Diyetisyenlerin Yapay Zekâ Hakkındaki Görüşleri: Derinlemesine Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin kullanımı günümüzde sağlık hizmetlerinden beslenme planlamasına kadar birçok alanda giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, diyetisyenlerin yapay zekânın beslenme alanındaki rolüne ilişkin algılarını, deneyimlerini ve mesleki bakış açılarını araştırmaktır.

Yöntem: Bu nitel çalışmada, farklı sektörlerde çalışan 29 diyetisyenle 27 Mart - 28 Nisan 2025 tarihleri ​​arasında çevrimiçi derinlemesine görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiştir. 15-20 dakika süren görüşmelerde, 10 sorudan oluşan yarı yapılandırılmış bir konu rehberi kullanılmıştır. Transkriptler tematik analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir.

Bulgular: Diyetisyenlerin ifadeleri (1) mesleki dönüşüm ve yapay zekânın rolü, (2) etik, güven ve mesleki sorumluluk, (3) mesleki yeterlilik, eğitim ve adaptasyon, (4) bilimsel geçerlilik, güvenilirlik ve kişiselleştirme temaları altında değerlendirilmiştir. Diyetisyenler, yapay zekâyı zamandan tasarruf sağlayan ve standart görevleri kolaylaştıran faydalı bir araç olarak değerlendirmiş olsalar da, insan dokunuşunun, empatik iletişimin ve etik sorumlulukların teknolojiyle değiştirilemeyeceğini vurgulamaktadırlar. Yapay zekânın beslenme alanında köklü bir değişime yol açacağı düşünülse de, hasta mahremiyeti, etik değerler ve bilimsel kanıt eksikliği gibi endişeler bulunmaktadır.

Sonuç: Bildiğimiz kadarıyla, bu çalışma Türkiye'de diyetisyenlerin beslenme alanında yapay zekâya bakış açılarını inceleyen ilk çalışmadır. Çalışmamız, yapay zekânın diyetisyenlik mesleğinde bazı risklerin yanı sıra fırsatlar da sunduğunu göstermekte ve bu dönüşüm sürecinde profesyonellerin bilgi, etik ve dijital yetkinlik açısından donanımlı olması gerektiğine dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Diyetetik
• yapay zekâ
• niteleyici araştırma
• etik
• dijital sağlık

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBİTAK 2209-A - Üniversite Öğrencileri Araştırma Projeleri Destekleme Programı

Proje Numarası

1919B012467807

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul izni İstinye Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Kurulu’ndan (Toplantı No: 2024-12, Toplantı Tarihi: 30.12.2024) alınmıştır.

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma, TÜBİTAK 2209-A Lisans Araştırma Destek Programı tarafından desteklenen “Diyetisyenlerin Yapay Zekanın Beslenme Alanındaki Rolüne İlişkin Görüşlerinin Niteliksel Olarak İncelenmesi” (1919B012467807) başlıklı proje kapsamında gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Dietitians' Views on Artificial Intelligence: An In-Depth Study

Öz

Aim: Today, the use of artificial intelligence technologies is becoming increasingly common in many areas from health services to nutrition planning. The aim of this study is to explore dietitians' perceptions, experiences, and professional perspectives on the role of artificial intelligence in the field of nutrition.

Method: In this qualitative study, online in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 dietitians working in different sectors between March 27 and April 28, 2025. In the interviews lasting 15-20 minutes, a semi-structured topic guide consisting of 10 questions was used. Transcripts were analyzed using the thematic analysis method.

Results: Dietitians' statements were evaluated under the themes of (1) professional transformation and the role of artificial intelligence, (2) ethics, trust and professional responsibility, (3) professional competence, education and adaptation, (4) Scientific validity, reliability and personalization. Dietitians evaluated artificial intelligence as a helpful tool that saves time and facilitates routine tasks, but emphasized that human interaction, empathetic communication, and ethical responsibility cannot be replaced by technology. Although it is thought that artificial intelligence will lead to a radical change in the field of nutrition, there are concerns about issues such as patient privacy, ethical values, and lack of scientific evidence.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study in Türkiye to explore dietitians’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in nutrition. This study shows that artificial intelligence presents both risks and opportunities in the dietitian profession, and draws attention to the fact that professionals should be equipped in terms of knowledge, ethics and digital competence in this transformation process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dietetics
• artificial intelligence
• qualitative research
• ethics
• digital health

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBİTAK 2209-A Undergraduate Research Support Program

Proje Numarası

1919B012467807

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee permission was obtained from Istinye University Social Sciences and Humanities Ethics Committee (Meeting No: 2024-12, Meeting Date: 30.12.2024).

Teşekkür

The present study was derived from a project funded by the TUBİTAK 2209-A Undergraduate Research Support Program, entitled “Qualitative Analysis of Dietitians' Views on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition” (1919B012467807).

Kaynakça

1. 1. Azer SA, Guerrero APS. The challenges imposed by artificial intelligence: Are we ready in medical education? BMC Med Educ. 2023;23:680.
2. 2. Hans D, Shevroja E, Leslie WD. Evolution in fracture risk assessment: Artificial versus augmented intelligence. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(2):209-212.
3. 3. Monteith S, Glenn T, Geddes J, Whybrow PC, Achtyes E, Bauer M. Expectations for artificial intelligence (AI) in psychiatry. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022;24(11):709-721.
4. 4. Sullivan BA, Kausch SL, Fairchild KD. Artificial and human intelligence for early identification of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):350-356.
5. 5. Maheshwari K, Cywinski JB, Papay F, Khanna AK, Mathur P. Artificial intelligence for perioperative medicine: Perioperative intelligence. Anesth Analg. 2023;136(4):637-645.
6. 6. Cerchia C, Lavecchia A. New avenues in artificial-intelligence-assisted drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2023;28(4):103516.
7. 7. Fu J, Gao Q, Li S. Application of intelligent medical sensing technology. Biosensors (Basel). 2023;13(8):812.
8. 8. Pepito JA, Ito H, Betriana F, Tanioka T, Locsin RC. Intelligent humanoid robots expressing artificial humanlike empathy in nursing situations. Nurs Philos. 2020;21(4):e12318.

9. 9. Horgan R, Nehme L, Abuhamad A. Artificial intelligence in obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review. Prenat Diagn. 2023;43(9):1176-1219.
10. 10. Chotwanvirat P, Prachansuwan A, Sridonpai P, Kriengsinyos W. Advancements in using AI for dietary assessment based on food images: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e51432.
11. 11. Ji Y, Waki K, Yamauchi T, Nangaku M, Ohe K. Using one-shot prompting of non-fine-tuned commercial artificial intelligence to assess nutrients from photographs of Japanese meals. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025:19322968241309889.
12. 12. Lee C, Kim S, Kim J, Lim C, Jung M. Challenges of diet planning for children using artificial intelligence. Nutr Res Pract. 2022;16(6):801-812.
13. 13. Haman M, Školník M, Lošťák M. AI dietician: Unveiling the accuracy of ChatGPT's nutritional estimations. Nutrition. 2024;119:112325.
14. 14. Buchan ML, Goel K, Schneider CK, Steullet V, Bratton S, Basch E. National implementation of an artificial intelligence-based virtual dietitian for patients with cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024;8:e2400085.
15. 15. Naja F, Taktouk M, Matbouli D, et al. Artificial intelligence chatbots for the nutrition management of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024;78(10):887-896.
16. 16. Kenger EB, Karahan TÖ. Artificial intelligence-generated diet plans for hypertension and dyslipidemia: Adherence and nutritional insights. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2025:54(6):1243.
17. 17. Karahan TÖ, Kenger EB. ChatGPT‐4o for weight management: Comparison of different diet models. Food Science & Nutrition. 2025:13(7):e70639.
18. 18. Bayram HM, Arslan S, Ozturkcan A. Evaluating AI‐generated meal plans for simulated diabetes profiles: A guideline‐based comparison of three language models. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2025:31(7):e70295.
19. 19. MacMillan Uribe AL, Patterson J. Are nutrition professionals ready for artificial intelligence? J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023;55(9):623.
20. 20. Sosa-Holwerda A, Park OH, Albracht-Schulte K, Niraula S, Thompson L, Oldewage-Theron W. The role of artificial intelligence in nutrition research: A scoping review. Nutrients. 2024;16(13):2066.
21. 21. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
22. 22. Theodore Armand TP, Nfor KA, Kim JI, Kim HC. Applications of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in nutrition: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2024;16(7):1073.
23. 23. Atwal K. Artificial intelligence in clinical nutrition and dietetics: A brief overview of current evidence. Nutr Clin Pract. 2024;39(4):736-742.
24. 24. Brown C, Story GW, Mourão-Miranda J, Baker JT. Will artificial intelligence eventually replace psychiatrists? Br J Psychiatry. 2021;218(3):131-134.
25. 25. Güner E, Ülker MT. Can artificial intelligence replace dietitians? A conversation with ChatGPT. Toros University Journal of Food, Nutrition and Gastronomy. 2024;3(1):49-56.
26. 26. Cleland JGF, Li C, Jones Y. Artificial intelligence needs clinical intelligence to succeed. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8(7):588-591.
27. 27. Bond A, Mccay K, Lal S. Artificial intelligence & clinical nutrition: What the future might have in store. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023;57:542-549.
28. 28. Giansanti D. Artificial intelligence in public health: Current trends and future possibilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):11907.
29. 29. Singer P, Robinson E, Raphaeli O. The future of artificial intelligence in clinical nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2024;27(2):200-206.
30. 30. World Health Organization. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/f780d926-4ae3-42ce-a6d6-e898a5562621/content.
31. 31. Christov-Moore L, Reggente N, Vaccaro A, et al. Preventing antisocial robots: A pathway to artificial empathy. Sci Robot. 2023;8(80):eabq3658.
32. 32. Yu KH, Healey E, Leon TY, Kohane I, Manrai AK. Medical artificial intelligence and human values. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2024;390(20):1895–1904.
33. 33. Nyholm S. Artificial intelligence and human enhancement: Can AI technologies make us more (artificially) intelligent? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024;33(1):76-88.
34. 34. Sauerbrei A, Kerasidou A, Lucivero F, Hallowell N. The impact of artificial intelligence on the person-centred, doctor-patient relationship: Some problems and solutions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023;23(1):73.