Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Akademisyenlerinin Z Kuşağı Öğrencilerine İlişkin Deneyimleri: Fenomenolojik Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 26, 611 - 626, 31.08.2025

Funda Çitil Canbay , Elif Tuğçe Çitil Güldü

https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1519782

Öz

Amaç: Araştırma, bir sağlık bilimleri fakültesi akademisyenlerinin Z kuşağı öğrencilerine ilişkin deneyimlerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.
Yöntem: Bu nitel desendeki fenomenoloji araştırması; Türkiye'de bir kamu üniversitesinin sağlık bilimleri fakültesinde, akademik deneyimleri 5-35 yıl arasında değişen 25 akademisyenle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Görüşmeler yarı yapılandırılmış olarak, yüz yüze derinlemesine görüşme tekniğiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizde Colaizzi içerik analizi uygulanmıştır.
Bulgular: Deneyimlerden dört tema, dokuz ana kategori ve otuz yedi alt kategori keşfedildi: Etkinliklerde Yaşanan Sorunlar, Etkinliklerde Algılanan Avantajlar, Kaygı ve Stres Deneyimi ve Zorluklarla Başa Çıkma Stratejileri. Akademisyenler öğrencilerin Z Kuşağına özgü özellikleri nedeniyle eğitim faaliyetlerinde zorlandıkları konusunda hemfikirdi. Akademisyenler öğrencilerin bazı olumlu özelliklerini takdir ederken, öğrencilerin uyum, kuşak çatışması ve üslup sorunlarından ve akademik başarı/verim düşüklüğünden şikâyetçi olmuşlardır. Zorluklara, kaygıya ve strese rağmen akademisyenler öğrencileri anlama ve destekleme konusunda gayret göstermişlerdir.
Sonuç: Araştırmada akademisyenlerin Z kuşağı öğrencileriyle etkileşimde genelde zorluk yaşadıkları sonucuna varılmıştır. Sağlık alanında çalışan akademisyenlerin eğitim verimliliğini arttırmaya ve kaygı/stres yönetimine yönelik uygun başa çıkma stratejileri geliştirmeleri gerekmektedir. Ayrıca Z kuşağının özelliklerine uygun eğitim ve destekleyici yaklaşımlarla olumlu etkileşimler sağlanmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sağlık eğitimi , öğrenciler , akademisyenler , Z kuşağı , Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi

Experiences of Academicians at a Faculty of Health Sciences Regarding Students of Generation Z: A Phenomenological Research

Öz

Aim: The research was conducted to examine the experiences of academics at a health sciences faculty regarding Generation Z students.
Method: This qualitative phenomenological study was conducted at the faculty of health sciences of a public university in Türkiye with 25 academicians with academic experience ranging from 5 to 35 years. The interviews were semi-structured, face-to-face, in-depth interviews. Colaizzi content analysis was applied in the analysis.
Results: Four themes, nine main categories, and thirty-seven subcategories were discovered from the experiences: Problems Experienced in Activities, Perceived Advantages in Activities, Experience of Anxiety and Stress, and Strategies to Cope with Challenges. Academicians agreed that students had difficulty in educational activities due to their Generation Z characteristics. While academicians appreciated some positive characteristics of students, they complained about students' adaptation, generation gap and style problems, and low academic achievement/productivity. Despite the difficulties, anxiety, and stress, academicians made an effort to understand and support students.
Conclusion: The study concluded that academics generally have difficulty interacting with Generation Z students. Academics working in the health field need to develop appropriate coping strategies to increase educational efficiency and manage anxiety/stress. In addition, positive interactions should be provided with education and supportive approaches appropriate to the characteristics of Generation Z.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Academicians , generation Z , health education , students , Faculty of Health Sciences

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval for the research was obtained from the Non-Interventional Ethics Committee of Kütahya Health Sciences University Rectorate (E-41997688-050.99-37660). In addition, written permission was obtained from the dean of the faculty of health sciences where the research was conducted. Written and verbal consent was obtained from the academics who participated in our research.

Teşekkür

We would like to thank Kütahya University of Health Sciences for providing us with the appropriate place throughout our study and academicians of the faculty of health sciences who participated in the research.

Kaynakça

• 1. Plochocki JH. Several ways generation Z may shape the medical school landscape. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019;31(6):2382120519884325.
• 2. DiMattio MJK, Hudacek SS. Educating generation Z: Psychosocial dimensions of the clinical learning environment that predict student satisfaction. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;49:102901.
• 3. Shatto B, Erwin K. Teaching millennials and generation Z: Bridging the generational divide. Creat Nurs. 2017;23(1):24-28.
• 4. Hampton D, Welsh D, Wiggins AT. Learning preferences and engagement level of generation Z nursing students. Nurse Educ. 2020;45(3):160-164.
• 5. Shorey S, Chan V, Rajendran P, et al. Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;57:103247.
• 6. Chunta K, Shellenbarger T, Chicca J. Generation Z students in the online environment: Strategies for nurse educators. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(2):87-91.
• 7. Reyes A, Galvan R Jr, Navarro A, et al. Across generations: Defining pedagogical characteristics of generation x, y, and z allied health teachers using q-methodology. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(4):1541-1549.
• 8. Kavaklı Ö. The investigation of relationship between proactive personality features and approach to conflict resolution in the interns of nursing students. J Educ Res Nurs. 2018;15(1):9-15.
• 9. Yanıkkerem E, Topsakal Ö, Çetinkaya A. Experience and perceptions of nurse academicians on generation Y nursing students: ‘Difficult students’. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;10(3):444–457.
• 10. Alnajjar H, Abou Hashish E. Exploring the relationship between leadership and conflict management styles among nursing students. Nurs Manag. 2022;29(3):25-31.
• 11. Hayashi M, Karouji Y, Nishiya K. Ambivalent professional identity of early remedial medical students from Generation Z: A qualitative study. BMC Med. Educ. 2022;22:501.
• 12. Liu Y, Sun X, Zhang P, et al. Generation Z nursing students' online learning experiences during COVID-19 epidemic: A qualitative study. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e14755.
• 13. Merriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
• 14. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2022.
• 15. Foley VC, Myrick F, Yonge O. A phenomenological perspective on preceptorship in the intergenerational context. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2012;9(1):1-23.
• 16. Foley VC, Myrick F, Yonge O. Intergenerational conflict in nursing preceptorship. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1003-1007.
• 17. Williams CA. Nurse educators meet your new students: Generation Z. Nurse Educ. 2019;44(2):59-60.
• 18. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative Research In Nursing: Advancing The Humanistic Imperative. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
• 19. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15.
• 20. Tong A, Sainsbury PJ. Craig Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
• 21. Dossett LA, Kaji AH, Cochran A. SRQR and COREQ reporting guidelines for qualitative studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(9):875-876.
• 22. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ. 1982;30(4):233–252.
• 23. Tobin GA, Begley CM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(4):388–396.
• 24. Zhuhra RT, Wahid MH, Mustika R. Exploring college adjustment in first-year gen Z medical students and its contributing factors. Malays J Med Sci. 2022;9(1):126-137.
• 25. Christodoulou E, Kalokairinou A. Net generation's learning styles in nursing education. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;213:119-121.
• 26. Chicca J, Shellenbarger T. Generation Z: Approaches and teaching-learning practices for nursing professional development practitioners. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2018;34(5):250-256.
• 27. Rathakrishnan B, Bikar Singh SS, Kamaluddin MR, et al. Smartphone addiction and sleep quality on academic performance of university students: An exploratory research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8291.
• 28. Yaman Aktaş Y, Karabulut N, Arslan B. Digital addiction, academic performance, and sleep disturbance among nursing students. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(4):1537-45.
• 29. Loleska S, Pop-Jordanova N. Is smartphone addiction in the younger population a public health problem? Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2021;42(3):29-36.
• 30. Serafin L, Danilewicz D, Chyla P, et al. What is the most needed competence for newly graduated generation Z nurses? Focus groups study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;94:104583.
• 31. Schmitt CA, Lancaster RJ. Readiness to practice in generation Z nursing students. J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(10):604-606.
• 32. Isaacs AN, Scott SA, Nisly SA. Move out of Z way Millennials. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020;12(12):1387-1389.
• 33. Holzer BM, Ramuz O, Minder CE, et al. Motivation and personality factors of generation Z high school students aspiring to study human medicine. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:31.
• 34. Kim J, Chae D, Yoo JY. Reasons behind generation Z nursing students' intentions to leave their profession: A cross-sectional study. Inquiry. 2021;58.