratıcı ve kültürel sektörlerin yapısı. Maliye Dergisi, 166 (1), 195-220.
53. Lloyd, R., & Clark, T. N. (2001). The city as an entertainment machine. In K. Fox Gotham (Ed.), Research in urban sociology, critical perspectives on urban redevelopment (pp. 357-378). Oxford: JAI/Elsevier.
54. Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.
55. Markusen, A. (2004). Targeting occupations in regional and community economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(3), 253-268. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01944360408976377
56. Markusen, A. (2006). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(10), 1921-1940. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38179
57. Marlet, G., & Woerkens, C. V. (2007). The Dutch creative class and how it fosters urban employment growth. Urban Studies, 44(13), 2605-2626. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43197604.(2021 Mart 22)
58. Mathur, V. K. (1999). Human capital-based strategy for regional economic development. Economic Development Quarterly 13(3), 203- 216. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249901300301
59. Mellander, C., & Florida, R. (2007). Human Capital or Creative Class? Explaining Regional Development in Sweden, KTH/CESIS Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation No: 79, http://swopec.hhs.se/cesisp/abs/ cesisp0079.htm.
60. Memişoğlu, D., & Kalağan, G. (2017). Yaratıcı kentler ve kentsel yetenek üzerine bir tartışma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 519-536. http://www.itobiad.com/en/pub/issue/27443/267552. (2021 Nisan 16)
61. Mincer, J. (1970). The distribution of labor incomes: A survey with special reference to the human capital approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 8(1), 1-26.
62. Moore Cherry, N. (2015). Theme cities: Solutions for urban problems, Springer Science Business Media B.V. 2015 W. K.D. Davies (ed.), GeoJournal Library 359-379 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9655- 2_10
63. OECD, (2020). https://www.sd.com.tr/2018/wp- content/uploads/2018/06/OECD-Teknoloji-Düzeyi-Sınıflandırma- Listesi, Pdf, adresinden edinilmiştir.
64. Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00281.x
65. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
66. Rausch, S., & Negrey, C. (2006). Does The creative engine run? A consideration of the effect of creativeclass on economic strength and growth. Journal Of Urban Affairs, 28(5), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2006.00310.x
67. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
68. Schultz, T. W. (1962). Investment in human capital in poor countries. In Paul D. Zook (Ed.), Foreign Trade and Human Capital (pp.3-6). Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.
69. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
70. Seçilmiş, E. İ. (2015). Türkiye’de yaratıcı endüstrilerin kümelenmesi.Ege Akademik Bakış, 15(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2015119948
71. SGK, (2021). http:// www.sgk.gov.tr /wps/portal/sgk/tr/ kurumsal/ istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari, adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Mayıs 19)
72. Smith, A. (1941). Milletlerin zenginliği. (Çev: H. Derin). İstanbul: İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
73. Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: Gentrification as global urban strategy. In N. Brenner, & N. Theodore (der) Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. 424-450. UK: Blackwell.
74. Şahin T., & Altuğ, F. (2017). Türkiye’de yenilik faaliyetlerinde yenilikçi uzmanlaşma eğilimleri: İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir bölgeleri İmalat sanayi patent göstergeleri. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi CBD, 15(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1501/Cogbil_0000000186
75. Thiel, J. (2017). Creative cities and the reflexivity of the urban creative economy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415595105
76. Turut, H., & Özgür, E. M. (2018). Bir kente göçün hikâyesi: Süreçler, bütünleşme ve aidiyet. Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 16(1), 153-180. https://doi.org/ 10.1501/Cogbil_0000000196
77. TÜİK, (2021). https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Arastirma- Gelistirme-Faaliyetleri-Arastirmasi-2019-33676,adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Mayıs 5)
78. Tümertekin, E. (1973). Türkiye’de şehirleşme ve şehirsel fonksiyonlar, İst. Ünv. Coğ. Enst. Yay. No: 1840. İstanbul.
79. TÜRK PATENT, (2021). https://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/TURKPATENT/statistics/ adresinden edinilmiştir. (2021 Mart 12)
80. Ullman, E. L. (1958). Regional development and the geography of concentration. Papers and proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 4(1), 179-98.
81. UNCTAD, (2021). Creative economy report, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditc20082cer_en.pdf adresinden edinilmiştir.
82. Weber, M. (2000). Şehir. Modern Kentin Oluşumu. Bakış Yayınları. İstanbul
83. Yetişen, S., Maden, S. I., Ünlü, H., Sezgin, A., & Dulupçu, M. A. (2016). Kuzeydoğu Anadolu, Ortadoğu Anadolu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu düzey 2 bölgelerinde beşeri sermaye yapısı üzerine bir panel veri uygulaması (2007-2011). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, CİEP Özel Sayısı, 891- 902