YouTube Videolarının Kapsamlı Bir İncelemesi: Çocuklarda Yürütücü İşlevler Üzerine Ergoterapi Videolarının Kalite ve İçerik Analizi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, YouTube'daki yürütücü işlevlerle ilgili pediatrik ergoterapi videolarının kalite ve içerik analizinin yapılmasıdır.
Yöntem: Araştırma tüm kategori filtreleri uygulanarak "pediatric occupational therapy executive functioning" anahtar kelimesi kullanılarak YouTube'da gerçekleştirildi. İlk 200 video uygunluk açısından değerlendirildi ve bunlardan 35'i iki bağımsız uzman tarafından incelendi. Video popülerliğini değerlendirmek için Video Güç Endeksi (VPI), video kalite değerlendirmesi için Modifiye Discern Puanlaması (Mdiscern) için Global Kalite Puanı (GQS) ve video güvenilirlik değerlendirmesi için JAMA Puanlama Sistemi kullanılmıştır. 
Bulgular: Analiz edilen 35 videonun %57,1'inin sağlık kurumları tarafından, %42,9'unun ise bağımsız terapistler tarafından yüklendiği tespit edildi. Bağımsız ergoterapistler tarafından yüklenen videoların Mdiscern ve JAMA puanları sağlık kurumları tarafından yüklenenlere kıyasla daha yüksek olduğu bulundu (sırasıyla p=0,003, 0,002). Ancak, VPI veya GQS için istatistiksel olarak iki grup arasında anlamlı farklar görülmedi (p>0,05).
Sonuç: Bu araştırma, ergoterapi uygulama alanları içerisinde kritik bir alan olan çocukluk çağı yürütücü işlevleri ile ilgili YouTube videoları hakkında bilgi sağlayarak bu popülasyon için çevrimiçi sağlık paylaşımlarının kalite ve güvenilirliğinin iyileştirilmesini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yürütücü işlevler
• pediatrik ergoterapi
• YouTube videoları
• kalite

A Comprehensive Examination of YouTube Videos: Quality and Content Analysis of Occupational Therapy on Executive Functions in Children

Öz

Aim: The scope of this research was to examinate the content analysis, quality level and credibility of occupational therapy videos on YouTube about executive functioning in the children. 
Method: The research was carried out on YouTube worldwide using the keyword "pediatric occupational therapy executive functioning" with all categories filters applied. The first 200 videos were evaluated for relevance, and 35 of them were reviewed by two independent experts. The Video Power Index (VPI) was utilized to identify the video trend, the Global Quality Score (GQS) for video quality assessment Modified Discern Scoring (Mdiscern), and the JAMA Scoring System for video reliability assessment. 
Results: Of the 35 videos analyzed, it was founded that 57.1% were uploaded by public healthcare institutions, while 42.9% were uploaded by independent therapists. Recordings posted by independent practitioners scored significantly higher on both the Mdiscern and JAMA scores (p=0.003 and p=0.002, respectively). However, no statistically significant group differences emerged for the VPI and the GQS (p>0.05).
Conclusion: This study highlights improvement of the quality level and credibility of online media health shares for the children through the availability of information about YouTube videos related to childhood executive functioning, a critical area of occupational therapy practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Executive functioning
• pediatric occupational therapy
• YouTube videos
• quality

Etik Beyan

No ethics board approval was required for this study.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Nigg JT. Annual Research Review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;58(4):361-383. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12675.
2. 2. Cristofori I, Cohen-Zimerman S, Grafman J. Chapter 11 - Executive functions. In: D'Esposito M, Grafman JH, eds. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Elsevier. 2019;163:197-219.
3. 3. Friedman NP, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 2017;86:186-204.
4. 4. Thompson A, Steinbeis N. Sensitive periods in executive function development. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020;36:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.001
5. 5. Crone EA, Steinbeis N. Neural perspectives on cognitive control development during childhood and adolescence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017;21(3):205-215.
6. 6. Craig F, Margari F, Legrottaglie AR, Palumbi R, de Giambattista C, Margari L. A review of executive function deficits in autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:1191-1202.
7. 7. Scope A, Empson J, McHale S. Executive function in children with high and low attentional skills: correspondences between behavioural and cognitive profiles. Br J Dev Psychol. 2010;28(Pt 2):293-305. doi: 10.1348/026151009x410371.
8. 8. Samuels W, Tournaki N, Blackman s, Zilinski C. Executive functioning predicts academic achievement in middle school: A 4-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research. 2016;109(5);478-490. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2014.979913.

9. 9. Morgan AB, Lilienfeld SO. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clinical Psychology Review. 2000;20(1):113-36.
10. 10. Anderson V. Assessing executive functions in children: biological, psychological, and developmental considerations. Pediatric Rehabilitation. 1998;4:119-36.
11. 11. Jacobsen G, Martins de Mello C, Kochhann R, Fonseca R. Executive functions in school-age children: influence of age, gender, school type and parental education: executive functions in school-age children. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2017;31:404-413.
12. 12. Josman N, Meyer S. Conceptualisation and use of executive functions in paediatrics: A scoping review of occupational therapy literature. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(1):77-90.
13. 13. Riccio CA, Gomes H. Interventions for executive function deficits in children and adolescents. Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2013;2(2):133-40.
14. 14. Moore JL, Shikako-Thomas K, Backus D. Knowledge translation in rehabilitation: a shared vision. Pediatr Phys Ther. Jul 2017;29(Suppl 3):64-72.
15. 15. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. Dec 2011;104(12):510-20.
16. 16. Longo E, Galvão É RVP, Ferreira HNC, Lindquist ARR, Shikako-Thomas K. Knowledge translation in pediatric rehabilitation: expanding access to scientific knowledge. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017;21(6):389-390. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.10.003.
17. 17. Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: A literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(4):268-283. doi: 10.1111/hir.12192.
18. 18. Canty MJ, Breitbart S, Siegel L, et al. The role of social media in selective dorsal rhizotomy for children: Information sharing and social support. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35(11):2179-2185. doi: 10.1007/s00381-019-04197-x.
19. 19. Duman C. YouTube™ quality as a source for parent education about the oral hygiene of children. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(3):261-267. doi: 10.1111/idh.12445.
20. 20. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.
21. 21. Furtado MAS, Sousa Junior RR, Soares LA, et al. Analysis of informative content on cerebral palsy presented in Brazilian-Portuguese YouTube videos. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022;42(4):369-383. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2022.2046677.
22. 22. Semerci R, Şimşek E, Savaş E, Orhan E, Erbey F. The quality and content analysis of YouTube videos about chemotherapy for children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024;71(4):e30865. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30865.
23. 23. Bora K, Das D, Barman B, Borah P. Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015-16 Zika virus pandemic. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112(6):320-328.
24. 24. Cortes Cavalcante J, Faria Sales M, Sousa Junior RR, et al. Analysis of the Brazilian-Portuguese content on autism spectrum disorder available on YouTube videos. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2024;44(1):128-142. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2023.2199843.
25. 25. Alias N, Abd Razak SH, Kunjambu NRMNK, Muniandy P. A content analysis in the studies of YouTube in selected journals. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;103:10-18.
26. 26. Yildiz MB, Yildiz E, Balci S, Özçelik Köse A. Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and educational content of Youtube videos as an information source for soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2021;47(11):617-621. doi: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000795.
27. 27. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten SV. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology. 2007;102(9):2070-2077.
28. 28. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis—a wakeup call? The Journal of Rhumatology. 2012;39(5):899-903.
29. 29. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111.
30. 30. Langford B, Hooten WM, D’Souza S, Moeschler S, D’Souza RS. YouTube as a source of medical information about spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2021;24(1):156-161.
31. 31. Leong AY, Sanghera R, Jhajj J, Desai N, Jammu BS, Makowsky MJ. Is YouTube useful as a source of health information for adults with type 2 diabetes? A South Asian perspective. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2018;42(4):395-403.
32. 32. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor-Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-5.
33. 33. Yılmaz R, Karpuz S, Yılmaz H, Solak İ. Osteoporoz ile ilgili Türkçe web sitelerinin bilgi içeriği, okunabilirlik, güvenilirlik ve kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis/Turk Osteoporoz Dergisi. 2023;29(2):109-116.
34. 34. Giles A, Annan D, Gober A, Greene L. E-learning innovations: implementation of video in an occupational therapy classroom. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education. 2018;2(1):1-13.
35. 35. McAlister RB. Use of instructor-produced YouTube® videos to supplement manual skills training in occupational therapy education. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(Suppl 2):S67-72.
36. 36. Szmuda T, Syed MT, Singh A, Ali S, Özdemir C, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of patient information for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(5):e2132. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2132.
37. 37. Kim J. The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media, Culture & Society. 2012;34(1):53-67.
38. 38. Chan WS, Leung AY. Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117.
39. 39. Holland M. How YouTube developed into a successful platform for user-generated content. The Journal of Undergraduate Research. 2016;7:1-12.
40. 40. Chang MC, Lee BJ, Park D. The quality, reliability, and accuracy of videos regarding exercises and management for dysphagia in pediatric populations uploaded on YouTube. Children (Basel). 2022;9(10):1514. doi: 10.3390/children9101514.