A NEW MODEL FOR DETERMINING TREE SPECIES COMPATIBLE WITH THE ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF THE AREAS TO BE AFFORESTED

Öz

Afforestation is an indispensable practice for the sustainability of forests in the absence of sufficient forest. Planting tree species compatible with local environmental factors will contribute to the strengthening and protection of forests. This study aims to develop a statistical model to determine the optimal growing areas of tree species compatible with local environmental factors using GIS. While creating this model, nine main environmental factors (lithology, landform, elevation, slope, aspect, temperature, precipitation, soil type, soil depth) that affect the distribution of tree species were determined. These factors were analyzed along with their sub-criteria. Analyzes were done using the AHP method. According to the analysis results, the distribution of tree species in the study area is affected by temperature, precipitation, elevation, slope, landform, and soil depth. The optimal growth areas of each tree species are quite different from each other. The results show that this method is easy to apply in forest planning and offers forest decision support systems opportunities to create a wide variety of alternative plans.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afforestation
• Tree Species
• Ecological Condition
• Forest Analysis
• Suitability Map

Kaynakça

1. Adams, J. (2009). Vegetation-climate interaction: How plants make the global environment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00881-8.
2. Atalay, I. (2006). Soil formation, its classification and geography. Meta Edition. Printing, Izmir.
3. Austin, M. P. (2005). Vegetation and environment: Discontinuities and continuities. In Vegetation Ecology (eds E. van der Maarel and J. Franklin). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118452592.ch3
4. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
5. Bonan, G. B. (2008). Forests and climate change: Forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science, 320(5882), 1444–1449.
6. Cardinale, B. J., Matulich, K. L., Hooper, D. U., Byrnes, J. E., Duffy, E., Gamfeldt, L., Balvanera, P., O’connor, M. I., & Gonzalez, A. (2011). The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 98(3), 572–592. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000364
7. Comita, L. S., Condit, R., & Hubbell, S. P. (2007). Developmental changes in habitat associations of tropical trees. Journal of Ecology, 95(3), 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01229.x
8. Barrio, G., Alvera, B., Puigdefabregas, J., & Diez, C. (1997). Response of high mountain landscape to topographic variables: Central Pyrenees. Landscape Ecology, 12(2), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02698210

9. FAO, (2011). Food and agriculture organization of United Nations; state of World’s forest [FAO Report]. Rome: FAO 978-92-5-106750-5
10. Federici, S., Tubiello, F. N., Salvatore, M., Jacobs, H., & Schmidhuber, J. (2015). New estimates of CO2 forest emissions and removals: 1990-2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.022.
11. Ferreira, J., Lennox, G. D., Gardner, T. A., Thomson, J. R., Berenguer, E., Lees, A. C., Mac Nally, R., Aragão, L. E., Ferraz, S. F., & Louzada, J. (2018). Carbon-focused conservation may fail to protect the most biodiverse tropical forests. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s4155 8-018-0225-7
12. Fick, S. E., & Hicmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 37(2), 4302-4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086
13. Florinsky, I. V., & Kuryakova, G. A. (1996). Influence of topography on some vegetation cover properties. Catena, 27(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0341-8162(96)00005-7
14. Forrester, D. I., Bauhus, J. (2016). A review of processes behind diversity—productivity relationships in forests. Current Forestry Reports, 2(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
15. Frank, T. D. (1988). Mapping dominant vegetation communities in the Colorado Rocky Mountain Front Range with Landsat Thematic Mapper and digital terrain data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 50(12), 1727–1734.
16. Greve, M., Lykke, A. M., Blach-Overgaard, A., & Svenning, J.-C. (2011). Environmental and anthropogenic determinants of vegetation distribution across Africa. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(5), 661-674. https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00666.x.
17. Guo, Q., & Ren, H. (2014). Productivity as related to diversity and age in planted versus natural forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 23(12), 1461-1471. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12238
18. Guo, Y., Wang, B., Mallik, A. U., Huang, F., Xiang, W., Ding, T., Wen, S., Lu, S., Li, D., & He, Y. (2017). Topographic species-habitat associations of tree species in a heterogeneous tropical karst seasonal rain forest, China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 10(3), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtw057
19. Harms, K. E., Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P., & Foster, R. B. (2001). Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology, 89(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00615.x
20. Hautier, Y., Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T., Adler, P. B., Harpole, W. S., Hillebrand, H., Lind, E. M., MacDougall, A. S.,
21. Stevens, C. J., & Bakker, J. D. (2014). Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands. Nature, 508(7497), 521-525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13014
22. Isbell, F., Craven, D., Connolly, J., Loreau, M., Schmid, B., Beierkuhnlein, C., Bezemer, T. M., Bonin, C., Bruelheide, H., & De Luca, E. (2015). Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature, 526(7574), 574-577. https://doi.org/10.1038/natur e15374
23. Jucker, T., Avăcăriței, D., Bărnoaiea, I., Duduman, G., Bouriaud, O., & Coomes, D. A. (2016). Climate modulates the effects of tree diversity on forest productivity. Journal of Ecology, 104(2), 388-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12522
24. Jucker, T., Bouriaud, O., Avacaritei, D., & Coomes, D. A. (2014). Stabilizing effects of diversity on aboveground wood production in forest ecosystems: Linking patterns and processes. Ecology Letters, 17(12), 1560-1569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12382
25. Jucker, T., Bouriaud, O., Avacaritei, D., Dănilă, I., Duduman, G., Valladares, F., & Coomes, D. A. (2014). Competition for light and water play contrasting roles in driving diversity–productivity relationships in Iberian forests. Journal of Ecology, 102(5), 1202-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12276
26. Kalajnxhiu, A., Tsiripidis, I., & Bergmeier, E. (2012). The diversity of woodland vegetation in Central Albania along an altitudinal gradient of 1300 m. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 146(4), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2011.634446
27. Kanagaraj, R., Wiegand, T., Comita, L. S., & Huth, A. (2011). Tropical tree species assemblages in topographical habitats change in time and with life stage. Journal of Ecology, 99(6), 1441-1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01878.x
28. Laamrani, A., Valeria, O., Bergeron, Y., Fenton, N., Cheng, L. Z., & Anyomi, K. (2014). Effects of topography and thickness of organic layer on productivity of black spruce boreal forests of the Canadian Clay Belt region. Forest Ecology and Management, 330, 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.013
29. Liu, X., Zhang, W., Zhang, B., Yang, Q., Chang, J., & Hou, K. (2016). Diurnal variation in soil respiration under different land uses on Taihang Mountain, North China. Atmospheric Environment, 125, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.034
30. MAF, (2014). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Turkey; Kahramanmaras tree inventory maps [Map]. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, retrieved from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx
31. Mazzochini, G. G., Fonseca, C. R., Costa, G. C., Santos, R. M., Oliveira-Filho, A. T., & Ganade, G. (2019). Plant phylogenetic diversity stabilizes large-scale ecosystem productivity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 28(10), 1430-1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12963
32. Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., & Ladson, A. R. (1991). Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes, 5(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103
33. Morales-Hidalgo, D., Oswalt, S. N., & Somanathan, E. (2015). Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management, 352(352), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.011
34. MRE, (2010). General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey; 1 / 100 000 scaled geology maps. Ankara.
35. Naeem, S., Duffy, J. E., & Zavaleta, E. (2012). The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science,336(6087), 1401-1406. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215855
36. Nilsson, H., Nordström, E.-M., & Öhman, K. (2016). Decision support for participatory forest planning using AHP and TOPSIS. Forests, 7(5), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7050100
37. Nüchela, J., Bøchera.; P. K., & Svenninga, J. C. (2019). Topographic slope steepness and anthropogenic pressure interact to shape the distribution of tree cover in China. Applied Geography, 103(3), 40-55. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/ j.apgeog.2018.12.008
38. Ohsawa, T., Saito, Y., Sawada, H., & Ide, Y. (2008). Impact of altitude and topography on the genetic diversity of Quercus serrata populations in the Chichibu Mountains, central Japan. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 203(3), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2007.02.007
39. Ouyang, S., Xiang, W., Gou, M., Chen, L., Lei, P., Xiao, W., Deng, X., Zeng, L., Li, J., Zhang, T., Peng, C., & Forrester, D. I. (2021). Stability in subtropical forests: The role of tree species diversity, stand structure, environmental and socio-economic conditions. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 30(2), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13235
40. Paquette, A., & Messier, C. (2011). The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: From temperate to boreal forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x
41. Peng, S.-S., Piao, S., Zeng, Z., Ciais, P., Zhou, L., Li, L. Z. X., Myneni, R. B., Yin, Y., & Zeng, H. (2014). Afforestation in China cools local land surface temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(8), 2915-2919. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315126111
42. Poorter, L., Sande, M. T. van der, Arets, E. J. M. M., Ascarrunz, N., Enquist, B. J., Finegan, B., Licona, J. C., Martínez-Ramos, M., Mazzei, L., Meave, J. A., Muñoz, R., Nytch, C. J., Oliveira, A. A. de, Pérez-García, E. A., Prado-Junior, J.,
43. Rodríguez-Velázques, J., Ruschel, A. R., Salgado-Negret, B., Schiavini, I., Swenson, N. G., Tenorio, E. A., Thompson, J., Toledo, M., Uriarte, M.,Hout, P. van der, Zimmerman, J. K., Pena-Claros, M. (2017). Biodiversity and climate determine the functioning of Neotropical forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(12), 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12668
44. Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Ciais, P., Frank, D., Mahecha, M. D., Seneviratne, S. I., Zscheischler, J., Beer, C., Buchmann, N., Frank, D. C., Papale, D., Rammig, A., Smith, P., Thonicke, K., van der Velde, M., Vicca, S., Walz, A., & Wattenbach, M. (2013). Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature, 500(7462), 287-295. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12350
45. Saaty, T. L. (1980a). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York; London.
46. Saaty, T. L. (1980b). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York; London. http://www.worldcat.org/search? qt=worldcat_org_all&q=0070543712
47. Sebastia, M.-T. (2004). Role of topography and soils in grassland structuring at the landscape and community scales. Basic and Applied Ecology, 5(4), 331-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2003.10.001
48. Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D., & Willis, K. J. (2016). Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature, 531(7593), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16986
49. Tsui, C.-C., Tsai, C.-C., & Chen, Z.-S. (2013). Soil organic carbon stocks in relation to elevation gradients in volcanic ash soils of Taiwan. Geoderma, 209-210(4), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.013
50. UN, (1992). Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests, United Nations: New York, retrieved from http://www.undocuments.net/for-prin.htm
51. Worldclim (2020). Climate data retrieved from: https://www.worldclim.org/data/index.html
52. Vie, J.-C., Hilton Taylor, C., & Stuart, S. N. (2009). Wildlife in a changing world: An analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Gland, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2009.17.en.
53. Wang, B., Zhang, G., & Duan, J. (2015). Relationship between topography and the distribution of understory vegetation in a Pinus massoniana forest in Southern China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 3(4), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.10.002
54. Wenhua, L. (2004). Degradation and restoration of forest ecosystems in China. Forest Ecology and Management, 201(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.010
55. Whittaker, R. H. (1956). Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs, 26(1), 1–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943577